Skip to main content

Perceptions and experiences of Latinx parents with language barriers in a pediatric emergency department: a qualitative study

Abstract

Background

Prior research has shown disparities exist among Latinx children who require treatment for respiratory illnesses within the pediatric emergency department (PED). Limited data exist regarding Latinx families’ experiences on the care they received at PEDs within non-traditional destination areas (NDA). Their experiences can identify areas of improvement to potentially reduce healthcare disparities among pediatric patients within this population. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the lived experiences of Latinx families with low English proficiency in the PED with a NDA. The broader purpose was to identify areas of improvement for reducing health care disparities among Latinx families.

Methods

We used qualitative methods to analyze semi-structured interviews among Latinx families who presented to the PED with their 0–2 year-old child for a respiratory illness from May 2019 through January 2020. All participants had low English proficiency and requested a Spanish interpreter during registration. All interviews were transcribed and reviewed using thematic analysis based on a phenomenology framework.

Results

Interviews were conducted with 16 Latinx parents. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes: (1) Uncertainty - Families expressed uncertainty regarding how to care for a child with distressing symptoms, (2) Communication – Families favored in-person interpreters which enhanced communication and allowed families to feel more informed, (3) System Burden – Families reported that the unfamiliarity with the US health system and lack of resources are additional burdens, and (4) Emotional Support – The emergency department visits garnered confidence and reassurance for families.

Conclusions

Our study identified four major themes among Latinx families within a PED of a NDA. Potential areas of interventions should focus on supporting access to an interpreter, improving information delivery, and enhancing education on community resources for families with low English proficiency.

Peer Review reports

Background

In 2016, the Census Bureau estimated that the Hispanic population of the United States (U.S.) was 56.6 million, which constitutes 17% of the nation’s total population. This proportion is expected to increase to 28% by 2060 [1]. About one-third of this population are children, which is the greatest proportion of children compared to proportions among families of Black, Asian or White origin [2, 3]. In the past, immigration of Latinx families to the U.S. has largely been concentrated in states with large urban areas, such as Texas, Florida, and New York [4]. However, recent growth among the Latinx population has been observed in areas of the U.S. that were not common destination areas in the past, such as areas within the Midwest, which are defined as nontraditional destination areas (NDAs) [5]. NDAs, such as Ohio and Nevada, have experienced at least between 100 and 200% growth in the past 2 decades compared to traditional areas, which experienced at least a 20% drop [6, 7]. The rapid growth of the Latinx population has significant health implications because NDAs do not have the infrastructure and resources to support the changing immigration patterns [6, 8]. For instance, a prior study conducted in the Midwest showed that linguistically and culturally appropriate services to meet the need of the growing Latinx community are lacking [5]. However, literature describing Latinx healthcare experiences within NDAs remains limited.

Prior literature has shown significant healthcare disparities among Latinx children whose families face language barriers within the emergency department (ED) [9,10,11,12]. For instance, there are differences in diagnostic testing and hospital charges in the pediatric emergency department (PED) among families with language barriers [9, 13, 14]. Some studies suggest that language barriers may be associated with poor health outcomes such as increased obesity and complications of appendicitis [10, 15, 16]. Compared to Latinx patients in traditional destination areas, Latinx patients in NDAs have different healthcare barriers, experiences, and needs because healthcare systems in NDAs are not properly equipped to work with populations that have limited English proficiency [5, 6, 17,18,19]. Latinx patients in NDAs may face more challenges such as social isolation, discrimination, and lack of social support [5, 6, 18, 20]. Given the rapid growth of Latinx population and the need for promoting greater equity in pediatric emergency care [21], exploring the experiences and perceptions of Latinx families surrounding their management in the PED can help target areas of improvement for reducing disparities within a NDA. Given the known disparities among pediatric patients with respiratory complaints [9], the purpose of this study is to explore the lived experiences of non-English speaking Latinx families with children with respiratory illnesses within a PED of a non-traditional destination area. The broader aim of this study is to identify areas of improvement for reducing health care disparities for Latinx families.

Methods

Study setting

The study was conducted at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), one of the largest academic children’s hospitals in the United States. The hospital treats children with rare and complex conditions from over 60 different countries [22]. There are two different PEDs which in combination have approximately 92,000 visits per year. Upon arrival to the PED, families are asked their preferred language and whether they need an interpreter for the remainder of the visit. The preferred language is documented within the patient’s chart. An interpreter can be used at any time or for the entire visit depending on availability, which includes access to an interpreter in-person, via video call, or via telephone.

Recruitment

We conducted purposive sampling of patients by screening electronic health records (EHR) for potential participants 7 day a week from May 2019 through January 2020. Parents or legal guardians were considered eligible for the study if they: 1) presented to the PED with their 0–2-year-old child for a viral upper or lower respiratory illness, 2) affirmed that their preferred language was Spanish at triage, and 3) requested a Spanish interpreter during registration. At the time of this study, only one pediatric emergency medicine attending was considered a certified language interpreter in Spanish. All other physicians were required to use an interpreter if the patient and/or family did not speak English.

Potentially eligible families were approached by study staff while patients were in the PED. The study staff and a Spanish interpreter explained the study, review informed consent, and scheduled a telephone interview once informed verbal consent was obtained.

Study staff also conducted weekly screening of the EHRs to identify potentially missed eligible families who had already been discharged. If the family met the inclusion criteria, study staff called the family to inform them of the study, solicit participation, and obtain informed verbal consent. The patient’s age, medical history, main complaint, and type of interpreter involved with the family was reviewed and confirmed prior to proceeding with the interview. All participants were given a $20 gift card in exchange for their participation in the study.

Data collection

Three authors conducted 16 semi-structured, one-on-one qualitative interviews from May 2019 through January 2020. Two (L.S. and E.M.) of the three interviewers were fluent in Spanish and did not use an interpreter for the interviews. One interviewer (L.S.) was of Hispanic descent. The other two interviews (E.M and R.Z) were not of Hispanic descent, however both have worked primarily with Latinx patients during their medical training. All interviewers received qualitative interview training from L.V. who has doctoral level training and research experience in qualitative research methods within the Latinx community. The interviewers used an interview guide (Table 1) that allowed them the flexibility to deviate from the guide and ask probing questions based on participants’ responses.

Table 1 Interview guide

All families who gave informed verbal consent while in the PED had their interview completed via phone within 30 days of the index PED visit. All interviews were audiotaped then translated and transcribed. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached, which occurred when the interviewers did not elicit any new information or themes [23].

Data analysis

This study drew from the phenomenology framework developed by Max Van Manen and Martin Heidegger, who described a hermeneutic approach to phenomenology that stresses how human experiences and “realities” are influenced by the world in which they live. This framework provided a way to understand each family’s meaning that they constructed from their experiences in the PED [24,25,26]. The research team utilized a thematic analysis approach to systematically identify meaningful subthemes and themes that represented major topics discussed in the interviews [27, 28]. Thematic analysis involved an iterative process to further clarify the themes that could be presented in a cohesive narrative. First, the research team independently reviewed all interview transcripts and developed codes, which were key words that represented specific phrases, patterns, and common features found in the transcripts. A codebook was developed to help guide the data analysis. All members of the research team collectively reviewed and coded all transcripts. Three other researchers other than the interviewers were included in the analysis for investigator triangulation. The research team met regularly to review the transcripts and discuss emerging codes until code agreement and saturation were reached. Each code was collated into unifying themes along with subcategories within each theme. The software program Dedoose was used to highlight specific themes or common phrases that might have been missed when reviewing the transcripts as a group [29]. Code frequencies within Dedoose were also used to identify patterns in families’ responses [29].

Results

Characteristics of study participants

Interviews were conducted with 16 Latinx parents (15 mothers, 1 father) who were seen in the PED with a child presenting with respiratory symptoms. The length of interviews ranged from 11 minutes to 26 minutes (median, 20 minutes). Most pediatric patients were male (66%). Among the families who were comfortable sharing their country of origin and length of time in the US, the range of time in the US ranged from 18 months to 13 years. Table 2 shows the proportions of patient triage levels, chief complaints, disposition, and final diagnoses.

Table 2 Characteristics of 16 participating families

Thematic analysis

Four major themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) Uncertainty - fear and uncertainty regarding how to care for a child with distressing symptoms, (2) Communication – the presence of in-person interpreters enhanced communication, allowing parents to feel more informed, (3) System Burden- unfamiliarity with the U.S. healthcare system and lack of resources are additional sources of hardship and (4) Emotional Support - despite limited understanding, “successful” visits garnered confidence and provided parents with needed reassurance. Table 3 lists illustrative quotations representative of major themes and subthemes.

Table 3 Themes and subthemes with illustrative quotations
  1. 1.

    Uncertainty: Fear and concern regarding how to care for a child with distressing symptoms:

    “I was worried about my little girl dying of this disease.” “Maybe if it was another case, my baby might have died, because we don’t know how to take care of the baby in the house.”

Participants reported that their children were experiencing various symptoms that were disconcerting. Parents were frightened by the symptoms and were unsure of their ability to care for their child at home. Some participants reported that they did not provide any treatment at home because they were inexperienced as a parent and thus not sure of the appropriate course of action. Others believed that if they provided interventions, they might make the situation worse. Furthermore, parents were fearful that if they did seek medical treatment, their limited English proficiency would affect their ability to effectively communicate with medical professionals. Nevertheless, their child’s distressing symptoms prompted parents to seek help anyway.

  1. 2.

    Communication: The presence of in-person interpreters enhanced communication, allowing parents to feel more informed:

“They explained how everything was going to be done and I was okay with that.” “Yes, having the in-person interpreter over there was better” “It did help me a lot because that way I was able to communicate through this person. I was able to explain everything. I was able to explain and say everything – everything that was going on with my son. And everything the doctor and the nurse wanted to tell me I was able to understand all of it through this person”

Participants reported that providers attempted to explain their child’s diagnosis and treatment plan; however, limited understanding of medical terminology was a barrier. Despite this issue, in-person interpreters lessened parents’ confusion and improved communication by translating parental concerns and describing procedures and tests discussed by the provider. The frequency of reported understanding was higher with in-person and video interpreters. To facilitate understanding, one participant reported that their provider showed a video depicting symptoms that would require medical attention. These measures (i.e., videos, pictures, infographics) made most parents feel informed of the plan of care and few reported feeling ignored and uninformed.

  1. 3.

    System Burden: Unfamiliarity with the U.S. healthcare system and lack of resources are additional sources of hardship:

“The way you are treated here is very different.” “I mean, for them to do something it has to be a life or death situation.” “For me yes; I haven’t found a way to get into health insurance” “I live alone and I am alone with my baby and so technically it is all me”

Parental expectations for care in the U.S. were affected by care they had previously received in their home country. Some parents believed that in order to receive the standard of care they are accustomed to in the PED, their child must be severely ill. Participants also reported having trouble making appointments with primary care pediatricians and limited accessibility to clinics that provide interpreters. Some parents listed social workers and family members accustomed to the system as sources of advice and assistance in coordinating care and accessing treatment. However, many participants reported social isolation and few community resources.

  1. 4.

    Emotional Support: Despite limited understanding, “Successful” visits garnered confidence and provided parents with needed reassurance:

“I felt confident in my doctors and they took away that doubt and that anguish.” They did everything my baby needed.” “I loved how they [the interpreter] explained the results of the x-ray.”

Although parents did not completely understand their provider, many were satisfied with the visit. Most participants believed their providers adequately addressed their concerns and provided adequate care to their children. However, a few parents felt the appointment was rushed and their concerns were not taken seriously due to the mild nature of their child’s illness. Overall, participants trusted their providers and were calmed by their provider’s assurance about their child’s prognosis.

Discussion

This study explored Latinx families’ lived experiences regarding the treatment of their children when presenting to a PED with respiratory symptoms within a NDA. This is extremely important for PED providers because they are treating patients at one point in time, without much, if any, foreknowledge of what led the families to their visit. Obtaining the clinical information, such as the child’s symptoms and clinical severity, is a streamlined process. However, exploring how families experienced their visit in the ED can be more difficult to assess, but can still be important information for providers. In this study, the major themes that emerged for all 3 interviewers included the fear of progression of illness due to the families’ uncertainty about the child’s clinical status, the importance of using in-person interpreters, unfamiliarity with the healthcare system, and the shift in perspective from lack of confidence to confidence in their ability to care for their child after the healthcare provider’s diagnosis and management in the PED.

This study reinforced the importance of having in-person and/or video interpreters, which is a relatively simple but vital aspect of a family’s experience when presenting to a PED for any health concern while facing a language barrier. Families felt more informed and reassured when a video or a combination of an in-person and video interpreter were used during the PED visit. It is known that the use of professional interpreters is associated with overall improvement in care for patients with limited English proficiency, with in-person or video interpretation leading to higher patient satisfaction compared to telephone interpretation [30, 31]. Prior research examining the Latinx population has shown that a lack of staff members of the same ethnic or language group is associated with barriers to health care [18, 32]. Although several prior research studies show that families may still have a degree of mistrust regardless of having access to an interpreter [33, 34], families in this study reaffirmed that they remained informed and reassured when they were given the opportunity to interact with an interpreter in-person or through a video.

Navigating the healthcare system within a NDA was another major theme among participants. Disparities in pediatric care may be due to a lack of access to primary care for Spanish-speakers [7]. Families often reported trying to visit primary care clinics first, but they were unable to get a visit with a Spanish-speaking provider or they did not know what to do if it was after regular business hours. These experiences support the literature that suggests increased PED utilization for routine sick visits among Latinx children, resulting in fewer interventions in the PED due to the higher frequency of low acuity visits [12, 33]. In contrast, patients among families within this study who reported difficulty with navigating the healthcare system had lower triage levels (higher acuity). Navigating the healthcare system can be more difficult among Latinx families within a NDA, which could lead to sicker patients going to the PED. Lower acculturation among ethnic groups has been shown to be associated with higher numbers of PED visits [32]. The increased difficulty for Latinx families within an NDA can lead to even higher numbers of PED visits and may influence the level of care needed in the emergency setting.

Another key issue highlighted in this study was the importance of educating the family about their child’s diagnosis and management in the PED. Families were often very grateful for the treatment they received even if the intervention was minimal such as nasal suctioning or providing an antipyretic. Although the need for extensive testing and interventions was low in this participant cohort, parents were very thankful and reassured for the care they received in the PED. This finding is interesting in the light of prior quantitative findings showing that Latinx patients facing language barriers receive increased PED charges and increased testing compared to patients without language barriers [13, 14]. Furthermore, it was not clear if parents always understood their child’s diagnosis or return precautions because of language barriers or health literacy levels. One family expressed appreciation for a short video that was shared with them before discharge that demonstrated an infant in respiratory distress as this ensured they understood appropriate return precautions. Nonetheless, families were reassured and more confident at the end of the encounter, regardless of whether the patient needed numerous tests or interventions in the PED.

There have been a few studies exploring Latino caregivers’ experiences within the PED [32, 35, 36]. However, no studies of similar methodology have been done within a NDA. A study within a PED in Texas was done with similar methodology to our study, and the researchers focused on children who presented to the PED with asthma symptoms [35]. Similar to our study, the researchers found themes that included uncertainty, importance of interpreter availability, and access to care. However, in our study, families reported the increased reliance of family members in their access to care. We also found that families valued the emotional support provided by the providers and staff, which may be important in a NDA in which there is typically not a large Latinx population.

There were several limitations that should be noted. Two of the three interviewers were not from the Latinx community, which could have impacted participants’ willingness to be open and honest. One interviewer did have to use an interpreter; however, the emergent themes did not differ among the 3 interviewers. Although data reached thematic saturation [23], the majority of the interviewed families were from the same country (e.g., Guatemala). Thus, findings should be interpreted with caution and may not apply to other Latinx populations. Lastly, although intentional in qualitative research, the study was conducted at a single site with non-probability sampling which limits the applicability of findings to other clinical settings.

Conclusions

Our study identified four major themes among Latinx families within a PED of a NDA. All families were fearful of their child’s illness, but they appreciated being informed via an interpreter and felt reassured by the end of the PED visit. However, families did have difficulty navigating the healthcare system. Qualitative studies such as this study can help identify specific factors from the parents’ experiences that could be improved to reduce disparities related to language barriers. Further areas of intervention should focus on support beyond providing access to an interpreter, such as improving information delivery, and enhancing education on community resources for families with low English proficiency in the PED.

Availability of data and materials

Data cannot be shared publicly because of potentially identifying patient information. Data are available from the Division of Emergency Medicine at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (contact Dr. Mahabee-Gittens via melinda.mahabee-gittens@cchmc.org) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Abbreviations

PED:

Pediatric Emergency Department

ED:

Emergency Department

NDA:

Nontraditional Destination Area

CCHMC:

Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center

EHR:

Electronic Health Record

References

  1. Cortez R. Hispanic Heritage Month. Not Am Math Soc. 2018;65(08):1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. PEW Research Center. The nation’s Latino population is defined by its youth. 2016 [cited 2022 Sep 7]; Available from: http://www.pewhispan-ic.org/2016/04/20/the-nations-latino-population-is-defined-by-its-youth/

  3. Connors KM. Barriers Latino Patients Face in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatr Nurs [Internet]. 2019;45(1):37–41,46. Available from: https://www.census.gov/

  4. Passel JS, Cohn D, Lopez MH. Hispanics Account for More than Half of Nation’s Growth in Past Decade | Pew Research Center. Pew Hisp Cent [Internet]. 2011; Available from: http://www.pewhispanic.org/2011/03/24/hispanics-account-for-more-than-half-of-nations-growth-in-past-decade/

  5. Jacquez F, Vaughn L, Zhen-Duan J, Graham C. Health care use and barriers to care among Latino immigrants in a new migration area. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(4):1761–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacquez F, Vaughn LM, Pelley T, Topmiller M. Healthcare experiences of Latinos in a nontraditional destination area. J Community Pract. 2015;23(1):76–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roan Gresenz C, Derose KP, Ruder T, Escarce JJ. Health Care Experiences of Hispanics in New and Traditional U.S. Destinations. Med Care Res Rev 2022;69(6):663–78. Available from: http://mcr.sagepub.com

  8. DeJonckheere MJ, Vaughn LM, Jacquez F. Latino immigrant youth living in a nontraditional Migration City: a social-ecological examination of the complexities of stress and resilience. Urban Educ. 2017;52(3):399–426.

  9. Zamor R, Byczkowski T, Zhang Y, Vaughn L, Mahabee-Gittens EM. Language barriers and the Management of Bronchiolitis in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Pediatr. 2020;20(3):356–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Levas MN, Dayan PS, Mittal MK, Stevenson MD, Bachur RG, Dudley NC, et al. Effect of hispanic ethnicity and language barriers on appendiceal perforation rates and imaging in children. J Pediatr. 2014;164(6).

  11. Valet RS, Gebretsadik T, Carroll KN, Minton PA, Woodward KB, Liu Z, et al. Increased healthcare resource utilization for acute respiratory illness among Latino infants. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):1186–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lassetter JH, Baldwin JH. Health care barriers for latino children and provision of culturally competent care. J Pediatr Nurs. 2004;19(3):184–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hampers LC, Cha S, Gutglass DJ, Binns HJ, Krug SE. Language barriers and resource utilization in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 I):1253–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Payne NR, Puumala SE. Racial disparities in ordering laboratory and radiology tests for pediatric patients in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(5):598–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lara M, Gamboa C, Kahramanian MI, Morales LS, Hayes Bautista DE. ACCULTURATION AND LATINO HEALTH IN THE UNITED STATES: A Review of the Literature and its Sociopolitical Context. Annu Rev Public Heal 2005;26:367–97. Available from: www.annualreviews.org

  16. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc 2012;307(5):483–90. Available from: http://www.jama.com.

  17. Jacquez F, Vaughn LM, Suarez-Cano G. Implementation of a stress intervention with Latino immigrants in a non-traditional Migration City. J Immigr Minor Health. 2019;21(2):372–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Topmiller M, Zhen-Duan J, Jacquez FJ, Vaughn LM. Place matters in non-traditional migration areas: exploring barriers to healthcare for Latino immigrants by region, neighborhood, and community health center. J Racial Ethn Heal Disparities. 2017;4(6):1214–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhen-Duan J, Jacquez F, Vaughn L. Demographic characteristics associated with barriers to health care among Mexican and Guatemalan immigrants in a nontraditional destination area. Fam Community Heal. 2017;40(2):101–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Biolsi R. Our Diverse Society: Race and Ethnicity—Implications for 21 st Century American Society, by David W. Engstrom and Lissette M. Piedra, (eds.) . Adm Soc Work. 2009 Jan 5;33(1):129–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03643100802508700.

  21. McDermott KW, Stocks C, Freeman WJ. Overview of Pediatric Emergency Department Visits, 2015: Statistical Brief #242. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD; 2006 [cited 2020 Aug 31]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277692

  22. Cincinnati Children’s Hospitals. Cincinnati Children’s: International Patients and Families [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/patients/visit/international

  23. Bowen GA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual Res. 2008;8(1):137–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moustakas C. Phenomenology and human science inquiry. SAGE Publications, Inc., 1994. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658.

  25. Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. London Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sundler AJ, Lindberg E, Nilsson C, Palmér L. Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nurs Open. 2019;6(3):733–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dedoose Version 8.0.35. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. 2018. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC www.dedoose.com.

  30. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited english proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(2):727–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Casey Lion K, Brown JC, Ebel BE, Klein EJ, Strelitz B, Gutman CK, et al. Effect of telephone vs video interpretation on parent comprehension, communication, and utilization in the pediatric emergency department a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(12):1117–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vaughn LM, Jacquez F. Characteristics of newly immigrated, Spanish-speaking Latinos who use the pediatric emergency department: preliminary findings in a secondary migration city. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28(4):345–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fields A, Abraham M, Gaughan J, Haines C, Hoehn KS. Language matters: race, trust, and outcomes in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016;32(4):222–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mayo RM, Sherrill WW, Sundareswaran P, Crew L. Attitudes and perceptions of hispanic patients and health care providers in the treatment of hispanic patients: a review of the literature. Hisp Health Care Int. 2007;5:64–72.

  35. Santos Malavé C, Diggs D, Sampayo EM. Spanish-speaking caregivers’ experience with an emergency department pediatric asthma-care bundle quality initiative. J Racial Ethn Heal Disparities. 2019;6(4):660–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-019-00564-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grigg A, Shetgiri R, Michel E, Rafton S, Ebel BE. Factors associated with nonurgent use of pediatric emergency care among Latino families. J Natl Med Assoc. 2013;105(1):77–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

This work was funded, in part, by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: NIH Grant Number R01HD083354. This funding source had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RZ, LV and EMM-G conceived the study and the overall study design. LV and EMM-G supervised the conduct of the study. RZ, EM, and LS recruited participants and conducted the interviews. RZ, EM, LS and EP analyzed the data. All authors reviewed the data and results. RZ, EM, LS, and EP drafted the manuscript and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronine L. Zamor.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed verbal consent was obtained from all participants. The study, including verbal consent, was approved by the Institutional Review Board at CCHMC and the research team followed ethical guidelines corresponding to research with human subjects.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zamor, R.L., Vaughn, L.M., McCann, E. et al. Perceptions and experiences of Latinx parents with language barriers in a pediatric emergency department: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 1463 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08839-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08839-w

Keywords