Skip to main content
Download PDF

The knowledge, barriers and opportunities to improve nutrition and physical activity amongst young people attending an Australian youth mental health service: a mixed-methods study

BMC Health Services Research volume 22, Article number: 789 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mental illnesses are the leading cause of disability in young people, and lifestyle interventions in young people at risk of mental illness remain a priority. Opportunities to improve nutrition and physical activity among young people through youth mental health services remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the knowledge and behaviors towards nutrition and physical activity, the barriers and enablers to improving behaviors, and the preferred providers and sources of information for nutrition and physical activity among a sample of young people attending a youth mental health service.

Methods

A mixed-method study was conducted in regional Tasmania, Australia in a sample of young people (15–25 years) attending a youth mental health service (headspace). A quantitative survey (n = 48) determined young people’s nutrition and physical activity knowledge, behaviors, barriers and enablers to achieving recommendations, and their preferred providers and sources of information. Structured interviews and a focus group further explored these concepts (n = 8), including the role of the mental health service as a provider of this support.

Results

The majority of participants did not meet national recommendations for nutrition and physical activity, despite possessing a high level of knowledge regarding their importance for mental health. Improving mental health was a common enabling factor for participants choosing to alter diet and physical activity habits, but also the leading barrier for participating in physical activity. Young people wanted to receive information from reputable health providers, ideally through social media sources. headspace was seen as an important potential provider of this information.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that there is a clear need to improve diet and physical activity habits to enhance mental and physical health outcomes in this at-risk group, and youth mental health services could provide further interventions to support their clients. Specialized staff (e.g. dietitians and exercise physiologists) may provide additional benefits alongside existing mental health care support.

Peer Review reports

Background

Young people (12–24 years) make up 13% of Australia’s population [1]. This is a key developmental period and a critical time for establishing good physical and mental health habits. When young people are in good health, they can more successfully transition into full-time work, develop healthy lifestyles, and experience fewer negative challenges in life [2]. The global onset of a first mental disorder occurs before age 14 in 34.6% of individuals, increasing to almost half (48.4%) by age 18 and extends to 62.5% by age 25, indicating that most adult mental disorders originate earlier in the lifespan [3]. Worldwide, mental illnesses cause more disability than any other illness in young people [4].

Good nutrition is essential for supporting mental health [5]. However, young people have the lowest diet quality compared with any other age group [6]. Poor dietary habits are more prevalent in individuals with mental health issues. Poorer food choices [7], medications [8], lifestyle behaviors [9], lower social determinants and behavioral problems [10] are contributing factors. Unhealthy dietary patterns have been associated with worse mental health in young people [11]. It has been theorized that young people may either eat poorly as a form of self-medication, or that poor quality diets lack sufficient nutrient-dense foods, leading to nutrient deficiencies associated with mental health issues [11] or affecting the development of the brain [12, 13]. Conversely, studies also suggest that a good quality, healthy diet, high in fruits and vegetables, can be protective of mental health [14, 15].

Further to the role of diet, regular participation in physical activity has been shown to improve mental health via changes to the structural and neurobiological composition of the brain [16]. Such changes encompass psychosocial mechanisms, including improved social connectedness, autonomy, self-acceptance, and mastery [17], and behavioral mechanisms, including improved coping skills and sleep hygiene [18]. There is growing evidence that physical activity is an effective treatment for people with acute and chronic mental illness, with evidence indicating that physical activity is just as effective, if not more effective than medications, in reducing depressive symptoms [19] as well as anxiety and stress symptoms [20]. Regular physical activity is recommended as a key element of mental health treatment [21]. Physical activity can improve mood and offset the negative side effects of common medications for mental illness, including improving body composition (lean muscle and reduced fat mass), blood pressure, cognition, and memory [22].

Knowledge and barriers to nutrition and physical activity in young people with mental illness:

Lower levels of knowledge regarding nutrition and physical activity recommendations have been associated with poorer dietary and physical activity behaviors in adults with mental illness [23]. However, the extent to which poor nutrition and physical activity knowledge contributes to poor dietary intake and lower physical activity levels in young people remains unclear. One small study of Australian young people with a mental illness found that nutrition knowledge scores were similar to those of other general population groups [24], suggesting that nutrition knowledge alone may not fully account for poorer dietary intake [24]. Thus, additional research is required to characterize the current knowledge of nutrition and physical activity in young people with mental illness to identify future opportunities to improve knowledge levels within this group.

The barriers and motivating factors towards achieving nutrition and physical activity recommendations in young Australian populations has been characterized [25]. Common motivators include improving health, body image and increasing energy, and common barriers relate to poor access to healthy food and exercise equipment, a real or perceived lack of time, tiredness/stress and a lack of motivation [26,27,28,29]. While some unique barriers and enabling factors have been identified in some different at-risk groups [30], the extent to which unique barriers and enablers affect young people with mental illness’s ability to eat healthily and participate in regular physical activity presently remains unclear.

Young people prefer to receive health information through a variety of sources, including their families, friends, the media and school [31]. It has been reported that increasingly, young people are turning to social media for information and support related to physical activity and nutrition habits [32]. However, the credibility of these sources is a challenge, and in particular, some young people have difficulty identifying which resources contain valid and reliable information [32]. The internet and mental health services are important sources of mental health support for people with mental illnesses [33]. However, the preferred sources of support and information for youth attending mental health services pertaining to nutrition and physical activity in this particular at-risk group remains unclear.

A growing body of evidence suggests that lifestyle behaviors, including nutrition and physical activity, can be substantially improved in those who attend mental health services using health promotion programs [34,35,36]. However, there remains limited research indicating how these principles can be applied to positively influence youth mental illness outcomes, which is vital given the higher prevalence of mental disorders in young people [3]. To improve the physical and mental health of young Australians with mental illness, effective programs focused on modifying nutrition and physical activity behaviors are urgently needed. Further, little research on the knowledge and attitudes towards nutrition and physical activity practices among young people attending a regional Australian youth mental health service has been published. Whilst there may be servicing challenges such as a lack of funding to run programs or to employ accredited nutrition and exercise practitioners to support clients, youth mental health services still require a clear understanding of the attitudes of young people towards the service’s role in providing activities which support healthy nutrition and physical activity practices. Without this, there is a risk that any implemented strategies will not meet the needs of their clients nor facilitate an improvement in their mental illness outcomes and management. Therefore, to inform future service delivery, the perspectives of young people attending a regional youth mental health service were investigated with the following research questions:

  1. 1.

    What are the behaviors and level of knowledge towards nutrition and physical activity in young people attending a regional youth mental health service?

  2. 2.

    What are the main barriers and enablers to achieving recommendations for nutrition and physical activity in young people attending a regional youth mental health service?

  3. 3.

    What do young people attending a regional youth mental health service understand about the relationship between nutrition and/or physical activity, and mental health outcomes?

  4. 4.

    What are the preferred providers and sources of information and support for nutrition and physical activity in young people attending a regional youth mental health service?

Methods

Study setting

Cornerstone Youth Services is based in Launceston, Tasmania, a regional city with a population of approximately 110,000 people [37]. In 2016, people aged 10–24 years comprised about 18% of the Tasmanian population [38]. Cornerstone delivers headspace, an Australia-wide non-profit organization that provides early intervention mental health services to 12–25 year olds. The service is designed to make it as easy as possible for a young person to access the help they need for problems affecting their wellbeing. headspace Launceston comprises a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, youth workers and administration staff. Young people can access services for free. The service has a headspace Advisory and Reference Team (hART) comprising young people that have previously accessed headspace. The hART is regularly consulted and offer youth perspective to inform service delivery and community engagement.

This study was a component of a larger project situated at headspace Launceston. The aim of the larger project was to increase overall service capacity to better support headspace clients to improve their nutrition and physical activity behaviors.

Study design

A mixed methods study using a convenience sample was designed in consultation with headspace management, staff, and hART members to enable an in-depth gathering of the perspectives of young people regarding the role of nutrition and physical activity behaviors in the maintenance of good mental health. The study included a quantitative online survey, as well as structured one-to-one interviews and a focus group. A mixed methods study design was chosen as these studies offer in-depth qualitative understanding, providing rich data from which to develop patterns, themes and experiences [39] with the reach of quantitative measures [40]. This project has ethical approval by the Tasmania Social Science Human Research Ethics Committee (H0023475) and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Participants

Participants were young people aged between 15 and 25 years who self-identified as having had contact with headspace Launceston within the past 12 months or were members of the hART. Participants who completed the survey were given the opportunity to participate in a structured one-to-one interview. Members of the hART were also invited to participate in a structured focus group or one-to-one interviews.

Recruitment

In consultation with the service, two recruitment methods were employed. First, headspace clinicians handed out flyers promoting the study to clients during their therapy sessions. Flyers were also available at reception. The flyers contained a study website link and a unique QR code enabling users to access the quantitative survey. Second, a five-week paid advertisement of the study was run on social media platforms to targeted youth in the area. Parameters on Facebook and Instagram were set to target 15–25 year-olds living in Launceston, Tasmania and surrounds. This resulted in 26,253 young people reached during the advertisement period. Data collection was undertaken between February and June 2021.

Consent

As some participants were under the age of 18 years, an informed assent/consent process was designed. For the online survey all participants had to answer three screening questions to enter the survey to check their eligibility and understanding of the use of study data. For the interviews and focus group, consent was acquired in person or discussed over the phone with the interviewer (a clinical and health psychologist) to ensure the participants had appropriate cognitive capacity. All participants of the focus group and interviews signed a consent form.

Online survey

The online survey (full survey supplementary file 1; summary of items in Table 1) was developed using adapted measures from existing validated tools, published surveys and guidelines specific to the study aims. headspace management and staff, hART members, and a high school teacher reviewed the survey for face validity and legibility. Based on the feedback, the survey was shortened to 33 questions and set at a reading level of age 12 to suit the known literacy level in the area, using Grammarly (2021© Grammarly Inc).

Table 1 Overview of the survey questions in the online survey for young people attending headspace in Launceston
Full size table

Interviews and focus group

The interview and focus group guide was developed from literature review findings and questions related to the study aims developed by the research team to extend upon the concepts explored by the survey (See focus group schedule in supplementary file 2). Interviews and the focus group were held at the headspace office, by phone or online (e.g., via Zoom) at the preference of the participant and took 20–45 minutes. A clinical and health psychologist from the research team (HB) conducted all interviews. Interviews were transcribed into Microsoft Word and sent to the participants to review and make any changes if they wanted, within a two-week period. Once returned, the transcripts were de-identified for analysis.

Data analysis

Online surveys were conducted through Lime Survey (limesurvey.org). An overview of the screening and consent process for the online survey is presented in Fig. 1. In total 621 potential participants clicked onto the survey home page, and 140 individuals clicked the survey link which led to the study information sheet and consent questions. Of those, 88 attempted the eligibility and consent questions which needed to be successfully answered to proceed to the survey and of these, 53 completed the survey. The remaining 35 were unable to provide consent. Duplicate surveys (surveys with the same IP address; n = 5) were removed prior to analysis. All data were downloaded and exported using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office Package 2011). All available data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean ± SD) in Microsoft Excel and presented in tables and figures.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overview of screening and consent process for the online survey

Full size image

Qualitative data was analyzed using an “inductive” approach [44], by two research team members (HB and AW). A coding guide was generated after familiarization with the data by the first researcher, and then codes were assigned to meaningful segments of text and agreed on in discussion between the two primary analysts. Codes were then grouped into categories, then sub-themes, and overarching themes were identified by discussion between the two researchers and then by team consensus.

Results

Survey participants (n = 48) had a mean age of 19.5 ± 2.7 (mean ± SD) years and 63% identified as female (Table 2). Most survey respondents were studying full time (65%) and the highest proportion were living out of their family home (44%) (Table 2). Most had attended headspace between 1 and 6 times (56%), and more than half had received a mental health diagnosis (54%) (Table 2). Four young people completed individual interviews and four participated in a focus group. Of these participants, 75% identified as female (n = 6); and age ranged from 20 to 25 years. Four main themes were identified (i) Dietary behaviors, knowledge, and barriers to healthy eating (ii) Behaviors, knowledge, and barriers to physical activity; (iii) The perceived relationship between nutrition and physical activity with mental health; and (iv) The role of youth mental health services in supporting nutrition and physical activity. Survey, interview and focus group findings are presented under each theme.

Table 2 Demographic information and frequency of mental health service use in the study sample of young people (n = 48)
Full size table

Dietary behaviors, knowledge, and barriers to healthy eating

Most survey respondents did not meet the Australian government recommendations for fruit (81%) and vegetable consumption (92%) (Table 3) in line with their age group. Additionally, most respondents (67%) skipped breakfast on one or more days during the week. While the majority (81%) of survey respondents consumed water on a daily basis, only 38% consumed it several times per day. Most survey respondents consumed drinks with added sugars (58%) and takeaway foods (75%), once a week or more. Most respondents (69%) correctly identified that they should consume less drinks with added sugar, however a minority of survey respondents (n = 2) who consumed drinks with added sugar more than once per day incorrectly reported that they should continue to consume this amount. The majority of the respondents (71%) correctly identified they should consume less take-away foods.

Table 3 Proportion (n (%)) of survey respondents’ consumption of fruit, vegetables, breakfast, sugar sweetened beverages and takeaway foods
Full size table

For nutrition knowledge, most (77%) survey respondents identified that monitoring food consumption behavior could help to maintain a healthy weight, but less than half identified not eating while watching the TV (40%) and reading food labels (27%) as behaviors that could help to maintain a healthy weight, and were identified as helpful strategies according to the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire [42]. More than a third of survey respondents reported that snacking throughout the day (37%) and taking nutritional supplements (77%) was a strategy to maintain a healthy weight, which was incorrect according to the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire [42]. All participants who took part in an interview and/or focus group were able to describe that fruit and vegetables form part of a healthy diet. Some of these participants described having the nutrition to support energy needs throughout the day and were able to provide examples of healthy foods including fruit, vegetables, protein and grains. Most participants were able to describe a “pyramid”, “plate”, or “2 and 5 campaign”, however they were unable to provide more detail about current national nutrition guidelines.

It means a good balanced diet and making sure that you’re not having too much of one thing and not enough of another. So just making sure you’ve got a good balance of fruit and veg, and sweets and stuff like that, but in moderation – Interview Participant 3

Figure 2 identifies the main barriers and enablers to healthy eating identified by survey respondents. Food access, time and expense of food were the primary barriers, with knowledge of cooking and healthy foods less commonly reported. Similar barriers were noted through the interview and focus group, with the main reported barriers to healthy eating being accessibility or convenience of fast food, perceived cost of healthy foods, and no time to prepare meals.

Often eating healthily is more difficult than eating junk food. It’s very easy to just walk past KFC or McDonalds or Dominoes or wherever and to just buy readymade bit of takeaway but to eat healthily, it takes more work – Interview Participant 4

The primary enabling factors identified through the survey for healthy eating as shown in Fig. 2 were to improve health and weight, body image and mental health. In addition, during interview and focus group, the most frequently reported motivator was social support:

I definitely think that the people around you make an influence about what you eat. So, my partner likes to eat quite healthily, he does a lot of meal prep, so then that encourages me to do the same. – Interview Participant 3

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage of survey respondents who indicated agreement with a series of statements about the main barriers and enablers to healthy eating

Full size image

Behaviors, knowledge, and barriers to physical activity

The majority of survey respondents (79%) identified walking as their main form of physical activity. A smaller proportion of survey participants identified going to the gym (33%), running (27%) and organized sport i.e. football, netball (23%) as additional forms of physical activity they participated in. Other forms of physical activity identified by individual survey respondents included dancing, swimming, bike riding/motor cross, karate and yoga (37%).

For survey respondents aged between 15 and 17, approximately a quarter (27%) met the Australian government’s physical activity requirements for their age group, and most of these survey respondents correctly identified they were doing enough physical activity. Of the survey respondents that were identified as adults, 36% (10 survey respondents) met the Australian government’s physical activity requirements for adults. Four out of the 10 survey respondents identified as adults were able to correctly identify they were already meeting the physical activity requirements. The 5 remaining survey respondents did not provide their ages; however, none met the requirements for either children or adults.

Figure 3 identifies the main barriers and enablers to physical activity identified by survey respondents. Main barriers of mood, time and embarrassment of exercising in public were identified through the survey. Conversely, no time, negative experiences during childhood, and low skills and confidence were identified as barriers through the interviews/focus group.

I don’t necessarily do as much as I should or to the extent where maybe I will only go once a week rather than once a day. I would like to be able to go once a day but it’s definitely something that I struggle to find time to fit in – Interview Participant 2

The main enablers for physical activity for survey respondents included improved body image, to be physically healthy, and to be mentally healthy (Fig. 3). Social support was the main enabler identified through both the interviews and focus group.

We both go to the gym … We go with a few of our friends. And it would make it.. It’s so fun … We sort of game-ify it – Focus Group Participant

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percentage of survey respondents who indicated agreement with a series of statements about the main barriers and enablers to physical activity

Full size image

Preferred providers and sources of nutrition and physical activity support

Figure 4 indicates who and where/how survey respondents would like to receive nutrition and physical activity information from. Additionally, interview and focus group participants described school as their main source of information for both healthy eating and physical activity behaviors. The internet (social media i.e. Facebook, Instagram) were also identified as a source of information for healthy eating. Most respondents expressed concern about the confusing amount of information on the internet and challenges of knowing who to believe, particularly when paid advertising from “influencers” overwhelmed their social media feed.

General high school level education is probably the most that I've had about food without being involved in anything cooking. I think there is not enough to extend that knowledge, especially when you have things like fad diets all coming into socials – like … keto, paleo … – it’s only bad stuff that I would see on my social media or hear from people – Interview Participant 2

The perceived relationship between nutrition and physical activity with mental health.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The proportion of survey respondents indicating the preferred provider and the source of receiving nutrition and physical activity information and support in a sample of young people attending a youth mental health service

Full size image

Two thirds of survey respondents (66%) reported that they considered good nutrition was important for managing mental health (Table 4), and 61% reported that physical activity was important for managing mental health (Table 4). The relationship between both healthy eating and physical activity and mental health were reported as enabling factors by approximately half of survey respondents (Figs. 2 and 3). During interviews and the focus group, participants strongly recognized the bidirectional link between healthy eating, physical activity and their mental health. Participants were aware that physical activity improved their mood and reduced stress. Participants were also aware that poor eating behaviors (e.g., skipping meals), poor food quality or consuming unhealthy foods directly impacted their mood. Some were aware that certain foods impacted their mood but were unaware of exactly how this occurred. One participant particularly noticed the negative impact of moving out of home on their healthy eating, physical activity and mental health:

… when I’m feeling down, I tend to go towards not so good foods, and it never really makes me feel any better. It then leads to stuff like fatigue, because you’re not getting the right sort of fuels in your body, and then potential weight gain … , which can then have a negative impact on your mental health … So, eating the right sort of foods like your fruit and veggie gives you the energy, and then you can go out and go for your walk and build up, get your serotonin levels going. And that helps – Interview Participant 3

Table 4 Proportion (n (%)) of survey respondents’ percieved importance of nutrition and physical activity for managing mental health
Full size table

The role of youth mental health services in supporting nutrition and physical activity

Of the survey respondents, only 33% reported that a source of nutrition and physical activity information and support should come from headspace (Fig. 4). However, all participants in the interviews and focus group expressed that headspace could have a stronger role in supporting healthy eating and physical activity. Most participants felt it would be helpful for headspace staff to be proactive in raising the topics as part of sessions, rather than the young person having to raise the topic. Participants felt that headspace staff could offer useful resources, facilitate referrals to health professionals, provide information on sports options and offer a personal link to these.

I had my therapist appointment this morning and we were talking about how my unhealthy eating was impacting me. It would have been awesome if she had a resource then that she could be like, “Actually, I know someone perfect to talk to you about that; here’s who you can talk to, they are going to be able to help you with this.” That sort of thing –Interview Participant 1

When participants reflected on their past experiences of accessing support at headspace, most acknowledged that receptivity to conversations initiated about healthy eating and physical activity during sessions would vary due to individual needs, maturity levels, priorities for attending sessions and motivation. One reflected they had had “general” conversations about healthy eating during headspace sessions, whilst another described a significant improvement in healthy eating and physical activity due to attendance at headspace sessions.

My food knowledge has drastically increased and through going to headspace and talking to my counsellor there – Interview Participant 2

Most participants expressed enthusiasm for the idea of accessing a dietitian or exercise physiologist through headspace, but were concerned about the barriers to this service, such as cost.

Discussion

This novel study comprehensively assessed nutrition and physical activity behaviors and knowledge, the main barriers and enablers to achieving recommendations and the preferred sources of support among a sample of young people attending a mental health service in regional Australia. Our results suggest that most young people in our study were knowledgeable about how their behavior compared to Australian Government diet and physical activity recommendations and understood the role of diet and physical activity for maintaining their mental health. However, participants reported poor nutrition and physical activity behaviors and experienced substantial barriers towards achieving recommendations. While support for improving nutrition and physical activity behaviors from reputable providers including health professionals was seen as a priority, most participants indicated they wanted to receive these messages through social media channels. Our results point to a clear opportunity to improve nutrition and physical activity behaviors in this vulnerable group, which could enhance both mental and physical health outcomes across their lifespan [46].

Our results indicate that a knowledge/behavior gap surrounding nutrition and physical activity appears in this sample of young people with mental health issues. The poor dietary behaviors in our study sample are similar to results from previous studies in a large sample of young people in Australia who consumed very low levels of fruit and vegetables [47] and had a high consumption of takeaway foods and drinks with added sugar [48]. Critically, these foods may be displacing nutrient-rich alternatives if consumed too frequently, leading to poor outcomes for both physical and mental health [48]. In our study, most participants reported either skipping or not eating breakfast on a regular basis. This was substantially higher than recent studies that show only 8% of Australian youth skipped breakfast [49] and may identify a significant gap in dietary behaviors in this particularly vulnerable group of youths. Indeed, a greater frequency of skipping breakfast is associated with a higher probability of experiencing depressive symptoms [50], and young people who consume breakfast have better mental health [51], indicating that this is a potential area of action for this group.

Further in our study, few participants met the recommendations for physical activity, which is not dissimilar to the levels of physical inactivity in young people nationally which show 18% of 12–17 year old and 6–22% of 15–17 year olds are not sufficiently active [52]. Walking was the most commonly reported type of physical activity, which is dissimilar to the organized sport preferences of younger Australian children [53]. Walking is generally considered to be a low-intensity physical activity, which has shown to lack the benefits of moderate or vigorous intensity physical activity for supporting cognitive and mental health measures in young people [54]. Thus, further integration of different types of physical activity (inclusive of moderate and/or vigorous intensity tasks) into the treatment and support for young people with mental health issues as an early intervention strategy would be important for supporting physical and mental health outcomes for this group [55].

In our study, most participants were aware of how their diet and physical activity compared with public health recommendations, however, substantial barriers in achieving positive behavior changes were reported. Time and expense ‘costs’ associated with healthy eating and physical activity were considerable factors limiting positive behaviors by participants in our study, with most reporting unhealthy food is easier to access. While Australian data shows that healthy diets can be more affordable than current (unhealthy) diets [56], research also shows that healthy diets are still unaffordable for some low-socioeconomic groups [57]. Given more than a third of our survey sample were receiving government financial assistance, financial and physical access to healthy food and opportunities appears to be a major issue in this group. The paradoxical result of mood being reported as an enabling factor and a barrier has also been reported in adult populations, with previous research indicating that stress and depression limits physical activity participation in more than 60% of adults with severe mental illness [58]. Our results highlight that in addition to challenges to changing health behaviors in young people in general, for those with poor mental health, barriers are amplified. Our results are similar to other research that shows improving body image, physical health and weight were amongst the top enabling factors for improving diet and physical activity in young people [59]. In one study in young men, those reporting they experienced greater stress were significantly more likely to rank mental health as a key motivator compared to those experiencing lesser symptoms of stress [59]. Given the relationship between all these factors and mental health in young people, strategies that improve physical activity and nutrition could promote positive weight and body image outcomes in addition to highlighting the benefits to mental wellbeing could be applied in this group. Such strategies, based on self-determination theory, that focus on promoting autonomous self-regulatory behavior have been previously demonstrated as effective [60].

The young people in our study reported wanting to receive health-related nutrition and physical activity support from various, qualified health professionals. This aligns with research that suggests that young people desire reliable and quality health care information [61], however in our study, young people commonly reported wanting to receive this information through social media channels. This finding was also confirmed in other Australian research, which was related to the assumed anonymity and privacy that social media offers [62], in addition to online health information being readily available [63]. Young people commonly search health related information through online sources [64]. In our study, the interview and focus group participants expressed concern about how health information can be confusing and misleading when accessed online, particularly when paid advertisements filled their social media. As such, they expressed a desire for trusted health professionals to deliver the information, or to help them make sense of the information they find online. In addition, young people reported that talking face-to-face was important to them, highlighting that conversations with trusted providers, such as mental health services remain relevant to young people. Given how widely social media is accessed by young Australians, it is important to explore further how this could be an effective tool for nutrition and physical activity support in young people with mental health issues. Peer-to-peer support using digital technologies is a preferred method for young people with mental health concerns to promote positive health behaviors [65]. Congruent with self determination theory [66], previous health promotion programs have demonstrated the importance of social connectedness and peer support in generating positive behavior change outcomes.

In our study, it was identified that the mental health service was among the top three preferred providers of nutrition and physical activity information, and that some conversations towards diet and physical activity had occurred already for some young people during sessions at headspace. However, given the priority focus on mental health, time pressure and lack of specialization of mental health counsellors in this field it is likely that these were limited to general comments about nutrition and physical activity for wellbeing, and referrals to professional services. While some preliminary evidence of the acceptability of an exercise program in young people attending a youth mental health service has been published [67], embedding this approach into standard psychological treatment for young people should be considered. Improving access for young people to receive nutrition and physical activity interventions may promote their knowledge and confidence, addressing the competency aspect of behavior change [66]. Integrating support for improving nutrition and physical activity behaviors into current counselling sessions may also be preferable to specialized programs, as it has previously been shown that consumer financial status and other responsibilities can influence program access and attendance in people with mental health issues [68].

Strengths and limitations

This study has a number of strengths including presenting detailed information about a range of factors impacting nutrition and physical activity behaviors in young people attending a youth mental health service that can be used to directly inform strategies to support young people. Despite this, limitations of this study are recognised. First, the study is limited by a small sample size due to recruitment challenges and project timeline constraints, which may reduce the power of the study and increase the margin of error. The convenience sampling utilized limits the transferability of the research. Additionally, the use of paid advertisement on social media to increase response rates means that researchers cannot be certain that all participants met the eligibility criteria, as this was self-reported. The use of the three screening questions for consent impacted the number of young people accessing the survey. In total, only 58 of 141 (41%) who attempted to access the survey were able to answer the screening questions correctly (despite efforts to provide multiple sources of study information in varying media formats). It is also possible that consent questions were not answered correctly due to low literacy levels, participants not reading/listening to the study information or the study information not being engaging enough for the needs of the cohort. Some survey questions were adapted from validated measures, such as The International Physical Activity Questionnaire [69], however most survey questions developed for the purpose of this study to be as simple as possible for this population group, regardless of validation, which might contribute to measurement error in this study. While our study selected appropriate, low literacy questions for screening participants for dietary behaviors to increase engagement, a more comprehensive assessment of diet using validated tools, such as a food frequency questionnaire, should be a priority for future research to more accurately quantify dietary patterns in this at-risk group. Finally, the study was conducted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in delays and limited access to the mental health service at the height of lockdowns. During the study, Tasmania had not had any transmission of COVID. However, it is possible these contextual factors may still have influenced the findings.

Conclusions

Our study, conducted in a sample of young people attending a regional youth mental health service, indicates that most young people are knowledgeable about how their behaviors compare to Australian government nutrition and physical activity recommendations and understand their role in maintaining their mental health. However, both diet and physical activity behaviors in this group were poor and there are substantial barriers to achieving these recommendations including poor mental health. Our results indicate that young people would prefer support for reputable information and advice to be communicated through social media. Given the results from this study, which highlights the large scale of poor diet and physical activity behaviors in youth mental health settings, it can be recommended that health professionals be commissioned to either produce or review materials to ensure young people have access to credible and accurate information and support. Understanding the complexities of behavior change from a self-determination perspective may also enhance the efficacy of interventions within the youth mental health context. There is an increasing awareness of the importance of dietitians and exercise physiologists in standard care. Further research is still required into how mental health care plans can be extended beyond just psychologists to also include appointments with other allied health professionals, given the increasing importance of multidisciplinary support in the maintenance of good mental health in young people. Additionally, future research should focus on how to best implement lifestyle interventions that improve nutrition and physical activity behaviors to support mental health outcomes in young people attending mental health services.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due ongoing data analysis but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health of young people. 2019. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/health-of-young-people. Accessed 7 June 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Young Australians: their health and wellbeing. 2011. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/young-australians-their-health-and-wellbeing-2011/summary. Accessed 7 June 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Solmi M, Radua J, Olivola M, Croce E, Soardo L, Salazar de Pablo G, et al. Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;27(1):281–95.

  4. Gore FM, Bloem PJ, Patton GC, Ferguson J, Joseph V, Coffey C, et al. Global burden of disease in young people aged 10-24 years: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2093–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCulloch A, Ryrie I. The impact of diet on mental health. Mental Health Rev. 2006;11(4):19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruiz LD, Zuelch ML, Dimitratos SM, Scherr RE. Adolescent obesity: diet quality, psychosocial health, and Cardiometabolic risk factors. Nutrients. 2019;12(1):43.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation. Nutrition standards for consumers of inpatient mental health services in NSW. Sydney: ACI Nutrition Network; 2013. https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/nutrition/nutrition-food-in-hospitals/nutrition-standards-diets/nutrition-standards-inpatient-mental-health.

  8. De Hert M, Correll CU, Bobes J, et al. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatry. 2011;10:52–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dipasquale S, Pariante CM, Dazzan P, Aguglia E, McGuire P, Mondelli V. The dietary pattern of patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:197–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartlem KM, Bowman JA, Bailey JM, et al. Chronic disease health risk behaviors amongst people with a mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49:731–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O'Neil A, Quirk SE, Housden S, Brennan SL, Williams LJ, Pasco JA, et al. Relationship between diet and mental health in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(10):31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oddy WH, Allen KL, Trapp GS, Ambrosini GL, Black LJ, Huang RC. Dietary patterns, body mass index and inflammation: pathways to depression and mental health problems in adolescents. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;69:428–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dumuid D, Olds T, Lewis LK, Martin-Fernández JA, Katzmarzyk PT, Barreira T, et al. Health-related quality of life and lifestyle behavior clusters in school-aged children from 12 countries. J Pediatr. 2017;183:178–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reichelt AC, Rank MM. The impact of junk foods on the adolescent brain. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(20):1649–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe CJ, Morton JB, Reichelt AC. Adolescent obesity and dietary decision making—a brain-health perspective. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(5):388–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaddock L, Pontifex MB, Hillman CH, Kramer AF. A review of the relation of aerobic fitness and physical activity to brain structure and function in children. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011;17(6):975–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lang C, Feldmeth AK, Brand S, Holsboer-Trachsler E, Pühse U, Gerber M. Effects of a physical education-based coping training on adolescents’ coping skills, stress perceptions and quality of sleep. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2017;22(3):213–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Richards J, Rosenbaum S, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;77:42–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, Firth J, Cosco T, Veronese N. An examination of the anxiolytic effects of exercise for people with anxiety and stress-related disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2017;249:102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenbaum S, Tiedemann A, Sherington C. Physical activity interventions for people with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75:964–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harvey SB, Øverland S, Hatch SL, Wessely S, Mykletun A, Hotopf M. Exercise and the prevention of depression: results of the HUNT cohort study. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(1):28–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Osborn DP, Nazareth I, King MB. Physical activity, dietary habits and coronary heart disease risk factor knowledge amongst people with severe mental illness. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(10):787–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Teasdale SB, Burrows TL, Hayes T, Hsia CY, Watkins A, Curtis J, et al. Dietary intake, food addiction and nutrition knowledge in young people with mental illness. Nutr Diet. 2020;77(3):315–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosselli M, Ermini E, Tosi B, Boddi M, Stefani L, Toncelli L, et al. Gender differences in barriers to physical activity among adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;30(9):1582–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ashton LM, Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Morgan PJ, Collins CE. Motivators and barriers to engaging in healthy eating and physical activity: a cross-sectional survey in young adult men. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11(2):330–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pearson N, Timperio A, Salmon J, Crawford D, Biddle SJ. Family influences on children's physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sabharwal M. Perceived barriers of young adults for participation in physical activity. Curr Nutr Food Sci. 2018;6(2):437–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shepherd J, Harden A, Rees R, Brunton G, Garcia J, Oliver S, et al. Young people and healthy eating: a systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(2):239–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Green R, Bruce L, O’Donnell R, Quarmby T, Hatzikiriakidis K, Strickland D, et al. “We’re trying so hard for outcomes but at the same time We’re not doing enough”: barriers to physical activity for Australian young people in residential out-of-home care. Child Care Pract. 2021:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2021.1895076.

  31. Baheiraei A, Khoori E, Foroushani AR, Ahmadi F, Ybarra ML. What sources do adolescents turn to for information about their health concerns? Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2014;26(1):61–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goodyear VA, Armour KM, Wood H. Young people and their engagement with health-related social media: new perspectives. Sport Educ Soc. 2019;24(7):673–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Burns JM, Davenport TA, Durkin LA, Luscombe GM, Hickie IB. The internet as a setting for mental health service utilisation by young people. Med J Aust. 2010;192:S22–S6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bailey JM, Bartlem KM, Wiggers JH, Wye PM, Stockings EAL, Hodder RK, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the provision of preventive care for modifiable chronic disease risk behaviors by mental health services. Prev Med Rep. 2019;16:100969.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Happell B, Davies C, Scott D. Health behavior interventions to improve physical health in individuals diagnosed with a mental illness: a systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2012;21(3):236–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Verhaeghe N, De Maeseneer J, Maes L, Van Heeringen C, Annemans L. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on physical activity and eating habits in persons with severe mental disorders: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. World Population. Launceston https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/launceston-population. Accessed Mar 2022.

  38. Australian Bureau of statistics. National, State and Territory Population https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/latest-release. Accessed 7 Aug 2020.

  39. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fielding NG. Triangulation and mixed methods designs: data integration with new research technologies. J Mixed Methods Res. 2012;6(2):124–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Flood VM, Webb K, Rangan A. Recommendations for short questions to assess food consumption in children for the NSW Health Surveys. 2005. https://ro.uow.edu.au/hbspapers/364.

  42. Kliemann N, Wardle J, Johnson F, Croker H. Reliability and validity of a revised version of the general nutrition knowledge questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70(10):1174–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Health AIo, Welfare. Insufficient physical activity. Canberra: AIHW; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Booth ML. Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;71(2):114–20.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Barriers to Being Active Quiz. What keeps you from being more active? https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/ndep/pdfs/8-road-to-health-barriers-quiz-508.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2021.

  46. Firth J, Gangwisch JE, Borsini A, Wootton RE, Mayer EA. Food and mood: how do diet and nutrition affect mental wellbeing? BMJ. 2020;369:m2382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Australian institute of health and welfare. Poor diet. 2019 https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/food-nutrition/poor-diet/contents/dietary-guidelines. Accessed 7 June 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hardy LL, Bell J, Bauman A, et al. Association between adolescents’ consumption of total and different types of sugar-sweetened beverages with oral health impacts and weight status. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017;42(1):22–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mullan B, Wong C, Kothe E, et al. An examination of the demographic predictors of adolescent breakfast consumption, content, and context. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:264.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee YS, Kim TH. Household food insecurity and breakfast skipping: their association with depressive symptoms. Psychiatry Res. 2019;271:83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Smith AP. Breakfast cereal consumption and subjective reports of health by young adults. Nutr Neurosci. 2003;6(1):59–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schranz N, Glennon V, Evans J, Gomersall S, Hardy L, Hesketh KD, et al. Results from Australia’s 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s children. aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children/contents/heath/the-health-of-australias-children. Accessed 7 June 2021.

  54. Nakagawa T, Koan I, Chen C, Matsubara T, Hagiwara K, Lei H, et al. Regular moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity rather than walking is associated with enhanced cognitive functions and mental health in young adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):614.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Pascoe M, Bailey AP, Craike M, Carter T, Patten R, Stepto N, et al. Physical activity and exercise in youth mental health promotion: a scoping review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020;6(1):e000677.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Lee AJ, Kane S, Ramsey R, Good E, Dick M. Testing the price and affordability of healthy and current (unhealthy) diets and the potential impacts of policy change in Australia. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lewis M, McNaughton SA, Rychetnik L, Lee AJ. Cost and affordability of healthy, equitable and sustainable diets in low socioeconomic Group in Australia. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2900.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Firth J, Rosenbaum S, Stubbs B, Gorczynski P, Yung AR, Vancampfort D. Motivating factors and barriers towards exercise in severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2016;46(14):2869–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ashton LM, Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Morgan PJ, Collins CE. Motivators and barriers to engaging in healthy eating and physical activity: a cross-sectional survey in young adult men. Am J Mens Health. 2016;11(2):330–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Fergie G, Hunt K, Hilton S. What young people want from health-related online resources: a focus group study. J Youth Stud. 2013;16(5):579–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Evers CW, Albury K, Byron P, Crawford K. Young people, social media, social network sites and sexual health communication in Australia:“this is funny, you should watch it”. Int J Commun. 2013;7:18.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lupton D. Young People’s use of digital health Technologies in the Global North: narrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e18286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Bach RL, Wenz A. Studying health-related internet and mobile device use using web logs and smartphone records. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Aschbrenner KA, Naslund JA, Tomlinson EF, Kinney A, Pratt SI, et al. Adolescents' use of digital technologies and preferences for mobile health coaching in public mental health settings. Front Public Health. 2019;7:178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lederman O, Ward PB, Rosenbaum S, Maloney C, Watkins A, Teasdale S, et al. Stepping up early treatment for help-seeking youth with at-risk mental states: feasibility and acceptability of a real-world exercise program. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020;14(4):450–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mucheru D, Ashby S, Hanlon M-C, McEvoy M, MacDonald-Wicks L. Factors to consider during the implementation of nutrition and physical activity trials for people with psychotic illness into an Australian community setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Craig CL, Marshall A, Sjostrom M, Bauman A, Booth M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:381–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the headspace Advisory and reference Team (hART) for their feedback and input; headspace management (Wayne Frost and Caroline Thaine) for their collaboration, engagement and support of the project, and headspace staff for their support with recruitment.

Funding

Funding was provided to the University of Tasmania through Cornerstone Youth Services Inc. who secured a small grant for this project from the Healthy Tasmania Project funding scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia

    Tamieka Mawer & Heather Bridgman

  2. School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia

    Katherine Kent, Andrew D. Williams, Courtney J. McGowan, Sandra Murray, Marie-Louise Bird & Sibella Hardcastle

  3. School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia

    Katherine Kent

  4. Sport Performance Optimization Research Team, School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia

    Courtney J. McGowan

Authors
  1. Tamieka Mawer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katherine Kent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew D. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Courtney J. McGowan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sandra Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marie-Louise Bird
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sibella Hardcastle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Heather Bridgman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualizations: all authors; methodology, all authors; software, HB.; formal analysis, TM, HB, AW, KK. writing—original draft preparation, TM and KK.; writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Bridgman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Tasmania Health and Medical/Social Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee (H-72066) and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. For the survey, an informed assent/consent process obtained informed consent from all participants prior to participation. For the focus groups/interview, written inform consent was provided by all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mawer, T., Kent, K., Williams, A.D. et al. The knowledge, barriers and opportunities to improve nutrition and physical activity amongst young people attending an Australian youth mental health service: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 789 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08182-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08182-0

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us