Skip to main content
Download PDF

The prevalence of chronic medication therapy problems and pharmacists’ interventions among hospitalized perioperative patients: a retrospective observational study

BMC Health Services Research volume 22, Article number: 1483 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Inadequate preoperative management of chronic medications can place perioperative patients at risk and cause unnecessary delays in surgical procedures. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of chronic medication therapy problems (CMTPs) in hospitalized perioperative patients and assess the relevance of pharmacists’ interventions.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of pharmacist-led preoperative management of chronic medications in hospitalized adult patients from November 2018 to April 2019. The recorded drug-related problems (DRPs) were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification V9.1 and were analyzed with a multinomial regression model to identify risk factors.

Results

A total of 254 DRPs were recorded, with an average of 0.52 DRPs per patient. Treatment safety (66.9%) was the most common DRP. The most frequent causes of perioperative DRPs and nonperioperative DRPs were drug selection (72.9%) and patient related (50.8%), respectively. Of the 292 documented interventions, 71.6% were fully accepted by the clinicians and patients. The majority (68.9%) of the recorded problems were completely resolved. The number of comorbidities (OR = 3.815) and the number of chronic medications taken (OR = 1.539) were risk factors for the occurrence of DRPs.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that pharmacist-led chronic medication therapy management in surgical wards may be an effective method to help reduce medication-related surgical risks and optimize the medication therapies used for the long-term treatment of chronic diseases.

Peer Review reports

Background

Half of the perioperative patients have a history of taking chronic medications [1]. Many studies have shown that inadequate preoperative management of chronic medications not only places patients at risk but also causes unnecessary delays in surgical procedures [1,2,3,4]. As a result, the potential risks of chronic medication during the perioperative period is an important patient safety concern. However, if chronic medication therapy problems (CMTPs) occur, physicians are unavailable for consultation in the stomatological specialist hospitals. Based on the published references, pharmacists are ideal members of the medical team to support the multi-disciplinary care team with a focus on the identification and resolution of drug-related problems (DRPs) to improve patient outcomes by performing pharmaceutical care activities, such as conducting medication reconciliation, reviewing medication orders, and providing patient education and counseling [5,6,7]. Therefore, as members of the preoperative team, clinical pharmacists may play an important role in chronic medication therapy management.

Many studies have documented the positive effect of pharmacy services on patients with chronic diseases in different settings, and some of these findings have supported the active involvement of pharmacists to optimize the medication management of perioperative patients [6,7,8,9]. Previous studies have focused on medication reconciliation and the DRPs of the medication orders in surgical wards [6, 7, 10, 11]. Very few studies have been conducted on the characteristics of CMTPs in surgical wards and the outcomes of the pharmacists’ interventions.

A DRP is defined as “an event or circumstance involving drug therapy that actually or potentially interferes with desired health outcomes” [12]. The Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification for DRPs V9.1 is an established system that has been revised several times in order to be a validated tool to categorize DRPs in multiple settings [5, 13, 14]. It differs from other systems because it separates the problems from the causes.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the significance of pharmacist-led chronic medication therapy management for hospitalized perioperative patients as well as to assess risk factors for the occurrence of DRPs.

Methods

Study design and setting

This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary teaching stomatological hospital in China. The electronic medical records and clinical pharmacist’s ward round records were evaluated. The inclusion criteria were all adult patients admitted to the oral and maxillofacial surgical wards of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University from November 2018 to April 2019. Patients who were admitted multiple times during the study period were considered another patient at each admission since different DRPs may be experienced during each hospitalization. Patients with incomplete records were excluded for the following reasons: (1) patients whose medication history within 48 h of admission was unknown due to communication barriers or the pharmacist being unable to reach them within 48 h for various reasons, which caused missing information and a failure to intervene in a timely manner, or (2) patients who were discharged within 72 h before the pharmacists provided the intervention.

Description of the recommendation process used by the clinical pharmacists

The inpatients received care from multidisciplinary teams that included clinical pharmacists who provided pharmaceutical care on weekdays. A clinical pharmacist used the Patient Health Information Form (see the Supplementary Material 1) to collect and document the patients’ information through face-to-face interviews. The form was designed for the patients treated in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery [15]. The clinical pharmacists reviewed chronic medication therapy and provided suitable interventions. Patient follow-up visits were conducted during hospitalization. Potential or manifested CMTPs that may have influenced the surgical outcomes or the treatment of chronic diseases were identified. Potential problems were those that were likely to occur, and manifested problems were those that had already occurred. The CMTPs and their possible causes were recorded with reference to the current guidelines [16,17,18,19,20], established literature [21, 22], and standardized databases such as MCDEX®, Lexicomp®, and UpToDate®. Only the drugs classified in the 2019 updated Beers criteria [21] as “medications that are potentially inappropriate in most older adults” were recorded as DRPs in patients aged 65 years and older. The DRPs that were identified, the interventions that were proposed, the acceptance of the interventions and the outcomes were recorded in the clinical pharmacist’s ward round records during the observation period. In this study, the final decisions were made by two clinical pharmacists through discussion. One pharmacist actively worked on the ward and another pharmacist provided consultations. Both of the clinical pharmacists had obtained clinical pharmacy training certificates from the China National Health Commission and had hospital pharmacy experience for longer than six years.

Data collection and extraction

We collected data from electronic medical records and the clinical pharmacist’s ward round records. This study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient names were removed during data collection to protect patient privacy. The collected and extracted demographic and health-related data included: sex, age, diagnosis at admission, personal history, laboratory data, medication history, recorded DRPs, interventions, acceptance, and outcomes. The combinations of drugs were determined according to the number of active ingredients; however, this did not apply to herbal products and dietary supplements. The diagnoses of the patients were classified by the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) [23].

Assessment and classification of DRPs

We retrospectively reviewed and categorized the recorded DRPs based on the PCNE classification V9.1. Regarding the cause category, we deleted “dose selection C3”, “treatment duration C4”, “dispensing C5”, “drug use process C6”, and “patient transfer related C8”, because no problems were recorded for those classes. The DRPs that only occurred in perioperative period (defined as the period from admission to discharge for patients who were hospitalized for surgery in this study) and may have affected the surgical outcomes were coded as “perioperative problems”, while the other DRPs that existed in the process of chronic disease treatment and may have affected the long-term treatment of chronic diseases were coded as “nonperioperative problems”.

Data analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation; nominal data are expressed as n (%). Data were analyzed with SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 25.0. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between the presence of DRPs and sex, age, number of comorbidities, and number of chronic medications. An unconditional logistic regression analysis was applied, and variables with P < 0.2 were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, where the variables were selected by a stepwise procedure. The results of the univariate and multivariate analyses were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients’ characteristics

A total of 573 adult patients (admissions) were admitted from November 2018 to April 2019; 488 (85.2%) patients were included, 23 of whom were admitted more than once during the study period. Eighty-five patients were excluded from the study due to an indeterminant medication history within 48 h of admission (9.1%) and a hospitalization time of less than 72 h (5.8%). The mean age of the patients was 52.0 years ± 15.0 (range 18–86 years). One hundred ninety-five (40%) of the included patients had been taking chronic medications at the time of admission, 11 of whom had no chronic diseases. The most common chronic medications that the patients were taking on admission included nifedipine (43/195, 22.1%), amlodipine (35/195, 17.9%) and metformin (34/195, 17.4%). Comorbidities (which were defined as chronic illnesses or diseases requiring long-term treatment) were present in 192 (39.3%) patients, 8 of whom took no chronic medications at admission. The most common comorbid diseases were hypertension (140/192, 72.9%), diabetes (64/192, 33.3%) and dyslipidemia (47/192, 24.5%). Details regarding the patient demographics and other clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 488 patients
Full size table

Details on the DRPs

A total of 254 DRPs were recorded, and an average rate of 0.52 DRPs per patient was calculated. Among the 488 included patients, 147 (30.1%) experienced at least one DRP. In addition, 72.4% of the patients undergoing chronic diseases/treatment (n = 203) experienced at least one DRP. As shown in Table 2, the major problems included “treatment safety” (66.9%), followed by “treatment effectiveness” (30.7%) and “other” (2.4%). All of the recorded DRPs were further classified as perioperative (144/254, 56.7%) and nonperioperative (110/254, 43.3%), as well as potential (179/254, 70.5%) and manifested (75/254, 29.5%). Based on the 2019 updated Beers criteria, 7 treatment safety problems were associated with potentially inappropriate medication use. The most commonly inappropriately used medication in older adults (≥ 65 years) was eszopiclone (n = 3), followed by reserpine (> 0.1 mg/day) (n = 2), nifedipine (immediate release) (n = 1), and estazolam (n = 1).

Table 2 The types of problems, interventions and acceptance of DRPs according to the PCNE classification V9.1
Full size table

The perioperative DRPs were most commonly associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (75/144, 52.1%), antiplatelet agents (20/144, 13.9%), and calcium channel blockers (19/144, 13.2%). The nonperioperative DRPs were most commonly associated with insulins (13/110, 11.8%), sulfonylureas (12/110, 10.9%), and herbal products (12/110, 10.9%).

Causes of DRPs

Each DRP could have more than one cause. A total of 268 causes were recorded; 53.7% were the causes of perioperative DRPs; and 46.3% were the ones of nonperioperative DRPs. The primary cause of perioperative DRPs was “drug selection C1” (72.9%), followed by “drug form C2” (19.4%) and “patient related C7” (7.6%). Regarding the nonperioperative DRPs, the primary cause was “patient related C7” (50.8%), followed by “drug selection C1” (46.0%) and “other C9” (3.2%). Table 3 shows the details and examples of the causes of the perioperative DRPs and nonperioperative DRPs.

Table 3 Causes of the DRPs according to the PCNE classification V9.1
Full size table

Interventions and acceptance

Each DRP could have more than one intervention. In total, 292 documented interventions were proposed by the clinical pharmacists with the aim of resolving the recorded DRPs. The most common interventions that were proposed to resolve the perioperative DRPs were made at the prescriber level (92.9%), while the interventions that were proposed to resolve the nonperioperative DRPs were mainly made at the patient level (71.7%). The majority (71.6%) of the interventions were accepted and fully implemented by the clinicians or patients, followed by interventions that were accepted with an unknown implementation status (22.2%). Table 2 shows an explanation of interventions and acceptance.

Outcomes of the interventions

Among the 254 recorded DRPs, the main outcomes of interventions were “solved O1” (68.9%), followed by “not known O0” (14.2%), “partially solved O2” (13.0%) and “not solved O3” (3.9%). Regarding the perioperative DRPs, 94 potential DRPs, which might have led to a risk of either perioperative hypertension or hypotension, were prevented in patients with hypertension; 23 potential DRPs, which might have caused a risk of perioperative hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, were successfully prevented in patients with diabetes; and 14 potential DRPs, which might have led to excessive bleeding or thromboembolic complications, were prevented in patients who were taking anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs or herbal products, such as ginkgo and ginseng, on admission. Regarding the nonperioperative DRPs, the totally solved DRPs were mostly “adverse drug event possibly occurring” (21/42, 50.0%). The majority of the partially solved DRPs and the DRPs with an unknown status were the “effect of drug treatment not optimal” (15/22, 68.2%; 15/36, 41.7%, respectively), and the unsolved DRPs were mostly “adverse drug event possibly occurring” (6/10, 60.0%), due to a lack of patient cooperation. Detailed descriptions of the outcomes of the documented interventions for the perioperative DRPs and the nonperioperative DRPs are provided in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.

Table 4 Outcomes of the pharmacists’ interventions on the perioperative DRPs according to the PCNE classification V9.1
Full size table
Table 5 Outcomes of the pharmacists’ interventions for the nonoperative DRPs according to the PCNE classification V9.1
Full size table

Potential risk factors for the occurrence of DRPs

The results of the logistic regression analysis are shown in Table 6. The univariate analysis showed that sex, age, the number of comorbidities and the number of chronic medications all had P values of < 0.2. These factors were analyzed in the full model. The results indicated that the number of comorbidities and number of chronic medications were statistically significant (P < 0.05), the ORs were 3.815 and 1.539, and the corresponding 95% CIs were 2.297, 6.337 and 1.153, 2.055, respectively.

Table 6 Factors associated with the occurrence of DRPs
Full size table

Discussion

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this was the first retrospective study that has been conducted to categorically evaluate CMTPs among perioperative patients at a Chinese stomatological hospital and to analyze the utility of pharmacist interventions. In our hospital, the inpatients were required to bring their own chronic medications at admission, and, the preanesthetic evaluation generally took place before the day of surgery, which raises the importance of using the knowledge of pharmacists for chronic medication therapy management. This study showed that pharmacist-led chronic medication therapy management significantly prevented the occurrence of potential DRPs and solved the DRPs that developed.

In our study, 30.1% of patients experienced at least one DRP, and the average rate of DRPs per patient was 0.52, which differed from the results of previous studies using the PCNE classification to evaluate DRPs [24, 25]. An analysis of hospitalized surgical patients reported that 19.6% of the patients included in that study had DRPs and that there was an average of 0.3 DRPs per patient [24]. Another study found that, in the oncology ward, 83.2% of the patients had DRPs and that there was an average occurrence of 3.5 DRPs per patient [25]. There might be several explanations for the difference of the number of DRPs that were observed in this study compared to the results of other studies. First, our study was conducted in a stomatological hospital rather than in a general hospital. In China, because physicians are unavailable for consultation in the stomatological hospitals, generally, only patients in good physical condition are hospitalized for oral or maxillofacial surgery. Second, our study focused on CMTPs without analyzing the medication orders related to surgery. In addition, our study reported that at least one DRP was detected in 72.4% of the patients with chronic diseases/treatment, highlighting the need for clinical pharmacists to help with chronic medication management in the perioperative period.

The possible occurrence of adverse drug events were the most common preoperative DRPs in this study, and this was consistent with the results of a previous study [11]. It is well known that perioperative patients who take chronic medications are at high risk of complications. For example, in this study, the patients who underwent free-flap reconstruction surgery required nasal feeding for several days after surgery. However, nifedipine, the most common chronic medication used in this study, is often available in controlled-release formulations, and it may lead to hypotension if it is crushed before administration. Moreover, ACEIs and ARBs should be withheld on the morning of surgery based on concerns about possible hypotension. The clinical pharmacists should consult with the surgeons to determine which chronic medications should be stopped or replaced, and alternative drugs should be recommended to reduce the occurrence of preoperative risks associated with CMTPs.

In this study, the clinical pharmacists not only focused on the preoperative DRPs but also actively intervened in the nonpreoperative DRPs. The “effect of drug treatment not optimal” and “adverse drug event possibly occurring” were the two most frequent problem subtypes of nonpreoperative DRPs. In this study, it was found that many patients with poor glycemic control lacked awareness of the importance of proper nutrition and exercise, and used or stored insulin pens incorrectly. The high incidence of lack of effectiveness and the safety problems in this study highlighted the need for clinical pharmacists to support hospitalized patients in the self-management of chronic diseases.

For perioperative DRPs, the high acceptance rate (92.9%) of the interventions and the improved outcomes could be explained by the following facts. First, the clinical pharmacists who were actively working on the ward received a large amount of professional clinical pharmacy training (including a 3-year general pharmacy practice residency, a 2-year specialized residency and a 1-year clinical pharmacist training). Second, after more than three years of cooperation, the surgeons were very willing to let the clinical pharmacist join the treatment team. Third, the solutions to most perioperative DRPs are generally clear. In addition, the acceptance rate of the interventions for nonperioperative DRPs was 47.8%, which was lower than that in other studies [8, 25]. This was mainly caused by the fact that despite 39.1% of the interventions being accepted, the implementation status was unknown, which mainly had to do with whether the patients visited doctors or whether the patient adherence was improved after discharge.

The multivariate analysis showed that the number of comorbidities and the number of chronic medications taken were risk factors for the occurrence of DRPs, and this was consistent with the results from other studies [26, 27]. Therefore, clinical pharmacists should closely monitor the patients with multiple comorbidities or polypharmacy. In our study, age and sex were not risk factors associated with the development of DRPs, however, previous findings were inconsistent. A study on patients with cardiovascular diseases found that age and sex were not risk factors for DRPs [28]. However, Mateti et al. [29] revealed that age and female sex were risk factors for developing DRPs.

This study has some limitations. First, this research did not involve the process of prescribing and dispensing of the chronic medications. Thus, some DRPs may have been missed due to a lack of necessary information. Second, as this study was conducted in a stomatological specialist hospital, the results may not be generalizable to other hospitals. Finally, a major limitation is our inability to determine the effects of the interventions on health outcomes due to the retrospective observational nature of our study, lack of a control group and the lack of patient information after discharge.

The findings of this study promoted involvement of clinical pharmacists into the multidisciplinary team to improve chronic medication safety during the perioperative period, which are essential for the development and implementation of clinical pharmacist-led chronic medication therapy management in surgical wards in China. The effect of a clinical pharmacist-led chronic medication therapy management on the health outcomes of hospitalized perioperative patients could be evaluated in future randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

In this study, CMTPs were commonly observed among perioperative patients with chronic diseases/treatment. Based on our findings, pharmacist-led chronic medication therapy management significantly prevented the occurrence of potential DRPs that may have affected the surgical outcomes and solved some of the DRPs that may have affected the long-term treatment of chronic diseases among preoperative patients. These findings suggest that pharmacist-led chronic medication therapy management in the surgical ward may be an effective method to help reduce medication-related surgical risks and optimize the medication therapies used for the long-term treatment of chronic diseases among preoperative patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during the study and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CMTP:

Chronic medication therapy problem

DRP:

Drug-related problem

PCNE:

Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe

ICD-11:

International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

WHO:

World Health Organization

ACEI:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

ARB:

Angiotensin II receptor blocker

TDM:

Therapeutic drug monitoring

References

  1. Kennedy JM, van Rij AM, Spears GF, Pettigrew RA, Tucker IG. Polypharmacy in a general surgical unit and consequences of drug withdrawal. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;49(4):353–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. de Lorenzo-Pinto A, Ortega-Navarro C, Ribed A, Giménez-Manzorro Á, Ibáñez-García S, de Miguel-Guijarro Á, et al. Cancellations of elective surgical procedures due to inadequate management of chronic medications. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019;44(4):561–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spell NO 3rd. Stopping and restarting medications in the perioperative period. Med Clin North Am. 2001;85(5):1117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wichards WS, Schobben AF, Leijten FS. Perioperative substitution of anti-epileptic drugs. J Neurol. 2013;260(11):2865–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayhan YE, Karakurt S, Sancar M. The effect of the clinical pharmacist in minimizing drug-related problems and related costs in the intensive care unit in Turkey: a non-randomized controlled study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022;47(11):1867–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guisado-Gil AB, Ramírez-Duque N, Barón-Franco B, Sánchez-Hidalgo M, De la Portilla F, Santos-Rubio MD. Impact of a multidisciplinary medication reconciliation program on clinical outcomes: a pre-post intervention study in surgical patients. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(7):1306–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng X, Xiao L, Li Y, Qiu F, Huang W, Li X. Improving safety and efficacy with pharmacist medication reconciliation in orthopedic joint surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X, Wang S, Yu X, Ma Z, Wang H, Yang J, et al. Impact of pharmacist-led medication therapy management in ambulatory elderly patients with chronic diseases. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(7):2937–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tommelein E, Mehuys E, Van Hees T, Adriaens E, Van Bortel L, Christiaens T, et al. Effectiveness of pharmaceutical care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PHARMACOP): a randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;77(5):756–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li H, Li N, Jia X, Zhai Y, Xue X, Qiao Y. Appropriateness and associated factors of stress ulcer prophylaxis for surgical inpatients of orthopedics department in a tertiary hospital: a cross-sectional study. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:881063.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meng L, Qu C, Qin X, Huang H, Hu Y, Qiu F, et al. Drug-related problems among hospitalized surgical elderly patients in China. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:8830606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe. Definition of drug-related problem. 2022. https://www.pcne.org/working-groups/2/drug-related-problems. Last accessed Aug 2022.

  13. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe. Classification for drug related problems V9.1. 2020. https://www.pcne.org/upload/files/417_PCNE_classification_V9-1_final.pdf. Last accessed Aug 2022.

  14. Lampert ML, Kraehenbuehl S, Hug BL. Drug-related problems: evaluation of a classification system in the daily practice of a Swiss University Hospital. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(6):768–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng H, Liu H. Medication therapy management in clinical pharmaceutical care for patients in head and neck cancer surgical ward. Cent S Pharm. 2019;17(10):1788–92.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sudhakaran S, Surani SR. Guidelines for perioperative management of the diabetic patient. Surg Res Pract. 2015;2015:284063.

    Google Scholar 

  17. American Diabetes Association. 15. Diabetes care in the hospital: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):173–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):e127–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082–143.

    Google Scholar 

  21. By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):674–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang K, Shen J, Jiang D, Xing X, Zhan S, Yan S. Development of a list of high-risk perioperative medications for the elderly: a Delphi method. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18(9):853–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases 11th revision. 2021. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en. Last accessed Aug 2022.

  24. Qu C, Meng L, Wang N, Chen Y, Yang X, Wang J, et al. Identify and categorize drug-related problems in hospitalized surgical patients in China. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41(1):13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Umar RM, Apikoglu-Rabus S, Yumuk PF. Significance of a clinical pharmacist-led comprehensive medication management program for hospitalized oncology patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020;42(2):652–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Baghdadi H, Koca Al-Baghdadi Ç, Abdi A, Gültekin O, Meštrović A, Demirdamar R, et al. Introducing clinical pharmacy services to cardiovascular clinics at a university hospital in Northern Cyprus. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(6):1185–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Blix HS, Viktil KK, Reikvam A, Moger TA, Hjemaas BJ, Pretsch P, et al. The majority of hospitalised patients have drug-related problems: results from a prospective study in general hospitals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;60(9):651–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdela OA, Bhagavathula AS, Getachew H, Kelifa Y. Risk factors for developing drug-related problems in patients with cardiovascular diseases attending Gondar University Hospital, Ethiopia. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8(4):289–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mateti UV, Lalwani T, Nagappa AN, Bhandary PV, Verupaksha D, Balkrishnan R. Assessment of drug-related problems in depressive patients. Perspect Clin Res. 2015;6(1):58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff of Beijing Stomatological Hospital for their support.

Funding

This work was supported by the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (CFH2020-2-2143), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82072984), the Project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KM202110025008), and the Innovation Foundation of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University (21-09-25).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China

    Hai-Ting Cheng, Hong-Tao Liu, Guo-Liang Shen & Ting Zhao

  2. Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital; National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital), Beijing, 100730, China

    Ming Zhao

  3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100050, Beijing, China

    Zhi-En Feng

Authors
  1. Hai-Ting Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong-Tao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guo-Liang Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ting Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhi-En Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.C. and Z.F. designed the experiments. H.C., T.Z., G.S. and H.L. performed the experiments. H.C., T.Z. and G.S. collected and analyzed the data. H.C. and M.Z. wrote the manuscript. H.C. and Z.F. revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-En Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University (No: CMUSH-IRB-KJ-PJ-2022-09). The date of approval was 25 April 2022. The procedures used in this study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, HT., Zhao, M., Liu, HT. et al. The prevalence of chronic medication therapy problems and pharmacists’ interventions among hospitalized perioperative patients: a retrospective observational study. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 1483 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08897-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08897-0

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us