Skip to main content

Analysis on the relationship between effort-reward imbalance and job satisfaction among family doctors in China: a cross-sectional study



Family doctor contract services was launched in Sichuan province in 2016. The focus was mainly on developing primary health care services but paying less attention to the work stress and job satisfaction of in-service family doctors.


This study aims to explore the influencing factors of job satisfaction, and the relation between work stress indicators and job satisfaction among family physicians.


An analytical online cross-sectional survey was performed among 1,105 family doctors from 23 districts and counties in Chengdu. Self-administered questionnaire was completed. Sociodemographic factors, work stress measured by Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI)scale, and job satisfaction assessed by the short Chinese version of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) were collected in this study. A statistical analysis and hierarchical linear regression analysis were performed to explore the influencing factors and the correlations among related variables.


The overall mean MSQ score was 52.01 ± 13.23. Analysis of doctor satisfaction indicated that age, education, job rank, type of institution, years of working and monthly income were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were negative correlation coefficients between general job satisfaction and effort/reward ratio (ERR) (r = -0.130, P < 0.001) and overcommitment (r = -0.615, P < 0.001).


The level of job satisfaction among family doctors was considerable low. Age, education, job rank, type of institution, years of working and monthly income were influencing factors of job satisfaction. ERI and overcommitment had a negative correlation with general job satisfaction.

Peer Review reports


Family doctors, known as general practitioners and family physicians, are widely regarded as the “gatekeepers” of health systems and play a vital role in providing comprehensive, continuous and appropriate primary health services [1]. To date, the family doctor service policy has been implemented in over 50 countries and regions throughout the world, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, etc., and has brought significant health and economic gains. China proposed family doctors and family doctor contracted services in the 1980s. In 2003, the family doctor system was carried out as a means of developing community health services [2]. In 2009, China experienced a new round of health system reform which emphasized the pressing need of establishing a sound basic medical and health service system and adopting measures to develop and strengthen community health service centres. In 2011, the Chinese government proposed the Guiding Opinions of the State Council on the Establishment of the General Practitioner System as a national indicator of family doctor services [3]. Family doctor contract services which are established by signing the contract of the service aimed to build a long-term and better medical cooperation between family doctors and the residents, so as to meet with the diversified healthcare needs and improve the residents’ health status [4, 5] have been available in Sichuan Province since 2016. However, due to the short-term development of family doctor primary care systems in China, primary care is a relatively new discipline in the medical field and a sequence of prominent defects and problems come to manifest, including an increased workload at community health service centres, an inadequate contract service rate, family doctor shortages, and the absence of supporting policies [6,7,8], unnecessary and tortuous paperwork, skimpy wages and salaries.

Occupational stress refers to a kind of psychological state, which refers to the response employees who experienced in response to several adverse conditions related to the working environment may have when one’s working resources, abilities and needs are not sufficient to cope with work demands and pressure [9]. It is reported that work stress prevalence rates among general working population are from 19 to 30% [10]. However, there is a high work stress prevalence among health workers at community health service centres. A survey carried out in Shanghai demonstrates that 190 (61.7%) family doctors experienced excessive occupational stress [11]. Similarly, an investigation conducted in in southwestern China showed that 78.39% primary health workers had occupational stress [12]. Occupational stress also significant impact on staff mental and psychological well-being.

The effort-reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire is a theoretical and validated psychosocial scale widely used in exploring associations between perceived occupational stress and health state through identifying failed reciprocity between the effort spent at work and the rewards received in turn [13]. There are three dimensions: efforts, rewards and overcommitment. Work efforts refer to the demands and obligation in exposed employees. Perceived rewards represent work resources and benefits provided to the employee including money, promotion prospects, job security, respect and prestige in the workplace [14]. While Overcommitment is assessed by personal combined responses to a high effort and low reward at work [15]. The degree of occupational stress (the ERI model) can be expressed by the effort-reward ratio (ERR). If an ERR value greater than 1.0 indicated a high level of ERI. The prevalence of ERR value of > 1.0 among worker is widely prevailing, with a prevalence rate from 22.3% to 78.39% [12, 16, 17]. The ERI model is built on an imbalance between effort and reward caused a state of emotional distress from emotional and psycho-physiological stress reactions, which leads to a decrease in job satisfaction [18, 19] and an increase in burnout [20,21,22] and turnover [23], and subsequently results an enormous variety of adverse health outcomes [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

Job satisfaction is a vital influencing indicator of one’s feeling about work, it reflects the extent to which people like their jobs [31]. To date, Job satisfaction has been assessed in diverse occupational settings, e.g., education, business firms, the military and medical care. With the prominent medical reforms and the society development, health problems and health workers’ working condition have received more and more attention. In China, a wide variety of studies have revealed the mediating effect of job satisfaction on health state and occupational commitment among nurse [32, 33], a correlation between job satisfaction and job burnout among emergency department health professionals [34, 35], the relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intention among physicians from urban state-owned medical institutions[36], the influence of effort-reward imbalance and job satisfaction on self-rated health and the way to improve job satisfaction among doctors form the public medical institutions[16, 37,38,39], the common reasons for dissatisfaction and job satisfaction and its related factors among psychiatry residents [40]. Few studies have focused on family doctors' job satisfaction and its related influencing factors. A survey compared the job satisfaction of community health workers (including doctors and nurses) before and after the local comprehensive medical care reform in Anhui Province and showed that the job satisfaction had a small improvement [41]. A cross-sectional survey of 448 community health workers (such as administrative staff, general practitioners, public health physicians and nurses, etc.) in Heilongjiang province suggested that there was a gap between actual and desired workplace characteristics, which had a negative influence on workers’ job satisfaction [42]. The popular researches about family doctors focused on the effect and challenge of family doctor contract services [43,44,45,46,47,48], chronic disease management to contract with family [50] and assessment of Chinese family physicians’ service competences [51]. Up to this point, these studies about job satisfaction and family doctors have been explored, however, these studies usually discussed other medical occupations or the effect of implementation family doctor policies, lacking of the overall occupational perception survey among family doctors at Community health centres. In this study, a cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate the prevalence of job satisfaction among family doctors in Chengdu, Sichuan, China. This study not only integrated demographic characteristics, but also ERI model to examine the influencing factors of job satisfaction, the correlations between occupational stress and job satisfaction. Our study may provide a new perspective for the hospital administrators to explore effective ways of increasing family doctors’ job satisfaction.


Sample and setting

Chengdu is the provincial capital city of Sichuan Province and its population is about 20.9 million, which is located in southwest China. At the end of 2020, there were 2,420 family doctor teams in Chengdu, with a total of 6.9million people who signed family doctor contract services. Between March 4, 2021 and March 26, 2021, an analytical cross-sectional survey using questionnaires was conducted among family doctors through participants’ cell phones or computers to collect the data. This study was part of a larger research project, the family doctor contract services performance evaluation survey, which was sponsored by Chengdu first people’s hospital and aimed to improve community healthcare quality. Given the geographic division and economic development in Chengdu, it was divided into 23 districts and counties, including Qingyang district, high tech zone, Dayi county and Pujiang county, and so forth. Two centres were randomly selected from each geographic region, and all respondents were targeted and told about the significance and value of this survey, and reached by each centre’s administration team. As a result, a total of 46 centres and 1273 family doctors were recruited for this study. Eventually, excluding the missing records in the questionnaire and the rejection from participants, 1,105 participants completely responded anonymously (effective response rate: 86.80%). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Chengdu first people’s hospital. All subjects in this study were voluntary and expressed informed consent prior to the questionnaires.


Sociodemographic variables

Demographic and working characteristics collected included gender, age, marital status, educational levels, technical title, work contract, type of institution, years of work and monthly take-home pay. Gender was divided as ‘male’ and ‘female’. Age was categorized as ‘ ≤ 25 years old’, ‘26 ~ 35 years old’, ‘36 ~ 45 years old’, ‘46 ~ 55 years old’ and ‘ ≥ 56 years old’ five groups. Marital status was categorized as ‘single’, ‘married’, and ‘divorced or widowed’. Educational levels were divided into ‘junior college or below’, ‘bachelor’s, and ‘master’s, or above’. Technical title was classified into ‘primary title or below’, ‘middle title’, and ‘vice-senior title, or above’. Work contract was categorized into informal work contract and formal work contract. Type of institution were divided as ‘village clinic /station’, ‘township health center’, ‘community health service centres’ and ‘second-class hospital’. Years of work was divided as ‘ ≤ 5 years’, ‘6 ~ 9 years’, ‘10 ~ 15 years’, ‘16 ~ 20 years’ and ‘ > 21 years’. Monthly take-home pay was categorized as ‘1000 ~ 3000 yuan’, ‘3001 ~ 6000 yuan’, ‘6001 ~ 9000 yuan’, and ‘9001 ~ 12,000 yuan and above’.

Assessment of effort-reward imbalance

The 23-item effort-reward imbalance scale was applied to assess occupational stress. The questionnaire is divided into three dimensions, including effort (6 items), reward (7 items), and overcommitment (6 items). Responses to the components of “effort” and “reward” are 5-point Likert scales (1 = completely disagree, 5 = strongly agree). The component of “overcommitment” is a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = full agreement). The overall imbalance between effort and reward was expressed by ERR [52]. ERR was calculated as [(effort score/reward score) × 0.545], where 0.545 was the correction factor based on the number of effort items and the number of reward items (6/11). If an ERR value of > 1.0 indicated a high level of imbalance between effort and reward [16, 17].

Satisfaction with working conditions and work itself

We assessed job satisfaction using the short Chinese version of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (20-MSQ short version items) [38, 53], which was developed to measure job general satisfaction along two dimensions: intrinsic satisfaction (12 items, e.g., “The chance to do different things from time to time”) and extrinsic satisfaction (6 items, e.g., “The praise I get for doing a good job”). The degree of job satisfaction was rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied. The sum scores for job satisfaction were ranged from 20 to 100. Higher scores on this scale were associated with a higher level of job satisfaction.

Data analysis

The characteristics of variables were presented as percentages and arithmetic means and standard deviation. The scores of job satisfaction among different variables were considered as continuous variables. First, the dimensions of job satisfaction by demographic variables and ERR were verified by the Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test for the non-normal continuous variables, and Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA for the normal continuous variables. Then, correlations between job satisfaction scores and ERR and overcommitment were performed by Pearson correlation. Moreover, hierarchical linear regression analyses were performed to estimate the association between job satisfaction and demographic characteristics, ERR and overcommitment by building progressive models. Job satisfaction score was set as the dependent variable. The independent variables were entered in two steps. In step 1, the sociodemographic variables were put in the model; in step 2, ERR and overcommitment were added. All data analysis were conducted using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS China Corp., Shanghai, China) for Windows, and a two-tailed P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


Participant characteristics

The basic characteristics of the family doctors and the mean scores of job satisfaction in the demographic categories are summarized in Table 1. In this study, a total of 1,105 participants completed the survey; 46.8% of them were male and 53.2%were female. Most respondents were less than 46 years old (39.3% were 36 ~ 45 years old and 34.5% were younger than 36 years old), and 87.8% respondents were married. In this sample, about half of the respondents had a bachelor degree or higher (50.4%). 46.5% of the participants had a middle title or higher job rank. 48.1% of them had a formal work contract. Moreover, in this survey, 11.2%, 48.5%, 34.2% and 6.1% of participants worked in village clinic / station township, health center community health service centres, second-class hospitals, respectively. Among all the respondents, 19.1% of answered respondents worked less than 6 years, 19.5% worked 6 -10 years, 19.7% worked 11 to 15 years, 10.6% worked 16 ~ 20 years, 31.1% worked ≥ 21 years. Approximately, half of respondents reported their take-home monthly pay was among 3001–6000 RMB (50.8%). In addition, the results of univariate analysis of job satisfaction in relation to the categorical variables were also shown in Table 1. 24.1% of the participants experienced occupational stress (ERR > 1) and these doctors had markedly lower scores than those with ERR ≤ 1 in job satisfaction. Consequently, significant differences were found between the groups for the following variables: age, educational level, technical title, grade of medical institutions, years of work and take-home monthly pay (P < 0.01).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of sample and distributions of job satisfaction (N = 1105)

Correlation between occupational stress and job satisfaction

The means, standard deviations (SD), and results of the Pearson correlation analyses are detailed in Table 2. Intrinsic job satisfaction showed negative correlation with ERR (P < 0.001), Intrinsic job satisfaction had a comparatively higher correlation coefficient with overcommitment (r = -0.615, P < 0.001). A negative significant correlation was observed between extrinsic job satisfaction and overcommitment (r = -0.433, P < 0.001). When the correlation between general job satisfaction and occupational stress was examined, there were negative correlation coefficients between general job satisfaction and ERR (r = -0.130, p < 0.001) and overcommitment (r = -0.615, P < 0.001).

Table 2 Correlation between occupational stress and job satisfaction

Factors associated with job satisfaction

The data were further employed for hierarchical regression analyses using job satisfaction as the dependent variable, where the sociodemographic characteristics and occupational stress were taken as independent variables. The major factors associated with job satisfaction are presented in Table 3. In the first step, sociodemographic factors accounted for 39.0% of the variance in intrinsic job satisfaction, 72.9% of the variance in extrinsic job satisfaction, 60.9% of the variance in overall job satisfaction. In the second step, the dimensions of occupational stress explained 52.4% of the variance in intrinsic job satisfaction, 68.3% of the variance in overall job satisfaction. However, gender, age, marital status, work contract, and grade of medical institutions had no significant association with all dimensions of job satisfaction in the hierarchical linear regression analyses.

Table 3 Hierarchical linear regression analyses for exploring associated factors for job satisfaction


In the present study, 1,105 participants were sampled from 46 health centres in 23 districts and towns throughout Chengdu and completed the survey, and they experienced a low level of job satisfaction (the overall mean MSQ score was 52.01 ± 13.23), which was lower than that of Chinese university teachers (69.71), Chinese township cadres (71.21), community health workers from two cities in northern China (68.2) and Chinese specialists(65.86)[17, 18, 38, 39, 53]. A possible explanation for the discrepancy is China’s national conditions and its geographical and economic diversity. Therefore, there is still a large room for improving job satisfaction among family doctors.

In this study, age, education, job rank, institution type, years of working and monthly income are demographic factors of family doctors’ job satisfaction, which are congruous with previous studies [39, 54,55,56,57]. With respect to age, a study conducted among university teachers revealed a U-shaped relationship between age and job satisfaction [58], but our study did not report such kind of relationship. Job satisfaction is much greater in the 36 to 45 years old group than in the other age groups. The explanation might be that this group had a high education level and climbed rapidly up the professional ladder, enabling them to be content with their job accomplishment. Family doctors with a master’s degree and above scored higher than those with a bachelor’s degree and below. Family doctors with a high education level can get access to publishing academic papers and undertaking research projects, which are the basic requirements for applying for a promotion in China. The current study showed that a worker’s professional rank influenced the level of job satisfaction, which was consistent with other studies [59, 60]. In addition, participants who worked in community health service centres were more likely to report a higher score of job satisfaction than those who worked in other types of health institutions. A possible explanation was that community health centres located in economically developed areas had a greater opportunity to improve healthcare access, basic health infrastructure, and high-quality health services than others. As for working years, some studies found that they affected staff satisfaction [39, 61, 62], but others presented the opposite results [63]. In the present study, workers with 16–20 working years were more satisfied with their job. The effect of working years was also reflected in the regression model. The reason for this phenomenon could be that staff with a longer duration of working experience were equipped with adequate medical skills and were responsible for more work, resulting in higher salary and social status. Moreover, we reported that sufficient monthly income was a strong predictor of job satisfaction, which was consistent with these previous findings [61, 64]. But there were other points of view on monetary factors. Studies abroad indicated that financial and non-financial factors affected job motivation and satisfaction among rural health workers [65] and that non-monetary factors had a greater impact on professional and performance satisfaction than income among health workers [66, 67]. Hence, income escalation combined with non-financial incentives could improve multidimensional satisfaction among family doctors.

This study demonstrated that effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment had a detrimental effect on general job satisfaction in correlation analysis. In addition, we found that 24.1% of the participants experienced occupational stress (ERR > 1). Moreover, overcommitment (rather than effort-reward imbalance) was a strong determinant of family doctors’ job satisfaction. According to the hierarchical regression results, based on the absolute value of β, effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment were likewise negatively correlated with job satisfaction. With the initiation of China’s new medical reform and health care system, family doctors assume the role as gatekeepers of the public’s health. Community health service policies, including family doctor contract services and hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, have reaped benefits in terms of reducing the difficulty of accessing medical services and its high costs and solving other health issues. However, the family doctor contract services were launched and developed later in our region than in other areas in China. Family doctors exerted greater effort toward organizational overall goals, suggesting that they might overestimate their abilities and devote more effort to tasks that were beyond their capabilities, leading to failed reciprocity between efforts and rewards. Moreover, due to the huge population and rapid ageing of the population, an endless number of rules and regulations, a lack of promotion and learning opportunities, and poor wages and salaries, community doctors are working in a high-stress environment and experiencing decreasing job satisfaction [49, 68, 69].Research suggested that employees with the effort-reward imbalance and high overcommitment were at a higher risk of stress-related mental and physical distress illnesses [63, 70] which resulted in decreasing job satisfaction. In addition, lowering the job satisfaction at workplace leads to a low sense of belonging and enthusiasm for work, as well as to a decreasing organization’s retention rate [71, 72]. On the contrary, a high level of job satisfaction has been shown to improve psychological and mental well-being [73]. Therefore, the requirements for basic health services at community health centres in China are increasing as the economy grows and the population ages. Notably, in the context of preventing and controlling the COVID-19 epidemic, family doctors must assume increasing responsibility and multitasking works, which caused the primary healthcare workers to feel stressed and depressed [74]. Research reported that challenges in carrying out the responsibility and multitasking work had a crippling effect on job satisfaction [41, 61].

Our study showed that family doctors suffered great work pressure, put more effort into completing work with lower rewards, and complained about low job satisfaction. We value the importance of family doctors considered as the backbone of basic healthcare in China. Therefore, it is imperative to take multiple measures to change the current situation. It is necessary to establish an effective hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system, to incent the specialists from general hospitals to help family doctors, to provide more learning and training opportunities, so as to improve their clinical competence. In addition, policy-makers need pay more attention to family doctors’ environment and conditions to formulate efficient policy and to meet their rational demands. Furthermore, healthcare managers motivate current staff by increasing income level, ameliorating promotion requirements, and enabling worker to be masters of their own decisions to avoid turnover intention and ensure the stability of the primary health workforce.

Furthermore, our study may provide a new perspective for the health administrators so that they could promote family doctors’ job satisfaction by developing strategic changes. To mitigate the dissatisfaction of family doctors at primary healthcare centres, it is necessary to establish a better incentive system and modify working conditions. This can be done by increasing income level, ameliorating the work burden, providing more learning and training opportunities, improving education level and professional title, avoiding turnover intention and ensuring the stability of the primary health workforce.

On the other hand, several limitations of this study also should be considered. First, due to the characteristics of a cross-sectional design in this study, it was not able to draw causal conclusions. To deepen the understanding of job satisfaction in this study, a qualitative approach or a longitudinal study is needed. Second, some other variables that have not been considered in this study might also have an impact on job satisfaction. Therefore, further research is needed to verify the relationship between these variables and job satisfaction. Third, although the participants were form every geographical area in Chengdu, owing to some constraints of time and convenience, the study results may not draw some extrapolated conclusion to generalize the findings to other cultures and geographic regions in China.

This study revealed that the level of job satisfaction among family doctors was considerable low. Age, education, job rank, type of institution, years of working and monthly income were influencing factors of job satisfaction. There was negative significant association between effort-reward imbalance, overcommitment and general job satisfaction. The results have implications for interventions to improve the job satisfaction of family doctors. A balance between efforts and rewards, a better incentive system and modify working conditions should put forward to increase family doctors’ job satisfaction.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Taylor RB. Family medicine: current issues and future practice family medicine-principles and practice. New York: Springer; 1998. p. 1–5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Opinions of the State Council of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Deepening the Reform of Medical and Health System. [].

  3. The State Council. Guidance of the State Council on the Establishment of a General Practitioner System. [].

  4. Bowman MA, Neale AV. Family physicians improve patient health care quality and outcomes. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26:617–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lam CL. The role of the family doctor in the era of multi-disciplinary primary care. Fam Pract. 2016;33:447.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu S, Liu Y, Zhang T, Wang L, Huang J, Liang H, Chen G, Liu C, Zhang Y. The developing family doctor system: evidence from the progress of the family doctor signing service from a longitudinal survey (2013–2016) in Pudong New Area, Shanghai. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22:11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan Y, Zhang X, Zhao Y. Analysis and thinking on the general practitioner training in community hospitals. ChinHealth Standards Manag. 2014;5:104–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feng W, Wang J, Zhang X. Rethinking about promoting the responsibility system for family doctors in Pudong new area. Prim Health Care China. 2016;30:7–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Härmä M, Kompier MA, Vahtera J. Work-related stress and health–risks, mechanisms and countermeasures. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:413–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finney C, Stergiopoulos E, Hensel J, Bonato S, Dewa CS. Organizational stressors associated with job stress and burnout in correctional officers: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;3:82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen Q, Liu S, Cui HQ, Chen C. Occupational stress and burnout in family doctors in Minhang District, Shanghai. Chin Gen Prac. 2019;22(31)221–5.

  12. Deng X, Fang R, Cai Y. Evaluation of the correlation between effort-reward imbalance and sleep quality among community health workers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:490.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jachens L, Houdmont J, Thomas R. Effort-reward imbalance and burnout among humanitarian aid workers. Disasters. 2019;43:67–87.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jachens L, Houdmont J, Thomas R. Work-related stress in a humanitarian context: A qualitative investigation. Disasters. 2018;42:619–34.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eriksson CB, Cardozo BL, Foy DW, Sabin M, Ager A. Pre-deployment mental health and trauma exposure of expatriate humanitarian aid workers: risk and resilience factors. Traumatology. 2013;19:41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ge JJ, He J, Liu Y, Zhang JY, Pan JP, Zhang XL. Effects of effort-reward imbalance, job satisfaction, and work engagement on self-rated health among healthcare workers. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:195.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pan B, Shen X, Liu L, Yang Y, Wang L. Factors Associated with Job Satisfaction among University Teachers in Northeastern Region of China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:12761–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shang Guan CY, Li Y, Ma HL. The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital on the Association between Occupational Stress and Job Satisfaction among Township Cadres in a Specific Province of China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:972.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Voltmer E, Rosta J, Siegrist J, Aasland OG. Job stress and job satisfaction of physicians in private practice: comparison of German and Norwegian physicians. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85:819–28.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Naeem A, Shaikh AA, Hassan SU, Abid H, Tahir A. Frequency of Workplace Burnout Among Postgraduate Trainees in a Teaching Hospital in Mirpur. Cureus. 2019;11:e4016.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yong X, Gao X, Zhang Z, Ge H, Sun X, Ma X, Liu J. Associations of occupational stress with job burn-out, depression and hypertension in coal miners of Xinjiang, China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e036087.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jasperse M, Herst P, Dungey G. Evaluating stress, burnout and job satisfaction in New Zealand radiation oncology departments. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014;23:82–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leineweber C, Bernhard-Oettel C, Eib C, Peristera P, Li J. The mediating effect of exhaustion in the relationship between effort-reward imbalance and turnover intentions: A 4-year longitudinal study from Sweden. J Occup Health. 2021;63:e12203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shimazu A, de Jonge J. Reciprocal relations between effort-reward imbalance at work and adverse health: a three-wave panel survey. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:60–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kouvonen A, Kivimäki M, Virtanen M. Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu L, Chang Y, Fu J, Wang J, Wang L. The mediating role of psychological capital on the association between occupational stress and depressive symptoms among Chinese physicians: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:219.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kan D, Yu X. Occupational stress, work-family conflict and depressive symptoms among chinese bank employees: the role of psychological capital. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:134.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dragano N, Siegrist J, Nyberg ST, Lunau T, Fransson EI, Alfredsson L. Effort-reward imbalance at work and incident coronary heart disease: a multicohort study of 90,164 individuals. Epidemiology. 2017;28:619–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Laethem M, Beckers DGJ, Kompier MAJ, Dijksterhuis A, Geurts SAE. Psychosocial work characteristics and sleep quality: a systematic review of longitudinal and intervention research. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39:535–49.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Inoue M, Tsurugano S, Yano E. Job stress and mental health of permanent and fixed-term workers measured by effort-reward imbalance model, depressive complaints, and clinic utilization. J Occup Health. 2011;53:93–101.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Spector PE. Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. 1997. p. 513–6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Gao YQ, Pan BC, Sun W, Wu H, Wang JN, Wang L. Anxiety symptoms among Chinese nurses and the associated factors: a cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang L, Tao H, Ellenbecker CH. Liu : Job satisfaction, occupational commitment and intent to stay among Chinese nurses: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:539–49.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tarcan M, Hikmet N, Schooley B, Top M, Tarcan GY. An analysis of the relationship between burnout, socio-demographic and workplace factors and job satisfaction among emergency department health professionals. Appl Nurs Res. 2017;34:40–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xiao Y, Wang J, Chen S. Psychological distress, burnout level and job satisfaction in emergency medicine: A cross-sectional study of physicians in China. Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26:538–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Y, Feng X. The relationship between job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intention among physicians from urban state-owned medical institutions in Hubei, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:235.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu Y, Hu XM, Huang XL. The relationship between job satisfaction, work stress, work-family conflict, and turnover intention among physicians in Guangdong, China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014894.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fu J, Sun W, Wang Y, Yang X, Wang L. Improving job satisfaction of Chinese doctors: the positive effects of perceived organizational support and psychological capital. Public Health. 2013;127:946–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu X, Zheng M, Cheng X, Xu B, Tao Z. Job Satisfaction Among Doctors from Jiangsu Province in China. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:7162–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiang F, Zhou H, Hu L, Rakofsky J, Liu T. Psychiatry Residents in China: Socio-Demographic Characteristics, Career Satisfaction, and Related Factors. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:177.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ding H, Sun X, Chang W, Zhang L, Xu X. A Comparison of Job Satisfaction of Community Health Workers before and after Local Comprehensive Medical Care Reform: A Typical Field Investigation in Central China. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73438.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li L, Zhang Z, Sun Z. Relationships between actual and desired workplace characteristics and job satisfaction for community health workers in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:180.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Feng S, Cheng A, Luo Z, Xiao Y, Zhang L. Effect of family doctor contract services on patient perceived quality of primary care in southern China. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21:218.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yuan S, Wang F, Li X, Jia M, Tian M. Facilitators and barriers to implement the family doctor contracting services in China: findings from a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e032444.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang J, Lu W, Wang L. A preliminary effect analysis of family doctor and medical insurance payment coordination reform in Changning District of Shanghai,China. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20:60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fu P, Wang Y, Liu S. Analysing the preferences for family doctor contract services in rural China: a study using a discrete choice experiment. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21:148.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang H, Shi L, Han X. Factors associated with contracted services of Chinese family doctors from the perspective of medical staff and consumers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:986.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shang X, Huang Y, Li B. Residents’ awareness of family doctor contract services, status of contract with a family doctor, and contract service needs in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3312.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Li J, Li J, Fu P, Chen Y, Tang X. Willingness of patients with chronic disease in rural China to contract with family doctors: implication for targeting characteristics. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22:203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Li Z, Li J, Fu P. Family doctor contract services and health-related quality of life among patients with chronic diseases in rural China: what is the role of socioeconomic status? Int J Equity Health. 2021;20:191.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ni Z, Wang X, Zhou S, Zhang T. Development of competency model for family physicians against the background of “internet plus healthcare” in China: a mixed methods study. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18:64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Siegrist J, Dragano N, Nyberg ST. Validating abbreviated measures of effort-reward imbalance at work in European cohort studies: the IPD Work consortium. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87:249–56.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ge C, Fu J, Chang Y, Wang L. Factors associated with job satisfaction among Chinese community health workers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:884.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Fogarty L, Kim YM, Juon HS, Tappis H, Noh JW, Zainullah P, Rozario A. Job satisfaction and retention of health-care providers in Afghanistan and Malawi. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12:11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sun W, Fu J, Chang Y, Wang L. Epidemiological study on risk factors for anxiety disorder among Chinese doctors. J Occup Health. 2012;54:1–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Teoh WM, Kit-Wei TA, Chong SC, Lew-Sian WO. Job satisfaction level among human resource employees: Malaysia’s perspective. Afr J Busi Manage. 2011;6:595–607.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jackson TN, Pearcy CP, Khorgami Z, Agrawal V, Taubman KE, Truitt MS. The Physician Attrition Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Risk Factors for Reduced Job Satisfaction Among US Surgeons. World J Surg. 2018;42:1285–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Clark A, Oswald A, Warr P. Is job satisfaction U-shaped in age? J Occup Organ Psychol. 1996;69:57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li N, Wang Y. Yu -E, Xiao S, Liu Y: Job satisfaction of staff in agencies for disease prevention and control in Hainan Province, China. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70:523–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lu Y, Hu XM, Huang XL, Zhuang XD, Guo P, Feng LF, Hu W, Chen L, Hao YT. Job satisfaction and associated factors among healthcare staff: a cross-sectional study in Guangdong Province, China. BMJ Open. 2016;19(6):e011388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Harkson DG, Unterreiner AS, Shepard KF. Factors related to job turnover in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1982;62:1465–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kabbash IA, El-Sallamy RM, Abdo SAE, Atalla AO. Job satisfaction among physicians in secondary and tertiary medical care levels. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27:37565–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Niedhammer I, Tek M-L, Starke D, Siegrist J. Effort–reward imbalance model and self-reported health: cross-sectional and prospective findings from the GAZEL cohort. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1531–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hasan H, Aljunid SM. Job satisfaction among Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) workers in caring for disabled persons in the east coast region of Peninsular Malaysia. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dieleman M, Cuong PV, Anh LVMT. Identifying for job motivation of rural health workers in North Viet Nam. Hum Resour Health. 2003;1:10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dawson J. Links between NHS staff experience and patient satisfaction: Analysis of surveys from 2014 and 2015. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2018;2:1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Janus K, Amelung VE, Gaitanides M, Schwartz FW. German physicians “on strike”-shedding light on the roots of physician dissatisfaction. Health Policy. 2007;82:357–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. de Sousa CC, de Araújo TM, Lua I, Gomes MR. Occupational stress and job dissatisfaction with health work. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2019;32:18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Munger MA, Gordon E, Hartman J, Vincent K, Feehan M. Community pharmacists’ occupational satisfaction and stress: a profession in jeopardy? J Am Pharm Assoc. 2013;53:282–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kuper H, Singh-Manoux A, Siegrist J, Marmot M. When reciprocity fails: effort-reward imbalance in relation to coronary heart disease and health functioning within the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:777–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Judge TA, Weiss HM, Kammeyer-Mueller JD. Hulin CL4: Job attitudes, job satisfaction, and job affect: A century of continuity and of change. J Appl Psychol. 2017;102:356–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Kaarna M. The importance of job satisfaction in hospital quality processes [M.D]. Nordic School of Public Health NHV. 2006.

  73. Satuf C, Monteiro S, Pereira H, Esgalhado G, Marina Afonso R, Loureiro M. The protective effect of job satisfaction in health, happiness, well-being and self-esteem. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24:181–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Shi LS, Xu RH, Xia Y, Chen DX, Wang D. The Impact of COVID-19-Related Work Stress on the Mental Health of Primary Healthcare Workers: The Mediating Effects of Social Support and Resilience. Front Psychol. 2022;12:800183.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thanks all doctors who participated in the study.


Medical and Scientific Research Project of Chengdu, China, NO:2021280.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



WY designed this study and revised the manuscript. LS supervised and conducted the study. CJ wrote the main manuscript text. DW, WY and XZ performed investigation, organized and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuyi Liu or Yuelei Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Chengdu first people’s hospital. All subjects in this study were voluntary and expressed informed consent prior to the questionnaires. We confirm that the investigation was carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Wang, Y., Du, W. et al. Analysis on the relationship between effort-reward imbalance and job satisfaction among family doctors in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 992 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Family doctor
  • Primary Health Care Centres
  • Community
  • Effort-Reward imbalance
  • Job Satisfaction