Skip to main content
Download PDF

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) in a sample of health professionals: a cross-sectional study

BMC Health Services Research volume 22, Article number: 111 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Although the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) has been used in different countries and translated into different languages, the Persian version of this scale has not been validated for healthcare professions in Iran. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of DASS-21 for nurses.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted among 1135 nurses working in public hospitals, who were selected through convenience sampling. DASS-21, which consists of 21 items and three dimensions (depression, anxiety, and stress), has been translated into Persian, and there is an online version available. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to examine the factor structure of this scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was also measured to establish internal consistency. Besides, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the test-retest reliability.

Results

The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was acceptable for anxiety (0.79), stress (0.91), and depression (0.93). An acceptable test-retest reliability (0.740-0.881, P < 0.01) was also reported for DASS-21 and its three dimensions. The results of CFA showed acceptable model fit (χ2/(df) = 1457/(186), P < 0.001), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA = 0.078), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI = 0.906), comparative fit index (CFI = 0.917), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR = 0.047). Fifty-seven nurses were included in the test-retest. The ICCs for all dimensions ranged from 0.75 to 0.86, indicating the acceptable test-retest reliability of the scale.

Conclusion

The Persian version of DASS-21 showed good psychometric characteristics, and it was confirmed as a valid and reliable tool for evaluating depression, anxiety, and stress among Iranian nurses. However, further validation studies of the Persian DSASS-21 are needed among other healthcare professionals, including physicians, midwives, and allied health professionals.

Peer Review reports

Background

Depression and anxiety are common problems around the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that more than 300 million people suffer from depression worldwide. Nearly the same number of people suffer from anxiety disorders, which is equivalent to almost 4-5% of the world’s population [1]. Depression is recognized as the most common mental health disorder globally and is expected to be the leading cause of mortality by 2030 [2, 3]. Economically disadvantaged developing countries have reported the highest prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms [4]. Evidence suggests that these mental health problems are directly associated with social and physical problems, such as dysfunctional family relationships, high suicide rates, poor achievement, and use of illegal drugs [1, 5,6,7].

Today, it is clear that nurses have one of the most stressful health occupations, with more mental health complaints than any other health professionals [8,9,10]. Depression, anxiety, and stress are the most common mental health problems among nurses, which need to be considered in health research on Iranian nurses [11,12,13]. The high prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress is associated with worse patient care safety and health care quality [14], higher occurrence of adverse events [15]. On the other hand, the COVID-19 pandemic has an important role in the well-being of healthcare professionals, especially nurses [16]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that almost one-third of nurses had depression, anxiety, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic [17]. A study among Iranian nurses demonstrated that anxiety, stress, and depression scores significantly increased during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the COVID-19 outbreak [18]. Additionally, a recent study focusing on comparison levels of depression, anxiety, and stress between nurses in the frontline and the second line of care delivery during the COVID-19 concluded that frontline line nurses had significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress [11].

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) is one of the screening instruments, designed to measure depression, anxiety, and stress. This validated questionnaire, which consists of 42 items, has been extensively used in different populations in various study backgrounds, given its applicability for the assessment of many negative mental health conditions [19]. DASS-21 is the new brief version of DASS with three subscales, each subscale includes seven items. Numerous studies have evaluated the psychometric properties of this scale in medical and non-medical populations to determine its validity and reliability [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. The majority of these studies have reported good internal consistency and reliability [23,24,25,26,27].

Generally, DASS-21 is a low-cost, easy-to-use scale, which allows for a rapid assessment of depression, anxiety, and stress [28]. In this scale, it is presumed that depression, anxiety, and stress form a general distress construct, despite having distinguished features. The depression scale includes questions related to lack of interest, anhedonia, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, and inertia, while stress is associated with irritability, tension, nervousness, difficulty relaxing, and agitation [19].

DASS-21 has been translated into more than 40 languages, including Turkish, Greek, Malaysian, Korean, Vietnamese, and Brazilian Portuguese [23, 24, 27,28,29].

Although the DASS-21 has also been translated and validated among non-clinical Iranian samples [30], its Persian version has not been validated for the healthcare professions, especially nurses. Given the high prevalence of depression, anxiety, and other mental disorders in Iranian healthcare professions especially nurses and their different working environments, and conditions. DASS-21 may be a useful screening tool for identifying early-stage mental health symptoms. Further, considering the importance and impact of mental health disorders, a tool with good psychometric properties is important to accurately assess the level of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of health professionals. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of DASS-21 among a sample of health professionals.

Methods

Study design and setting

In this nationwide cross-sectional study, a convenience sampling method was applied. During the COVID-19 pandemic, nurses who worked in public hospitals between September 2020 and July 2021 were recruited in this study. A structured online questionnaire was distributed to gather information from the target population. This study is part of a larger study examining the relationship between burnout and depression, anxiety, and stress, based on self-reports of patient care quality and adverse events among nurses in Iran. One companion paper from this study assessed burnout and its relationship to self-reported quality of patient care and adverse events among nurses [31].

Study sample

The inclusion criteria were as follows: nurses working full-time in public hospitals; nurses working in medical wards; and nurses with more than a year of working experience in the hospital. On the other hand, newly recruited nurses and part-time nurses were excluded.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated based on an item-to-respondent ratio of 1:11 [32]. The minimum accepted sample size was 231 participants. However, 1135 nurses participated in the current study during the data collection period. To measure the test-retest reliability coefficient, a previous study showed that 52 participants are required [33]. Seventy participants were randomly selected to complete the questionnaires; also, 57 participants completed the questionnaire again after 3 weeks.

Study instrument

In the current study, DASS-21 with 21 items and three subscales (7 items for each subscale) was used [34]. This instrument measures the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress signs and symptoms during the past weeks. The items of the scale are rated on a four-point Likert scale, with the score for each item ranging from 0 (“does not apply to me at all”) to 3 (“applies to me most of the time”). The subscale scores were calculated by summing the scores of the individual items, and the maximum sum for each subscale is 21; higher scores represent higher psychological distress. The original study reported the high reliability of DASS-21, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients for depression, anxiety, and stress were reported as 0.91, 0.84, and 0.90, respectively [19]. The Persian version of DASS-21 has been previously translated and revised in an Iranian non-clinical setting [30]. This questionnaire includes seven items to assess the sociodemographic characteristics of individuals (i.e., gender, age, marital status, educational level, nursing experience, work unit, shift work, and work hours per week).

Data collection

The study questionnaire was distributed online via Avalform (https://avalform.com), a viable survey tool widely used in Iran. At the beginning of the survey, a brief explanation was given regarding the purpose of the study and how to complete the questionnaire. After reading the explanations, if the participant responded positively to the question about willingness to participate in the study, he/she was allowed to enter the questionnaire; otherwise, he/she will not be able to access the survey questions. The answers to all questions were fixed, and the respondents could not proceed with the questionnaire unless all questions were completed; therefore, no data is missing. One answer to each question can be submitted via phone or computer account. The survey link was sent to the nurses via social media such as Telegram, WhatsApp and LinkedIn. Participating nurses were asked to send the link to other nurses in their departments and hospitals. To achieve a high response rate, the survey was sent out multiple times, and the survey link was available for about 12 weeks.

Data analysis

We used SPSS V.20.0 and AMOS V.21.0 software of Windows for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were measured to describe the participants’ characteristics, each DASS-21 subscale, and individual items. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was also determined to evaluate the internal consistency of DASS-21; a coefficient above 0.70 was reported, which is considered acceptable [35, 36]. Besides, corrected item-total correlations of the three subscales were calculated, which represent the correlation of each item with its subscale when the item is removed. The test-retest reliability method, based on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a two-way random model, was used to evaluate reliability. An ICC above 0.7 indicates an acceptable test-retest reliability [37]. Moreover, the construct validity of DASS-21 was examined using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to determine if the Persian version supports the three-factor construct of the original DASS-21. We did not use exploratory factor analysis (EFA) because as far as we knew, DASS-21 was developed using EFA [19]. In general, CFA is a robust method of statistical analysis for examining a predetermined factor structure or hypothetical theory; it describes how well each item evaluates the scale dimensionality. In many studies, CFA has been considered an important index for culturally adapted scales [38].

The goodness of fit was established based on the following fit indices: The Chi-square (χ2) goodness of fit should have a P-value > 0.05; the comparative fit index (CFI) should be ≥0.90 [39]; the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) should be > 0.90 [40]; the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) should be ≥0.08 [40]; the goodness of fit index (GFI) and the adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) should be ≥0.85 [40], and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) should be ≤0.08 [40]. The correlations between the dimensions of DASS-21 were evaluated by measuring Pearson’s correlation coefficients.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

The characteristics of the study respondents are presented in Table 1. A total of 1245 nurses completed this survey; however, 110 questionnaires were excluded, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, 1135 nurses were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 33.8 ± 7.8 years. The majority of the participants were female (75.7%), had shift work (77.4%), and had a bachelor’s degree (91.4%). The mean experience of the participants in nursing was 9.6 ± 7.3 years.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study participants (N = 1135)
Full size table

Reliability

In Table 2 the results of the corrected item-total correlations and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the index subscales, in addition to the mean scores and standard deviations (SDs) for the items and the three subscales (depression, anxiety, and stress) was presented. The corrected item-total correlations for the DASS 21 were ranged from .59-.77 which could be considered acceptable, from the point of view that more than half of the retained elements have a score in the range of 0.30-0.70 [41]. The corrected item-total correlations were above 0.59 for the items of all subscales. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.93 for the Persian version of DASS-21; it was 0.88 for depression, 0.88 for anxiety, and 0.89 for stress, indicating the acceptable internal consistency of the scale. In addition, the test-retest reliability of the Persian Version DASS-21 was acceptable, and the ICC of all domains was adequate which ranged from 0.75 to 0.86. Table 3 displays the test-retest reliability.

Table 2 Summary of reliability and mean scores and standard deviations for DASS-21 items and subscales (n = 1135)
Full size table
Table 3 Test–retest reliability (N = 57)
Full size table

Construct validity

The analysis yielded a 21-item three-factor model that fit the data of the Persian of DAAS-21 (Fig. 1). The CFA revealed the acceptable fit indexes of the three-factor model (Table 4). The goodness-of-fit indices in the CFA showed RMSEA of 0.078, TLI of 0.91, CFI of 0.92, NFI of 0.91, SMRS of 0.047, and GFI of 0.88. Except for the AGFI, the fit indices were lower than the cutoff points in our study. Also, χ2/df was higher than the cutoff point (χ2/df = 7.83) [25, 38, 40, 42, 43]. The factor loadings ranged from 0.61 to 0.86 for all items, and the correlation coefficients between the subscales were between 0.86 and 0.94. Accordingly, the good fit of the three-factor model was established, suggesting the stability of this instrument.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Confirmatory analysis model with factor loadings and correlations for the three IR- DASS-21 subscales

Full size image
Table 4 Confirmatory factor analysis fits for the three DASS-21 subscales (n = 1135)
Full size table

Correlations between the subscales of the Persian version of DASS-21

Table 5 presents the correlations (r) between the subscales of the Persian DASS-21. The subscales of the Persian DASS-21 were found to be significantly correlated. The coefficients for the correlations of subscales were as follows: 0.77 for depression and anxiety; 0.83 for depression and stress; and 0.82 for anxiety and stress.

Table 5 Pearson correlations among the subscales of the IR- DASS-21 (n = 1135)
Full size table

Discussion

Although DASS-21 has been used in different countries and translated into different languages, the Persian version of this scale has not been validated in medical populations in Iran. The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the Persian version of DASS-21 for a sample of health professionals. This is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to examine the factor structure of the Persian DASS-21 for healthcare professionals. The present findings supported the three-factor structure of DASS-21, as reported in previous studies [19, 23, 25, 26, 29, 30, 36].

The main contribution of the current study was the measurement of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of DASS-21 among nurses as important health professionals in any healthcare system, contributing significantly to the delivery and quality of healthcare services [44,45,46]. In Iran, there is a shortage of nurses of around 130,000, and there is and only 1.3 nurses per 1000 people [47], compared with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average of 7.4 per 1000 people [48]. A recent systematic review study identified he most important causes for the shortage of nurses in Iran. they including unwillingness to enter and stay in nursing, job abandonment and trying other jobs, low social status, insufficient support in the workplace, immigration to other countries, poor policies and programs for recruitment of workforce, the negative impression of nursing as a woman’s career, Insufficient salaries compared to other professions [47]. On the other hand, Iranian nurses face many challenges such as job dissatisfaction [49], high job stress [15], low quality of work life [50], high job burnout [31] and high anxiety and depression [51].

As frontline health service providers, nurses may face different challenges, such as the risk of infection, lack of protective supplies, risk of infection by relatives, and lack of essential medications; these challenges may increase the risk of insomnia, frustration, fear, stress, anxiety, and depression among nurses [52,53,54]. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, many studies around the world and in Iran have indicated the urgent need to evaluate psychological disorders in the general population, as well as healthcare professionals, who are at the highest risk of psychological and mental health problems [55,56,57].

In the present study, the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Persian DASS-21 were examined. This validated questionnaire can be used as a robust tool to measure depression, anxiety, and stress among Iranian healthcare professionals, particularly nurses. The present results revealed the acceptable internal consistency reliability of the scale, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.88 for depression, 0.88 for anxiety, and 0.89 for stress; the overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.93. The present results are consistent with previous validation studies of DASS-21 conducted in different countries in both medical and non-medical settings, which revealed that Cronbach’s alpha was above the agreed cutoff point (0.70) [22,23,24,25,26, 29, 30, 58]. Psychometric studies of the DASS tool for healthcare professions in Turkey and Greece showed that Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for three dimensions varies between 0.81 and 0.85 [23, 24]. Moreover, a study in China among hospital workers reported a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.95 for the total DASS-21 scale [22].

The construct validity of the Persian DASS-21 was satisfactory based on the CFA, and all fit indexes of the model were acceptable. Generally, structural validity refers “to the extent to which the structure of a multi-item scale reflects the hypothesized dimensionality of the construct being measure” [59]. The indexes of the CFA model showed that the three-dimension structure of DASS-21 was a satisfactory fit for the data, and the results were in line with previous validation research [22, 24, 60]. The findings of the present study showed that the Persian DASS-21 is suitable for future research in the Iranian community.

In the present study, the RMSEA was calculated to be 0.078, and χ2/df P-value was < 0.001. Based on the criteria for CFA, the goodness-of-fit indices of CFA indicated the acceptable fit of the model with the original construct [40]. Some previous studies have reported acceptable RMSEA, including a study conducted in Turkey among health control and clinical samples (RMSEA = 0.065) [24] and reported a χ2/df P-value of > 0.05. According to the criteria for CFA, these goodness-of-fit indices suggest the acceptable fit of the model with the original construct [40].

Besides, some studies have reported acceptable RMSEA, including a study conducted in Turkey among health control and clinical samples (RMSEA = 0.065) [24] and a study in Chinese hospital workers (RMSEA = 0.075) [22]. Moreover, the CFI measured in our study (0.917) was above the cutoff point, indicating a satisfactory model fit. It was lower than the values reported in studies performed in Australia (CFI = 0.944) [61] and Greece (CFI = 0.95) [23], while it was higher than the value reported in Turkey (CFI = 0.905) [24].

Limitations

There are some limitations to the present study, Due to coronavirus concerns, data was collected online and using a convenient sampling method, which could result in selection bias. Also, only nurses with access to the Internet could complete the questionnaire. Besides, other healthcare professionals, such as physicians, laboratory technicians, and paramedics, were not included in this study. Nevertheless, the present study established the validity and reliability of the Persian version of DASS-21, which can be applied in future research to measure depression, anxiety, and stress in different healthcare professionals in the Iranian healthcare system.

Conclusion

The Persian version of DASS-21 showed good psychometric characteristics. This tool was found to be a valid and reliable questionnaire to assess depression, anxiety, and stress among Iranian nurses. However, further validation studies of this scale are needed among other healthcare professionals, including physicians, midwives, and allied health professionals.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AGFI:

Adjusted goodness-of-fit index

CFA:

Confirmatory factor analysis

CI:

Confidence Interval

DASS-21:

Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Items

GFI:

Goodness of fit index

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

RMSEA:

Root mean square error of approximation

SD:

Standard deviations

SRMR:

Standardized root mean square residual

TLI:

Tucker-Lewis index

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Depression World Health Organization. Other common mental disorders: global health estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. p. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020: summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.

  3. World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

  4. Tran TD, Tran T, Fisher J. Validation of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) 21 as a screening instrument for depression and anxiety in a rural community-based cohort of northern Vietnamese women. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R, Dennis C-L. The prevalence of antenatal and postnatal co-morbid anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017;47(12):2041–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gobbi G, Atkin T, Zytynski T, Wang S, Askari S, Boruff J, et al. Association of cannabis use in adolescence and risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidality in young adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiat. 2019;76(4):426–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai HMX, Cleary M, Sitharthan T, Hunt GE. Prevalence of comorbid substance use, anxiety and mood disorders in epidemiological surveys, 1990–2014: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;154:1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung T, Yip PS. Lifestyle and depression among Hong Kong nurses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(1):135.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamali J, Roustaei N, Ayatollahi SMT, Sadeghi E. Factors affecting minor psychiatric disorder in southern Iranian nurses: a latent class regression analysis. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2015;4(2).

  10. Ghazwin MY, Kavian M, Ahmadloo M, Jarchi A, Javadi SG, Latifi S, et al. The association between life satisfaction and the extent of depression, anxiety and stress among Iranian nurses: a multicenter survey. Iran J Psychiatry. 2016;11(2):120.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heidarijamebozorgi M, Jafari H, Sadeghi R, Sheikhbardsiri H, Kargar M, Amiri GM. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among nurses during the coronavirus disease 2019: a comparison between nurses in the frontline and the second line of care delivery. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2021;10(3):188–93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kakemam E, Raeissi P, Raoofi S, Soltani A, Sokhanvar M, Visentin DC, et al. Occupational stress and associated risk factors among nurses: a cross-sectional study. Contemp Nurse. 2019;55(2-3):237–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shahri SSS, Ghashghaee A, Behzadifar M, Bragazzi NL, Behzadifar M, Mousavinejad N, et al. Depression among Iranian nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:130.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson J, Louch G, Dunning A, Johnson O, Grange A, Reynolds C, et al. Burnout mediates the association between depression and patient safety perceptions: a cross-sectional study in hospital nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(7):1667–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kakemam E, Kalhor R, Khakdel Z, Khezri A, West S, Visentin D, et al. Occupational stress and cognitive failure of nurses and associations with self-reported adverse events: a national cross-sectional survey. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(12):3609–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chegini Z, Arab-Zozani M, Rajabi MR, Kakemam E. Experiences of critical care nurses fighting against COVID-19: a qualitative phenomenological study. Nurs Forum. 2021;56(3):571–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Al Maqbali M, Al Sinani M, Al-Lenjawi B. Prevalence of stress, depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2021;141:110343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zakeri MA, Rahiminezhad E, Salehi F, Ganjeh H, Dehghan M. Burnout, anxiety, stress, and depression among Iranian nurses: before and during the Covid-19 outbreak. Front Psychol. 2021.

  19. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ali AM, Ahmed A, Sharaf A, Kawakami N, Abdeldayem SM, Green J. The Arabic version of the depression anxiety stress Scale-21: cumulative scaling and discriminant-validation testing. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017;30:56–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ali AM, Green J. Factor structure of the depression anxiety stress Scale-21 (DASS-21): Unidimensionality of the Arabic version among Egyptian drug users. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019;14(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang L-c, Yan Y-j, Jin Z-S, Hu M-L, Wang L, Song Y, et al. The depression anxiety stress Scale-21 in Chinese hospital workers: reliability, latent structure, and measurement invariance across genders. Front Psychol. 2020;11:247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pezirkianidis C, Karakasidou E, Lakioti A, Stalikas A, Galanakis M. Psychometric properties of the depression, anxiety, stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Greek sample. Psychology. 2018;9(15):2933–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarıçam H. The psychometric properties of Turkish version of depression anxiety stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in health control and clinical samples. J Cognitive Behav Psychotherapy Res. 2018;7(1):19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thapa DK, Visentin D, Kornhaber R, Cleary M. Psychometric properties of the Nepali language version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21). Nurs Open.

  26. Yıldırım A, Boysan M, Kefeli MC. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the depression anxiety stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). Br J Guid Counsell. 2018;46(5):582–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zanon C, Brenner RE, Baptista MN, Vogel DL, Rubin M, Al-Darmaki FR, et al. Examining the dimensionality, reliability, and invariance of the depression, anxiety, and stress scale–21 (DASS-21) across eight countries. Assessment. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119887449.

  28. Ng F, Trauer T, Dodd S, Callaly T, Campbell S, Berk M. The validity of the 21-item version of the depression anxiety stress scales as a routine clinical outcome measure. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2007;19(5):304–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tonsing KN. Psychometric properties and validation of Nepali version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21). Asian J Psychiatr. 2014;8:63–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Asghari A, Saed F, Dibajnia P. Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a non-clinical Iranian sample. Int J Psychol. 2008;2(2):82–102.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kakemam E, Chegini Z, Rouhi A, Ahmadi F, Majidi S. Burnout and its relationship to self-reported quality of patient care and adverse events during COVID-19: a cross-sectional online survey among nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(7):1974–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kline P. Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge; 2013.

  33. Shoukri MM, Asyali M, Donner A. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res. 2004;13(4):251–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1996.

  35. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu Y, Liu J, Qu B. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the WHOQOL-HIV BREF to assess quality of life among people living with HIV/AIDS: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Lummel RC, Walgaard S, Hobert MA, Maetzler W, Van Dieën JH, Galindo-Garre F, et al. Intra-rater, inter-rater and test-retest reliability of an instrumented timed up and go (iTUG) test in patients with Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151881.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Blunch N. Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS statistics and. AMOS: Sage; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lt H, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. On establishing the empirical dimensionality of theoretical terms: An analytical example. Pol Methodol. 1974:75–96.

  42. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge; 2013.

  43. Polit DF, Yang F. Measurement and the measurement of change: a primer for the health professions. PA: Wolters Kluwer Philadelphia; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chandler CI, Chonya S, Mtei F, Reyburn H, Whitty CJ. Motivation, money and respect: a mixed-method study of Tanzanian non-physician clinicians. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(11):2078–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Negarandeh R, Dehghan-Nayeri N, Ghasemi E. Motivating factors among Iranian nurses. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015;20(4):436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Courbage Y, Abu Hamad B, Zagha A. Palestine 2030-demographic change: opportunities for development. State of Palestine: United Nations Population Fund Palestine; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shamsi A, Peyravi H. Nursing shortage, a different challenge in Iran: a systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Kim J, Kim S, Lee E, Kwon H, Lee J, Bae H. The effect of the reformed nurse staffing policy on employment of nurses in Korea. Nurs Open. 2021;8(5):2850–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Akbari M, Bagheri A, Fathollahi A, Darvish M. Job satisfaction among nurses in Iran: does gender matter? J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Raeissi P, Rajabi MR, Ahmadizadeh E, Rajabkhah K, Kakemam E. Quality of work life and factors associated with it among nurses in public hospitals. Iran J Egyptian Pub Health Assoc. 2019;94(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pouralizadeh M, Bostani Z, Maroufizadeh S, Ghanbari A, Khoshbakht M, Alavi SA, et al. Anxiety and depression and the related factors in nurses of Guilan University of Medical Sciences hospitals during COVID-19: a web-based cross-sectional study. Int J Africa Nurs Sci. 2020;13:100233.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fawaz M, Anshasi H, Samaha A. Nurses at the front line of COVID-19: roles, responsibilities, risks, and rights. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(4):1341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Salari N, Khazaie H, Hosseinian-Far A, Khaledi-Paveh B, Kazeminia M, Mohammadi M, et al. The prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression within front-line healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-regression. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mamun MA, Griffiths MD. First COVID-19 suicide case in Bangladesh due to fear of COVID-19 and xenophobia: possible suicide prevention strategies. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Moghanibashi-Mansourieh A. Assessing the anxiety level of Iranian general population during COVID-19 outbreak. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Nakhostin-Ansari A, Sherafati A, Aghajani F, Khonji MS, Aghajani R, Shahmansouri N. Depression and anxiety among Iranian medical students during COVID-19 pandemic. Iran J Psychiatry. 2020;15(3):228.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Shehada AK, Albelbeisi AH, Albelbeisi A, El Bilbeisi AH, El Afifi A. The fear of COVID-19 outbreak among health care professionals in Gaza strip, Palestine. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Jun D, Johnston V, Kim J-M, O’Leary S. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the depression, anxiety and stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in the Korean working population. Work. 2018;59(1):93–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2008.

  60. Teo YC, Yusuf AH, Lim WPA, Ghazali NB, Abd Rahman H, Lin N, et al. Validation of DASS-21 among nursing and midwifery students in Brunei. J Public Health. 2019;27(3):387–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tully PJ, Zajac IT, Venning AJ. The structure of anxiety and depression in a normative sample of younger and older Australian adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009;37(5):717–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the nurses who participated in the study.

Funding

The study was funded by Vice-chancellor for Research and Technology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (NO Grant: 9910167153).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Edris Kakemam

  2. Imam Hussein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Elahe Navvabi

  3. Medical Services Directorate, Gaza Strip, Palestine

    Ahmed Hassan Albelbeisi

  4. Department of Health Services Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Faeze Saeedikia

  5. Deputy of Treatment, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Amin Rouhi

  6. District Health Center of Hamadan City, Health Center of Hamadan City, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Soheila Majidi

Authors
  1. Edris Kakemam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elahe Navvabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmed Hassan Albelbeisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Faeze Saeedikia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amin Rouhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Soheila Majidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EK and SM designed and conducted the study, performed the analysis and drafted the manuscript. AHA advised on the study design, facilitated data collection and revised the manuscript. EN, AR, SM and FS helped in data collection and analysis, interpretation of data and revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soheila Majidi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (reference No.: IR.UMSHA.REC.1399.569). The participants were asked to approve their participation in the study to proceed with the online survey. Informed consent was also obtained from each participant for the survey. The nurses were told that their information would remain anonymous. They were also assured that the survey was voluntary and that they could withdraw from the study at any time. All the methods in this study were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kakemam, E., Navvabi, E., Albelbeisi, A.H. et al. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) in a sample of health professionals: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07514-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07514-4

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us