Skip to main content

Developing a model for prevention of malnutrition among children under 5 years old

Abstract

Background

Serious consequences leading to the increase of infectious diseases and mortality of children justifies the importance of interventions for eradication of malnutrition. Thus, this study aimed to provide a model for the prevention of malnutrition among children under 5 years old (CU5) in Iran.

Methods

This paper is part of a bigger study, conducted in 2017 using a mixed methods approach. A model for prevention of malnutrition in CU5 was proposed based on the earlier steps, with the cooperation and consultation of experts and specialists. In the final step, a Delphi method was used to determine the validity of the proposed model.

Results

The main dimensions of the prevention model of malnutrition for CU5 in Iran included four level: basic causes, interventions, outcomes and impact. The proposed interventions are presented based on twelve areas: structural, intersectoral, political, economic, sanitary, health-oriented, research, educational/cultural, evaluation related, production, infrastructures and legal. Based on these areas, 118 solutions were finally selected for the final model. This model is designed based on the current conditions in different regions of Iran, the factors related to child malnutrition, affective context on policy making, the content of previous policies, the process of policy making in Iran, and key stakeholders and actors in policy making.

Conclusion

In order to prevent malnutrition, the causing factors should be identified and resolved. The adopted policies should be, more seriously, based on the presence of key stakeholders and actors. Most of the existing nutritional problems among children are because of inappropriate consumerism culture and habits in families and its transfer to children.

Peer Review reports

Background

Early years of childhood, as the most important years of life, can affect the health status of whole life seriously [1, 2]. The first 1000 days of life are so momentous that low and inadequate nutrition in this period may lead to an irreversible growth decrease along with cognitive ability disorders and performance reduction [3,4,5,6]. Growth monitoring during childhood is one of the most important health care means of children, and growth disorder is the first recognizable sign of medical, social, and especially nutritional problems [7].

Malnutrition is a condition in which a deficiency, excess or imbalance of energy, protein and other nutrients occurs [8]. Approximately half of all children under five (CU5) mortalities are attributable to under nutrition. Under nutrition exposures children to a higher risk of dying from common infections and slower recovery when infected [9]. Malnutrition among children also affects their cognitive-sensory function and consequently disrupts their ability to have a productive and efficient life [10].

This type of malnutrition is caused by many factors such as inadequate care in pregnancy period, low literacy of family members, inadequate community malfunctions (injustice, war, natural disasters, etc.), polluted environments, poor nutrition of the household, frequent and severe infections, inadequate supply of food, and poverty, especially [11]. Despite the importance of malnutrition and its relevance to the cause of important diseases, this issue continues to be underestimated [12] .

Considering the fact that stunning, underweight and wasting are among the most important indicators of malnutrition, the current study aimed to use these indicators to investigate malnutrition among children. In 2018, globally 149 million CU5 (22%) were stunted [13] and 49.48 (7.3%) million wasted [14]. The prevalence of underweight, wasting and stunning in Iran, according to the latest national study were 3.8, 4 and 4.6%, respectively [15]. Although malnutrition prevalence has been declining in recent years, Iran is still far from a World Without Malnutrition [9].

Using the indigenous models, specific for each region of world, needs to be considered to reduce malnutrition and improve the situation. Hence, given the importance of malnutrition in children, the aim of this study was to develop a model for the prevention of malnutrition among CU5 in Iran.

Methods

This paper is a part of a bigger study that was conducted in 2017 using a mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) approach in four steps (Fig. 1). The first and second steps were a systematic review and a policy analysis conducted and published earlier [2, 5, 6]. In the third step of the study, based on the findings of the first two steps, a malnutrition prevention model was developed for the CU5, enjoying the cooperation and consultation of experts and specialists. In the final step of the study, a Delphi method was used to determine the validity of the model. The Delphi technique is an approach for gathering data used to gain consensus among respondents within their domain of expertise. This is achieved through a series of rounds using questionnaires (Table 1), where information is fed back to panel members [16, 17].

Fig. 1
figure1

Research steps. The final model is the result of a mixed methods approach in four step. In the final step, a Delphi method was used to determine the validity of the proposed model

Table 1 Delphi Form

The initially proposed model was formulated in the form of a questionnaire. For this step, the study sample consisted of 38 key policy makers, senior health system managers, specialists and faculty members of nutrition departments of universities. The inclusion criteria were as follows: the individuals with education and research history on nutrition, especially CU5, senior managers with the history of conducting research (at least 5 years), individuals with the experience of executive jobs (at least 5 years), and finally, having effective experience related with policy making in this area. Snowballing method was also used to detect the eligible samples for entering the study.

Data collection tool comprised of three sections: demographic information of respondents, policy options, and also a section for recording the participants’ responses about the proposed options. The validity of the questionnaire was evaluated through the opinions of experts in this field. To assess the reliability, a pilot study was done on five individuals. A summary of the objectives along with a proposed model was sent to the experts in two rounds. The results of the first phase were analyzed and a revised model was developed based on the comments. It was then sent back to the experts and to collect their final comments. To prepare the final model, the Delphi step findings were analyzed by descriptive method. If the agreement was over 75%, the policy option was approved and if the agreement was between 50 and 75%, the policy option entered the next round. Moreover, the agreement below 50% would lead to the rejection of options [18]. At the end, the final model was formulated based on the approved dimensions and aspects.

Results

In order to design the primary model (Fig. 2), the findings of the first phase of the study [5], the factors related to malnutrition in Iranian CU5, were classified into six categories: the social, economic, biological, environmental, child-related and family-related causes. The findings of the meta-analysis study [2] showed that the prevalence of malnutrition was higher in the deprived regions of the country. Therefore, different regions of the country need different interventions; some regions need urgent and short-term interventions while some preventive and supportive interventions, due to their low economic situation and higher prevalence compared with the standards assigned by World Health Organization. These issues are considered in the present model. Given the cultural, ethnic and regional differences, the level of education and different food styles in different regions of the country, we need individual and social policies which are included in the final model. The findings from the interviews [6] are also used in more details for the regions in need of intervention.

Fig. 2
figure2

The main dimensions of model for prevention of malnutrition among children under 5 years old. The main dimensions of the final model included four level: basic causes, interventions, outcomes and impact. The interventions can implement based on the area, scale, type, or time to reduce the children malnutrition

The first and second phases of the Delphi attended by 25 and 20 individuals respectively. In Table 2, the proposed interventions are presented within the following twelve areas: structural, intersectoral, political, economic, sanitary, health-oriented, research, educational/cultural, evaluation related, production, infrastructures and legal. Based on these domains, 118 policy options were finally selected for preventing malnutrition among CU5.

Table 2 Policy options of the final model for malnutrition prevention among children under 5 years old in Iran

Discussion

The prevalence of malnutrition among Iranian CU5 is much lower than the global average and is in relatively good condition. About contextual causes, mother education level, father education level, child gender, birth weight, and age group were mentioned as the most important factors in the literature.

Based on evidence, the main factors in malnutrition are low socioeconomic status of family, parental education level, household health index, health literacy, nutrition culture, maternal characteristics such as BMI, nutrition during pregnancy, and the number of childbirths, child characteristics such as age, gender, birth weight and common infectious diseases [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Considering that nutritional problems are multi-factorial, different creating causes need to be resolved to prevent them [26]. The problem of food insecurity or malnutrition in a region would be solved only if all its contextual, and mediating and immediate factors are addressed [27].

The interventions are suggested to be classify based on the area, scale, type, or time to reduce the children malnutrition. Considering the contextual causes, the most important intervention could be maternal measures. Maternal interventions, particularly during pregnancy, may have intergenerational effects and on birth weight and child growth [28]. Other interventions in the studies include providing nutritional aids and paying cash, micronutrient supplements such as vitamin A, fertility and children health (immunization, prenatal care, the presence of a skilled person at childbirth, and the treatment of childhood common diseases), hand washing program, supplement foods enriched with micronutrient [29,30,31,32,33]. Another powerful potential strategy to prevent malnutrition in poor and sick children is consuming nutritional supplements [34]. Studies have also shown that the prevalence of malnutrition in lower social classes is higher [35] and by improving the economic status and reducing poverty, the chance of a better nutrition at higher income levels is higher. In this regard, some studies have shown a relationship between income and a reduction in the risk of stunting [36,37,38,39].

Low cost and time are the two points mentioned in previous studies regarding the implementation of interventions. Results of the study by Peru et al. showed that nutritional interventions are low cost and may improve growth in the short or midterm [40]. Clombati et al. also showed that in countries with a high prevalence of malnutrition, low cost and short-term interventions are easily applicable and effective [41]. Furthermore, Shimpton et al. showed that these interventions should start from the early pregnancy or at birth [42].

Nevertheless, results of some studies showed that some interventions had low impact. The results of three meta-analysis studies showed that the use of micronutrient as an intervention was effective in improving the development of children, but iron and vitamin supplements did not have a significant effect in the improvement of children’s growth [43]. A study by Bandari et al. in rural areas of India revealed that educational interventions aimed at increasing energy consumption and improving nutritional methods for infants from 6 to 18 months could not improve their weight [44]. Some double-blind controlled studies also showed that zinc intake could not improve the growth of malnourished children [45].

In general, it seems that screening in short intervals, the status of children can be monitored regularly and the effectiveness of interventions can be controlled in order to modify them. It should also be noted that health policies, including nutrition, differ greatly from other policies, and interests and objectives of the governors have a direct impact on nutrition policies [46]. Some studies showed that strong political support programs were of the main strengths of nutritional policies; and such support could improve the nutritional status of the children [47, 48].

The findings of policy analysis in the current study showed that using evidence, documents, policies, previous experiences, and experiences of other countries, a successful model for preventing child malnutrition can be developed for the country. A model that, in addition to the children’s health and nutrition needs, involves all individuals, organizations and stakeholders, considers the health of mother and child before the childbirth and has the ability to align the activities of all stakeholders. Furthermore, a nationwide program and a comprehensive document in the field of the nutrition for CU5 is needed; to do so, strengthening of the political process is crucial [49].

Some studies presented a model for preventing and reducing malnutrition in children. Using appropriate models to improve the quality of services in different organizations can be considered to develop the final model [50,51,52]. Different countries around the world may design specific models based on their epidemiological situation or use a combination of several models. The models of UNICEF and WHO are among most important models and frameworks for prevention and control of malnutrition. In the UNICEF model consists of three levels of causes: basic, underlying, and immediate. Each of these levels contains components that need to be considered to prevent and control malnutrition [26]. The WHO model addresses the context and causes of malnutrition. Some other models, in addition to context causes, consider children and mothers as two main pillars, and necessitate a deeper understanding of cultural models in each region to formulate the needed programs [53, 54].

Policy options of the final model for malnutrition prevention in CU5 in Iran are presented based on educational, research, structural, economic, health-oriented, hygiene, political and inter-sectorial dimensions. This model was developed based on the current conditions in different regions of the country, factors related to child malnutrition, context effecting policy making, the content of previous policies, the process of policy making in Iran, and stakeholders and actors effective in policy making.

Conclusion

The findings showed that in order to prevent malnutrition, first, the context causes should be identified and resolved. Context causes, solutions and interventions may differ in different regions of the country. The interventions can be supportive and health care related. The adopted policies should be strongly based on key stakeholders and actors. One of the most important needs in children nutrition, especially CU5, is formulating a comprehensive national document designed for this age group. The issue of targeted subsidies, helping poor people, job creation and production are also so important and need to be considered. Economic empowerment will ultimately lead to an increase in welfare of the family and the improvement of the nutritional status of children. One of the important strategies for improving economic conditions of the community is the balanced distribution of resources. Also, the correct reinforcing of laws will improve many indicators and ultimately improve the nutritional status of children. In many cases, there are proper and comprehensive rules for resolving issues but they are not correctly implemented. Finally, nutritional culture and literacy need to be considered. Low nutritional literacy will result in inadequate or inappropriate nutrition, malnutrition and other complications in children. Many of the current nutritional problems are due to wrong consumption culture in family that transfers to children. Solving the above-mentioned problems and meeting the desired goals require strong cooperation between the organizations involved in the nutrition of children; and it can be achieved with sufficient expertise and being commitment to the goals.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CU5:

Children under 5 years old

CMA:

Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

UNICEF:

The United Nations Children’s Fund

WHO:

World Health Organization

STROBE:

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology

References

  1. 1.

    Moridi G, Fathi M. Malnutrition in children under five in Iran. J Nurs Midwifery. 2009;19(64).

  2. 2.

    Mohseni M, Aryankhesal A, Kalantari N. Prevalence of malnutrition among Iran’s under five-year-old children and the related factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Pediatr. 2018;28(1):e9189.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women [https://data.unicef.org/topic/nutrition/malnutrition/].

  4. 4.

    Danaei G, Andrews KG, Sudfeld CR, Fink G, McCoy DC, Peet E, Sania A, Fawzi MCS, Ezzati M, Fawzi WW. Risk factors for childhood stunting in 137 developing countries: a comparative risk assessment analysis at global, regional, and country levels. PLoS Med. 2016;13(11):e1002164.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mohseni M, Aryankhesal A, Kalantari N. Factors associated with malnutrition among under five-year-old children in Iran: a systematic review. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2017;10(5):1147.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mohseni M, Aryankhesal A, Kalantari N. Prevention of malnutrition among children under 5 years old in Iran: a policy analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213136.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hatami H, Rasavi S, Eftekhar A, Majlesi F, Sayed Nozadi M, Parizadeh S. Text book of public health. Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M. Disease-related malnutrition: an evidence-based approach to treatment: Cabi; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Malnutrition rates remain alarming: stunting is declining too slowly while wasting still impacts the lives of far too many young children [https://data.unicef.org/topic/nutrition/malnutrition/#more%2D%2D1684].

  10. 10.

    Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, Rudan I, Campbell H, Cibulskis R, Li M. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2151–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Müller O, Krawinkel M. Malnutrition and health in developing countries. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;173(3):279–86.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schaible UE, Stefan H. Malnutrition and infection: complex mechanisms and global impacts. PLoS Med. 2007;4(5):e115.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Global Health Observatory (GHO) data, Child malnutrition [https://www.who.int/gho/child-malnutrition/en/].

  14. 14.

    Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates 2019 edition [https://data.unicef.org/resources/joint-child-malnutrition-estimates-interactive-dashboard/].

  15. 15.

    Reducing the prevalence of underweight [http://isargaran.behdasht.gov.ir/index.jsp?siteid=1&fkeyid=&siteid=1&pageid=54782&newsview=177588].

  16. 16.

    Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38(2):195–200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hsu C-C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(1):10.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wolf S. Assessing the skillsets of alternatively certified agricultural science teachers: a delphi study. Master of science. Texas: West Texas A&M University; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Demissie S, Worku A. Magnitude and factors associated with malnutrition in children 6-59 months of age in pastoral community of Dollo ado district, Somali region, Ethiopia. Sci J Public Health. 2013;1(4):175–83.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jesmin A, Yamamoto SS, Malik AA, Haque MA. Prevalence and determinants of chronic malnutrition among preschool children: a cross-sectional study in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011:494–9.

  21. 21.

    Asgary R, Liu M, Naderi R, Grigoryan Z, Malachovsky M. Malnutrition prevalence and nutrition barriers in children under 5 years: a mixed methods study in Madagascar. Int Health. 2015;7(6):426–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Fesharakinia A, Sharifzadeh G. Prevalence of malnutrition in under 5-year old children in Birjand city in 2011. J Birjand Univ Med Sci. 2013;20(1):77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Alavi Naeini M. The study of the prevalence of malnutrition and its related factors among zero to 59 month old children in Birgand rurel areas. J Tehran Faculty Med. 2001;1(59):99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ramazanpour M, Akaberi A, Khoshnoud Ostad E, Shoraka H. Investigation into malnutrition prevalence rate and effective factors on under – five – year – old children in Maneh -Semelghan city (2012-2013). J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci. 2013;5(2):374.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Souza OF d, Benicio MH, de Castro TG, Muniz PT, Cardoso MA. Malnutrition among children under 60 months of age in two cities of the state of acre, Brazil: prevalence and associated factors. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2012;15(1):211–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Weisstaub G, Araya M, Hill A, Uauy R. Childhood malnutrition: prevention and control at the national level. Nutrition in Pediatrics. 4th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Abdollahi Z. Community nutrition. Tehran: Nutrition Department, Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2012. p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Investigators M-EN. Childhood stunting in relation to the pre-and postnatal environment during the first 2 years of life: the MAL-ED longitudinal birth cohort study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(10):e1002408.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Berger S, de Pee S, Bloem M, Halati S, Semba R. Malnutrition and morbidity among children not reached by the national vitamin a capsule programme in urban slum areas of Indonesia. Public Health. 2008;122(4):371–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kiran B, Banapurmath C. Influence of RCH programme on nutritional status and immunization status in urban slum children. Int J Curr Biol Med Sci. 2011;1(4):143–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Langford R, Lunn P, Brick CP. Hand-washing, subclinical infections, and growth: a longitudinal evaluation of an intervention in Nepali slums. Am J Hum Biol. 2011;23(5):621–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Oelofse A, Van Raaij J, Benade A, Dhansay M, Tolboom J, Hautvast J. The effect of a micronutrient-fortified complementary food on micronutrient status, growth and development of 6-to 12-month-old disadvantaged urban south African infants. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2003;54(5):399–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Semba RD, Moench-Pfanner R, Sun K, de Pee S, Akhter N, Rah JH, Campbell AA, Badham J, Bloem MW, Kraemer K. Consumption of micronutrient-fortified milk and noodles is associated with lower risk of stunting in preschool-aged children in Indonesia. Food Nutr Bull. 2011;32(4):347–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    van der Kam S, Salse-Ubach N, Roll S, Swarthout T, Gayton-Toyoshima S, Jiya NM, Matsumoto A, Shanks L. Effect of short-term supplementation with ready-to-use therapeutic food or micronutrients for children after illness for prevention of malnutrition: a randomised controlled trial in Nigeria. PLoS Med. 2016;13(2):e1001952.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Baliga S. Assessment of nutritional status of under five children in Ashok Nagar, Belgaum-a community based cross sectional study. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2013;5(19):121.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Delpeuch F, Traissac P, Martin-Prével Y, Massamba J, Maire B. Economic crisis and malnutrition: socioeconomic determinants of anthropometric status of preschool children and their mothers in an African urban area. Public Health Nutr. 2000;3(01):39–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pryer JA, Rogers S, Rahman A. The epidemiology of good nutritional status among children from a population with a high prevalence of malnutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(02):311–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rode S. Economic growth and increasing trends of child malnutrition in Mumbai City. J Econ Int Finance. 2011;3(14):713.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mian RM, Ali M, Ferroni PA, Underwood P. The nutritional status of school-aged children in an urban squatter settlement in Pakistan. Pak J Nutr. 2002;1(3):121–3.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Perra A, Costello A. Efficacy of outreach nutrition rehabilitation centres in reducing mortality and improving nutritional outcome of severely malnourished children in Guinea Bissau. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995;49(5):353–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Colombatti R, Coin A, Bestagini P, Vieira CS, Schiavon L, Ambrosini V, Bertinato L, Zancan L, Riccardi F. A short-term intervention for the treatment of severe malnutrition in a post-conflict country: results of a survey in Guinea Bissau. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11(12):1357–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shrimpton R, Victora CG, de Onis M, Lima RC, Blössner M, Clugston G. Worldwide timing of growth faltering: implications for nutritional interventions. Pediatrics. 2001;107(5):e75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ramakrishnan U, Aburto N, McCabe G, Martorell R. Multimicronutrient interventions but not vitamin a or iron interventions alone improve child growth: results of 3 meta-analyses. J Nutr. 2004;134(10):2592–602.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bhandari N, Mazumder S, Bahl R, Martines J, Black RE, Bhan MK, Group IFS. An educational intervention to promote appropriate complementary feeding practices and physical growth in infants and young children in rural Haryana, India. J Nutr. 2004;134(9):2342–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Müller O, Garenne M, Reitmaier P, van Zweeden AB, Kouyate B, Becher H. Effect of zinc supplementation on growth in west African children: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in rural Burkina Faso. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(6):1098–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Goshtaei M. Analysis of the nutrition policy making in Iran. PhD Thesis. Tehran: Teheran University of Medical Sciences; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Winichagoon P, Kachondham Y, Attig G, Tontisirin K. Integrating food and nutrition into development. In: Thailand’s experiences and future visions Bangkok: UNICEF (East Asia and Pacific Regional Office); 1992.

  48. 48.

    Gurney J. A situation analysis and agenda for the turn of the century for countries of the south-east region of WHO, part I: program file (nutrition). In: Paper discussed in the FAO/WHO Asia and pacific Regional Meeting Bangkok, vol. 1992; 1992. p. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Mohseni M, Aryankhesal A. A National Document for child nutrition in Iran: a vital need. Ann Nutr Metab. 2018;73(3):250–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    WHO, editor. Quality and accreditation in health care services: A Global Review. Geneva: WHO, editor; 2003. p. 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Aghazadeh S-M. Implementation of total quality management in the managed care industry. TQM Mag. 2002;14(2):79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Mohseni M, Aryankhesal A, Kalantari N. Developing a pattern for prevention of malnutrition among under five-years old children in Iran. dissertation. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Stewart CP, Iannotti L, Dewey KG, Michaelsen KF, Onyango AW. Contextualising complementary feeding in a broader framework for stunting prevention. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9(S2):27–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Flax VL. ‘It was caused by the carelessness of the parents’: cultural models of child malnutrition in southern Malawi. Mater Child Nutr. 2015;11(1):104–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was part of a PhD thesis supported by Iran University of Medical Sciences (grant No: IUMS/SHMIS_1394/9221557201). The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of all the participants who contributed in this research.

Consent to publication

Not Applicable.

Funding

This study was part of a PhD thesis supported by Iran University of Medical Sciences (grant No: IUMS/SHMIS_1394/9221557201). The funder did not have role in any process of the study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MM and AA contributed to the concept, design, analysis and interpretation of the data. MM contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aidin Aryankhesal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS. REC1394.9221557201). Written informed consent was obtained from all of participants, all adult, for interviews. The interviews were confidential.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohseni, M., Aryankhesal, A. Developing a model for prevention of malnutrition among children under 5 years old. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 718 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05567-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Prevention
  • Pattern
  • Malnutrition
  • Under 5 years old children
\