Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Health insurance for patients with HIV/AIDS in Vietnam: coverage and barriers

  • Quyen Le Thi Nguyen1Email author,
  • Tuong Van Phan2,
  • Bach Xuan Tran3, 4,
  • Long Hoang Nguyen6,
  • Chau Ngo4,
  • Huong Thi Thu Phan5 and
  • Carl A. Latkin4
Contributed equally
BMC Health Services ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:519

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2464-0

Received: 28 March 2017

Accepted: 23 July 2017

Published: 3 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Health insurance (HI) plays an important role in ensuring the financial equity by the risk pooling mechanism and reducing the economic burden of healthcare for HIV/AIDS patients. However, there is a lack of evidence to clearly understand HI coverage in regard to people living with HIV (PLWH). We conducted this study to explore the coverage and barriers of HI among PLWH in Vietnam.

Methods

A cross- sectional study was conducted in multi-sites including 3 hospitals and 5 outpatient clinics in Hanoi and Nam Dinh in 2013. A convenience sampling approach was used to recruit the participants. A structured questionnaire was used to examine current status of using HI, lacking information about HI, feeling difficulties in accessing, using and paying HI. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to examine factors associated with HI use and barriers.

Results

Among 1133 HIV/AIDS patients, the coverage of HI was 46.0%. About 36.4% lacked information about HI, 21.0% felt difficulty in accessing HI. Meanwhile, the proportions of patients feeling difficulty in using HI and paying HI were 19.9 and 18.6%, respectively. Multivariate regression found that lacking information about HI and feeling difficulty in accessing HI were main barriers of having HI among PLWH.

Conclusion

This study found a high proportion of PLWH was not covered by HI. Lacking information about HI and feeling difficulty in accessing HI were primary barriers that should be resolved via timely educational campaigns and consultations as well as supports from families in order to expand effectively the HI coverage.

Keywords

Health insurance HIV/AIDS Coverage and barriers Health finance Policy

Background

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a chronic disease with multiple opportunity infections requiring lifetime treatment [15], which may increase risks of catastrophic health expenditures for households in the global context, especially in low and middle income countries as Vietnam [610]. A prior study reported that in Vietnam, nearly one-third of HIV-affected households experienced high health expenses despite the provision of free-of-charge antiretroviral therapy (ART) [11]. Additionally, as Vietnam is transitioning from a low-income to a lower middle-income country, international funds for HIV/AIDS programs are dramatically declining. This may lead to an issue that 94.1% of 67,057 HIV/AIDS patients receiving free ART under the funding will perhaps no longer be provided with free ART service [12]. Health insurance (HI) is considered a core solution for keeping HIV programs stable as well as having ART service remain accessible among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH).

HI plays an important role in reducing the economic burden of healthcare for patients and ensuring the financial equity by the risk pooling mechanism [13]. This mechanism refers to a financial protection against high health care cost through spreading risks amongst members of a pool [14]. Social HI (SHI) scheme covers most of HIV/AIDS services and treatments in high-income and even in middle-income countries with a higher rate of PLWH – such as Brazil, Mexico and Thailand [15]. In Taiwan, the highly active ART service has been free-of-charge for PLWH through the National HI program since 1997 [16]. In Thailand, SHI scheme has covered services and treatments for HIV-infected patients and voluntary counseling treatment for HIV high risk group to achieve equity in healthcare [17].

SHI was initially launched in Vietnam since 1992, and has been demonstrated to effectively reduce both direct and indirect medical cost of healthcare for household [18]. Given its enormous benefits, the Vietnam National Assembly has promulgated the Law on HI in 2008, and its amendments 2014, that mandated the enrollment of all citizens in SHI [19]. These laws introduce two co-existing national insurance schemes: a compulsory scheme and a voluntary scheme. The former includes employees of all type of firms (since 2009) and students (since 2010), while the latter includes farmers, self-employed, the elderly and children-over-six and others. SHI covers 100% health care cost for vulnerable populations such as the poor, the ethnic minorities and children under 6 years old; 95% for those who are close to the poverty line and retired people; and 80% for the others. HI Premium is estimated as 4.5% of base salary and equal to 653,400 VND (Vietnamese dollar, equivalent to 30 USD). People who close to poverty line and retired people have to pay 30% of HI Premium (190,000 VND or 9 USD) to get an HI card [20]. Additionally, people belonged to the poor and ethnic minorities, and children under 6 years old are subsidized by the state budget for free access to HI card. Noticeably, since 2013, with the aim of expanding HI coverage, voluntary HI is replaced by voluntary household-based HI that requires all family members having HI [21].

The Vietnamese government has set a goal of moving toward universal HI with the population coverage of 80% and reducing out-of-pocket health expenditure to under 40% by 2020 [22]. For PLWH, the Vietnamese government has commanded expanding HI to reach 100% insured PLWH. In order to encourage the enrollment of PLWH into SHI, HIV examination and treatment services such as ARVs and opportunistic infections drug, HIV and CD4 cell count test have been covered in Vietnamese HI scheme. Furthermore, many activities for consolidating and scaling up HI for PLHIV have being implemented in Vietnam. However, according to statistical reports of the Vietnam Authority of HIV/AIDS Control, the rates of insured PLWH varied from 30 to 50% across locations. Some barriers of accessing to HI among PLWH have been raised, namely: HI premium affordability and difficulties in participating HI scheme due to the lack of legal administrative procedures such as identity card and family record [23].

Working toward developing policy to expand HI in Vietnam requires systematic research for specific populations, particularly vulnerable groups such as PLWH. However, there has been scarcity of evidence about the coverage of HI among PLWH in Vietnam, the barriers to HI and the ways to resolve these problems. Therefore, we conducted this study to explore the coverage and barriers of HI among PLWH, and identify their associated factors in order to suggest contextualized solutions to promote the coverage of HI in Vietnam.

Methods

Study setting and participants

This study was conducted in eight outpatient clinics in Hanoi and Nam Dinh- two HIV/AIDS epicenters in Northern Vietnam with 18,108 and 21,500 PLWH, respectively.

The enrolled clinics comprised several levels of the health system including one national hospital (Bach Mai Hospital), one provincial hospitals (Nam Dinh provincial hospital), one provincial center (Nam Dinh provincial AIDS Center) and five district health centers (Hoang Mai, Long Bien, Dong Anh, Ha Dong, and Xuan Truong).

HIV patients who met following the inclusion criteria were invited to enroll into the study: 1) at least 18 years of age; 2) registered at selected outpatient clinics; and 3) able to complete the 30–40 min interview. For patients with HIV/AIDS who agreed to participate, informed consents were obtained and face-to-face interviews were conducted until our sample size was at least 200 patients per clinic at the national level and 100 patients per other sites. A total of 1133 adult patients receiving ART or pre-ART participated in this study. The participation rates were approximately 85–90% in all clinics.

Measures and instruments

We utilized a structured questionnaire and recruited well-trained survey administrators to interview patients. The interviews were taken place in a designated counseling room and were conducted in Vietnamese language by Vietnamese interviewers. In this questionnaire, only an instrument entitled EUROQOL - 5 dimensions with five response levels (EQ-5D-5 L) was an international tool that was required a translation. We followed steps in a guideline of World Health Organization to translate from English to Vietnamese, which included forward translation, expert panel and back-translation [24].

The questionnaire included three main parts: socioeconomic characteristics (age, sex, education, marital status, religion, and employment status), health status and health services utilization, and current status of using HI and difficulties in accessing and using HI. These factors were selected based on reviewing prior literatures. The conceptual framework was displayed in Fig. 1. We first piloted the questionnaire with 20 PLWH to identify any text, content and logical issues. After piloting, because only minor text errors had been found that did not influence the responses, we decided to include people participating in pilot study into the whole study sample.
Fig. 1

Conceptual framework about determinants of health insurance’s coverage and it-related barriers

We examined health status of respondents by using EQ-5D-5 L including “no problem” “slightly”, “moderately”, “severely”, “extremely” [25]. Five dimensions included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The Vietnamese version has been translated and validated in previous literatures [2632].

Health services utilization was assessed by asking respondents if they received outpatient (excluding any HIV outpatient clinic visits for ARV medications) and inpatient care in the last 12 months. This approach has been applied in prior studies [27, 3337]. Additionally, participants also were asked to report the location of the facilities where they received health services as well as the affordability of these services.

Respondents were then asked a question to assess their current HI status: “Do you have social HI?” After that, barriers to access and use HI were examined based on 4 dimensions: information, access to HI selling point, HI cost and paying health care services by HI. The questions used to measure this information were: “Do you lack information about HI?” “Did you feel any difficulties in accessing to HI selling points?” “Did you feel any difficulties in paying treatment cost by HI?” and “Did you feel any financial difficulties in paying HI cost?” Additionally, respondents were also asked a question about the expected time to pay HI.

Data analysis

All data were entered into Microsoft Access and analyzed using Stata 12.0 software. We divided the participants into two groups (rural and urban), and examined the differences in characteristics between these group by using T-test and Chi-square test. To define catastrophic expenditures, we used a threshold of at least 40% total households’ monthly non-substances expenditure [38].

Finally, we used multivariable logistic models to explore the influence of socio-economic characteristic, health status and health services utilization on the HI status as well as barriers to access health. We used a stepwise backward selection strategy to develop a reduced model from the original full model. Log-likelihood ratio test at a p-value of 0.2 was applied to remove non-significant factors [17]. A p-value <0.05 was set as level of statistical significance.

Results

Of the 1133 participants with an average age of 35.5 years old (SD = 6.9), 58.7% were male. The majority of patients lived with spouse/partner (61.2%), had cult of ancestors (88.4%). There were 42.7% of respondents completing high school or above. One-fifth of the sample were unemployed. The majority of respondents (96.0%) were currently on ART treatment (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of respondents

 

Rural

Urban

Total

P-value

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Sex

 Male

145

56.2

520

59.4

665

58.7

0.36

 Female

113

43.8

355

40.6

468

41.3

Education

  < Elementary

53

20.5

179

20.5

232

20.5

0.03

 Secondary

109

42.3

309

35.3

418

36.9

 High

80

31

282

32.2

362

32

  > Vocational

16

6.2

105

12

121

10.7

Marital status

 Single

26

10.1

143

16.3

169

14.9

0.01

 Live with spouse/partner

178

69

515

58.9

693

61.2

 Divorced/widow

54

20.9

217

24.8

271

23.9

Religion

 Cult of ancestors

222

86.1

779

89.03

1001

88.4

0.03

 Buddhism and Protestant

12

4.6

52

5.94

64

5.6

 Catholic

24

9.3

44

5.03

68

6.0

Employment

 Unemployed

47

18.2

185

21.1

232

20.5

<0.01

 Self-employed

98

38

371

42.4

469

41.4

 White collars

13

5

67

7.7

80

7.1

 Workers, Farmers

94

36.4

188

21.5

282

24.9

 Other jobs

6

2.3

64

7.3

70

6.2

ART

 Currently receiving ART

249

98.0

801

95.4

1050

96.0

0.06

 Pre-ART

5

2.0

39

4.6

44

4.0

 

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

 

Age

35.6

6.6

35.5

7

35.5

6.9

0.79

A relatively high proportion of participants experienced anxiety/depression (44.9%), pain/discomfort (37.7%). Of the sample, 16.6% reported problems in usual activities, 20.5% experienced problems in mobility and a low rate of respondents having problems with self-care (9.7%). People living in urban area had higher rates of problems in five dimensions than that among rural people. Regarding inpatient services utilization, 18.4% reported using these services, 55.5% admitted to the central health clinics and more than half of the sample could pay full charges. Inpatient service usage in city dwellers was two times higher than that of rural ones. As for outpatient services, 29.8% reported using these services, 29.0% admitted to the central hospital and more than two-third of patients were fully affordable to this health care service (Table 2).
Table 2

Behaviors, health status and health service utilization of respondents

 

Rural

Urban

Total

P-value

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

EQ5D5L

 Having problem in mobility

33

12.8

199

22.7

232

20.5

<0.01

 Having problem in self-care

12

4.7

98

11.2

110

9.7

<0.01

 Having problem in usual activities

26

10.1

162

18.5

188

16.6

<0.01

 Pain/Discomfort

85

33.0

342

39.1

427

37.7

0.07

 Anxiety/Depression

104

40.3

405

46.3

509

44.9

0.09

Inpatient service use

28

10.9

180

20.6

208

18.4

<0.01

Facility for inpatient use

 Central

10

38.5

101

58.1

111

55.5

0.10

 Province

9

34.6

49

28.2

58

29.0

 

 Others

7

26.9

24

13.8

31

15.5

 

Affordability to pay inpatient services

 Full payment

15

57.7

87

51.2

102

52.0

0.72

 Unaffordable

8

30.8

51

30.0

59

30.1

 

 Partly payment

3

11.5

32

18.8

35

17.9

 

Outpatient service use

76

29.5

262

29.9

338

29.8

0.88

Facility for outpatient use

 Central

15

20.6

82

31.4

97

29.0

0.01

 Province

17

23.3

64

24.5

81

24.3

 

 District

25

34.3

43

16.5

68

20.4

 

 Private

9

12.3

52

19.9

61

18.3

 

 Others

7

9.6

20

7.7

27

8.1

 

Affordability to pay outpatient services

 Full payment

49

84.5

172

75.1

221

77.0

0.26

 Unaffordable

4

6.9

33

14.4

37

12.9

 

 Partly payment

5

8.6

24

10.5

29

10.1

 
Table 3 presents the current coverage and barriers to access to social HI among respondents. About 46.0% of respondents had HI and this rate in the rural was higher than that among urban people. Barriers of accessing to HI included: lack of information about HI (36.4%), difficulty of access HI (21.0%), difficulty of HI use (19.9%), and difficulty to make HI payment (18.6%). The percentage of urban citizens reported having HI barriers was higher than their rural counterparts in all categories, except for the “difficult to pay HI” category. A quarter of participants preferred to pay HI in multiple installments per year.
Table 3

Current coverage and barriers to social HI among respondents

 

Rural

Urban

Total

P-value

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Having HI

136

52.7

385

44

521

46.0

0.01

Lack of Information about HI

 Yes

65

25.8

335

39.5

400

36.4

<0.01

 No

187

74.2

513

60.5

700

63.6

Feel difficulty in accessing HI

 Yes

44

17.7

186

22.0

230

21.0

0.15

 No

204

82.3

660

78.0

864

79.0

Feel difficulty in using HI

 Yes

46

18.6

170

20.3

216

19.9

<0.01

 No

177

71.4

392

46.9

569

52.5

 Unknown

25

10.1

274

32.8

299

27.6

Feel difficulty in paying HI

 Yes

47

19.2

154

18.5

201

18.6

<0.01

 No

169

69.0

467

56.1

636

59

 Unknown

29

11.8

212

25.5

241

22.4

Expected time to pay HI

 Monthly

14

5.6

89

10.5

103

9.4

0.149

 Quarterly

21

8.4

71

8.4

92

8.4

 Every 6 months

22

8.8

60

7.1

82

7.5

 Annually

160

64

502

59.3

662

60.4

 Unknown

33

13.2

125

14.8

158

14.4

Table 4 presents factors associated with owning HI. People who had insufficient information about HI (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.24–0.69) or difficulty to access HI (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.23–0.95) were less likely to have HI. Meanwhile, having university degrees or higher (OR = 15.83; 95% CI = 2.87–87.15) and living with spouses (OR = 2.71; 95% CI = 1.59–4.63) increased significantly the likelihood of having HI among patients. In addition, the likelihood of having HI among respondents suffering catastrophic expenditure were 1.79 times higher than other people (OR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.05–3.05).
Table 4

Factors associated with the use and barriers of SHI among respondents

 

Having HI

Lack of information about HI

Feel difficulty in accessing HI

Feel difficulty in using HI

Feel difficulty in paying HI

AOR

95%CI

AOR

95%CI

AOR

95%CI

AOR

95%CI

AOR

95%CI

Gender (Female vs. Male)

      

4.97**

1.15; 21.57

 

Education (vs. Illiterate)

 • High school

      

0.49**

0.24; 1.00

  

 • Vocational

  

0.10**

0.01; 0.81

     

 • ≥ University

15.83***

2.87; 87.15

   

5.62***

1.58; 19.94

 

Marital status (vs. Single)

 • Living with spouse/partner

2.71***

1.59; 4.63

0.67*

0.43; 1.04

0.53**

0.32; 0.88

   

 • Divorces

      

4.77***

1.98; 11.47

 

 • Widow

6.36*

0.77; 52.82

       

Religion (vs. No)

 • Catholic

2.81**

1.13; 6.98

       

Having problem in self-care (Yes vs. No)

        

2.26**

1.01; 5.05

Pain/Discomfort (Yes vs. No)

  

2.74***

1.73; 4.32

1.58*

0.95; 2.62

   

Catastrophic health expenditure (Yes vs. No)

1.79**

1.05; 3.05

   

1.81*

0.94; 3.48

 

Lack of information about HI (Yes vs. No)

0.41***

0.24; 0.69

       

Feel difficulty in accessing HI (Yes vs. No)

0.47**

0.23; 0.95

       

*** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1

Table 4 also indicates that having vocational training degree were negatively associated with lacking information about HI (OR = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.01–0.81), while experiencing pain/discomfort were positively related to having inadequate information (OR = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.73–4.32). Regarding feeling difficulty to access HI, people living with spouse/partners were approximately two times less than single patients in confronting difficult to access HI (OR = 0.53; 95% CI =0.32–0.88). For difficult to use HI, people who were female, having university degree or higher, living with spouse/partner and experiencing catastrophic health expenditure had higher likelihood to face difficulties in using HI. Finally, only having problems in self-care was found to be positively associated with having difficulties in paying HI (OR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.01–5.05).

Discussion

This study examined HI coverage and barriers among PLWH, which contribute to the existing evidence for planning strategies to increase the coverage of HI in Vietnam. Our results show that the rate of PLWH having HI was low while the rates of PLWH who could not afford health care services remained relatively high. In addition, this study also depicts high proportions of PLWH experiencing a lack of information about HI and facing problems with accessibility, affordability and usage of HI. Findings from multivariate analysis suggest that several potential implications to promote the coverage of HI among PLWH in Vietnam.

PLWH and their families are at high risk of financial burden due to out-of-pocket payments for health care even when ART is provided freely in Vietnam. Prior studies indicated that more than one third of households having PLWH suffered catastrophic expenditures [11, 39, 40]. In our study, nearly half and more than one fifth of respondents were unable to fully pay inpatient and outpatient services, respectively. This problem might be more substantial as in the coming years, ART will no longer be free (101 USD for the 1st line and 1049 USD for 2nd line of ARV regimen per year) due to the rapid decline of international aids [12].

Given benefits as covering HIV-related services, having HI is necessary for protecting PLWH from any financial consequences of healthcare payments. However, HI covered only approximately half of our respondents. This coverage rate was much lower than that among PLWH in other countries such as America (70.4–73.5%) [41] and Thailand (72%) [42]. The rate of insured PLWH in our study was also much lower than that in the general Vietnamese population (66.8%) (2012) [19]. This figure implies that despite strong commitments of the Vietnam Government to cover all HIV-related services in HI schemes, it is still a long road to reach universal coverage among PLWH in Vietnam [16].

Notably, one significant problem is that patients might prefer to buy HI only when they suffer sickness [21, 43]. There are several reasons behind this decision such as long waiting time, complicated administrative procedure, low service quality, and high informal payments for medical staffs [21, 44, 45]. In current study, we found that people experiencing catastrophic expenditures due to healthcare in the last 12 months were more likely to have HI at the time of interview. We assumed that the patients might be aware of the advantages of HI in preventing high out-of-pocket payments and decide to buy HI afterward. This is still a substantial problem when limiting the risk pooling role of HI; otherwise, HI could not be used as a preventive mechanism for financial burden.

Addressing issues as regards lacking information about HI could potentially encourage the enrollment of PLWH in HI schemes, which is demonstrated in previous studies [46, 47]. Multivariate analysis indicates that people having insufficient information were less likely to have HI. In our sample, more than one-third of respondents reported a lack of information about HI. Having inadequate information in our study means not only having insufficient knowledge about HI, but also perceiving limitations of HI via unofficial sources as well as negative attitudes from HI users (e.g. from friends or relatives who already used HI for health service utilization). This information might mislead PLWH about the benefits of HI, resulting in the feeling of difficulties in accessing, using and paying HI, and eventually, preventing the intention to pay and use HI of PLWH, particularly among those not yet owning a HI card. Moreover, respondents shared that they worried about their confidentiality when having HI and they were not aware of their rights in protecting their privacy. Literature documented that HIV/AIDS stigma was a barrier in using HI among PLWH because their HIV status was disclosed due to the requirement of the test form or prescription [4850]. However, it should be noted that the information of PLWH is protected by many legal regulations (e.g. Law on HIV/AIDS prevention and prevention and Law on Medical examination and treatment) [51, 52]. Therefore, informing accurate knowledge about the benefits of HI in regard to reimbursement, quality of service and rights of information protection is very necessary to motivate PLWH participating in HI.

Along with lacking information, we recognized that feeling difficulty in accessing HI was also a main challenge to expand the coverage of HI in PLWH population. Noticeably, we found that people living with spouse/partner did not face this barrier compared to single ones. As mentioned before, stigma is still an obstacle in having HI, including meeting with health staffs or people who are responsible for HI in the community [4850]. As such, spouses/partners of patients can help them to access and buy HI. This is the principle of household HI that one person can purchase HI for his/her family members, which is expected to be implemented in the future. However, due to the replacement of individual HI by household HI that required the participation of all family member, HI premium is reported as a financial burden for patients and their family [23]. In fact, about 19% patients reported feeling difficulty in paying HI. Therefore, to reduce the economic burden, it is recommended that HI premium should be paid in multiple installments per year and a quarter of the sample preferred to pay HI monthly, quarterly or bi-annually. In addition, financial support policies for the poor, people who close to poverty line and other vulnerable people among PLWH should be continued and promoted simultaneously.

In this study, patients having university degree or higher were more likely to be insured. We assumed that people with higher education might highly perceive the importance of HI and pay HI for financial protection [44, 53, 54]. Moreover, they have a higher likelihood to have stable jobs, and their HI are paid mandatorily by their employers according to the Vietnam Labor Code [55]. In addition, they were also likely to feel difficulty in using HI in health facilities, while people having lower education felt less difficulty in utilizing HI. It is due to the fact that people attaining high education had higher expectation for the healthcare services; however, when using these services, they might confront some aforementioned limitations of HI-related service and then feel difficulties and unsatisfied. This issue is well-documented in various populations [5658]. Similar reasons could be used to explain the figures that female and divorced patients were more likely to feel difficulty in using HI compared to male and single ones, respectively [57, 59, 60].

Several implications should be considered from the study. First, campaigns to enhance communication and providing information about HI for PLWH are recommended. Integration of counseling as well as delivering leaflet, guidebook and pictures about HI when patients visit HIV outpatient clinics should also be considered. In addition, information about HI should be broadened for the people having high at risk of HIV at methadone maintenance treatment clinics, HIV counselling and testing sites, as well as through peer outreach channels. Second, to effectively expand HI for PLWH, their families should be involved to support them in accessing and paying HI via household HI. In addition, policy makers (HI agencies) could allow users to pay HI premium in multiple installments per year to increase the affordability of HI premium. In health facilities, regulations about using discreet code instead of disease names and simplifying the administrative procedures should be developed to reduce the barriers in using HI among PLWH.

Our study has several strengths. First, the study recruited a relatively large number of respondents from multiple sites across levels of health system and geographical areas of Vietnam. Second, the study addressed the pressing issue of HIV/AIDS programs in Vietnam. However, our study also has several limitations. First, this study was designed as a cross-sectional study, thus we could not determine how the barriers in HI reimbursement, HI premium, HI purchasing and lack of HI information influence patients’ insurance coverage over time. Second, our study is limited in exploring the details of these barriers as well as the need and the demand of these patients that can better support for the HI policy developments, and can be included in further study of a quantitative combining with qualitative. Third, we collected self-reported information, which might lead to recall bias. Finally, we utilized convenience sampling technique, that may limit the generalization of this study to other settings.

Conclusion

To conclude, this study found a high proportion of PLWH were not covered by HI. Lacking information about HI and feeling difficulty in accessing HI were primary barriers that should be resolved via timely educational campaigns and consultations as well as supports from families in order to expand effectively the HI coverage.

Abbreviations

AIDS: 

Acquired immune deficiency syndrome

ART: 

Antiretroviral therapy

HI: 

Health insurance

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

PLWH: 

People living with HIV

SHI: 

Social health insurance

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would also like to thank all research managers, staffs and health professionals in Ha Noi and Nam Dinh Provinces for the tremendous supports in implementing the study.

Funding

The study was funded by Vietnam Authority of HIV/AIDS Control (email: vaactw@gmail.com).

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study were made available by the Vietnam Authority of HIV/AIDS Control, but there were a few restrictions on the availability of these data. The data was used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from the Vietnam Authority of HIV/AIDS Control.

Authors’ contributions

QTLN, TVP, BXT: Developed the outline and contributed to analyses, interpreted results, and wrote the first and final drafts of the manuscript. BXT, TVP, QTLN, LHN, CN, HTTP, CAL: Designed the study and collected data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the IRB of Vietnam Authority of HIV/AIDS Control at Ministry of Health. Data collection procedures were also approved by the directors of the HIV outpatient clinics. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Global Health Innovation, Duy Tan University
(2)
Institute of Health Management, Hanoi University of Public Health
(3)
Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University
(4)
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
(5)
Authority of HIV/AIDS Control, Ministry of Health
(6)
School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University

References

  1. Deeks SG, Lewin SR, Havlir DV. The end of AIDS: HIV infection as a chronic disease. Lancet. 2013;382(9903):1525–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang H, Wolock TM, Carter A, Nguyen G, Kyu HH, Gakidou E, Hay SI, Mills EJ, Trickey A, Msemburi W, et al. Estimates of global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and mortality of HIV, 1980-2015: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet HIV. 2016;3(8):e361-e387.Google Scholar
  3. Kassebaum NJ, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown J, Carter A, Casey DC, Charlson FJ, Coates MM, Coggeshall M et al: Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet, 388(10053):1603–1658. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31460-X.
  4. Collaborators GDaIIaP. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Collaborators GMaCoD. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Barennes H, Frichittavong A, Gripenberg M, Koffi P. Evidence of high out of pocket spending for HIV care leading to catastrophic expenditure for affected patients in Lao People's Democratic Republic. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136664.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Russell S. The economic burden of illness for households in developing countries: a review of studies focusing on malaria, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71(2 Suppl):147–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Duraisamy P, Ganesh AK, Homan R, Kumarasamy N, Castle C, Sripriya P, Mahendra V, Solomon S. Costs and financial burden of care and support services to PLHA and households in South India. AIDS Care. 2006;18(2):121–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Riyarto S, Hidayat B, Johns B, Probandari A, Mahendradhata Y, Utarini A, Trisnantoro L, Flessenkaemper S. The financial burden of HIV care, including antiretroviral therapy, on patients in three sites in Indonesia. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(4):272–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Moon S, Van Leemput L, Durier N, Jambert E, Dahmane A, Jie Y, Wu G, Philips M, Hu Y, Saranchuk P. Out-of-pocket costs of AIDS care in China: are free antiretroviral drugs enough? AIDS Care. 2008;20(8):984–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tran BX, Duong AT, Nguyen LT, Hwang J, Nguyen BT, Nguyen QT, Nong VM, Vu PX, Ohinmaa A. Financial burden of health care for HIV/AIDS patients in Vietnam. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(2):212–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nguyen LT, Tran BX, Tran CT, Le HT, Tran SV. The cost of antiretroviral treatment service for patients with HIV/AIDS in a central outpatient clinic in Vietnam. ClinicoEconomics Outcomes Res. 2014;6:101–8.Google Scholar
  13. Manning WG, Marquis MS. Health insurance: the tradeoff between risk pooling and moral hazard. J Health Econ. 1996;15(5):609–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrin Guy JC, World Health Organization. Dept. of Health System Financing, Expenditure and Resource Allocation: Reaching universal coverage via social health insurance: key design features in the transition period / Guy Carrin and Chris James. In., vol. FER/EIP discussion paper; 2004: 65p: 29.Google Scholar
  15. UNAIDS: Expanding long term financing options for HIV in Vietnam. UNAIDS 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Fang CT, Hsu HM, Twu SJ, Chen MY, Chang YY, Hwang JS, Wang JD, Chuang CY. Division of a, std CfDCDoHEY: decreased HIV transmission after a policy of providing free access to highly active antiretroviral therapy in Taiwan. J Infect Dis. 2004;190(5):879–85.Google Scholar
  17. Pianghatai Ingun CN. Prasit Boongerd: Thailand health information system improvement through universal health coverage implementation. J Thai Med Inform Assoc. 2015;2:137–47.Google Scholar
  18. Nguyen KT, Khuat OT, Ma S, Pham DC, Khuat GT, Ruger JP. Impact of health insurance on health care treatment and cost in Vietnam: a health capability approach to financial protection. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(8):1450–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ha BT, Frizen S, Thi Le M, Duong DT, Duc DM. Policy processes underpinning universal health insurance in Vietnam. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:24928.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Assembly VN. Amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Law on Health Insurance. Number 46/2014/QH13. National Assembly; Hanoi; 2014.Google Scholar
  21. Do N, Oh J, Lee JS. Moving toward universal coverage of health Insurance in Vietnam: barriers, facilitating factors, and lessons from Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(7):919–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Somanathan ATA, Lan DH, Hurt Kari L, F-PH L. Moving toward universal coverage of social health insurance in Vietnam: assessment andoptions. Directions in development. Washington: World Bank; 2014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. VAAC. Vietnam Authority of HIV/AIDS Control Report: Barriers to access to health insurance among people living with HIV/AIDS. In. Ministry of Health; Hanoi; 2016.Google Scholar
  24. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/].
  25. EuroQol Group. EQ-5D-5L User Guide: Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EuroQol Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 2011.Google Scholar
  26. Nguyen LH, Nguyen HTT, Nguyen HLT, Tran BX, Latkin CA. Adherence to methadone maintenance treatment and associated factors among patients in Vietnamese mountainside areas. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017;12(1):31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Tran BX, Nguyen LH, Nong VM, Nguyen CT, Phan HT, Latkin CA. Behavioral and quality-of-life outcomes in different service models for methadone maintenance treatment in Vietnam. Harm Reduction J. 2016;13:4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Nguyen LH, Tran BX, Nguyen HLT, Nguyen CT, Hoang CD, Le HQ, Van Nguyen H, Le HT, Tran TD, Latkin CA et al: Psychological Distress Among Methadone Maintenance Patients in Vietnamese Mountainous Areas. AIDS and behavior 2017. (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Tran BX, Ohinmaa A, Nguyen LT. Quality of life profile and psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in HIV/AIDS patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:132.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Tran BX, Huong LT, Hinh ND, Nguyen LH, Le BN, Nong VM, Thuc VT, Tho TD, Latkin C, Zhang MW, et al. A study on the influence of internet addiction and online interpersonal influences on health-related quality of life in young Vietnamese. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):138.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang MWB, Tran BX, Nguyen HLT, Le HT, Long NH, Le HT, Hinh ND, Tho TD, Le BN, Thuc VTM, et al. Using online respondent driven sampling for Vietnamese Youths’ alcohol use and associated risk factors. Healthc Inform Res. 2017;23(2):109–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Tran BX, Hwang J, Nguyen LH, Nguyen AT, Latkin NRK, Tran NK, Minh Thuc VT, Nguyen HLT, Phan HTT, Le HT, et al. Impact of socioeconomic inequality on access, adherence, and outcomes of antiretroviral treatment Services for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Vietnam. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168687.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Tran BX, Nguyen LH, Nguyen CT, Phan HTT, Latkin CA. Alcohol abuse increases the risk of HIV infection and diminishes health status of clients attending HIV testing services in Vietnam. Harm Reduction J. 2016;13(1):6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Nguyen QLT, Nguyen LH, Tran BX, Phan HTT, Le HT, Nguyen HD, Tran TD, Do CD, Nguyen CM, Thuc VTM, et al. Co-financing for viral load monitoring during the course of antiretroviral therapy among patients with HIV/AIDS in Vietnam: a contingent valuation survey. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172050.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Tran BX, Phan HT, Nguyen LH, Nguyen CT, Nguyen AT, Le TN, Latkin CA. Economic vulnerability of methadone maintenance patients: Implications for policies on co-payment services. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;31:131-7.Google Scholar
  36. Tran BX, Nguyen LH, Nong VM, Nguyen CT. Health status and health service utilization in remote and mountainous areas in Vietnam. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):85.Google Scholar
  37. Nguyen LH, Nguyen LHT, Boggiano VL, Hoang CD, Van Nguyen H, Le HT, Le HQ, Tran TD, Tran BX, Latkin CA, et al. Quality of life and healthcare service utilization among methadone maintenance patients in a mountainous area of northern Vietnam. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu K, Evans DB, Kawabata K, Zeramdini R, Klavus J, Murray CJ. Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet. 2003;362(9378):111–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tran BX, Nguyen LT, Nguyen NH, Hoang QV, Hwang J. Determinants of antiretroviral treatment adherence among HIV/AIDS patients: a multisite study. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:19570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tran BX, Ohinmaa A, Nguyen LT, Nguyen TA, Nguyen TH. Determinants of health-related quality of life in adults living with HIV in Vietnam. AIDS Care. 2011;23(10):1236–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yehia BR, Fleishman JA, Agwu AL, Metlay JP, Berry SA, Gebo KA, Network HIVR. Health insurance coverage for persons in HIV care, 2006-2012. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(1):102–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Financing UWBERGTWGoS. Integration of HIV Financing into Health Financing Systems in Lowand Middle-Income Countries. In: Conceptual Framework and Preliminary Findings. New York: World Bank; 2014.Google Scholar
  43. Nguyen CV. The impact of voluntary health insurance on health care utilization and out-of-pocket payments: new evidence for Vietnam. Health Econ. 2012;21(8):946–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lofgren C, Thanh NX, Chuc NTK, Emmelin A, Lindholm L. People's willingness to pay for health insurance in rural Vietnam. Cost Effectiveness Resour Allocation. 2008;6:16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Thanh NX, Curt L, Chuc NTK, Niklas R, Lars L: People's preferences for health care financing options: a choice experiement in rural Vietnam. In. Sweden: Umeå: Umeå University; 2005.Google Scholar
  46. Nguyen LH, Hoang ATD: Willingness to Pay for Social Health Insurance in Central Vietnam. Frontiers in Public Health 2017, 5(89).Google Scholar
  47. Agago TA, Woldie M, Ololo S. Willingness to join and pay for the newly proposed social health insurance among teachers in Wolaita Sodo town, South Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014;24(3):195–202.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Chesney MSA. Critical delays in testing and care: the potential role of stigma. Am Behav Sci. 1999;42:1162–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Kalichman SCSL. HIV testing attitudes, AIDS stigma, and voluntary counseling and testing in a black township in cape town, South Africa. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:442–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Bond VCE, Aggelton P. Stigma, HIV/AIDS prevention, and mother to child transmission in Zambia. Eval Program Plann. 2002;25:242–356.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Assembly N. Law No 64/2006/QH11 on HIV/AIDS prevention and control. In.; National Assembly; Hanoi; 2006.Google Scholar
  52. Assembly N. Law No 40/2009/QH12 on medical examination and treatment. In. National Assembly; Hanoi; 2009. Google Scholar
  53. Nosratnejad S, Rashidian A, Mehrara M, Sari AA, Mahdavi G, Moeini M. Willingness to pay for social health Insurance in Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;6(5):154–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Ahmed S, Hoque ME, Sarker AR, Sultana M, Islam Z, Gazi R, Khan JAM. Willingness-to-pay for community-based health insurance among informal Workers in Urban Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148211.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Assembly N. Labor Code No. 10/2012/QH13. National Assembly; Hanoi; 2012.Google Scholar
  56. Trujols J, Garijo I, Sinol N, del Pozo J, Portella MJ. Perez de los Cobos J: patient satisfaction with methadone maintenance treatment: the relevance of participation in treatment and social functioning. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;123(1–3):41–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, Thomas H. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(32):1–244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tran BX, Nguyen LH, Phan HT, Latkin CA: Patient satisfaction with methadone maintenance treatment in Vietnam: a comparison of different integrative-service delivery models. PLoS ONE 2015, 10.Google Scholar
  59. Quintana JM, González N, Bilbao A, Aizpuru F, Escobar A, Esteban C, San-Sebastián JA, de-la-Sierra E, Thompson A. Predictors of patient satisfaction with hospital health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(1):102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Nguyen Thi PL, Briançon S, Empereur F, Guillemin F. Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(4):493–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017