Chen J, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Marciniak TA, Krumholz HM: Do America's Best Hospitals perform better for acute myocardial infarction?". N Engl J Med. 1999, 340 (4): 286-92. 10.1056/NEJM199901283400407.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eysenbach G, Thomson M: The FA4CT algorithm: a new model and tool for consumers to assess and filter health information on the Internet. Medinfo. 2007, 12 (Pt 1): 142-6.
Google Scholar
Eysenbach G: From intermediation to disintermediation and apomediation: new models for consumers to access and assess the credibility of health information in the age of Web2.0. Medinfo. 2007, 12 (Pt 1): 162-6.
Google Scholar
Eysenbach G: Medicine 2.0. Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness. J Med Internet Res. 2008, 10 (3): e22-10.2196/jmir.1030.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Krumholz HM, Rathore SS, Chen J, Wang Y, Radford MJ: Evaluation of a consumer-oriented internet health care report card: the risk of quality ratings based on mortality data. JAMA. 2002, 287 (10): 1277-87. 10.1001/jama.287.10.1277.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Judith KB, Tierney EG, Shoshanna S, Cathy ED, William JW, Marcia KP: Using Public Reports of Patient Satisfaction for Hospital Quality Improvement. Health Serv Res. 2002, 41 (3 Pt 1): 663-682.
Google Scholar
Tuffs A: German hospital rankings questioned. British Medical Journal. 2007, 335: 177-10.1136/bmj.39283.598530.DB.
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wang OJ, Wang Y, Lichtman JH, Bradley EH, Normand SL, Krumholz HM: America's Best Hospitals" in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167 (13): 1345-51. 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1345.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
O'Brein SM, Peterson ED: Identifying high-quality hospitals: consult the ratings or flip a coin?". Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167: 1342-4. 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1342.
Article
Google Scholar
Picker (Picker Institute Europe): What do you think of your doctor?. accessed September 22, 2008, [http://www.pickereurope.org/]
Leapfrog Group. accessed September 22, 2008, [http://www.leapfroggroup.org/]
Patient Opinion. accessed September 22, 2008. accessed September 22, 2008, [http://www.patientopinion.org.uk/]
Barreto C: What comes after Web 2.0?. 10.1136/bmj.39062.555405.80. accessed September 22, 2008, [http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/17845/]
Giustini D: How web 2.0 is changing medicine. British Medical Journal. 2006, 333: 1283-4. 10.1136/bmj.39317.641296.AD.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lilford RJ, Brown CA, Nicholl J: Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice. British Medical Journal. 2007, 335: 648-50. 10.1258/jrsm.96.7.338.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Magee H, Davis LJ, Coulter A: Public views on healthcare performance indicators and patient choice. J R Soc Med. 2003, 96 (7): 338-380. 10.1258/jrsm.96.7.338.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
EPIE: Patient survey report – adult inpatients. 2004, Picker Institute Europe, Oxford
Google Scholar
Coulter A: The evidence speaks for itselfbut can the public?. Nursing Management. 2003, 11 (8): 12-15.
Article
Google Scholar
Likert RA: Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 1932, 140: 32-66. 10.1111/1468-0009.00105.
Google Scholar
Johnson DE: Applied multivariate methods for data analysis. 1998, Duxbury, Belmont, CA
Google Scholar
Rasch G: Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligent and Attainment Tests. 1960, Copenhagen, Denmark: Institute of Educational Research
Google Scholar
Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH: How good is the quality of health care in the United States?. Milbank Q. 1998, 76: 517-580. 10.1136/qhc.0100152...
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Cambell SM, Roland MO: Systematic review of quality if clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.". Qual Health Care. 2001, 10: 152-160. 10.1126/science.103.2684.677.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Stevens SS: On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 1946, 103: 677-680. 10.1056/NEJMsa055505.
Article
Google Scholar
Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Hiroeh U, Roland M: Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2006, 355 (4): 375-384. 10.1007/BF02295289.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stout WF: A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika. 1990, 55 (2): 293-325. 10.1007/BF02295289.
Article
Google Scholar
Lord FM, Novick MR: Statistical theories of mental test scores. 1968, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Google Scholar
Wright BD, Mead RJ, Ludlow LH: KIDMAP: Person-by-item interaction mapping. Research Memorandum. 1980, MESA Psychometric Laboratory, Department of Education, University of Chicago, Chicago, 29.
Google Scholar
Masters GN: KIDMAP – a history. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1004, 8 (2): 366-accessed September 22, 2008. accessed 2008 Jan. 25, [http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt82k.htm]
Google Scholar
Adams RJ, Khoo ST: QUEST – Version 2.1 The Interactive Test Analysis System. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1998, 11 (4): 598.
Google Scholar
Chien TW, Wang WC, Chen NS, Lin HJ: Improving Hospital Indicator Management with the Web-KIDMAP Module: THIS as an Example. Journal of Taiwan Association for Medical Informatic. 2006, 15 (4): 15-26. 10.1136/qhc.11.4.335.
Google Scholar
Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S, Richards N, Chandola T: Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002, 11 (4): 335-344. 10.1136/qhc.11.4.335.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Smith RM: A comparison of methods for determining dimensionality in Rasch Measurement. Structural Equation Modeling. 1996, 3 (1): 25-40. 10.1007/BF02293814.
Article
Google Scholar
Andrich DA: rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978, 43: 561-73. 10.1007/BF02293814.
Article
Google Scholar
Linacre JM: WINSTEPS [computer program], Chicago, IL. accessed September 22, 2008, [http://www.WINSTEPS.com]
Linacre JM: Detecting multidimensionality: which residual data-type works best?. Journal of Outcome Measurement. 1998, 2 (3): 266-283.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bond TG, Fox CM: Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2007, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2
Google Scholar
Linacre JM: Structure in Rasch residuals: Why principal components analysis?. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1998, 12 (2): 636.
Google Scholar
Wright BD, Masters GN: Rating Scale Analysis. 1982, Chicago, Ill: MESA Press
Google Scholar
Wright BD, Mok M: Understanding Rasch Measurement: Rasch Models Overview. J Appl Meas. 2000, 1: 83-106.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Linacre JM: User's guide to WINSTEPS. 2009, Chicago: Mesa Press
Google Scholar
Schumacker RE, Linacre JM: Factor analysis and Rasch analysis. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1996, 9 (4): 470.
Google Scholar
Wright BD, Linacre JM, Gustafson J-E, Martin-Lof P: Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994, 8: 370.
Google Scholar
Waugh RF, Chapman ES: An analysis of dimensionality using factor analysis (true-score theory) and Rasch measurement: What is the difference? Which method is better?. J Appl Meas. 2005, 6: 80-99.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith EV: Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002, 3 (2): 205-31. 10.1002/pon.1015.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith AB, Wright EP, Rush R, Stark DP, Velikova G, Selby PJ: Rasch analysis of the dimensional structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Psychooncology. 2006, 15 (9): 817-27. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-19.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith AB, Wright P, Selby PJ, Velikova G: A Rasch and factor analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007, 5: 19-10.1007/BF02310555.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wright BD, Stone MH: Making measures. 2004, Chicago, The Phaneron Press
Google Scholar
Holland PW, Wainer H: Differential Item Functioning. 1993, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Google Scholar
Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951, 16: 297-334. 10.1007/BF02310555.
Article
Google Scholar
Fisher WP: Reliability and separation. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1996, 9: 472.
Google Scholar
Linacre JM: Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002, 3 (1): 85-106. 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e19.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eysenbach G, Jadad AR: Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. J Med Internet Res. 2001, 3 (2): e19-10.1207/S15327752JPA8002_10.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Blais MA: Have you heard we're having a revolution? The coming of modern test theory. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2003, 80 (2): 208-210. 10.1186/1477-7525-7-39.
Article
Google Scholar
Chien TW, Wu HM, Wang WC, Castillo RV, Chou W: Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009, 7: 39-10.1186/1477-7525-7-39.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar