- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice among nurses: a self-report survey
BMC Health Services Researchvolume 12, Article number: 367 (2012)
Health authorities in several countries have decided that the health care services should be evidence-based. Recent research indicates that evidence-based practice may be more successfully implemented if the interventions overcome identified barriers.
The present study aimed to examine factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based practice among nurses in a large Norwegian university hospital.
Cross-sectional data was collected from 407 nurses during the period November 8 to December 3, 2010, using the Norwegian version of Developing Evidence-based Practice questionnaire (DEBP). The DEBP included data on various sources of information used for support in practice, on potential barriers for evidence-based practice, and on self-reported skills on managing research-based evidence. The DEBP was translated into Norwegian in accordance with standardized guidelines for translation and cultural adaptation.
Nurses largely used experienced-based knowledge collected from their own observations, colleagues and other collaborators for support in practice. Evidence from research was seldom used. The greatest barriers were lack of time and lack of skills to find and manage research evidence. The nurse’s age, the number of years of nursing practice, and the number of years since obtaining the last health professional degree influenced the use of sources of knowledge and self-reported barriers. Self-reported skills in finding, reviewing and using different sources of evidence were positively associated with the use of research evidence and inversely related to barriers in use of research evidence.
Skills in evidence-based practice seem to reduce barriers to using research evidence and to increase use of research evidence in clinical practice.
Evidence-based practice requires making professional decisions based on systematically gathered evidence drawn from research and from experience and on the patients’ desires and needs in a specific situation . Public authorities and professional organizations, international and national organizations [2–6] have promoted making evidence-based practice the standard for health services. The benefit is that evidence-based health services will be better able to meet the challenges of improving patient safety and the quality of services. The need for systematic information literacy is necessary because of an increasing amount of formal and informal health information, expectations related to new treatments and patient extended role related to clinical decisions .
Complex and often unpredictable conditions within the organization determine whether an implementation process for evidence-based nursing practice is successful [8, 9]. Flodgren et al. conducted a systematic review where the purpose was to identify which organizational infrastructures promote evidence-based practice in nursing services. Only one study met the inclusion criteria. The absence of relevant literature may be due to the fact that it is difficult to carry out intervention studies in organizations such as hospitals, because ongoing changes makes it difficult to decide which interventions have led to change.
It is unclear which individual factors must be present for practice to be evidence-based. Individual factors are influenced by the fact that the individual nurse is working in a context with others, so that colleagues, organizational and cultural factors influence the practice . Implementation must not only consider what knowledge to be implemented, but also how knowledge is facilitated in the context where it will be used . Successful implementation is the function of knowledge, context and facilitation according to the frame work “Promoting action on Research Implementation in Health Care” (PARiHS) .
Research shows that measures for implementing evidence-based practice are more likely to succeed if they overcome identified barriers . The BARRIERS to Research Utilization Scale  is the most frequently used instrument for mapping the barriers to evidence-based practice among nurses. Reviews of research show that the predominant barriers are related to organizational factors such as lack of time to find research and to implement this and lack of authority to implement the findings. The barriers are consistently independent of time, geographical location, sample size, response rate and organization . In Norway, Hommelstad & Ruland  conducted a survey study using BARRIERS to Research Utilization Scale in a sample consisting of perioperative nurses. The main identified barriers in this study was that the research literature is not compiled in one place, lack of time, uncooperative physicians, insufficient resources and lack of access to information.
The BARRIERS to Research Utilization Scale has been criticized because it solely identifies the barriers to the use of research and does not identify the degree to which nurses use other sources of information to support practice in relation to the definition of evidence-based practice . Clinical experience is a prerequisite for determining whether research findings are relevant for use in practice, whether as general measures for a specific patient group or as measures for individual patients . Since the BARRIERS to Research Utilization Scale was developed, the Internet has become an important tool for gathering information. Medical databases, journals that disseminate research and large international guideline databases are now available free of charge for health care personnel in Norway through the Norwegian Electronic Health Library . How this influences the use of various sources of knowledge needs to be examined.
Gathering evidence to be used in practice requires systematic methods and not arbitrary Internet searches. How nurses rate their own skills in finding, assessing and using evidence seems to be an important factor to consider in implementing evidence-based practice. In Norway, health authorities have decided that the health care services should be evidence-based.
The present study aimed to identify the sources of knowledge on which nurses base their practice, barriers they consider hinder evidence-based practice and the skills they identify in finding, reviewing and using research-based evidence. Further, we wanted to determine whether the self-reported skills in finding, reviewing and using research in practice were associated with a) the sources of knowledge that were reported to be used and b) the reported barriers to evidence-based practice.
We carried out a cross-sectional survey at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway. This hospital treats nearly 600,000 patients and trains about 2000 health care workers each year . The survey population comprised nurses working at 20 selected units in the somatic sector of the hospital with 1100 beds. The criterion for selecting units was that the managers had indicated interest in participating in the hospital’s project on implementing evidence-based practice. Altogether 661 nurses were invited to participate during the period November 8 to December 3, 2010. Subjects who were on sick leave, on other leave or on vacation during the data collection, were not invited.
The questionnaires were distributed to the nurses at work with an attached reply envelope. Each unit selected a contact person who took responsibility for collecting data. They were informed about the aims of the study and that the study was anonymised and that participation was voluntary. The designated contact persons further disseminated information about the study to the nurses at their respective units by e-mail as well as at information meetings. Completed questionnaires were collected at each unit. A person other than the investigator opened the envelopes and delivered the questionnaires for data processing. The study was approved by the ombudsperson of the Haukeland University Hospital as well as the head of the Department of Research and Development. A pseudo number was made to ensure that data could not directly be traced back to any respondent. The link between the pseudo number and personal identification number was stored separately on a secured server at the hospital.
The self-reported Developing Evidence-based Practice Questionnaire was developed by Gerrish et al. for mapping factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice. The questionnaire was previously shown to be a valid and reliable instrument . Gerrish has done extensive research on the implementation of strategies to promote evidence-based practice and provided permission to translate and use her questionnaire. The questionnaire was translated into Norwegian in accordance with the World Health Organization’s  procedures for translation and adaptation before data collection started. The Norwegian version included an additional question in the second section asking whether ability in English might be a barrier for using research-based evidence. The internal consistency of the Norwegian questionnaire version measured by Cronbach`s alpha was 0.88. The first author of this publication carried out the translation.
The Norwegian version of the questionnaire includes 50 pre-structured questions and 4 open-ended questions. The pre-structured questions that were answered by using a five-point Likert scale. The open-ended questions were beyond the scope of the current study. The Questionnaire is divided into 5 sections. Section 1 consists of 22 questions about the use of sources of knowledge for support in practice, rated from never (1) to always (5). The sources of knowledge are divided into five dimensions, (1) own experience covered by items 1–5, (2) social interaction covered by items 6–8, (3) internal sources of knowledge covered by items 9–14, (4) research evidence covered by items 15–19 and (5) external sources of knowledge covered by items 20–22. Sections 2–4 include 20 statements on possible barriers to evidence-based practice. Respondents rated the statements in sections 2 and 3 from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5). In contrast, section 4 has a positive value for affirmative responses, from always (1) to never (5). Section 5 includes 8 questions about skills in finding, reviewing and using research-based evidence. The responses range from complete beginner (1) to expert (5). The questionnaire ends with questions on demographic variables such as the nurse’s age, sex, current educational level and number of years of nursing practice.
We used PASW for Windows version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois) for statistical analysis. Due to multiple testing, all P values were two-sided, and values below 0.01 were considered statistically significant. To handle missing values in regression models, we used the method of list-wise deletion. Continuous variables were reported as means (SD) and categorical variables as counts (percentage).
To examine the associations of various background variables with variables on sources of knowledge, we used linear regression models. Variables on sources of knowledge were continuous (i.e., scales) and constructed by aggregating response items within each of the five dimensions: own experience, social interaction, internal source of knowledge, external source of knowledge, and research evidence. Background variables selected for the analyses were categorical and included nurse’s age, number of years of clinical practice, and number of years since obtaining last health professional degree. The P value for trend was estimated by incorporating the background variables as linear terms in the regression models. P values were reported with and without adjustment for age, number of years of nursing practice, number of years since obtaining last health professional degree, as well as current educational level.
To examine the associations of self-reported skills in finding, reviewing and using research evidence with the use of specific sources of knowledge and evidence, we used chi-square tests. Variables on the use of specific sources of knowledge and evidence were recoded into 3 categories (seldom/never, sometimes, often/always) and included two separate response items on finding research-based evidence, two separate response items on assessing research-based evidence, and two separate response items on using research-based evidence to change practice. Similar analyses were performed for the association between self-reported skills in evidence-based practice and reported barriers.
Of the 661 nurses invited to participate, 407 (62%) returned completed questionnaires. The mean age of the respondents was 37.4 (range 22–63) years. The respondents had a mean 11.3 (range 0–40) years of nursing practice. The mean number of years since obtaining last health professional degree was 7.5 (range 0–37). The population characteristics are displayed in Table 1.
The ranking of sources of information showed that the five most frequently used sources in supporting clinical practice were: 1) information learned about each patient as an individual, 2) knowledge based on personal experience, 3) information obtained from hospital policy and protocols, 4) information obtained from experienced nurses, and 5) information obtained from discussion with physicians (Table 2). Articles published in medical, nursing or other research journals were among the least frequently used sources of information for supporting clinical practice.
Unadjusted regression analyses showed that use of self-experienced knowledge significantly increased with higher age of the nurses, with increased number of years of nursing practice, and increased number of years since obtaining last health professional degree (Table 3). In contrast, the use of external sources of knowledge was inversely associated with the same background variables. Furthermore, there was a positive association of the use of research evidence with the nurse’s age and number of years of nursing practice. After adjustment of the background variables as well as current educational level, a statistically significant association was observed only between research evidence and age and between external sources of knowledge and number of years of nursing practice (Table 3).
The five greatest barriers to evidence-based practice were 1) insufficient time to find research reports, 2) insufficient time to find organizational information (such as guidelines and protocols), 3) lack of confidence in assessing the quality of research, 4) difficulty in understanding English-language publications and 5) insufficient time at work to implement changes in practice (Table 4). The least barrier was the culture in the hospital team.
The use of research was significantly associated with self-reported skills in finding and reviewing research-based evidence and implementing it in practice (Table 5; all P values <0.001).
Furthermore, self-reported skills in evidence-based practice were significantly associated with barriers for evidence-based practice (Table 6). Participants who reported that they were competent or experts were more likely to disagree or disagree strongly in the following statements: “I do not know how to find appropriate research reports” (P value < 0.001), “Research reports are not easy to find”, “I find it difficult to understand research reports”, “I do not feel confident in judging the quality of research reports” (P value < 0.001), “I do not feel confident about beginning to change my practice” (P value < 0.001) and “I lack authority in the work to change practice” (P value < 0.001).
Younger nurses and nurses with fewer years of practice generally reported greater barriers to changing practice based on the “best” evidence than respondents of average age (P < 0.001, not shown in tables). This trend was similar for the number of years since obtaining the last health professional degree (P < 0.001, not shown in tables).
Nurses who disagreed or strongly disagreed with the following statements “I do not know how to find appropriate research reports”, “I do not feel confident in assessing the quality of research reports” and “I find it difficult to identify the implications of research findings for my own practice” were younger than nurses who agreed or strongly agreed with the statements (all P < 0.001, not shown in tables). This trend was also statistically significant for the number of years of nursing practice and the number of years since obtaining the last health professional degree (P < 0.001, not shown in tables).
Figure 1 shows how the respondents rated their skills in finding and reviewing research-based evidence and using it to change practice. The respondents use the Internet more often than any other method of searching for information. Apart from using the Internet and libraries to find evidence, more than half the respondents said that they are complete beginners or novices in finding and reviewing research-based evidence and using it to change practice.
The results showed that nurses mainly used experience-based knowledge for use in practice rather than evidence gained from research journals. Insufficient time was the greatest barrier to finding and reviewing research literature. However, skills in evidence-based practice influenced the use of knowledge sources as well as how the nurses assessed barriers to evidence-based practice.
Sources of information reported for supporting practice
Articles published in medical, nursing and other research journals were the least frequently used sources of information. This result is in accordance with other studies [23–25]. A surprising result was that the use of research-based evidence as a source in practice increased with the age of the nurse and with number of years of nursing practice. This contrasts with the findings of Milner et al., who found that increasing age indicated a lower score in the use of research-based evidence. The reason why age and number of years of practice were associated with various responses could be that experienced nurses have basic knowledge-based experience that provides confidence in how to carry out routine tasks and manage unforeseen events [27, 28]. Experienced nurses often pose other types of questions that can be answered using research-based sources of evidence. These are called foreground questions, in which someone wants specific evidence as the basis for decisions. Less experienced nurses tend to seek general knowledge within a topic and pose background questions that can be answered by using textbooks, knowledge from education and training and by asking more experienced colleagues . A review shows, however, no association between age or the number of years of practice and the use of research-based evidence . Estabrooks et al. found that the nursing profession and how practice is organized may be reasons why informal sources are used so extensively. The nursing profession has traditionally been based on a theory, guided practice, in contrast to medicine, which is dominated by empirical models for evidence, especially obtained from randomized controlled trials [18, 30]. The findings in this study suggest that experienced nurses may be a resource for implementing evidence-based nursing practice. Experienced nurses can act as facilitators assisting colleagues to frame precise questions as a basis for search in the literature and critically assess relevant findings. Facilitation is crucial for successful implementation of evidence-based practice . A prerequisite for this success is also that facilitators are offered training in evidence-based practice methods .
This study and others [24, 32] show that nurses often use hospital policy and protocols as a source of information. Good evidence-based professional policy, guidelines and protocols should therefore be worked out using the best available evidence and clinical knowledge tools for ensuring that research is integrated into clinical practice . An erroneous perception has been that introduction of evidence, for example evidence-based guidelines or protocols are seen as a linear, technical process at individual level . Having guidelines based on the best available evidence and easily accessible in the organization’s document management system does not guarantee that they will be used. Effective measures for implementation are required for this, but the research conducted so far does not indicate which measures are most effective . A survey conducted among Norwegian hospitals showed that the quality of the protocols and procedures is uncertain . There is a need to ensure that the local procedures meet established quality criteria if the protocols and policy should be a tool for implementation of evidence-based practice in health care in Norway. Further, organizational and professional awareness-raising is needed concerning the effects of not using the approved hospital guidelines and procedures, even if they are not based on evidence .
Barriers to evidence-based practice
In accordance with other studies [16, 35], the greatest barrier using research-based evidence was insufficient time to find research. The culture of changing the clinical practice of the hospital team was considered the least barrier. Thompson et al. investigated the relationships between “insufficient time” and evidence-based practice. Insufficient time reflects the mental time and energy required to use research and the culture of busyness rather than the actual amount of time required. Nurses, their colleagues and the organization itself maintain a culture in which busyness is valued and rewarded. Such a culture does not favour participants who sit down and read and reflect over research results but instead largely rewards observable tasks carried out among patients.
In contrast, a culture that supports the implementation of research in practice is considered a strong motivational factor for using research-based evidence . Findings  indicate that administrative and collegial support probably has more strongly influence on the use of research than lack of time resulting from a high pace of work. Cultural resistance may be more related to indifference and lack of action than active resistance . Younger nurses and nurses with fewer years of practice considered lack of time a greater barrier than others. This may be related to personal characteristics such as experience and confidence and how tasks can be solved in a complex organization .
Nurses’ skills in finding and assessing research-based evidence and implementing it in practice
Most responding nurses rated their skills in evidence-based practice as being beginner/novice. Previous studies [15, 32, 38] have explained the limited use of research-based evidence by lack of competence in finding, assessing and understanding research. This would imply that courses in evidence-based practice would lead to greater use of research-based evidence. Nevertheless, the effect of teaching as the sole measure for increasing the use of research-based evidence is very uncertain [25, 39, 40]. Whether a person has higher skills in evidence-based practice does not mean that that this person implements the evidence in practice .
Associations between managing evidence and the sources of information used and the barriers to evidence-based practice
This study found that skills in evidence-based practice were statistically significantly associated with the sources of information used. Nurses who reported higher skills in evidence-based practice used research papers more often than nurses with lower skills. This suggests that an implementation process should include courses in evidence-based practice for nurses .
Similarly, skills were statistically significantly associated with how the barriers to the use of research-based evidence were assessed, also after being adjusted for age. Nurses with better skills reported fewer barriers to evidence-based practice. Research is not used in isolation but is influenced by factors at the individual level, collaboration between multidisciplinary groups, management and organizational structure . A recently updated systematic review found association between the use of research and individual factors such as attitudes toward evidence-based practice, completed course in evidence-based practice, education of undergraduates, working in an intensive care unit and job satisfaction .
This was a cross-sectional study which describes a nurse population in a specific time period. Although it may indicate possible associations, more studies should be conducted to confirm our findings. Furthermore, our results may not be representative for nurses in general, but biased towards nurses in units where the management implements evidence-based practice. Finally, the Developing Evidence-based Practice Questionnaire is relatively new and has to date only been used in a few studies for assessing factors influencing the development of evidence based practice. Our results could therefore not be directly compared to other studies.
Conclusion and relevance to clinical practice
This study showed that experience-based knowledge was a more frequent source of information in clinical practice than research-based evidence. Insufficient time was the main barrier to using research-based evidence, in contrast to workplace culture which was the least reported barrier. Nurse’s age, the number of years of practice and the number of years since obtaining the last health professional degree were associated with the sources of information used and the barriers to implementing evidence-based practice. The responding nurses rated their skills in managing evidence as poor. Higher skills in managing evidence were associated with the sources of evidence used.
The results from this study might be a base for systematic facilitation where the purpose is to help and support nurses to overcome reported barriers and to increase skills in evidence-based practice. A prerequisite for a successful facilitation process is that leaders support nurses to participate in working groups to achieve research utilization in nursing practice.
Nortvedt MW, Jamtvedt G, Graverholdt B, Reinar LM: Å Arbeide og Undervise Kunnskapsbasert: en Arbeidsbok for Sykepleiere. 2007, Oslo: Norwegian Nurses’ Organisation
Norwegian Directorate of Health: And It’s Going to Get Better! National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health and Social Services (2005–2015): for Leaders and Providers. 2005, Oslo: Norwegian Directorate of Health
Ministry of Education and Research: St.meld. nr. 30 (2008–2009): Klima for Forskning [Report to the Storting No. 30 (2008–2009): the climate for research]. 2009, Ministry of Education and Research, Oslo, http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/kd/dok/regpubl/stmeld/2008-2009/stmeld-nr-30-2008-2009-.html?id=556563.
Norwegian Nurses’ Organisation: Fag: om sykepleie [The profession: about nursing]. 2011, Oslo: Norwegian Nurses’ Organisation, [https://www.sykepleierforbundet.no/portal/page/portal/NSF/ArtikkelMedLenker?p_dimension_id=267893&p_menu_id=17038]
Sanders D, Haines A: Implementation research is needed to achieve international health goals. PLoS Med. 2006, 3: 719-722.
World Health Organization: Bridging the “Know–Do” Gap. Meeting on Knowledge Translation in Global Health. 2006, Geneva: World Health Organization, [http://www.who.int/kms/WHO_EIP_KMS_2006_2.pdf]
Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID: Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice. 2009, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell
Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME, Eccles MP, Wensing M: Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q. 2007, 85 (1): 93-138. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x.
Cummings GG, Estabrooks CA, Midodzi WK, Wallin L, Hayduk L: Influence of organizational characteristics and context on research utilization. Nurs Res. 2007, 56 (4 Suppl): S24-39.
Flodgren G, Rojas-Reyes MX, Cole N, Foxcroft DR: Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, 2: CD002212.
Rycroft-Malone J: Evidence-informed practice: from individual to context. J Nurs Manag. 2008, 16 (4): 404-8. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00859.x.
Gerrish K, Clayton J: Promoting evidence-based practice: an organizational approach. J Nurs Manag. 2004, 12 (2): 114-23. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00454.x.
Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A: Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008, 3: 1-10.1186/1748-5908-3-1.
Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, Robertson N: Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, CD005470-3
Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM: BARRIERS: the barriers to research utilization scale. Appl Nurs Res. 1991, 4: 39-45. 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80052-7.
Kajermo KN, Bostrom AM, Thompson DS, Hutchinson AM, Estabrooks CA, Wallin L: The BARRIERS scale – the barriers to research utilization scale: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2010, 5: 32-10.1186/1748-5908-5-32.
Hommelstad J, Ruland CM: Norwegian nurses' perceived barriers and facilitators to research use. AORN J. 2004, 79 (3): 621-34. 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)60914-9.
Gerrish K, Ashworth P, Lacey A, Bailey J, Cooke J, Kendall S, McNeilly E: Factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice: a research tool. J Adv Nurs. 2007, 57: 328-338. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04112.x.
DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Ciliska D: Evidence-based Nursing: a Guide to Clinical Nursing. 2005, St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services: Norwegian Electronic Health Library. 2011, Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, http://www.helsebiblioteket.no/English.
Helse Bergen: Om oss [about us]. 2011, Bergen: Haukeland University Hospital, http://www.helse-bergen.no/OMOSS/Sider/side.aspx.
World Health Organization: Process of Translation and Adaptation of Instruments. 2010, Geneva: World Health Organization, [http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en]
Estabrooks CA, Rutakumwa W, O’Leary KA, Profetto-McGrath J, Milner M, Levers MJ, Scott-Findlay S: Sources of practice knowledge among nurses. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15: 460-476. 10.1177/1049732304273702.
Gerrish K, Ashworth P, Lacey A, Bailey J: Developing evidence-based practice: experiences of senior and junior clinical nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2008, 62: 62-73. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04579.x.
Thompson DS, Moore KN, Estabrooks C: Increasing research use in nursing: implications for clinical educators and managers. Evid Based Nurs. 2008, 11 (2): 35-39. 10.1136/ebn.11.2.35.
Milner FM, Estabrooks CA, Humphrey C: Clinical nurse educators as agents for change: increasing research utilization. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005, 42: 899-914. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.11.006.
Nortvedt MW, Jamtvedt G: Kunnskapsbasert praksis: engasjerer og provoserer [Evidence-based practice: engages and provokes]. Sykepleien. 2009, 97 (07): 64-69.
Mokhtar IA, Majid S, Foo S, Zhang X, Theng YL, Chang YK, et al: Evidence-based practice and related information literacy skills of nurses in Singapore: an exploratory case study. Health Informatics J. 2012, 18 (1): 12-25. 10.1177/1460458211434753.
Squires JE, Estabrooks CA, Gustavsson P, Wallin L: Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update. Implement Sci. 2011, 6: 1-10.1186/1748-5908-6-1.
DiCenso A, Prevost S, Benefield L, Bingle J, Ciliska D, Driever M, Lock S, Titler M: Evidence-based nursing: rationale and resources. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004, 1: 69-75.
Rutledge DN, Skelton K: Clinical expert facilitators of evidence-based practice: a community hospital program. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2011, 27 (5): 231-235. 10.1097/NND.0b013e31822d6efd. Epub 2011/09/29
Squires JE, Moralejo D, Lefort SM: Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses. Implement Sci. 2007, 2: 17-10.1186/1748-5908-2-17.
Treweek S, Flottorp S, Fretheim A, Håvelsrud K, Kristoffersen D, Oxman A, Aasland O: Guidelines in general practice – are they read and are they used?. Tidssk nor laegeforen. 2005, 3: 300-303.
Eiring O, Stolt Pedersen M, Borgen K, Jamtvedt G: The making of clinical procedures - meaningless diversity? [Prosedyrearbeid - meningsløst mangfold?]. 2010, Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Contract No.: 577
Palfreyman S, Tod A, Doyle J: Comparing evidence-based practice of nurses and physiotherapists. Br J Nurs. 2003, 12: 246-253.
Thompson DS, O’Leary K, Jensen E, Scott-Findlay S, O’Brien-Pallas L, Estabrooks CA: The relationship between busyness and research utilization: it is about time. J Clin Nurs. 2008, 17: 539-548. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01981.x.
McCaughan D, Thompson C, Cullum N, Sheldon TA, Thompson DR: Acute care nurses’ perceptions of barriers to using research information in clinical decision-making. J Adv Nurs. 2002, 39: 46-60. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02241.x.
Cadmus E, Van Wynen EA, Chamberlain B, Steingall P, Kilgallen ME, Holly C, Gallagher-Ford L: Nurses’ skill level and access to evidence-based practice. J Nurs Adm. 2008, 38: 494-503. 10.1097/01.NNA.0000339471.42596.18.
Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O’Brien MA, Wolf F, Davis D, Odgaard-Jensen J, Oxman AD: Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, CD003030-2
Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, Seers K, Kitson A, McCormack B, Titchen A: An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. J Clin Nurs. 2004, 13: 913-924. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01007.x.
McCleary L, Brown GT: Association between nurses’ education about research and their research use. Nurse Educ Today. 2003, 23: 556-565. 10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00084-4.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/367/prepub
We thank the Western Norway Regional Health Authority for financial support for carrying out the study.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MWN, SH and AD contributed to the design of the study, the acquisition, interpretation and analysis of the data, as well as drafting and critically revising the manuscript. RMN and AD contributed to the process of analysis and interpretation of finding and critically revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.