This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evaluation of computerized health management information system for primary health care in rural India
© Krishnan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 16 March 2010
Accepted: 16 November 2010
Published: 16 November 2010
The Comprehensive Rural Health Services Project Ballabgarh, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi has a computerized Health Management Information System (HMIS) since 1988. The HMIS at Ballabgarh has undergone evolution and is currently in its third version which uses generic and open source software. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a computerized Health Management Information System in rural health system in India.
The data for evaluation were collected by in-depth interviews of the stakeholders i.e. program managers (authors) and health workers. Health Workers from AIIMS and Non-AIIMS Primary Health Centers were interviewed to compare the manual with computerized HMIS. A cost comparison between the two methods was carried out based on market costs. The resource utilization for both manual and computerized HMIS was identified based on workers' interviews.
There have been no major hardware problems in use of computerized HMIS. More than 95% of data was found to be accurate. Health workers acknowledge the usefulness of HMIS in service delivery, data storage, generation of workplans and reports. For program managers, it provides a better tool for monitoring and supervision and data management. The initial cost incurred in computerization of two Primary Health Centers was estimated to be Indian National Rupee (INR) 1674,217 (USD 35,622). Equivalent annual incremental cost of capital items was estimated as INR 198,017 (USD 4213). The annual savings is around INR 894,283 (USD 11,924).
The major advantage of computerization has been in saving of time of health workers in record keeping and report generation. The initial capital costs of computerization can be recovered within two years of implementation if the system is fully operational. Computerization has enabled implementation of a good system for service delivery, monitoring and supervision.
A health management information system (HMIS) is a process whereby health data (input) are recorded, stored, retrieved and processed for decision-making (output). Decision making broadly includes managerial aspects such as planning, organizing and control of health care facilities at the national, state and institution levels . In public health programmes HMIS would be primarily concerned with health care delivery issues like - antenatal care, immunization, and disease control programs and administrative issues like reporting, inventory management, financial management, and vehicle and personnel management issues. Therefore maintaining a good HMIS is an essential part of running a health system. This can be done manually as it is being done in most of India, or it can be maintained in a computerized system.
Though, India has a vast network of Primary Health Centers (PHC) to provide primary health care in rural areas, its functioning has been suboptimal. In order to function efficiently, health managers need to do regular monitoring of the health status of the population, medicines, vaccines, requirement and utilization patterns, equipment availability and status etc. Timely and accurate information is necessary to formulate and implement effective programmes. Such information is currently lacking in the health system in the country. Health workers generate lot of data in the village, send it to the PHC, where it is compiled in the form of monthly reports and transferred to the secondary level. Primarily the flow of data is unidirectional. In addition, a lot of data that the health workers collect is redundant or never utilized adequately. Efficient management of data is difficult in a manual system, and often involves duplication of efforts and wastage of time. A computerized management information system is one among the many ways that Information Technology (IT) can help improve the health system; IT can aid the workers in providing services, data collection, storage, analysis and dissemination of information.
There have been very few examples globally where a computerized HMIS has been operational in a population based health care delivery system for a significant duration [1–3]. In evaluation of a Health Management information system in Uganda, based on interviews with doctors and nurses, the authors concluded that introduction of HMIS resulted in health workers valuing the data generated by them better; it supported program planning and decision making as well as improved the quality of and access to health care . Many of the evaluations have also looked at the utility of HMIS as a tool to assist organizational development [5, 6].
In this paper we share our evaluation of the HMIS which has been operational in a rural health system in Ballabgarh for about two decades now. The research questions being addressed in this study were: What are the benefits of a computerized HMIS as compared to a manual system, and what are the issues which need to be considered to upscale to a higher level.
Background of the project area
The Comprehensive Rural Health Services Project (CRHSP) Ballabgarh was started in 1965 and is situated in Ballabgarh, Haryana in Northern India. It is run by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi in active collaboration with the State Government of Haryana with the objective of demonstrating a model health care delivery system and for training of medical students. The Intensive Field Practice Area of the project comprises of 28 villages catering to a population of 85,552 in the year 2008. The health care in these villages is provided according to the national pattern. There are two PHCs under the Project, namely-Dayalpur PHC and Chhainsa PHC with six subcenters each. The staff consists of medical officers, 24 health workers (each subcenter has one male and one female health worker) and four supervisors. As in all the PHCs throughout the country, all activities related to national health programmes are implemented through the health workers. The health workers (male and female) make house visits every fortnight in their respective subcenters. Besides, male workers are also responsible for registration of vital events. Apart from the routine continuous collection of demographic information, annual census is conducted in the month of December by the male workers. Information in about 10% of households is crosschecked by the supervisor and another 5% by the medical officers for completeness and accuracy. In order to overcome the problems faced by the health workers in handling data and making efficient use of data collected, a computerized data management system was introduced in the Comprehensive Rural Health Services Project Ballabgarh in February 1988 . The full computerization was completed in 1990.
Description of HMIS
Haazen et al have advocated a tri-axial framework for HMIS comprising of system dimension, system uses and system sectors/stakeholders in terms of its placement in a system hierarchy . However we use a simplified framework for describing our HMIS in terms of the technology, human resources and the output of the system.
Evolution of technology used in Ballabgarh HMIS
2002 - 2005
2006 (Generic HMIS)
A data entry operator updates the data with the assistance of the health workers once a month. Thus, currently the data entry operator spends two weeks for this purpose. On other days, he works with hospital data.
Framework of Evaluation of HMIS
Programmatic features of Ballabgarh HMIS
1. Data Storage
• Hold Family Case Records
• Data on Service provision records like immunization, Family Planning etc.
2. Improve Service Delivery
• Generate work plan
• Generate eligible lists
• Generate census list
• Work Plan
• Eligible list
• Census List
3. Program Monitoring
• Generate Worker's annual performance
• Generate List for random checks
• Generate annual service coverage statistics
• Worker Annual
• Performance score
• Random list
• Annual Report
4. Improving Reporting
• Generate Monthly reports
• Monthly report
5. Support Research Activities
• Provide a sampling frame
• Provide data for analysis
• Research Projects
The World Health Organization (WHO) has given certain guidelines under which evaluation of HMIS is to be done i.e., data generation and report compilation, data utilization, details about computer hardware and software, training and monitoring . This evaluation is also in tune with the WHO guidelines.
Methodology of data collection to compare manual and computerized HMIS
The data for evaluation were collected by in-depth interviews of the program managers (authors) and health workers. In depth interview method was chosen because, unlike focus group discussions, it gave the opportunity for one- to- one interaction, and individual opinions could be elicited. Health workers from AIIMS (using computerized HMIS) and non AIIMS centers (using manual HMIS) were interviewed to identify the benefits of computerization.
As described earlier, the male workers are involved in vital events registration, so we decided to interview only the male workers for this study. Male workers from all the 12 subcenters under AIIMS were included in the study. During the period of data collection, one worker was not available so finally only 11 male workers from AIIMS were interviewed. Besides our PHCs, there are 3 other PHCs in the same district, which are not under AIIMS. Correspondingly 11 male workers from these adjacent non-AIIMS PHCs were selected Therefore a total of 22 health workers were selected for in-depth interviews. With the exception of computerization, both these sets of workers were expected to carry out similar activities under the various national health programs, and work under similar conditions.
Interviews were also conducted with two medical officers of the PHCs and two program managers (authors). The interviews for program managers and medical officers were carried out only for the staff under AIIMS since this study was primarily planned to assess its usefulness at the user's (Health workers) end and to identify problems and areas which need strengthening at the grass root level.
Data collection was carried out in May 2009. This was a descriptive study and a semi-structured in-depth interview guide was used as study instrument. The study instrument had questions under different domains such as record keeping, data quality, supervision and feedback and overall usefulness of the computerization of HMIS (Appendix).
Analysis of Qualitative Data
The interviews were recorded in a voice recorder. A coding framework was prepared based on the interview schedule. Transcription of data was done in Hindi (local language), and later translated to English. The transcripts were read and responses were free listed; most commonly occurring codes were identified. The codes identified were grouped in specific categories based on the pre-identified themes in the evaluation framework. The analysis was done manually and no software was used for analysis. The analysis was done by two researchers (AK, KY) separately and compared. In case of a discrepancy, the issues were discussed and resolved by consensus.
Capital cost - The capital cost consists of those items which have a life of more than one year and represent an initial investment. Training cost and software development was treated as a capital cost with life of ten years. Data transfer was also considered as a one-time investment with a life of 20 years. No space or building cost was included as existing health facilities would be able to accommodate the requirement within the available space. The capital costs were converted to equivalent annual costs based on their useful life years and a discount rate of 5%.
Recurrent costs (consumables & salaries) - Recurrent costs include those items that have less than one year of life and largely consisted of human resource cost and cost of consumables like paper, cartridges, electricity etc. Two set of computers and printers were estimated to be required to house the database and facilitate easy working. The time required for training and database transfer was estimated based on our experience of doing these activities. The time spent by workers in planning their work, record keeping, report preparation at subcenter level, compilation at PHC level as well as review by medical officer were based on interview with workers of AIIMS and non-AIIMS. The costs of maintenance, stationery, electricity were based on actual as recovered from records. The cost of all equipments including computer and printer was based on market rates for 2008. The cost of time spent by all human resources was estimated based on their current salary structure under Government of India.
The difference between the two systems of data storage gave the incremental cost of shifting to the computerized system. Dividing the total cost with 85,552 (population of the project area in 2008) gave the cost per individual.
This paper presents the results of a program evaluation by the program managers and implementers themselves with the purpose of learning lessons for themselves and sharing with others. This was considered as a routine part of the job of the authors of the paper and hence no separate ethical clearance was obtained. Written consent was taken for interviews with the field workers. Most the information derived for costing was based on internal discussions of the team and no formal interviews were held.
Based on the interviews with different stakeholders and experience of the authors the results are presented as per the framework. The in-depth interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. The duration of the audio recordings was about fourteen hours and about fifty three pages of transcripts were generated.
The technical support to the HMIS was initially provided by Media Lab Asia, Department of Information Technology, Government of India, and subsequently has been taken over by the AIIMS team.
There has been no major hardware problem since computerization. While there are two computers (one for each PHCs), these are maintained at Ballabgarh, and have not been shifted to PHCs due to poor logistic support in terms of electricity supply and difficulty of accessing hardware engineers to provide service in rural areas.
Minor problems in software continue to arise requiring some programming modifications. These are regularly taken care of by the AIIMS team without need for any external assistance. A monthly meeting is held to review the working of HMIS and any problems identified are discussed and solutions identified.
The current technical staff has been trained in use of computerized HMIS at the time of its installation. A training manual has also been prepared.
There is no separate budget for the HMIS. The entire funding for this program comes from AIIMS under the budget head for the rural health program. All the staff, infrastructure, resources are inclusive of the whole program, and not especially for HMIS. This can be interpreted in a positive aspect wherein the cost of HMIS is adjusted within the existing facilities without any special budget allocation.
The fact that a computerized system has been in place for the last twenty years is in itself a testimony to its sustainability. A clear understanding of the potential benefits, strong commitment from the team at Ballabgarh and appropriate technical support are responsible for this sustained use. The fact that the system has undergone modification regularly to cater to the demand of the health system has ensured the continued relevance for the computerized HMIS.
Data are collected at the subcenter level by individual health workers. Additions or modifications are noted in the workplan as they carry out their activities. At the end of the month the workers update the HMIS in CRHSP with the assistance of a data entry operator. After every monthly update, workplan for the subsequent month is generated and handed over to the workers; therefore monthly updated information is available. Besides the workplan, a monthly report is generated and submitted to the District level. Consequently, at the end of the month, the workers get a feedback of the previous month's performance and the problems and possible solutions are discussed with the supervisors.
Since the database stores personal information on a large population where they can be identified by names, data security is a vital concern. A security audit of the system has not yet been conducted. Still, to maximize data security, several steps have been instituted. The hardware and software setup is access controlled with multiple passwords (boot time, HMIS application, and database). All data access by personnel other than data entry operators are logged in a register. Regular weekly and monthly backups are taken on optical disks which are stored in lock and key. Anti-virus software is installed on the machines and they are regularly updated using offline techniques. To minimize the risk of hacking, the HMIS computers have not been connected to internet or local area network. The PHC medical officers are responsible for the authenticity of the data entered in the HMIS. For data integrity, each time a row in the database tables gets updated; information on time and the person who has updated gets logged in the database. However it does not store the previous values. To ensure application integrity, any changes in software code of the application or the database, are reviewed with the project in-charge before being implemented. The primary key is not included in any of the outputs of the HMIS. There is a policy on data sharing with researchers (both AIIMS and non-AIIMS). If any HMIS data is to be utilized for research activities, informed consent is taken from the individuals prior to utilization of the data. Logs are maintained for all data sharing requests.
The reliability of data is often a concern many experts have voiced about field data from developing countries. Computerization ensures that vital events registration is more accurate and timely. It improves record keeping, integrity and validity of data through better supervision and a possibility of a random check. In our HMIS, there is an inbuilt system to crosscheck the completeness and accuracy of data. Every year the annual census is carried out in December, where 100% verification of data is done, and we have found that there are no major discrepancies in the data. The reliability and validity of data is also verified by external users - either investigators of research projects or postgraduates of Centre for Community Medicine e.g. in an ongoing project at CRHSP, research workers collected demographic data and it was identified that in more than 95% of the fields, the demographic information in the HMIS was accurate (Broor S. Direct and Indirect Protection by Influenza Vaccine given to children in India. Project NI-1099, All India Institute of Medical Sciences. Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences; funded by Centre for Diseases Control, Atlanta, USA, Ongoing project). Also, in 2009, an exercise to validate the database was done by checking the total births in the project area in a sample of 100 infants (This was done as a part of a thesis to find out the determinants of institutional deliveries). It was observed that in one case the gender of the child was not correct; otherwise there was no other discrepancy .
Better data storage and management
Paper based records at PHCs were prone to termite attacks and would need regular renewal. While, initially at Ballabgarh data were stored on floppy discs and then Compact Discs (CDs), better storage options are now available. Data processing is faster, and retrieval of data could be done rapidly. Workplan and generation of list of eligibles, is a productive feedback that saves workers' time and energy.
Health worker from AIIMS area
Health worker from non-AIIMS area
Improved Monitoring and Supervision
It has provided a better tool for monitoring and assessing the health worker's performance in a more objective manner. The recording and listing of activities in Workplan makes supervision easier. A six monthly review of program performance using indicators generated from HMIS makes the workers understand the need for the data collected and also to take timely action if needed. HMIS also allows a generation of workplan for supervisors and medical officers. This includes a randomly generated sample of the previous months work entered in to the system for verification e.g. details like immunization, births and deaths, contraceptive users. It creates a system for quality control. A health worker performance report can also be generated on monthly basis.
Program Manager, CRHSP area
Use for research purpose
While the primary purpose of HMIS, was and should be, related to improving health care service delivery, its potential for research is also immense. Another offshoot of the computerized HMIS was that it could be used in research activities, since accurate data were available for the entire population and over a long period of time. Some of our research publications from the HMIS illustrate this potential [13–17]. Only in the recent years, the research potential has been realized. The database is currently being modified to address possible research issues. Availability of a large community based cohort with computerized HMIS makes this centre attractive for vaccine trials. We have also used HMIS for the training of postgraduates.
Program Manager, CRHSP area
Outcomes (improved system performance)
User Perspectives of advantages and disadvantages
Comparison of health workers' interviews on the manual versus computerized HMIS
Record keeping: (Number of registers, time taken and problem)
• Registers: 7 - 15
• Average time: around 2 hrs (0.5 - 3 hrs.)
• No major problem identified
• Registers: 7 - 10
• 1 hour (0.5-1.5 hrs)
• No major problems
Estimation of target population e.g. the eligible children for vaccination, or number of antenatal cases
• Procedure for estimation not known as targets are provided from District level.
• Estimation is done from information available in HMIS
Calculation of estimation of
Immunization coverage and backlogs
• Based on monthly report and immunization register.
• Backlogs are identified with the help of ASHA1, AWW2
• Based on monthly report, and immunization register
• Backlog by Work plan (eligible list) and HMIS.
Reported completeness of Birth/Death Registration
• About 95% (90 - 100%) verified during field visits.
• All (100%) verified during field visits and during census.
Updating of records after Annual Census
• First, overwrite in the old register. After that they update in new register.
• Takes about 2 months (1 - 3 month)
• Make changes in the paper print out of families and update the computerized database.
• Takes about 3 days (2-4 days) for each subcentre.
Preparation of monthly report (Process and time)
• Compile data from various registers
• Takes about 3 days (2 to 5 days)
• Compile from workplan and computer generated information
• Takes about 6 hours (2 hours to 1 day)
Feedback from higher levels
(CHC/District hospital/Ballabgarh) on the monthly reports
• No feedback from Community Health Centre/District Hospital. They discuss the issues during monthly meeting.
• They get monthly feedback and discuss the issues during PHC monthly meeting.
• They also get work plan for next month from Ballabgarh
Perceived benefits of
computerization of records
• Not Applicable
• Work plan makes the work very easy. They know what to do during house visits. It reduces time spent per house.
• Senior officers can monitor the field performance of health workers objectively.
The major advantage was in the time saved by the computerized system. The workers took double the time to update their records in a manual system as compared to a computerized one (average time taken was about 2 hours in a manual system as compared to 1 hour in the computerized one). Similarly, after the annual census, it took about 3 months to update the records in the manual system, as compared to 3-4 days in the computerized system.
Improving Service delivery
A computerized HMIS has improved service delivery and has helped the workers during home visits e.g. reminders generated for ANC check up, Immunization, follow-up of family planning acceptors. The work-plan generated after each update serves as a guide for health workers' activity in the field. Work plan is also used by the health workers for data recording during their daily house visits.
Health worker from AIIMS area
Health worker from non-AIIMS area
It has aided in report generation monthly and annual reports could be generated easily and rapidly. It was also possible to address loose end queries or generating unscheduled reports besides the routine e.g. information about measles immunization in any village in case of a measles outbreak etc.
Program coverage indicators
Health service delivery indicators for major national programs since 1990 in CRHSP Ballabgarh & comparison with indicators of Faridabad District
Faridabad District (2002-04)*
Coverage of antenatal with tetanus toxoid
Deliveries by Skilled Birth Attendants
Couple Protection Rate
Cost evaluation(Table 5)
Annual Cost (INR) of functioning manual and computerized Ballabgarh HMIS
(Computerized system - manual system)
Computer cost (2)
Printer Cost (2)
Data Transfer cost
Data Entry Operator
Maintenance Cost of hardware
The initial cost incurred in computerization of two PHCs was estimated to be INR 1,674,217 (USD 35,622 @ INR 47 = 1 USD). The equivalent annual incremental cost of capital items was estimated as INR 198,017 (USD 4,213). A major saving of computerization was seen in the time saved by the workers in record keeping and report preparation. This is in keeping with the results of interviews with workers mentioned above. The amount annually saved due to computerization of the HMIS came out to be around INR 894,283 (USD 11,924). In other words, the original capital investment was recovered within two years. This is provided of course, that the time saved by health workers due to computerization is utilized effectively for program delivery. The annual cost per person was estimated to be INR 18 for the computerized system as compared to INR 28 for the manual system.
Our experience of two decades with a computerized system resulting in a high service coverage statistics indicate the feasibility and desirability of implementing such a system for strengthening the health care delivery system in rural India. We have seen that our system has achieved most of what it set out to achieve in terms of improving the service delivery. The chief concern of the program managers was always of workload of health workers and quality of data at the level of generation of the data. We have demonstrated that these concerns can be addressed and would result in a more effective and efficient system. In fact, in our centre, we are moving further ahead with contemplating the use of handheld computers by the health workers . However, currently, the computerization stops at the secondary level i.e. CRHSP Ballabgarh level, and there is no link with higher facilities as these are not computerized. Also, currently, the HMIS does not cover other important needs such as inventory management.
The need for strengthening information systems in health care and the role that information technology can play in this has been emphasized by many authors [18–23]. Lucas et al have also identified that one of the ways that IT can improve future health systems is to improve traditional health information systems . A need for strengthening information systems and focus on building local capacity, increase utilization of data for planning and decision making has also been pointed out by Adindu et al . Lack of denominators for immunization coverage assessment and target setting result in inability to assess performance of workers was also identified by Braa et al .
Most studies on Health Management Information Systems actually deal with three types of systems. The most common is electronic medical records of patients. The second one is about a software for compiling aggregate reports. The third type is a name-based system which can generate monthly reports as well. Our HMIS is an example of the third type i.e. a name based system. An experience of using an electronic HMIS for public health information in three districts of Himachal Pradesh, India in collaboration with German Agency for Technical Collaboration has also been positive . However, that was not a name based system but only reported information from the block level with linkage till state level. The front end was in Visual Basic and back end in MS Access. The computerization saved workers time in keeping multiple registers. Visual display of analysis of report improved managerial decision making. The challenges identified were maintenance of software and skeptical users at field level.
Our results mirror the experience of another experiment in India on a development of computerized HMIS to support the delivery of public health programs for MCH services using a modular approach. Moidu and Singh et al have demonstrated an improvement in delivery of MCH services (ANC and immunization) following an implementation of a computer-based information system in India [22, 23]. They also showed that in economic terms, the cost of a fully immunized child was reduced with reduction of dropouts - improved cost effectiveness. This and other national experiences described above clearly highlight that there is a need to upscale such a system to national level.
We have compared our health service indicators with corresponding indicators of Faridabad District (CRHSP Ballabgarh belongs to Faridabad District). The District Level Household and Facility Survey, conducted by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India (2007-08) reported a much lower coverage for all the indicators in the rest of the district as compared to CRHSP indicators (Table 4) . Therefore there is no doubt that a computerized HMIS definitely will help in better service delivery program planning and better monitoring.
Having a functional demographic database has other advantages as well. Very often, the government, under different programs asks health functionaries to carry out needs assessment surveys. Many of these would be obviated if we switch over to an electronic system. It is necessary that these advantages are weighed against the cost and other inputs required to put such a system in place on a scale of a country like India; we have seen that the actual cost can be easily recovered within two years if the system is functional.
Limitations of the study
One limitation of the study is that the investigators who were a part of the system being evaluated themselves planned and carried out the study. Though efforts were made to carry out interviews in a neutral unbiased manner, the possibility of interviewer bias cannot be ruled out. Secondly, the responses were recorded as narrated by the participants and their estimate of time taken for various activities was subjective. A time motion study would have been an ideal method to actually document the time spent by the health workers in both the groups. But due to logistic reasons this could not be carried out. The study did not look into issues of HMIS as a tool for organizational development. Another limitation is that the comparison with non-AIIMS HMIS was done only at the level of the health workers of non-AIIMS PHC. This provided us with information about the perceived benefits of the end users only. An interview with the medical officers of non-AIIMS PHCs would have given us more insights into the issues from the program managers' perspective.
The future challenges can be at two levels: intramural and extramural. The first one is to have sufficient intramural technical support to continue to address programmatic changes as new programs are added like that of chronic non-communicable diseases. Realization of research potential of a longitudinal population database is yet to happen. Extramurally, the challenge is to replicate this system in routine PHCs of state governments so as to enable a full evaluation of its implementation in a routine health system of the government as opposed to a health system run by an institution. We have not yet met with success on efforts to roll-out this HMIS more widely. While many people have shown interest in the HMIS, the interest has not yet been translated into action. The main concern is related to technical aspects of computerization till Community Health Centre (secondary level) or Primary Health Centre level. In 2005, the National Rural Health Mission was launched by the Government of India. This is a flagship program of the Government to strengthen the health system of the country. In this program, computerization is being taken up in a serious way, and we hope that inputs from our experience will be important for a large scale implementation. Once it is scaled up, the organizational and behavioral challenges may become more important.
In summary, maintaining a good HMIS is essential for an effective health system in any country. However we have seen that in India and other developing countries this component is weak and therefore there is often a lack of good quality data and inefficient utilization of resources. Our experience at Ballabgarh shows that computerizing the HMIS using a name based system is feasible and has several advantages. It improves effectiveness, efficiency, saves resources and is a flexible framework. The major advantage of computerization has been in saving of time of health workers in record keeping and report generation. The initial capital costs of computerization can be recovered within two years of implementation if the system is fully operational. Computerization has enabled implementation of a good system for service delivery, planning, monitoring and supervision. In future, it can also provide a platform for convergence of different services related to social sectors.
Appendix: Interview schedule used for indepth interviews
A. Interview Schedule for Health workers (using manual HMIS, non-computerized)
Introduction of interviewer
Confirmation of interviewees' identification details
Explanation of the research objectives
Explanation of confidentiality and taking informed consent
I would like to start by asking you about details regarding the record keeping/maintaining registers that you are required to do as part of your job as a health worker?
How many registers do you have to maintain?
When do you fill up the registers?
How much time do you take to fill up the registers?
How do you estimate the target population for the different services that you are required to deliver to the community in your sub-centre? For eg total number of children eligible for immunization, number of antenatal women, etc.
Do you face any difficulty in estimating the target population?
How do you calculate the coverage of different services being delivered by you as part of your job as health worker? For eg. Immunisation coverage, percentage of antenatal women given Iron tablets, etc.
How exactly do you calculate the immunization coverage rates? How do you calculate the numerator and denominator for the same?
Do you face any difficulty in calculating the immunization coverage rates? If yes, what?
How do you identify the new births and deaths occurring in the community covered by your subcentre?
In your opinion how complete are the birth and death registration?
Do you carry out a census or any other similar activity in your area to update your records? If yes, how frequently?
When is the census carried out?
How much time does it take to complete the census in your subcentre?
Do you prepare a monthly report of activities/services carried out by you as part of your work every month? If yes is the report as per the prescribed format?
How do you prepare the monthly report? From which source is the information required for monthly report collected?
How much time does it take to prepare a monthly report?
Do you receive any feedback from your supervisors/higher authorities on the work done by you during the month?
Do you get any feedback on the monthly report that you submit?
Do you think the feedback that you receive (if you receive any) is useful?
B. Interview Schedule for Health workers (using computerized HMIS)
Do you think computerization of HMIS/record keeping has made your work easier/simpler or more difficult? Please explain how?
Please give the specific features of computerized HMIS that have made your work easier or difficult?
Please explain how the identified feature has helped you or impeded your work.
Source of funding
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. The funding body, does not have any role in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
CRHSP Ballabgarh is a member of the INDEPTH Network. (The International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health in Developing Countries (INDEPTH) is a global network of members who conduct longitudinal health and demographic evaluation of populations in low- and middle-income countries) .We acknowledge the support of INDEPTH in database related activities including training of personnel.
- Chawla R, Bansal AK, Indrayan A: Informatics technology in health care in India. Natl Med J India. 1997, 10 (1): 31-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Littlejohns P, Wyatt JC, Garvican L: Evaluating computerized health information systems:hard lessons to be learnt. BMJ. 2003, 326 (7394): 860-863. 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.860.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tuli K, Kapoor SK, Nath LM: Primary Health Care software - a Data Based Management System. Ind J Com Medicine. 1990, 15 (3): 153-154.Google Scholar
- Fenenga C, de Jager A: Health Management Information Systems as a tool for organisational development. 2007, Cordaid-IICD Health Programme Uganda, Cited 10th August, 2010, [http://www.iicd.org/files/HMIS_ThematicReport_FINAL_2007_online.pdf]Google Scholar
- Gladwin J, Dixon RA, Wilson TD: Implementing a new health management information system in Uganda. Health Policy and Planning. 2003, 18 (2): 214-224. 10.1093/heapol/czg026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith M, Madon S, Anifalaje A, Lazzaro-Malecela M, Michael E: Integrated Health Information Systems in Tanzania: Experience and Challenges. EJISDC. 2008, 33 (1): 1-21.Google Scholar
- Haazen DS, Streveler DJ: A Framework for Assessing HMIS in Developing Countries: Latvia as a Case Study. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 6. 2004, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6: 60153b.Google Scholar
- Aqil A, Lippeveld T, Hozumi D: PRISM framework: a paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems. Health Policy Plan. 2009, 24 (3): 217-28. 10.1093/heapol/czp010.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hotchkiss DR, Aqil A, Lippeveld T, Mukooyo E: Evaluation of the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) framework: evidence from Uganda. BMC Health Services Research. 2010, 10: 188-10.1186/1472-6963-10-188.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Odhiambo-Otieno GW, Odero WWO: Evaluation criteria for the district health management information systems: lessons from the Ministry of Health, Kenya. African Health Sciences. 2005, 5 (1): 59-64.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific: Developing health management information systems: a practical guide for developing countries. 2004, WHO, 35-ISBN 92 9061 1650Google Scholar
- Palanivel C: Determinants of place of delivery in selected villages of Ballabgarh Block, Haryana (MD Thesis). 2009, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- Anand K, Kumar G, Kant S, Kapoor SK: Seasonality of births and possible factors influencing it in a rural area of Haryana, India. Indian Pediatr. 2000, 37 (3): 306-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kabir Z, Long J, Reddaiah VP: Non-specific effect of measles vaccination on overall child mortality in an area of rural India with high vaccination coverage: a population-based case-control study. Bull World Health Organ. 2003, 81 (4): 244-250.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kumar G, Anand K, Kant S, Kapoor SK: Scale for identification of "at risk" families for underfive deaths. Indian J Pediatr. 2000, 67 (6): 411-17. 10.1007/BF02859456.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anand K, Kant S, Kumar G, Kapoor SK: "Development" is not essential to reduce infant mortality rate in India: experience from the Ballabgarh project. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000, 54 (4): 247-53. 10.1136/jech.54.4.247.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Anantraman V, Mikkelsen T, Khilnani R, Pentland A, Anand K, Kapoor SK, Patro B: Open source handheld based EMR for paramedics working in rural areas. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002, 12-16.Google Scholar
- Lucas H: Information and communications technology for future health systems in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 66 (10): 2122-32. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adindu A, Babatunde S: Health manager's perception of the primary health care management information systems: a case of Bama Local Government in northern Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2006, 15 (3): 266-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Braa J: A study of the actual and potential usage of information and communication technology at district and provincial levels in Mozambique with a focus on the Health Sector. EJISDC. 2001, 5 (2): 1-29.Google Scholar
- Davey A: Rationalized and computerized Health management System (HMIS) for public health information, Himachal Pradesh. Cited 3rd February 2010, [http://cbhi-hsprod.nic.in/listdetails.asp?roid=95]
- Moidu K, Singh AK, Bostrım K, Wigertz O, Trell E, Kjessler B: MCHS: an application software for family welfare programmes. Med Inform (London). 1992, 17 (4): 279-91. 10.3109/14639239209079810.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Singh AK, Moidu K, Trell E, Wigertz O: Impact on the management and delivery of primary health care by a computer-based information system. Comput Methods Progrmas Biomed. 1992, 37 (1): 55-64. 10.1016/0169-2607(92)90029-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India 2002-04. District Level Household and Facility Survey, Faridabad District Haryana. Cited 20th August 2010, [http://www.rchiips.org/pdf/state/Haryana.pdf]
- The International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health in Developing Countries (INDEPTH). cited 24th August 2010, [http://www.indepth-network.org]
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/310/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.