Skip to main content

Job satisfaction and intent to stay in neonatal nursing in England and Wales: a study protocol

Abstract

Background

Nursing shortages are an ongoing concern for neonatal units, with many struggling to meet recommended nurse to patient ratios. Workforce data underlines the high proportion of neonatal nurses nearing retirement and a reduced number of nurses joining the profession. In order to recommend strategies to increase recruitment and retention to neonatal nursing, we need to understand the current challenges nurses are facing within the profession. The aim of this study is to investigate current job satisfaction, burnout, and intent to stay in neonatal nursing in England and Wales.

Methods

This study has two parts: (1) a systematic review exploring job satisfaction, burnout and intent to stay in neonatal nursing, and any previous interventions undertaken to enhance nurse retention, (2) an online survey of neonatal nurses in England and Wales exploring job satisfaction, burnout and intent to stay in neonatal nursing. We will measure job satisfaction using the McCloskey Mueller Satisfaction Scale (MMSS), burnout using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) and the Nurse Retention Index (NRI) will be used to measure intent to stay. All nurses working in neonatal units in England and Wales will be eligible to participate in the nursing survey.

Discussion

Retention of neonatal nurses is a significant issue affecting neonatal units across England and Wales, which can impact the delivery of safe patient care. Exploring job satisfaction and intent to stay will enable the understanding of challenges being faced and how best to support neonatal nurses. Identifying localised initiatives for the geographical areas most at risk of nurses leaving would help to improve nurse retention.

Peer Review reports

Background

A combination of low recruitment and high turnover rates of registered nurses has contributed to a global shortage of nurses [1]. Combined with the number of nurses nearing retirement, the World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates a global shortfall of around 9 million by 2030 [2]. Across the UK, there are an estimated 50,000 nursing vacancies, with 46,828 in England [3], and 1,719 in Wales [4]. At a time when healthcare demand has risen owing to an aging population, and an increase in patients with complex care needs, nursing retention is of critical importance. Evidence exploring reasons for leaving nursing is limited and complex, however factors such as retirement, work life balance, and health issues have been reported [5]. A recent national survey of nurses considering leaving revealed nurses felt undervalued, understaffed, and exhausted [6].

The provision of safe care is of importance within neonatal nursing. Critically ill infants cared for in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are among the most vulnerable patient group within a hospital, requiring specially trained nurses to care for them. There are currently around 5000 neonatal nurses working across almost 200 neonatal units in the UK [7], however due to national staff shortages, only 71% of units meet nurse to patient ratios as recommended by the British Association of Perinatal Medicine [8]. Research has explored the implications of these workforce challenges, with increased neonatal nursing workload associated with greater opportunities for missed nursing care, increased risk of infant health care associated infections, and increased patient safety concerns [9,10,11]. Nursing workload has also been associated with job satisfaction and intent to stay in the profession, with high patient to nurse ratios and missed nursing care associated with greater job dissatisfaction and increased odds of nurses intending to leave [12, 13]. Workplace stress, low morale, and an over-reliance on nurses to fill gaps in rotas as agency or bank shifts, or on the goodwill of nurses to keep services running [14] continue at a time when nurses are still recovering from the extra strain of the COVID-19 pandemic which saw many neonatal nurses re-deployed to adult intensive care units due to their critical care skill set.

Neonatal nursing workforce challenges are exacerbated by the complex and emotionally challenging environment of the neonatal unit [15]. As part of a larger team neonatal nurses are responsible for caring for extremely preterm and/or critically unwell infants, potentially having frequent conversations with parents around life and death decisions [16]. Advancing technology has resulted in the ability to provide treatment to babies born at the edge of viability from 22 weeks gestation onwards, creating ethically challenging scenarios which often result in differing attitudes towards how treatment should be provided to families [17, 18]. In a qualitative study of neonatal nurses in Sweden, concerns for patient safety when workload was heavy were expressed [19]. Nurses reported feelings of guilt and inadequacy at being unable to provide the attention and support they felt families required. This increased empathetic engagement can result in increased rates of secondary post-traumatic stress and burnout in comparison to adult critical care nurses, and increases with age and experience [20]. Moral distress has been linked to staff burnout, which in turn impacts staff turnover.

It is therefore imperative to explore current job satisfaction and intent to stay in neonatal nursing to identify the risk of increased attrition in nursing numbers, and the potential future impact upon neonatal services. Interventions to increase nurse retention have largely focussed on adult nurses or early career nurses and range from team building [21], to professional identity development programmes [22] and mentorship programmes [23], each with varying success. To our knowledge there have been few interventions to improve retention in neonatal nursing and few studies have focused on job satisfaction, burnout, and intent to stay amongst neonatal nurses, despite recommendations to improve recruitment and retention [24]. This study will therefore investigate current job satisfaction, burnout, and intent to stay in neonatal nursing. It will also explore previously trialled interventions to increase nurse retention, and obtain neonatal nurses’ opinions on these interventions. Results from the study will inform future policy for increasing retention rates amongst neonatal nurses.

Methods

Aim

The aim of this study is to explore job satisfaction, burnout, and intent to stay in neonatal nursing in England and Wales.

Design

There are two strands to this study:

  1. 1.

    A systematic review of current literature

A systematic review of the literature will be undertaken to explore job satisfaction, burnout, and intent to stay in neonatal nursing. We will also identify the impact of any initiatives to improve retention in nursing. The review will be registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), using PRISMA guidelines to assist with the development of the protocol. The search strategy for the review will be developed using defined MeSH descriptor headings and undertaken in all relevant databases, with no date or language limitations. Papers not written in English will be translated either through the hosting search database such as EBSCOHost or following upload to Google translate. All studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be reviewed by 2 reviewers independently (KC, YN) and any discrepancies discussed with a third (KG). Data from eligible studies will be extracted into a pre-designed outcome proforma (including author, year, country of study, study design, study intervention, characteristics of study intervention, participants and sample size, and outcome measures). The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the relevant criteria (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool).

  1. 2.

    Neonatal nursing survey

Validated scales will be used to explore job satisfaction, burnout and intent to stay. Job satisfaction will be measured using a the 31 item McCloskey Mueller Satisfaction Scale (MMSS) [25]. The survey contains 5 point Likert scale questions ranging from very dissatisfied (1) to very satisfied (5) measuring 8 domains for nurses job satisfaction: satisfaction with extrinsic rewards, scheduling, family/work balance, co-workers, interaction, professional opportunities, praise/recognition, and control/responsibility. Intent to stay in nursing will be measured using the Nursing Retention Index (NRI) [26]. The survey is comprised of 6 items measured using an 8-point Likert scale from 1 (definitely false) to 8 (definitely true). Permission has been sought from the author to contextualise the questions to neonatal nursing. For example, item 4 ‘I expect to keep working as a nurse’ will be changed to ‘I expect to keep working as a neonatal nurse’. Neonatal nurses may have received paediatric, adult or midwifery training; we would like to measure the responses for nurses who intend to leave the area of neonatal care rather than the nursing or midwifery profession. Burnout will be measured using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) which is a 19 item survey measured using a five point Likert scale [27]. The CBI measures three different areas of burnout: personal (six items), work-related (seven items) and client-related (six items), and has been used previously to explore burnout in the nursing population.

We will collect demographic information including gender, neonatal unit, length of time since qualification, highest qualification, number of working hours per week, and banding level. Based on the results of the systematic review, further questions will be developed to explore nurses’ attitudes towards previously trialled interventions to improve nursing retention. This will likely be comprised of 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions.

Participants

All neonatal nurses, nurse associates, nursery nurses and healthcare assistants working on neonatal units in England and Wales will be eligible to take part in the study. Student nurses, nurses working outside of England and Wales, and nurses working outside of a neonatal unit will not be included in the study. There are 5000 neonatal nurses working in the UK, however it is unclear how many of these nurses work in England and Wales. We aim to recruit over 1000 neonatal nurses to the study.

Study procedure

The systematic review will run alongside the application for ethical approval. Neonatal nurses will be recruited through their hospital; neonatal units agreeing to advertise the study will send an email to all neonatal nurses and place a poster in nursing staff break rooms with a link or QR code signposting to the study information. Recruitment will be enhanced through advertisement in email, newsletters, and the social media platform of relevant professional bodies including the Neonatal Nurses Association (NNA). We are also collaborating with the lead neonatal nurse in the National Health Service England (NHSE) and neonatal nursing research and practice champions from around the country, who will further promote the study.

The survey will be hosted by REDCap, a secure platform for managing online surveys. Written consent will be requested at the start of the online survey and required to access the survey questions. The survey will take approximately 15 minutes to complete. Any identifying information provided will be removed prior to data analysis to ensure anonymity. The study will be open to responses for 7 months between March and September 2024.

The study has received ethical approval by the Health Research Authority (HRA) and the Health and Care Research Wales ((HCRW), HRA ID: 23/HRA/4690). The study has also been registered under the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Portfolio which provides support for funded research studies conducted in hospitals in England and Wales.

Data analysis

Data from the surveys will be imported into SPSS for data analysis. Descriptive statistics will be performed per questionnaire, and mean scores will be measured per item/subscale. Internal reliability will be measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Correlations between job satisfaction and burnout with intent to stay will be assessed using Pearson’s correlation. Multivariate regression will be used to examine the relationship between subscales of job satisfaction and burnout with intent to stay to identify the greatest predictors. Open ended questions will be analysed using content or thematic analysis, depending on the amount of text involved, looking either for repeated words, phrases or themes between the text [28]. Results will be reported using the CROSS reporting guidelines [29].

Discussion

Neonatal nursing staff retention is currently a significant issue facing most neonatal units throughout England and Wales, with potential significant impacts upon the delivery of safe and effective care of babies and their families admitted for neonatal care. This study will identify the experience of neonatal nurses across England and Wales, through measures of neonatal nursing job satisfaction, burnout and intent to stay in neonatal nursing. This will enable us to identify geographical areas, or neonatal networks, at high-risk for staff losses, and the reasons behind this. Exploring the attitudes and experiences of neonatal nurses towards previously trialled initiatives to improve nursing job satisfaction, burnout and retention, will allow us to determine what initiatives could potentially improve nursing job satisfaction and retention in the future. This could lead to future research to determine the feasibility of a specific intervention to enhance neonatal nursing retention. The approach of this study could also be used as a framework for other specialist nursing areas to similarly explore workforce and retention in their own area.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

CBI:

Copenhagen Burnout Inventory

DHSC:

Department of Health and Social Care

GIRFT:

Getting it Right First Time

HCRW:

Health and Care Research Wales

HRA:

Health Research Authority

MMSS:

McCloskey Mueller Satisfaction Scale

NHSE:

National Health Service England

NIHR:

National Institute for Health Research

NNA:

Neonatal Nurses Association

NRI:

Nurse Retention Index

PROSPERO:

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews

RCN:

Royal College of Nursing

RCPCH:

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

WHO:

World Health Organisation

References

  1. Drennan VM, Ross F. Global nurse shortages: the facts, the impact and action for change. Br Med Bull. 2019;130(1):25–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organisation. Nursing and midwifery. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/nursing-and-midwifery

  3. Royal College of Nursing. NHS nurse vacancies jump by 21% in a year to record level, official data shows. 2022. https://www.rcn.org.uk/news-and-events/Press-Releases/vacancy-stats

  4. Royal College of Nursing. RCN Wales Publishes 2021 Nursing in Numbers Report. 2021. https://www.rcn.org.uk/wales/Wales-News/Press/Press-Releases/Nursing-in-Numbers#:~:text=RCN%20Wales%20Publishes%202021%20Nursing%20in%20Numbers%20Report&text=There%20are%20currently%201719%20nursing,up%20from%201%2C612%20in%202020

  5. Nuffield Trust. Peak leaving? A spotlight on nurse leaver rates in the UK. 2022. https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/peak-leaving-a-spotlight-on-nurse-leaver-rates-in-the-uk

  6. Royal College of Nursing. Employment Survey 2021. 2021. file:///C:/Users/rmjbkcc/OneDrive%20-%20University%20College%20London/Downloads/010-075%20(2).pdf

  7. Infant. Neonatal unit guide. :text=On%20this%20page%20we%20list,Unit%20%2D%20NICU%20for%20complex%20care; 2024. https://www.infantjournal.co.uk/nicu_list.html#:~.

  8. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) Summary report on 2022 data. 2024. https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/sites/default/files/202310/nnap_summary_report_on_2022_data.pdf

  9. Beltempo M, Blais R, Lacroix G, Cabot M, Piedboeuf B. Association of nursing overtime, nurse staffing, and unit occupancy with health care–associated infections in the NICU. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(10):0996–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogowski JA, Staiger D, Patrick T, Horbar J, Kenny M, Lake ET. Nurse staffing and NICU infection rates. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(5):444–50.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tubbs-Cooley H, Mara C, Carle A, Mark B, Pickler R. Association of nurse workload with missed nursing care in the neonatal. Intensive Care Unit. 2019;173(1):44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aiken LH, Sermeus W, Van den Heede K, Sloane DM, Busse R, McKee M, Bruyneel L, Rafferty AM, Griffiths P, Moreno-Casbas MT, Tishelman C. Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. BMJ. 2012;344.

  13. Smith JG, Rogowski JA, Lake ET. Missed care relates to nurse job enjoyment and intention to leave in neonatal intensive care. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2020;28(8):1940–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Helm C, Bungeroth L. Safe and effective staffing: the real picture. Royal College of Nursing London. https://www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/publications/pub-006195. 2017.

  15. Prentice T, Janvier A, Gillam L, Davis PG. Moral distress within neonatal and paediatric intensive care units: a systematic review. Archives of disease in childhood. 2016;archdischild-2015.

  16. Carletto S, Ariotti MC, Garelli G, Di Noto L, Berchialla P, Malandrone F, Guardione R, Boarino F, Campagnoli MF, Savant Levet P, Bertino E. Moral distress and burnout in neonatal intensive care unit healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(14):8526.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mactier H, Bates SE, Johnston T, Lee-Davey C, Marlow N, Mulley K, Smith LK, To M, Wilkinson D. Perinatal management of extreme preterm birth before 27 weeks of gestation: a framework for practice. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition; 2020.

  18. Gallagher K, Shaw C, Parisaei M, Marlow N, Aladangady N. Attitudes about extremely Preterm Birth among Obstetric and neonatal Health Care professionals in England: a qualitative study. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(11):e2241802.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bry A, Wigert H. Stress and social support among registered nurses in a level II NICU. J Neonatal Nurs. 2022;28(1):37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lowe PL, Jakimowicz S, Levett-Jones T. Neonatal nurses’ professional quality of life: an integrative review. Collegian. 2022;29(2):201–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DiMeglio K, Padula C, Piatek C, Korber S, Barrett A, Ducharme M, Lucas S, Piermont N, Joyal E, DeNicola V, Corry K. Group cohesion and nurse satisfaction: examination of a team-building approach. JONA: J Nurs Adm. 2005;35(3):110–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sabanciogullari S, Dogan S. Effects of the professional identity development programme on the professional identity, job satisfaction and burnout levels of nurses: a pilot study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2015;21(6):847–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moss CR. Examining job satisfaction and intent to stay for neonatal nurse practitioners: the impact of mentoring. Adv Neonatal Care. 2022;22(4):341–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Getting it right first time. Neonatology – Workforce, GIRFT Programme National Specialty Report. 2022. https://future.nhs.uk/GIRFTNational/view?objectId=130557701

  25. Mueller CW, McCloskey JC. Nurses’ job satisfaction: a proposed measure. Nurs Res. 1990;39(2):113–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cowin L. The effects of nurses’ job satisfaction on retention: an Australian perspective. JONA: J Nurs Adm. 2002;32(5):283–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress. 2005;19(3):192–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam NH, Ng SJ, Abbas KS, Huy NT, Marušić A, Paul CL, Kwok J, Karbwang J. A consensus-based checklist for reporting of survey studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179–87.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Neonatal Nurses Association (NNA) and NHS England for their ongoing support with the study.

Funding

This project was funded by the General Nursing Council for England & Wales Trust (GNCT); the funders have taken no role in the design, running of the study or interpretation of the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KC and KG conceived the idea. All authors have contributed to the design of the protocol and obtained funding. KC wrote the first draft and produced the final version. All authors have reviewed and contributed to this manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathy Chant.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has received ethical approval from the Health Research Authority (HRA) and the Health and Care Research Wales ((HCRW), HRA ID: 23/HRA/4690). All participants will provide written consent prior to participating in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chant, K., Latour, J.M., Booth, N. et al. Job satisfaction and intent to stay in neonatal nursing in England and Wales: a study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 24, 913 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11379-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11379-0

Keywords