Skip to main content
Download PDF

Implementation and early effects of medicaid policy interventions to promote racial equity in pregnancy and early childhood outcomes in Pennsylvania: protocol for a mixed methods study

BMC Health Services Research volume 24, Article number: 498 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There are large racial inequities in pregnancy and early childhood health within state Medicaid programs in the United States. To date, few Medicaid policy interventions have explicitly focused on improving health in Black populations. Pennsylvania Medicaid has adopted two policy interventions to incentivize racial health equity in managed care (equity payment program) and obstetric service delivery (equity focused obstetric bundle). Our research team will conduct a mixed-methods study to investigate the implementation and early effects of these two policy interventions on pregnancy and infant health equity.

Methods

Qualitative interviews will be conducted with Medicaid managed care administrators and obstetric and pediatric providers, and focus groups will be conducted among Medicaid beneficiaries. Quantitative data on healthcare utilization, healthcare quality, and health outcomes among pregnant and parenting people will be extracted from administrative Medicaid healthcare data. Primary outcomes are stakeholder perspectives on policy intervention implementation (qualitative) and timely prenatal care, pregnancy and birth outcomes, and well-child visits (quantitative). Template analysis methods will be applied to qualitative data. Quantitative analyses will use an interrupted time series design to examine changes over time in outcomes among Black people, relative to people of other races, before and after adoption of the Pennsylvania Medicaid equity-focused policy interventions.

Discussion

Findings from this study are expected to advance knowledge about how Medicaid programs can best implement policy interventions to promote racial equity in pregnancy and early childhood health.

Peer Review reports

Background

Rates of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in the United States far exceed those of comparable nations [1]. The burdens of racist policies have produced vastly worse outcomes for Black and Native, relative to White, populations [2]. For example, Black and Native birthing people are more than three times as likely to experience pregnancy-related mortality compared to white birthing people [3]. For every pregnancy-related death, there are thousands of birthing people who experience severe morbidity; including stark racial disparities where Black populations are more likely to experience stroke or serious cardiovascular events sending them on a trajectory of adverse health outcomes beyond pregnancy [4, 5]. We also see similar racial inequities for infant mortality and morbidity. These racial inequities are not adequately explained by individual behaviors or other socio-economic factors, but are a complex intersection of factors shaped by structural and social determinants [2, 6], policies and institutions carrying out such policies [7]. There is a long history of structural racism that has resulted in practices and policies that have had a detrimental impact on Black and Indigenous populations in the United States [8].

State Medicaid programs are the largest single payer for pregnancy and birth in the US, covering 68% of births to Black people [9]. As such, Medicaid programs have great potential to implement structural interventions to advance racial equity in healthcare and health outcomes during pregnancy and postpartum [10]. Historically, Medicaid policies have promoted equality, that is, providing equal benefits to all regardless of the distribution of need [11]. An equity-focused policy approach, however, will direct resources toward improving health and well-being among those with the greatest need [12]. Unfortunately, a vast body of research conducted among Medicaid-enrolled populations shows that healthcare systems do not provide the same quality of obstetric care to Black people and other people of color, relative to white people [13,14,15,16,17,18].

Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program is the fourth-largest in the United States, with 3.5 million people enrolled and expenditures of $35.1 billion [19, 20]. Past research in the Pennsylvania Medicaid program has demonstrated Black people were less able to access prenatal and postpartum care relative to those in other race groups [15]. Reporting from the Pennsylvania Maternal Mortality Commission shows that in more than half of the cases of pregnancy-associated deaths, the decadents were enrolled in Medicaid [21]. Similar to national figures, pregnancy-associated death was far more common among Black people vs. those of other races ( [21].

To ameliorate these racial disparities, Pennsylvania Medicaid is currently implementing two novel policies with the goal to advance racial equity in pregnancy and child health. The first, the equity incentive payment program, was initiated in 2020. The equity incentive payment program makes available approximately $26 million in Medicaid managed care organization (MCO) payments each year to plans that improve access to timely prenatal care and well-child visits among Black beneficiaries. The second is the maternity care bundled payment model, initiated in 2021, designed to provide incentives to obstetric providers across a wide range of pregnancy health outcomes and specifically incentivizes improvements among Black beneficiaries.

Although these policy approaches are unique, it is possible that other state Medicaid programs or other health insurers could learn from the policies and adapt or expand these approaches. Our research team will conduct a mixed-methods study to investigate the implementation and early effects of the two aforementioned policy changes on pregnancy and infant health equity. Our research aims are to: (1) evaluate implementation and early effects of the equity incentive payment program prenatal and early childhood healthcare outcomes and experiences among Black Medicaid beneficiaries; and (2) determine the extent to which an equity-focused maternity care bundled payment model affects racial equity in obstetric care and pregnancy health outcomes. To achieve these aims, we will draw on established partnerships between university researchers, community organizations, and policymakers to collect and analyze data. First, we will collect qualitative data with diverse stakeholders including Medicaid beneficiaries, MCO plan representatives, and pediatric and obstetric care clinicians to study implementation of these equity-focused policy changes. Second, we will use a community-partnered approach to develop a quantitative analysis plan of Medicaid administrative data for an estimated 167,000 birthing person-child dyads to estimate early effects of these policies. Our cross-disciplinary, community-engaged partnerships will enable us to triangulate how the healthcare policy structures of state Medicaid programs can be changed to promote racial equity in health.

Methods

Theoretical framework

The proposed research seeks to advance knowledge about the causes of, and structural interventions to improve, health and well-being among Black pregnant and parenting persons and their children in Medicaid. The theoretical model underlying this work is informed by foundational literature from a range of disciplines. First, it incorporates Critical Race Theory and Public Health Critical Race Praxis, which posit structural determinants, such as racism and other forms of oppression (e.g., sexism, classism, poverty), as fundamental causes of adverse social environments that interact to make certain populations more susceptible to illness and resulting in suboptimal health [22,23,24,25,26]. Second, it incorporates political science theory that dominant social definitions of populations shape group empowerment and resulting health policies and material benefits [27]. Third, it draws on new scholarship suggesting the necessity of studying social welfare policies with a critical race lens centering the beneficiaries’ lived experiences [11, 28, 29].

As depicted in Fig. 1, our research project identifies both the Medicaid policy environment as well as the beneficiary experiences of the policy environment as upstream factors that influence healthcare organization and beneficiaries’ interaction with healthcare systems. In particular, we aim to facilitate and further enhance the connection between beneficiaries’ lived experiences and policy decision-makers through our collaboration with community partners. This connection can influence the policymaking process that shapes how care is delivered both at the managed care and healthcare provider levels. Healthcare utilization and quality are conceptualized as intermediate outcomes which may influence pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Conceptual model of the evaluation of structural interventions in Medicaid to promote racial equity in pregnancy and child health

Full size image

Medicaid policy interventions

Nearly all Medicaid beneficiaries in Pennsylvania are enrolled in 1 of 8 Medicaid managed care plans, which manage the physical health care of enrollees and are subject to pay-for-performance requirements for healthcare quality measures. Currently, the Pennsylvania Medicaid program makes available 2% of total payments to MCO plans, contingent on MCO plan performance on 13 different healthcare quality metrics. An equity incentive payment program was added to this reimbursement scheme for two metrics in 2020: timely prenatal care and well-child visit utilization in the first 15 months of life (Fig. 2). Specifically, 2/13 (or 0.15%) of total payments are withheld for these two equity-focused metrics. MCO plans are assessed on overall performance and subsequently on the annual improvement on these measures among Black beneficiaries. MCO plans can be penalized (up to -0.12% of total payments) or rewarded (up to + 0.35% of total payments) for their performance on each of these two metrics.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pennsylvania Medicaid’s health equity incentive payment program will condition payments to managed care organizations based on overall performance as well as improvement among Black beneficiaries

Full size image

Second, Pennsylvania Medicaid implemented a maternity care bundled payment model in 2021 that considers outcomes among Black beneficiaries (Fig. 3). Under maternity care bundled payment models, obstetric providers are incentivized to meet a total cost threshold and quality metrics for prenatal and delivery care [30]. Specifically, providers and payers agree on a target cost for low- or average-risk perinatal care, including pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care. If total payments to providers are lower than the target cost while maintaining certain quality metrics, providers and payers share those savings. Under Pennsylvania’s new model, providers are able to achieve shared savings based on quality metric performance, as well as a health equity score reflecting performance on those metrics among Black beneficiaries.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pennsylvania Medicaid’s equity-focused maternity bundled payment model will allow for shared savings between obstetric care providers and managed care organizations, allowing for extra shared savings among providers whose Black patients experience better outcomes

Full size image

Qualitative data Collection

To understand the interventions and responses to these policies, as well as related implementation barriers and facilitators, we will conduct interviews with each at least two representatives from each MCO (n = 18). We will partner with colleagues from the Department of Human Services (DHS) to identify relevant MCO representatives. Interviews will elucidate MCOs’ perspectives, processes used by MCOs to design their interventions (e.g., review of existing evidence, input from community members or providers who serve them), anticipated effects, and sustainability of these payment policy changes. The goal is for some of the results of these interviews to inform our understanding of the implementation process which will be further explored in the interviews and focus groups with clinicians and Medicaid recipients.

In collaboration with the Community Health Advocates (CHA) program led by Healthy Start Pittsburgh, as well as other community and organizational partners across the state, we will recruit current and former Medicaid beneficiaries for focus group participation. We aim to recruit ∼ 50 community participants and will purposively oversample Black participants and will aim to recruit people of all ethnicities who identify as Black and multi-racial in order to achieve our aims of elucidating the experiences of Black parenting and pregnant people in Medicaid. Inclusion criteria are: current pregnancy or pregnant within the past 2 years; current or former enrollment in Pennsylvania Medicaid and/or Healthy Start; and ability to complete the interview in English.

Finally, we will partner with colleagues from DHS to identify pediatric and obstetric health professionals for interviews regarding the maternity bundled payment program and key outcomes related to the equity incentive payment. We will also use Medicaid administrative data to identify providers who serve Black beneficiaries and invite them to participate. We will aim to interview at least 20 obstetric and pediatric healthcare professionals to elucidate their perspectives on how structural racism in medicine affects patient outcomes, and the types of Medicaid policy changes that should be implemented.

We developed separate focus group/interview guides for community members, MCO leaders, and healthcare professionals. Each interview guide consists of open-ended questions to elucidate participants’ experiences with Medicaid; desired policy changes in Medicaid (among beneficiary participants); perceived steps that would be useful to combat anti-Black racism in healthcare and social services (especially among Black participants); and perspectives about the new Medicaid policies. Additionally, the interview guides ask demographic questions regarding gender identity, race, and ethnicity. We will first pilot-test the guide with our research partners and Healthy Start CHAs for clarity of question wording. All interviews will take place in-person in a private office space, or over the phone or videoconference, according to participants’ preferences and COVID-19 protocols. The interviewer will describe study objectives to each participant, obtain consent, and each interview will be audio-recorded and the interviewer will take notes throughout. Interview audio recordings will be transcribed verbatim, and transcripts spot-checked against the audio recordings for accuracy. The audio recording files will then be deleted to protect confidentiality of participants.

Qualitative data analysis

Study data will be analyzed and reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) Framework [31]. To analyze data, we will use template analysis, which combines features of deductive content analysis and inductive grounded theory, thereby allowing us to obtain specific information while also capturing any new or unanticipated themes [32]. Two coders will separately code the first 3 interview transcripts, meet to compare codes, discuss inconsistency in coding approaches, and then alter or add codes. This iterative process will be repeated until the coding scheme is fully developed. The coders will independently code all transcripts, and any coding discrepancies will be resolved via discussion. Once coding is complete, synthesis of content will begin by organizing codes under broader domains (meta-codes) as well as sub-codes. The primary analysis will be to convey qualitative data, including the use of illustrative quotes.

Quantitative healthcare data and analysis

Administrative healthcare data from the Pennsylvania Medicaid program, with linked birthing person-child dyads, will be used to create our quantitative analytic data. Medicaid data include a census of enrollment, hospital, outpatient/professional, pharmaceutical, and provider data for all beneficiaries in the Pennsylvania Medicaid program. Importantly, data contain self-reported race and ethnicity that is provided at the time of Medicaid enrollment (< 2% missing); as well as time-varying data on 9-digit ZIP code of residence. Data also include the amounts paid from Medicaid MCOs to healthcare providers for all medical services. Table 1 shows baseline data from Pennsylvania Medicaid-enrolled persons with a livebirth delivery in 2019, overall and stratified by race of the birthing person. We will also conduct sensitivity analyses to examine dyads that are multi-racial.

Table 1 Characteristics of Pennsylvania Medicaid beneficiaries with a livebirth delivery in 2019
Full size table

We will employ a comparative interrupted time series (ITS) analyses with a nonequivalent comparison group to estimate policy effects. Specifically, we will evaluate: (1) the extent to which the equity incentive payment program improved timely prenatal care and well-child visits among Black beneficiaries, relative to those of other races; and (2) the extent to which healthcare provider participation in the equity-focused maternity bundled payment model improved healthcare and health outcomes among Black beneficiaries, relative to those of other races.

For Aim 1, outcomes include binary measures of initiating prenatal care in the first trimester, and children receiving at least 6 well-child visits in the first six months of life. We will compare outcomes among Black beneficiaries relative to those of other racial groups, post- relative to pre- implementation of the equity incentive payment program. For Aim 2, outcomes include a composite of prenatal care quality measures (social determinants of health screening, prenatal and postpartum depression screening and follow-up, immunization, screening and treatment for substance use disorders, postpartum visit attendance), gestational age and birthweight, and severe maternal morbidity [33]. For both aims, multivariable regression models will control for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, ZIP code of residence, MCO plan enrollment, Medicaid eligibility category (expansion, pregnancy, disability, or others), and indices of obstetric and pediatric clinical comorbidities [34, 35].

Sensitivity analyses

Analyses are designed to estimate early effects of the policies and should be interpreted alongside the qualitative results regarding policy implementation and beneficiary experiences. One assumption of ITS analyses is that our comparison groups approximate a counterfactual scenario for the intervention groups [36,37,38]. Although trends in Black-White inequities in pregnancy and child outcomes have, unfortunately, persisted over time [39], the COVID-19 pandemic has differentially burdened Black and Latina/x people relative to other race and ethnic groups [40, 41]. Effects of the pandemic on pregnancy outcomes are only just beginning of what is to be explored [42]. It is therefore possible that we will not be able to disentangle policy effects from effects of COVID-19. To address this limitation, we will employ area-level rates of COVID-19 infection as control variables and for Aim 1 (equity incentive payment) we will conduct a sub-analysis investigating trends in 2021 vs. 2020. We chose to evaluate outcomes for Aim 2 (maternity care bundled payment) only in 2021, comparing the statistical intervention of race*provider. Finally, our qualitative analyses will provide context on differential impacts of COVID-19, which will inform interpretation of the quantitative results.

This study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (Study # 23090108).

Discussion

This mixed-methods research will investigate the extent to which changes in the Pennsylvania Medicaid program are associated with improvements in access to medical care and health outcomes among Black pregnant and birthing persons and their children. Our past research found that Black childbearing people in Pennsylvania Medicaid consistently experienced worse healthcare and health outcomes, compared to those of other racial and ethnic groups [43, 44]. Racism in healthcare and other systems manifests in systematically worse access to and quality of care and other services for Black childbearing people [8]. In addition to suboptimal healthcare experiences, historical policies and practices such as residential redlining and segregation have resulted in lower wealth attainment in Black communities resulting in inequities in neighborhood factors and perinatal health [45,46,47].

The policies under study involve modifying common Medicaid reimbursement arrangements– namely, pay-for-performance programs and maternity care bundled payments. The policies are modified to embed financial incentives for Medicaid health plans and healthcare providers to improve the quality of care and health outcomes for Black pregnant and parenting persons and their children. These are the first such payment policies, to our knowledge, that explicitly aim to promote racial health equity with an explicit focus on addressing inequities that affect Black and Indigenous populations in Pennsylvania.

Interest from policymakers in payment reforms to improve health equity has increased recently; however, information on the implementation and effects of such models is sparse [48, 49]. Although several state Medicaid programs have adopted maternity care bundled payment models, prior models have not considered racial inequities in pregnancy outcomes [30, 50]. In 2012, Oregon adopted regional health equity coalitions as part of the state Medicaid program’s transition to Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs). CCOs were required and given support to develop strategies that would address racial health disparities within the Medicaid population, and the regional health equity coalitions included underrepresented stakeholders to guide CCOs in the development of these interventions. While CCOs did reduce Black-white differences in primary care utilization and access to care within 3 years of policy implementation, it did not impact disparities in emergency department utilization [51]. The current research project will add to the extant evidence on how Medicaid programs can use policy to promote racial health equity.

Our study is limited in investigating the direct effects of the pandemic on racial inequities in perinatal and infant health and the intersections between the effects of the pandemic and the effects of the aforementioned Medicaid policies. However, we will have the ability to look at changes in outcomes over time. Additionally, these payment reform interventions focus largely on transforming the financing and delivery of healthcare, drawing attention to the structural and social determinants of health in the healthcare system. It is estimated that medical care contributes 10–20% to health outcomes; health and well-being are also shaped by factors such as environmental and socioeconomic conditions [52].

This study will contribute to the current body of knowledge about the recent interventions in Medicaid focused on racial equity. Specifically, findings will shed light on how the equity-focused obstetric care policies are being implemented and provide an evaluation of effects on health outcomes. These results can be used for future adaptions of the policy interventions or to inform the adoption of such equity-focused policies in different geographic regions of the United States.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current protocol study.

Abbreviations

MCO:

Managed Care Organization

CHA:

Community Health Advocate

CCO:

Coordinated Care Organization

References

  1. Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, Zhang S, Moller AB, Gemmill A, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-agency Group. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang E, Glazer KB, Howell EA, Janevic TM. Social determinants of pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity in the United States: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(4):896–915.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoyert D. Maternal mortality rates in the United States, 2020. NCHS Health E-Stats; 2022.

  4. Fingar K, Hambrick MM, Heslin KC, Moore JE. Trends and Disparities in Delivery Hospitalizations Involving Severe Maternal Morbidity, 2006–2015. Rockville, MD. 2018.

  5. Thomas SB, Quinn SC, Butler J, Fryer CS, Garza MA. Toward a fourth generation of disparities research to achieve health equity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:399–416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Crear-Perry J, Correa-de-Araujo R, Lewis Johnson T, McLemore MR, Neilson E, Wallace M. Social and Structural Determinants of Health Inequities in maternal health. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021;30(2):230–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones CP. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener’s tale. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1212–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Prather C, Fuller TR, Jeffries WLt, Marshall KJ, Howell AV, Belyue-Umole A, et al. Racism, African American Women, and their sexual and Reproductive Health: a review of historical and Contemporary Evidence and Implications for Health Equity. Health Equity. 2018;2(1):249–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Markus AR, Andres E, West KD, Garro N, Pellegrini C. Medicaid covered births, 2008 through 2010, in the context of the implementation of health reform. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23(5):e273–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Headen IE, Elovitz MA, Battarbee AN, Lo JO, Debbink MP. Racism and perinatal health inequities research: where we have been and where we should go. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022.

  11. Michener JSM, Thurston C. From the Margins to the Center: A Bottom- Up Approach to Welfare State Scholarship. Perspectives on Politics. 2020:1–16.

  12. Braveman PAE, Orleans T, Proctor D, Plough A. What is health equity? And what difference does a definition make? Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thiel de Bocanegra H, Braughton M, Bradsberry M, Howell M, Logan J, Schwarz EB. Racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum care and contraception in California’s Medicaid program. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):47. e1- e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao YA, Drake C, Krans EE, Chen Q, Jarlenski MP. Explaining racial-ethnic disparities in the receipt of medication for opioid use disorder during pregnancy. J Addict Med. 2022.

  15. Parekh N, Jarlenski M, Kelley D. Prenatal and Postpartum Care Disparities in a large Medicaid Program. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22(3):429–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gavin NI, Adams EK, Hartmann KE, Benedict MB, Chireau M. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of pregnancy-related health care among Medicaid pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2004;8(3):113–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aseltine RH Jr., Yan J, Fleischman S, Katz M, DeFrancesco M. Racial and ethnic disparities in Hospital readmissions after Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):1040–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wagner JL, White RS, Tangel V, Gupta S, Pick JS. Socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in Postpartum readmissions in patients with Preeclampsia: a multi-state analysis, 2007–2014. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019;6(4):806–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaiser Family Foundation. Total Monthly Medicaid/CHIP Enrollment and Pre-ACA Enrollment: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2022 [ https://www.kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/total-monthly-medicaid-and-chip-enrollment/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D.

  20. Kaiser Family Foundation, Total Medicaid Spending. FY 2020 2022 [ https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/total-medicaid-spending/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D.

  21. Pennsylvania Department of Health. Pregnancy-Associated Deaths in Pennsylvania, 2013–2018. Harrisburg, PA. 2020 December 2020.

  22. Geronimus AT, Hicken MT, Pearson JA, Seashols SJ, Brown KL, Cruz TD. Do US Black women experience stress-related Accelerated Biological Aging? A Novel Theory and First Population-based test of black-white differences in telomere length. Hum Nat. 2010;21(1):19–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Marmot M. Health in an unequal world. Lancet. 2006;368(9552):2081–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ekeke P, Mendez DD, Yanowitz TD, Catov JM. Racial differences in the biochemical effects of stress in pregnancy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ford CL, Airhihenbuwa CO. Critical race theory, race equity, and public health: toward antiracism praxis. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl 1):S30–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agenor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1453–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schneider AIH. Social Construction of Target populations: implications for politics and policy. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1993;87(2):334–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Michener J. Fragmented democracy: medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2018. xii, 226 pages p.

  29. Ford CL, Airhihenbuwa CO. The public health critical race methodology: praxis for antiracism research. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(8):1390–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Carroll C, Chernew M, Fendrick AM, Thompson J, Rose S. Effects of episode-based payment on health care spending and utilization: evidence from perinatal care in Arkansas. J Health Econ. 2018;61:47–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe Maternal Morbidity in the United States 2021 [ http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/severematernalmorbidity.html.

  34. Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Hernandez-Diaz S, Huybrechts KF, Fischer MA, Creanga AA, et al. Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):957–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Feudtner C, Feinstein JA, Zhong W, Hall M, Dai D. Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ashenfelter OCD. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. Rev Econ Stat. 1985;67:648–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Donald SGLK. Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Rev Econ Stat. 2007;89(2):221–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Imbens GWJ. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J Econ Lit. 2009;47(1):5–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Goldfarb SS, Houser K, Wells BA, Brown Speights JS, Beitsch L, Rust G. Pockets of progress amidst persistent racial disparities in low birthweight rates. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0201658.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Prasannan L, Rochelson B, Shan W, Nicholson K, Solmonovich R, Kulkarni A et al. Social Determinants of Health and Coronavirus Disease 2019 in pregnancy: condensation: social determinants of health, including neighborhood characteristics such as household income and educational attainment, are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity of COVID-19 in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021:100349.

  41. Flores LE, Frontera WR, Andrasik MP, Del Rio C, Mondriguez-Gonzalez A, Price SA, et al. Assessment of the Inclusion of Racial/Ethnic Minority, female, and older individuals in Vaccine clinical trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2037640.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Janevic T, Glazer KB, Vieira L, Weber E, Stone J, Stern T, et al. Racial/Ethnic disparities in very Preterm Birth and Preterm Birth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e211816.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Krans EE, Kim JY, James AE 3rd, Kelley D, Jarlenski MP. Medication-assisted treatment use among pregnant women with opioid Use Disorder. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(5):943–51.

  44. Parekh NJM, Kelley D. Disparities in access to care and emergency department utilization in a large Medicaid program. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2018;11(4):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Assibey-Mensah V, Fabio A, Mendez DD, Lee PC, Roberts JM, Catov JM. Neighbourhood assets and early pregnancy cardiometabolic risk factors. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33(1):79–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mendez DD, Hogan VK, Culhane JF. Institutional racism, neighborhood factors, stress, and preterm birth. Ethn Health. 2014;19(5):479–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mendez DD, Hogan VK, Culhane J. Institutional racism and pregnancy health: using Home Mortgage Disclosure act data to develop an index for mortgage discrimination at the community level. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(Suppl 3):102–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Huffstetler AN, Phillips RL. Jr. Payment structures that support Social Care Integration with Clinical Care: Social Deprivation indices and Novel Payment models. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(6 Suppl 1):S82–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Anderson AC, O’Rourke E, Chin MH, Ponce NA, Bernheim SM, Burstin H. Promoting Health Equity and eliminating disparities through performance measurement and payment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(3):371–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jarlenski M, Borrero S, La Charite T, Zite NB. Episode-based payment for Perinatal Care in Medicaid: implications for practice and policy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(6):1080–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. McConnell KJ, Charlesworth CJ, Meath THA, George RM, Kim H. Oregon’s emphasis on Equity Shows Signs of Early Success for Black and American Indian Medicaid Enrollees. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(3):386–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hood CM, Gennuso KP, Swain GR, Catlin BB. County Health rankings: relationships between determinant factors and Health outcomes. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(2):129–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received funding from the National Institute of Nursing Research under award R01NR020670. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, or decision to publish the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, 130 DeSoto St, A619, 15261, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Marian Jarlenski, Evan Cole & Christine McClure

  2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Sarah Sanders, Marquita Smalls & Dara D Méndez

Authors
  1. Marian Jarlenski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evan Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine McClure
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarah Sanders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marquita Smalls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dara D Méndez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jarlenski: Conceptualization; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; supervision; writing-original draftCole: Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; resources; writing-reviewing and editingMcClure: Investigation; project administration; supervision; writing-reviewing and editingSanders: Investigation; methodology; visualization; writing-reviewing and editingSmalls: Investigation; project administration; visualization; writing-reviewing and editingMendez: Conceptualization; funding acquisition; investigation; validation; supervision; writing-original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marian Jarlenski.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (Study # 23090108).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jarlenski, M., Cole, E., McClure, C. et al. Implementation and early effects of medicaid policy interventions to promote racial equity in pregnancy and early childhood outcomes in Pennsylvania: protocol for a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 24, 498 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10982-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10982-5

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us