Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Reasons for non-disclosure of HIV-Positive status to healthcare providers: a mixed methods study in Mozambique

BMC Health Services Research volume 23, Article number: 925 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Non-disclosure of known HIV status by people living with HIV but undergoing HIV testing leads to waste of HIV testing resources and distortion of estimates of HIV indicators. In Mozambique, an estimated one-third of persons who tested positive already knew their HIV-positive status. To our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the factors that prevent people living with HIV (PLHIV) from disclosing their HIV-positive status to healthcare providers during a provider-initiated counseling and testing (PICT) campaign.

Methods

This analysis was nested in a larger PICT cross-sectional study performed in the Manhiça District, Southern Mozambique from January to July 2019, in which healthcare providers actively asked patients about their HIV-status. Patients who tested positive for HIV were crosschecked with the hospital database to identify those who had previously tested positive and were currently or previously enrolled in care. PLHIV who did not disclose their HIV-positive status were invited to participate and provide consent, and were interviewed using a questionnaire designed to explore barriers, patterns of community/family disclosure, and stigma and discrimination.

Results

We found that 16.1% of participants who tested positive during a PICT session already knew their HIV-positive status but did not disclose it to the healthcare provider. All the participants reported previous mistreatment by general healthcare providers as a reason for nondisclosure during PICT. Other reasons included the desire to know if they were cured (33.3%) or to re-engage in care (23.5%). Among respondents, 83.9% reported having disclosed their HIV-status within their close community, 48.1% reported being victims of verbal or physical discrimination following their HIV diagnosis, and 46.7% reported that their HIV status affected their daily activities.

Conclusion

Previous mistreatment by healthcare workers was the main barrier to disclosing HIV-positive status. The high proportion of those disclosing their HIV status to their community but not to healthcare providers suggests that challenges with patient-provider relationships affect this care behavior rather than social stigma and discrimination. Improving patient-provider relationships could increase trust in healthcare providers, reduce non-disclosures, and help optimize resources and provide accurate estimates of the UNAIDS first 95 goal.

Peer Review reports

Background

To end the HIV epidemic by 2030, in 2014, the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) set the 95–95-95 targets establishing that, by 2030, 95% of all people living with HIV (PLHIV) should be diagnosed, 95% of all them should receive antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 95% of those receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART) should be virally suppressed. Thus, if these targets are achieved, at least 86% of all PLHIV will be virally suppressed and therefore will be unable to transmit HIV [1, 2]. In 2019 there were 1.7 million people newly infected with HIV and 38.0 million PLHIV worldwide [3]. Mozambique had 2,200,000 PLHIV [4], with an HIV prevalence among the adult population (aged 15 to 49 years) of 12.6% in 2019 [4]. However, according to UNAIDS, in 2019, only 77% of PLHIV in Mozambique knew their status, 59% were on treatment and 45% were virally suppressed [4]. In the Manhiça District of Southern Mozambique, where the community HIV-prevalence in 2015 was 33.6%, 75.9% of men and 88.9% of women were aware of their status [5].

HIV t step to entering the HIV cascatesting and counseling (HTC) is the firsde of care and receiving appropriate ART. Provider-initiated counseling and testing (PICT) was implemented to scale up HIV testing at health facility level and to achieve the first UNAIDS 95 goal by offering HTC to all individuals seeking care. However, a previous study conducted in 2015 in Southern Mozambique quantified, for the first time worldwide, that during PICT campaigns almost one third of individuals testing HIV-positive were already diagnosed and enrolled in care [6]. Non-disclosure of a previous HIV-positive diagnosis to the healthcare provider leads to repeat HIV testing among individuals already diagnosed, distorting the number of people that start care in an already overburdened healthcare system. In addition, this distorts programmatic indicators by underestimating the true proportion of PLHIV who are aware of their status and overestimating the number of individuals newly HIV-diagnosed [6]. Although reasons for non-disclosure in the family context have been previously described and associated with stigma and poor retention in HIV care and treatment [7,8,9,10], no studies have explored reasons for non-disclosure to the healthcare provider in the context of HIV-testing. Understanding the difficulties faced by PLHIV in disclosing their previous diagnosis to healthcare providers will aid in improving their re-engagement and retention in HIV care, in optimizing resources and in obtaining more accurate estimates of the 95–95-95 targets in high HIV-burden areas. This study sought to explore, factors that prevent PLHIV from disclosing their previous HIV diagnosis during a PICT session in four rural health facilities in the Manhiça district, Southern Mozambique.

Methods

Study area and population

This study was performed among youths (> 15 years old) and adults attending primary care in four health facilities in the Manhiça District (Manhiça District Hospital (MDH), Xinavane Rural Hospital and Palmeira and Maragra Peripheral Health Units) from January to July 2019. This region is a semi-rural area located in Maputo province, Southern Mozambique, with an overall community HIV-prevalence of 36.6% in 2015 [5], where the Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM) has conducted a continuous health and demographic surveillance system (HDSS) for vital events since 1996. The HDSS registers births, deaths, migrations, pregnancies and household characteristics [11].

At each health facility, HIV-services are delivered free of charge, including HIV-testing [11]. Provider-initiated HIV counseling and testing (PICT) was the most widespread testing modality in the district whereby the provider recommends HTC as part of a primary clinical evaluation according to patient’s symptoms and HIV risk factors.

Routine patient‐level HIV clinical data are recorded on paper since the day of HIV diagnosis and transcribed daily into an electronic Patient Tracking System (ePTS) which is co-managed by the Ministry of Health and other stakeholders.

Study design and procedures

This is a cross-sectional analysis nested in a larger study which aimed to evaluate the efficiency of a specific provider training proposed by the Mozambican Ministry of Health (MoH) to increase the yield of new diagnoses through targeted PICT. Initially, healthcare providers performed the primary clinical consultation and recommended HIV-testing according to national guidelines for suggestive symptoms, or HIV risk behaviors [12]. Referred patients then visited an HIV counselor, who probed them again about their HIV status. For study procedures, during the counseling session, a study questionnaire exploring socio-demographic characteristics, HIV-related symptoms and sensitive HIV risk behaviors was completed for each participant. To evaluate any impact in the diagnostic yield, universal testing was performed for all individuals that self-reported a previous HIV-negative result or those with unknown HIV status, independently of the symptoms and risk factors. Individuals who self-reported a previous HIV diagnosis were not tested. The identity of all participants who tested HIV-positive during the campaign was cross-checked with the ePTS to detect participants previously diagnosed and enrolled in HIV care but who did not disclose their HIV-positive status to the health provider.

For the purposes of this analysis, we only included those participants who reported being HIV-negative to the healthcare provider or with unknown HIV status but were identified through the ePTS system as previously diagnosed and enrolled in HIV care and the following definitions were used:

  • Awareness: refer to all known PLHIV who self-reported a previous HIV-positive diagnosis or who are registered in the ePTS.

  • Non-disclosure participants refer to PLHIV who did not disclose their previous HIV-positive diagnosis to the healthcare provider during targeted PICT and were then identified through the ePTS. Two groups were created based on the timing and manner of identification.

  • Partial non-disclosures: individuals who disclosed their HIV-status to the counselor during the pre-counseling session before undergoing HIV-testing.

  • Complete non-disclosures: individuals who did not disclose their HIV-status to either the provider or the counselor and underwent HIV-testing.

  • External stigma was defined as negative attitudes and behaviors that others direct towards PLHIV, which can result in their devaluation or the perception of having less dignity and value than others [13].

  • Internal stigma refers to negative attitudes and feelings that individuals may have towards themselves due to their stigmatized identity, such as feelings of shame [13].

  • Discrimination was defined as treating someone in a different, unfair or detrimental way, because of his/her HIV condition [13].

Data collection and data management

Data was captured during the study visit in two electronic questionnaires directly uploaded into REDCap database (Research Electronic Data Capture) [14]. The first questionnaire was completed for all individuals participating in the larger study, including sociodemographic data, HIV risk behaviors, and clinical symptoms, while the second questionnaire, specifically designed for this sub-study, was conducted only among PLHIV who do not disclose their HIV status. This questionnaire explored barriers to disclosing the HIV-positive status to the healthcare provider/counselor, patterns of disclosure amongst acquaintances and family, and questions about stigma and discrimination, extracted from “The People Living with HIV Stigma Index survey” [13].

Qualitative and quantitative data analysis

Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore factors that prevent PLHIV from disclosing their status to healthcare providers. The interviews utilized a pre-defined codebook of potential factors based on previous literature on linkage and retention in care [6, 15,16,17], as well as an open text field for respondents to elaborate on their answers if necessary [18]. Responses from the open text field were then coded and tabulated along with the other predefined codes in an Excel matrix and triangulated by three experienced HIV researchers. Similar barriers were grouped in conceptual categories, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussions and reclassification of codes when necessary. The cumulative frequency of reporting for each barrier and category was assessed, and the number of participants that reported each category was calculated. As participants could report multiple barriers the number of participants referring to a specific category (not individual barrier) was counted only once per category, even if they reported more than one barrier from the same category.

A descriptive analysis was conducted to examine the baseline characteristics of the participants, stratified by the type of disclosure. This study investigated the relationship between disclosure status and several factors, such as patterns of disclosure among close community members, HIV suggestive symptoms, risk behaviors, belonging to HIV key populations, and other variables used to describe the perception of external and internal stigma and discrimination. The statistical analyses used to assess baseline characteristics and the disclosure status of the participants were the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, together with the corresponding 95% confident interval (95% CI).

Results

Study profile

Overall, in the four health facilities of the Manhiça District, 7102 adults reporting to the primary or emergency care settings consented to participate in the larger study and were assessed for HIV testing criteria following PICT procedures (Fig. 1). Among those, 71.3% (5065/7102) (95% CI 70.3–72.4) were offered an HIV test by a counsellor while 28.7% (2037/7102) (95% CI 27.6–29.7) were not referred for testing mainly because they self-reported a previous HIV-positive diagnosis (23.5%, 1670/7102). After the first screening performed by the health provider, during the counseling and testing session, 40 individuals (0.8%, 95% CI 0.6–1.1) disclosed their positive HIV status to the counselor just prior to the test (Partial non-disclosure), and thus were not tested. Out of the 508 individuals who tested HIV-positive during the study, 48 (9.4%,95% CI 7.0–12.3) were identified as PLHIV who did not disclose their status through the ePTS.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study profile

Full size image

Finally, of the 88 participants who did not disclose their status, 81 (92.0%) agreed to respond to the specific questionnaire design for the purpose of this sub-analysis.

Baseline characteristics among PLHIV who do not disclose their HIV status

Among the 81 study participants, two-thirds (66.7%) were women, and mean age was 39.4 years (IQR 28.0 -48.0) (Table 1). Differences were not found by type of non-disclosure. In the MDH and the secondary health facilities the proportion of individuals that do not disclose their HIV status at all (complete non-disclosures) was higher compared with those individuals that disclosed their status prior to undergoing testing (partial non-disclosures) (86.2% and 67.3% respectively), whereas in the rural Hospital (Xinavane) partial non-disclosures predominated (66.7%).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the participants (n = 81) identified during the PICT campaign according to type of non-disclosure either partial or complete
Full size table

Disclosure of HIV-status and implications for the first UNAIDS target

Overall, in this cohort, there were 2218 individuals living with HIV (including 1670 participants that self-reported their HIV status, 40 participants that report their status prior to HIV testing, and 508 individuals that tested positive). Of the 548 PLHIV who should have been referred for HIV testing as part of the provider-initiated testing and counseling strategy in ideal conditions, 16.1% (88/548, 95% CI 13.1–19.4) were previously diagnosed and enrolled in HIV care.

To assess progress towards the first UNAIDS 95 target, we used the definition of awareness of HIV status as a proxy. Our results showed that 79.3% (1758/2218, 95% CI 77.5–80.9) of the PLHIV in this cohort were already aware of their HIV-positive status. However, under routine care conditions, where the participants would not have been asked subsequently by the provider and counselor about their HIV status, the 88 individuals who did not disclose their HIV status would have been considered newly diagnosed with HIV. This would have resulted in an underestimate of the first UNAIDS 95 by 4%. Therefore, the estimated proportion of participants aware of their HIV-positive status would have been 75.3% (1670/2218, 95% CI 73.4–77.1) and the true proportion of individuals newly diagnosed would be overestimated from 20.7% (95% CI 19.5–22.5) to 24.7% (95% CI 22.9–26.6).

Social behavior among PLHIV who do not disclose their HIV status

Regarding HIV-related risk behaviors, 49.2% (29/59) of the respondents reported never using condoms during sexual relationships and 8.6% (7/81) reported having a partner living with HIV (Table 2). Additionally, we explored patterns of disclosure of HIV-status to their community, and most of the participants (68/81, 83.9%) reported that they had talked to someone about their HIV-status since their first HIV diagnosis. Almost half of them (39/81, 48.2%) disclosed their HIV-status to someone on the day of their diagnosis. Overall, among participants with a partner (n = 49), 77.5% (38/49) stated that their partner knew their HIV-status, and 63.2% (31/49) reported that they talked about their diagnosis with them. Regarding reported feelings during the disclosure process, only 42.0% (34/81) reported having felt understood or supported when disclosing their condition, while 17.3% (14/81) mentioned that the other person felt disappointed and 9.9% (8/81) surprised (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical characteristics, risk behaviors and patterns of disclosure to close community (n = 81)
Full size table

Factors related to non-disclosure of HIV-positive status to the healthcare provider

Out of the 81 respondents, a total of 185 self-reported factors were identified that prevented disclosure of HIV-positive status, which were then grouped into 7 conceptually similar categories. Table 3 summarizes the frequency of reporting of these factors based on the number of participants that reported them.

Table 3 Barriers to disclosure of HIV-positive status to healthcare providers
Full size table

All participants reported previous mistreatment by healthcare providers. In addition to mistreatment, other frequently reported reasons for not disclosing HIV-positive status included the desire to see if they were cured (33.3%, 27/81), miscommunication challenges between the healthcare provider and the participant (30.9%, 25/81), or desire to reengage in care (23.5%, 19/81). Several participants expressed that re-testing is the only way to reengage HIV care in a new health facility. Moreover, distrust in the previous positive test result was also reported as a factor that prevented disclosure (16.0%, 13/81). Only a small number of participants (7.4%, 6/81) expressed factors directly related to stigma and discrimination.

Stigma and discrimination

While stigma and discrimination were not among the main self-reported barriers to disclosing HIV-positive status to the healthcare provider, Table 4 shows that when participants were specifically asked about the impact of their HIV status in their daily life, almost half of them (44.4%, 36/81) reported that they had stopped doing some activities. Of these, 18.5% (15/81) had stopped going to the clinic and 7.4% (6/81) reported that they did not go to the hospital when they needed to. Furthermore, 42.0% (34/81) of the participants reported experiencing negative feelings related to their HIV status over the past year, while 48.1% (39/81) reported having been victims of gossip, insults or physical attacks that they attributed to their HIV status. A quarter of the participants (21/81, 25.9%) reported hearing gossip about themselves, particularly women (35.2% compared to 7.4% for men, p = 0.006), and 9.9% (8/81) reported being physically attacked at least once during the previous 12 months.

Table 4 Stigma and discrimination suffered by people living with HIV who do not disclose their status among their close community
Full size table

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study that explored factors that prevent PLHIV from disclosing their previous HIV-positive status to healthcare providers in the context of HIV-testing campaigns in southern Mozambique. We found that, among individuals referred for HIV-testing by the healthcare provider and identified as a person living with HIV by an HIV counselor, about one fifth were previously diagnosed with HIV and enrolled in care but did not disclose their previous status to the healthcare provider. Mistreatment by the healthcare provider was the most reported factor that prevented disclosing in the context of PICT and was expressed by all participants. Moreover, the desire to re-engage in care after being lost to follow up was a commonly reported reason to not disclose and re-test. Other factors included the desire to see if they have been cured, and a lack of efficient communication between the healthcare provider and the individual. Nevertheless, among those non-disclosing individuals, a high proportion (83.9%) reported having disclosed it within their close community. Almost half of the participants (46.9%) stopped doing some routine activities due to their HIV-positive status and 48.1% declared themselves as having been victims of gossip, insults or physical attacks during the previous year due to their serostatus.

Our findings suggest that one in six people referred for HIV-testing in a PICT context were already diagnosed. This proportion of individuals who did not disclose their HIV-status to a healthcare provider has remained high in the context of PICT during the past five years. In 2015, in a similar study conducted in Manhiça, the proportion of non-disclosures detected during a PICT campaign was 29.4% [5]. Although our findings suggested a lower proportion of non-disclosure (16.1%) this reduction may be due to proactive efforts by providers and counselors to reduce the expected proportion of non-disclosure patients and to the improvement in the PICT strategy over the years. Changes in HIV-testing policies, such as the implementation of Universal Treatment in Mozambique that began in mid-2016 [19], may have had an impact on the reduction of the number of PLHIV who do not disclose their HIV status by expanding the access to HIV diagnosis and care, improving healthcare providers’ skills in identifying and counseling PLHIV, and thus increasing the potential willingness among individuals to disclose their HIV-positive status.

In our study we found that all PLHIV who do not disclose their HIV status had previously experienced situations of mistreatment from health care providers and referenced those situations as a barrier to do not disclose their status to the clinician. Previous studies demonstrated that disrespectful attitudes towards PLHIV in the context of clinical care are also key barriers to follow up.

In some cases, mistreatment by healthcare providers, including negative attitudes and practices towards PLHIV, may result from factors such as burn-out syndrome among healthcare workers [20], which has been widely reported in sub-Saharan Africa [21, 22], or misunderstanding stemming from ineffective communication between healthcare providers and PLHIV who may have received a previous diagnosis but did not disclose their status. Lack of health literacy leads to unsafe health practices [23, 24] and healthcare providers should be able to understand the context of the individual that influences how healthcare information is received.

Patient-centered approaches may be useful to improve communication between healthcare providers and PLHIV. In this sense, a study performed in Tanzania in 2017 to improve the ability of healthcare providers to identify non-adherent patients by identifying problems of communication with patients, increased the percentage of patients reporting to health providers their non-adherence from 3.3% to 10.7% in two months [25]. In addition, peer-based educational interventions may be beneficial to increase HIV literacy [26]. A meta-analysis performed in 2018 that included studies performed in developing countries found that peer education interventions appeared to be effective in informing individuals about HIV transmission routes [27]. Additionally, we found that non-disclosure of HIV-positive status as a means to re-engage in care represented 15.7% of the barriers cited by participants. Thus, although we did not investigate previous retention in care, there is likely to be overlap between the non-disclosing re-testers and those who dropped out of care.

The study found that among participants who did not disclose their HIV status to healthcare providers, the majority of them (84.0%) had disclosed it to their close community, indicating that these two disclosure processes face different challenges. Extensive efforts to identify and address barriers to HIV disclosure to sexual partners, such as shown through previous research [8, 10, 28,29,30], could explain these high rates of disclosure. However, there is a lack of research on interventions aimed at reducing the number of PLHIV who do not disclose their status to healthcare providers.

In our study, stigma and discrimination only represent 3.2% of reported barriers. However, 48.1% of the participants reported experiencing gossip, threats or attacks in the past year, a lower proportion than the 56% found in the 2013 Mozambican National Stigma Index Survey [31]. These results suggest that while efforts to reduce HIV-related stigma in Mozambique may have had some success, stigma and discrimination continue to be prevalent at the community level. One possible explanation for this decrease in stigma may be the 2014 law passed by the Mozambican government that aimed to protect the rights and dignity of PLHIV [32]. However, it is important to note that PLHIV who do not disclose their HIV status to health providers in this study may have unique characteristics and perceptions of stigma that differ from those in the PLHIV population surveyed in the Mozambican National Stigma Survey [31], that included PLHIV in general. As such, comparisons between the two populations should be made with caution.

Finally, in the absence of a mechanism to identify non-disclosures, the estimated proportion of individuals aware of their HIV status would be 75.3% (95% CI 73.4–77.1), while after their identification, this proportion rises to 79.3% (95% CI 77.5–80.9), closer to the 95% goal. The most recent AIDS impact survey in Mozambique found that 16% of PLHIV with blood evidence of antiretroviral therapy and/or viral suppression reported that they had never been tested for HIV, and 22% reported a negative result from their last HIV test [33]. In this context, the practice of reclassifying such individuals as knowing their status for estimation of the first 95% goal is important.

This study has several limitations. First, each health facility has its own electronic Patient Tracking System database, thus individuals presenting at a facility for testing but enrolled in HIV care in other National Health Facilities will be considered new diagnoses. In addition, patients may have received a previous positive test result but not linked to care, in which case they would not appear in the ePTS system, and thus estimates of non-disclosures could be underestimated. Second, the questionnaires used for this study were designed considering previous literature and the results of former studies performed in the same region of Mozambique [6, 15]. Thus, despite the open-answer nature of the questionnaire, the design of the questionnaire may have focused the results towards the predefined categories, thus some potential barriers for disclosing HIV-positive status to the healthcare provider may have been omitted or underestimated. Finally, for each category of barriers, we attempt to assess the association between that specific barrier to do not disclose and the patient characteristics through a bivariate and multivariate analysis, however, due to the relatively small sample size the model was underpowered. Thus, the interpretation of reported associations should be interpreted with caution and further research should be conducted to consolidate such associations and potentially confusing factors.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study identified mistreatment by healthcare providers as the most reported factor that prevented PLHIV from disclosing their previous HIV-positive status to healthcare providers in the context of PICT campaigns. Patient-centered approaches and peer-based educational interventions may be useful to improve communication between healthcare providers and PLHIV, ultimately increasing the potential willingness among individuals to disclose their HIV-positive status. The high proportion of non-disclosing individuals who disclosed their status within their close community highlights the importance of continuing to address community-level stigma and discrimination. Our findings underscore the need for efforts to reduce mistreatment by healthcare providers and address community-level stigma and discrimination to increase disclosure of HIV-positive status to healthcare providers, ultimately improving access to HIV care and treatment. Finally, by reducing the number of non-disclosures, scarce resources will not be wasted on re-testing individuals that have previously been diagnosed with HIV, and critical programmatic indicators will not be underestimated, leading to more accurate estimates of the UNAIDS first 95 goal.

Availability of data and materials

There are ethical restrictions on sharing a de-identified data. Data contain potentially sensitive information and national ethics committee in Mozambique does not authorize data sharing without a data sharing request specifying the objectives and the researchers who will have access to the data.

Abbreviations

UNAIDS:

Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS

PLHIV:

People living with HIV

ART:

Antiretroviral therapy

HTC:

HIV-testing and counseling

PICT:

Provider-initiated counseling and testing

MDH:

Manhiça District Hospital

CISM:

Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça

HDSS:

Health and demographic surveillance system

ePTS:

Electronic Patient Tracking System

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Fast-Track - Ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030 | UNAIDS. 2014.

  2. Undetectable = untransmittable | UNAIDS.

  3. UNAIDS. Seizing the Moment - Global AIDS Update 2020. Geneva; 2020.

  4. UNAIDS. UNAIDS DATA 2019 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 14]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2019-UNAIDS-data_en.pdf

  5. Lopez-Varela E, Augusto O, Fuente-Soro L, Sacoor C, Nhacolo A, Casavant I, et al. Quantifying the gender gap in the HIV care cascade in southern Mozambique: We are missing the men. PLoS One 2021; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33577559/

  6. Fuente-Soro L, Lopez-Varela E, Augusto O, Sacoor C, Nhacolo A, Honwana N, et al. Monitoring progress towards the first UNAIDS target: understanding the impact of people living with HIV who re-test during HIV-testing campaigns in rural Mozambique. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21(4):e25095.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Umeokonkwo CD, Onoka CA, Agu PA, Ossai EN, Balogun MS, Ogbonnaya LU. Retention in care and adherence to HIV and AIDS treatment in Anambra State Nigeria. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dessie G, Wagnew F, Mulugeta H, Amare D, Jara D, Leshargie CT, et al. The effect of disclosure on adherence to antiretroviral therapy among adults living with HIV in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heestermans T, Browne JL, Aitken SC, Vervoort SC, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Determinants of adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Heal. 2016;1(4):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klopper C, Stellenberg E, van der Merwe A. Stigma and HIV disclosure in the cape Metropolitan area. South Africa Afr J AIDS Res. 2014;13(1):37–43. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2014.886606. (Available from Cited 14 Nov 2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sacoor C, Nhacolo A, Nhalungo D, Aponte JJ, Bassat Q, Augusto O, et al. Profile: Manhiça health research centre (Manhiça HDSS). Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(5):1309–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ministério da Saúde. Direcção Nacional de Saúde Pública - Programa Nacional de Controlo das ITS/HIV e SIDA. Guião Orientador sobre Modelos Diferenciados de Serviços em Moçambique. 2018. Available from: https://differentiatedservicedelivery.org/wp-content/uploads/guiao-dos-modelos-diferenciados-de-servicos.pdf

  13. The people living with HIV stigma index - User Guide. 2008. Available from: https://www.childrenandaids.org/sites/default/files/2018-11/The people living with HIV stigma index - User guide.pdf

  14. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008;42:377–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuente-Soro L, Iniesta C, López-Varela E, Cuna M, Guilaze R, Maixenchs M, et al. Tipping the balance towards long-term retention in the HIV care cascade: A mixed methods study in southern Mozambique Francis JM, editor. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lifson AR, Demissie W, Tadesse A, Ketema K, May R, Yakob B, et al. Barriers to retention in care as perceived by persons living with HIV in rural Ethiopia: focus group results and recommended strategies. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015;12(1):32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. da Silva M, Blevins M, Wester CW, Manjolo J, José E, Gonzalez LC, et al. Patient loss to follow-up before antiretroviral therapy initiation in rural mozambique. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(4):666–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuente-Soro L, López-Varela E, Augusto O, Bernardo EL, Sacoor C, Nhacolo A, et al. Loss to follow-up and opportunities for reengagement in HIV care in rural Mozambique: A prospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(20). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32443358/. Available from Cited 5 Apr 2023

  19. MISAU. Guião de implementação da abordagem do testar e iniciar 2016. 2016;13–34.

  20. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. The maslach burnout inventory manual. Maslach Burn Invent. 2016;1997(3):191–217.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim MH, Mazenga AC, Simon K, Yu X, Ahmed S, Nyasulu P, et al. Burnout and self-reported suboptimal patient care amongst health care workers providing HIV care in Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dubale BW, Friedman LE, Chemali Z, Denninger JW, Mehta DH, Alem A, et al. Systematic review of burnout among healthcare providers in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1).

  23. Medicine I of. Health Literacy. Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, editors. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2004.

  24. “What Did the Doctor Say?:” Improving Health Literacy to Protect Patient Safety “What Did the Doctor Say?:” Improving Health Literacy to Protect Patient Safety Another in the series of Health Care at the Crossroads reports. 2007.

  25. Erb S, Letang E, Glass TR, Natamatungiro A, Mnzava D, Mapesi H, et al. Health care provider communication training in rural Tanzania empowers HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy to discuss adherence problems. HIV Med. 2017;18(9):623–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Medley A, Kennedy C, O’Reilly K, Sweat M. Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009;21(3):181–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Faust L, Yaya S. The effect of HIV educational interventions on HIV-related knowledge, condom use, and HIV incidence in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kennedy CE, Fonner VA, Armstrong KA, Kevin RO, Sweat MD. Increasing HIV serostatus disclosure in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of intervention evaluations. 2017;29(1):1–20.

  29. Peltzer K, Jones D, Weiss SM, Shikwane E. Promoting male involvement to improve PMTCT uptake and reduce antenatal HIV infection: A cluster randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):778.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bernier A, Yattassaye A, Beaulieu-Prévost D, Otis J, Henry E, Flores-Aranda J, et al. Empowering Malian women living with HIV regarding serostatus disclosure management: Short-term effects of a community-based intervention. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(2):248–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mocambique. Índice de Estigma de Pessoas Vivendo com HIV/SIDA Moçambique: Relatório Final-Metodologia e Resultados. 2013;56.

  32. República de Moçambique. Boletin da República _ Lei n.o 19/2014: Lei de Protecção da Pessoa, do Trabalhador e do Candidato a Emprego Vivendo com HIV e SIDA . Assembleia da República; Aug, 2014. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---ilo_aids/documents/legaldocument/wcms_361981.pdf

  33. IMASIDA. Inquérito de Indicadores de Imunização, Malária e HIV/SIDA. 2015;507.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Elisabeth Salvo for her contributions to this work. We gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Health of Mozambique, our research team, collaborators, and especially all study participants and their communities. Moreover, we acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and State Research Agency through the “Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023” Program (CEX2018-000806-S), and support from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program.

Funding

This study was made possible with support from the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the terms of CoAg NU2GGH002092 (Achieving Viral Load Suppression In the Community of Manhiça, Mozambique: strengthening surveillance systems (HDSS), and Implementing evidence-based interventions for optimized Linkage and Retention in HIV Care—VINCI). The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agency. CDC investigators did not interact with human subjects or have access to identifiable data or specimens for research purposes.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Laura Fuente-Soro and Antía Figueroa equally contributed to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Laura Fuente-Soro, Antía Figueroa-Romero, Sheila Fernández-Luis, Elisa López-Varela, Anna Saura-Lázaro & Denise Naniche

  2. Centro de Investigação Em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique

    Laura Fuente-Soro, Sheila Fernández-Luis, Orvalho Augusto, Elisa López-Varela, Edson Bernardo, Tacilta Nhampossa & Denise Naniche

  3. Fundação Ariel Glazer Contra O SIDA Pediatrico, Maputo, Mozambique

    Paula Vaz

  4. U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Maputo, Mozambique

    Stanley C. Wei & Peter R. Kerndt

  5. Instituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Maputo, Mozambique

    Tacilta Nhampossa

Authors
  1. Laura Fuente-Soro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antía Figueroa-Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sheila Fernández-Luis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Orvalho Augusto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elisa López-Varela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Edson Bernardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Anna Saura-Lázaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paula Vaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Stanley C. Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Peter R. Kerndt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tacilta Nhampossa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Denise Naniche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DN conceived the study; DN, LFS, SFL and ELV designed the study; LFS, ELV, OA, SCW, PK, TN, EB, and PV acquired the data. LFS, DN, SFL, AFR, ASL and OA analyzed the data. LFS, AFR and DN wrote the first draft. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved it for submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Laura Fuente-Soro or Antía Figueroa-Romero.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Mozambican National Bioethics Committee, the Institutional Review Boards at the Hospital Clinical of Barcelona (Spain) and Manhiça Health Research Center. The study was also reviewed in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) human research protection procedures and was determined to be research.

All participants provided written informed consent. Those participants aged 18 years or older provided informed consent for their own participation. Individuals between 15 and 18 years of age, signed an assent form in addition to a consent/permission form from their parent(s)/legal representative, following national legislations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

We declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuente-Soro, L., Figueroa-Romero, A., Fernández-Luis, S. et al. Reasons for non-disclosure of HIV-Positive status to healthcare providers: a mixed methods study in Mozambique. BMC Health Serv Res 23, 925 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09865-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09865-y

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us