Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Patient-reported outcomes among patients undergoing total hip replacement in an integrated care system and in a standard care system in Region Stockholm, Sweden

BMC Health Services Research volume 22, Article number: 1414 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Coordination, cooperation and efficient use of resources is vital for the health- and social care sector if it is to meet the needs of an aging population. Integrated care is a patient-centred approach to provision of care aiming to improve quality of care and overcome fragmented care through co-productive partnerships and may positively affect quality of care and health outcomes, especially among those in need of highly coordinated care services.

Aim

To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) in the integrated care system in Norrtälje Municipality and in the standard care system in other municipalities in Region Stockholm, Sweden.

Methods

Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register PRO data during 2008–2015 were compared 1 year after THR among patients (≥50 years) in integrated care (n = 407) and standard care (n = 3501) systems using linear (EQ VAS score), logistic (EQ-5D-3L dimensions) and negative binomial (hip pain VAS score) regressions. Analyses were adjusted for the preoperative factors age, sex, BMI, ASA class and type of incision.

Results

1-year postoperatively, patients in the integrated care system did not report their health significantly different from patients receiving standard care. Exceptions: Female patients in integrated care reported less problems with self-care (OR:0.52; 0.29–0.96) and patients above 70 years reported more problems with mobility (OR: 1.37; 1.01–1.87).

Conclusion

No significant differences were found between the two care systems for postoperative PROs. A longer follow-up time and analyses by socioeconomic groups would be valuable.

Peer Review reports

Background

In high-income countries, health care systems are challenged by the demographic transition leading to an aging population [1, 2]. Reduced mortality at higher ages has led to more and more people surviving into older ages [1], but at the same time a large proportion of the aging population do not spend all of these additional life years in good health.

In Sweden, it is estimated that 66% of the population above 65 years have comorbidities [2, 3], which leads to an increased need for health and social care services and often from different care providers [4]. Coordination, cooperation and efficient use of existing resources is therefore vital for the health and social care sector to meet the needs of an aging population [4].

Nevertheless, health care services have become more and more specialized during the last decades, leading to an increasingly fragmented system [2]. Coordination between health care providers in Sweden is often reported as lacking which can lead to lower quality of care, decreased patient satisfaction with the care provided, and increased costs due to unnecessary treatments arising from poor communication [3]. Furthermore, additional responsibility is put on the patient and relatives to coordinate the contact between health and social care providers, when coordination between providers are lacking [3].

In this context, integrated care has attained increased interest in both Sweden and elsewhere. Integrated care is a patient-centred approach to provision of care aiming to improve quality of care and overcome fragmented care through co-productive partnerships either within the health care sector or between different operating care organisations [5,6,7,8]. Integrated care is believed to have a positive impact on the quality of care, especially for those in need of highly coordinated care services [2, 3, 5, 9]. However, due to the lack of robust evaluations, the impact of integrated care on many quality indicators is still uncertain [10, 11].

Integrated care in a Swedish setting

In Sweden, there are several ongoing integrated care initiatives, with a varying degree of integration and on different levels in the health and social care system. Norrtälje Municipality in Region Stockholm, has developed and incorporated a fully integrated care system at the organisational level, labelled The Norrtälje Model [12]. The cooperation resulted in a new authority ‘Municipal health care and social care in Norrtälje’ (KSON by Swedish acronym) [12], promoting both horizontal and vertical integration of health and social care in Norrtälje Municipality [13].

KSON owns the health care company ‘Vårdbolaget Tiohundra’ that is responsible for the emergency hospital, primary health care, psychiatric care, childcare, elderly care homes, and home care. The purpose of establishing ‘Vårdbolaget Tiohundra’ is to by-pass usual borders often existing between different care providers to create a smoother access and care-flow for patients [12]. In 2009 and 2010, national choice reforms were introduced giving private providers the right to freely establish publicly funded primary care facilities and home care services [14, 15], which made it possible for multiple providers to establish in Norrtälje Municipality. Hence, ‘Vårdbolaget Tiohundra’ was no longer the only provider of health and social care, however, they are still the main provider.

Well-coordinated care is especially important for vulnerable patients with comorbidities and patients in need of care from several different health and social care services [3]. One such vulnerable group is patients with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis is estimated to be the fourth leading cause of disability in 2020 in Sweden [16]. Since a few decades, total hip replacement (THR) has made a significant positive change for patients disabled by hip osteoarthritis [17]. Today, when non-surgical treatment options are not sufficient to control symptoms, the main indication for THR surgery is hip pain and poor general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [17,18,19].

A patient undergoing THR will meet professionals from both primary care and specialized care and is in need of both follow-up [20] and early recovery rehabilitation [21] after the surgery in order to get long lasting positive effects of a THR. These patients will therefore benefit from a well-coordinated, patient-centred health and social care system.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to evaluate aspects of the provided care important to the patient [22, 23] and may also be used to improve quality of care and predict future outcomes in geriatric care [24]. As the main indications for a THR among osteoarthritis patients are hip pain and low HRQoL these patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may provide valuable information to increase knowledge on the impact of standard care as well as integrated care.

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative PROs among patients undergoing THR in the integrated care system in Norrtälje Municipality and in the standard care system in the other municipalities in Region Stockholm.

Method

This longitudinal register-based study is based on pre- and 1-year postoperative data from patients who have undergone a THR either within an integrated care system (Norrtälje Hospital) or at other publicly owned hospitals operating within a standard care system (Södertälje Hospital; Danderyd Hospital; Karolinska University Hospital in Huddinge; Karolinska University Hospital in Solna; Södersjukhuset).

Norrtälje hospital is placed in Norrtälje Municipality which is the most northern municipality in Region Stockholm. The population in Norrtälje differs to some extend from the total population in the rest of Region Stockholm. There is a higher proportion of people with low income, there are a lower proportion of people born outside Sweden, and the proportion of 80+ year olds are slightly lower [25]. The other hospitals are scattered around Region Stockholm and covers all hospitals in Region Stockholm that provides THR.

The integrated care system in Norrtälje is characterised by having funding responsibilities for both health and social care for the entire population in Norrtälje. It has an explicit focus on health promotion and prevention, and health and social care are integrated on an organisational level to achieve greater benefit for patients. Although the integrated care system covers the entire population in Norrtälje there are some specific goals targeting the needs of older adults. These goals have been described by Back et al. [13], and some are listed below:

  • “To get their health and social problems addressed/solved, and also to satisfy wishes related to health, social care and continuation of a good life in general despite age, chronic conditions and multiple morbidities”

  • “To experience a higher degree of security in their daily life, continuity and coordinated/comprehensive help from health and social professionals, carers and organisations”

  • “No older person should be a victim of poor integration, be outside of everyone’s responsibility (In Swedish the idiomatic expression is referred “Nobody should fall between two chairs”).”

  • “Prioritised prevention work”

  • “Good and safe medication”

[13].

The main health and social care provider in Norrtälje is the publicly owned company Tiohundra, which provides primary, secondary, and tertiary care as well as social care. All areas are represented in the company’s management board which facilitates communication and collaboration between the different areas.

In comparison, standard care hospitals provide care in a system where health and social care is divided in two separate systems. Health care is organised and financed within the region, and social care as well as some types of rehabilitation (e.g. rehabilitation provided in the home) are organised and financed by the municipality. Further, primary care is organised separately from hospital care.

Data were retrieved from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) where data on THRs have been collected since the 1970s. Data are based on patients self-reported data from both pre- and post-operative surveys as well as medical data registered by health care staff. Between 2009 and 2018 the completeness rate for the register have been between 97 and 99%. The period for the present study was from January 1st 2008 until December 31st 2015. Patients aged 50 years and above, with primary osteoarthritis who had undergone a unilateral THR procedure during this period in one of the chosen hospitals and who had filled out both pre- and 1-year postoperative questionnaires on their PROMs were included. A total of 3908 patients were eligible for this study.

Patient-reported outcome measures

The generic instrument EQ-5D-3L was used to measure HRQoL. It consists of the descriptive system where the patient reports his/her own health on five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) with three severity levels (no, some and severe problems) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) called the EQ VAS. The EQ VAS reflects the patients’ overall assessment of their own health on a scale ranging from 100 (best imaginable health state) to 0 (worst imaginable health state) [26]. A single-index value of health (1 = full health, 0 = dead) for each of the 243 unique health profiles or health states described by the classification system was obtained by employing the Swedish TTO value set for EQ-5D-3L [27].

Hip pain was measured on a VAS (Pain VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable). The patients were asked to rate their hip pain during the past 4 weeks [19].

Other variables

Other factors, such as age, Body Mass Index (BMI), physical health status, walking ability, type of surgery and interventions preceding the surgery (seeing a physiotherapist or attending arthritis school), may also impact on the measured outcomes and were adjusted for in the analyses.

Patients were divided into the following age groups: 50–59 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years and above 80 years in the descriptive analyses. When controlling for age in the regression models age was used as a continuous variable.

BMI was categorised into underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), pre-obesity (BMI 25–29.9), obesity class I (BMI 30–34.9), obesity II (BMI ≥35). As there were only one patient being underweight operated on Norrtälje Hospital, we excluded the underweight in the final regression analyses.

All patients were classified according to The American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) from class I (healthy) to V (life-threatening) used globally as a standard in preoperative assessments [28]. In this study, no patients met the criteria for ASA class V. ASA class III and IV were combined in the regression analyses as there were too few patients in class IV.

The Charnley classification groups patients into three categories with respect to their walking ability: one hip involved (Charnley class A), both hips involved but no other joints (Charnley class B), and other medical factors contributing to limited walking ability (Charnley class C). The classification system was originally designed for categorization by a professional, however in SHAR it is self-reported by the patient [29].

Several types of incision approaches may be used when performing a THR [30]. In this study, the main part of the incisions performed were a posterior approach or a direct lateral approach. In previous studies, the type of incision approach that is used has been shown to have an impact on PROMs, with a posterior approach leading to slightly better PROMs compared to a direct lateral approach [31]. We therefore use incision type as a control variable in the analyses.

Patient-reported attendance at supported osteoarthritis self-management programme (SOSP) was registered from 2011 [30]. In SOSP the patients attended three theory-based meetings led by a physiotherapist and were offered an individualized exercise-program. Patient-reported information on seeing a physiotherapist or not before surgery was registered in SHAR from 2011 [30].

Statistical analyses

Data on the percentage of problems reported on the EQ-5D-3L dimensions, EQ VAS score and pain VAS score were analysed pre- and 1-year postoperatively. For the EQ-5D dimensions, Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact t-test were used. For EQ VAS score and pain VAS score the Mann-Whitney U test was performed. A significance level of < 0.05 was employed.

In order to examine the association between having a THR in an integrated care system and the change in health-related quality of life, multiple linear regression was performed for EQ VAS score and EQ-5D-3L index. Assumptions of normality, linearity and homoscedasticity were examined [32].

The relative odds of reporting some problems or severe problems in each EQ-5D dimension were examined using logistic regression.

The hip pain VAS scale outcome had a high proportion of zeros and a right-skewed distribution. In such circumstances generalised linear models or zero-inflated models have been shown to provide a better fit than standard linear regression models [33]. Although hip pain VAS scores are not counts, they have the same distributional characteristics as count data, as they consist of non-negative integers [33]. We found that the negative binomial regression provided an acceptable fit to the hip pain VAS data. A strength in relation to the zero-inflated models is that the outcomes from the negative binomial regression have been shown to be comparable with those from linear regression [33].

Analyses including the variables attendance at SOSP and visit to physiotherapist was only done on a reduced sample from 2011─2015.

The analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics and use of physiotherapy for patients in the two systems, integrated care and standard care, are reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics and use of physiopherapy of respondents in Norrtälje Hospital and standard care hospitals, n = 3908
Full size table

Baseline clinical information is reported in Table 2. A significantly higher proportion of patients had a THR with a posterior approach in the integrated care system (61%) compared to standard care (46%) (p < 0.001). The two groups of patients were comparable regarding ASA and Charnley classifications as well as hip side for operation.

Table 2 Clinical information of respondents in Norrtälje Hospital and standard care hospitals, N = 3908
Full size table

There was a significantly lower proportion of patients with problems in the mobility dimension pre-operatively (89.9% vs 93.2%, p = 0.009) in the integrated care system compared to standard care. One year after surgery there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the five EQ-5D dimensions. There was no significant difference in the mean EQ VAS score between the two care systems preoperatively or postoperatively (Table 3).

Table 3 Problems reported on the EQ-5D-3L dimensions and EQ VAS and pain VAS values, preoperative and 1-year postoperative in Norrtälje hospital and Standard care hospitals, N = 3908
Full size table

The mean hip pain VAS score was significantly lower for patients in integrated care preoperatively (p < 0.001). One year post-operatively, there were no significant differences in mean hip pain VAS scores (Table 3).

Regression analysis on EQ VAS score and EQ-5D-3L index

For the two outcomes EQ VAS scores and EQ-5D-3L index multiple linear regression analyses were conducted (Table 4), with Model 1 controlling for preoperative EQ VAS score or preoperative EQ-5D-3L index, Model 2 additionally controlling for age and sex and Model 3 additionally controlling for BMI, ASA classification and type of incision. No significant differences between integrated and standard care were found in the EQ VAS score and the EQ-5D-3L index, which was also the case for the stratified analyses. There seems to be a tendency for older patients in integrated care to have a more positive outcome compared to older patients in standard care in regards to both EQ VAS score and EQ-5D-3L index, especially among men, however these differences were not significant in any of the models.

Table 4 The relative difference in 1-year postoperative EQ VAS score and EQ-5D-3L index for patients operated at Norrtälje Hospital compared to patients operated at standard care hospitals (2008─2015)
Full size table

In the analyses of the reduced sample from 2011─2015, attendance at SOSP was associated with a positive outcome for both EQ VAS score and EQ-5D-3L index, especially among men (for EQ VAS score 4.39; p = 0.04). Seeing a physiotherapist was not statistically associated with neither EQ VAS score nor EQ-5D-3L index and also reduced the significance of attendance at SOSP, when added to the model. However, the effect of care system did not change when adding the variables to the model (results not shown).

Regression analyses on each EQ-5D-3L dimension

Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of having some or severe problems in each EQ-5D-3L dimension (Table 5). Patients in integrated care aged 70 years or above did have a significantly higher odds of reporting problems in the dimension mobility compared to patients in standard care (OR:1.37; 95% CI: 1.01─1.87), whereas female patients in integrated care had significantly lower odds of reporting any problems in the self-care dimension (OR: 0.52; 95% CI:0.29–0.96).

Table 5 The odds ratio (OR) of reporting some or severe problems in each EQ-5D-3L dimension, 1 year postoperatively for patients operated at Norrtälje Hospital compared to patients operated at standard care hospitals (2008─2015)
Full size table

Patients in integrated care aged 70 year or above had significantly higher odds of reporting problems in the anxiety/depression dimension (OR:1.28; 95% CI: 1.04–1.60). In the stratified analyses, women in integrated care had lower OR and men had higher OR for reporting problems in the anxiety/depression dimension. However, none of the stratified analyses were significant.

Regression analysis on hip pain VAS scores

Negative binomial regression was used to model the hip pain VAS score. In all models, patients in integrated care had slightly higher postoperative scores on hip pain VAS compared to patients in standard care hospitals. None of the results were statistically significant, however the results of the third model were significant on a significance level of 0.1 (1.162, p = 0.066) (Table 6). None of the stratified analyses showed any significant effect of integrated care on the hip pain VAS scores.

Table 6 The relative difference in the level of 1-year postoperative hip pain VAS score for patients operated at Norrtälje Hospital compared to patients operated at standard care hospitals (2008─2015)
Full size table

Neither attending SOSP nor seeing a physiotherapist was associated with any significant change in the hip pain VAS score and the analyses on the reduced sample from 2011─2015 did not differ significantly from the full sample.

Sensitivity analysis

To account for some of the differences in the socioeconomic composition between Norrtälje Municipality and the comparison area we performed a sensitivity analysis comparing patients in integrated care from Norrtälje Hospital with patients in standard care from Södertälje Hospital. Södertälje Municipality is in the southernmost part of Region Stockholm and more comparable to Norrtälje Municipality in terms of socioeconomic composition. Like Norrtälje Municipality, there is only one hospital. The number of surgeries for THR are almost the same in the two hospitals, however, at Södertälje Hospital they do not perform THR with the posterior approach and we were therefore only able to compare the surgeries from Norrtälje Hospital where they used the direct lateral approach. These analyses did not show any significant difference between the two hospitals.

Discussion

The findings of this study suggest that patients undergoing THR in integrated care system at the hospital in Norrtälje Municipality did not have a more positive outcome on PROMs compared to patients in standard care hospitals in the other municipalities in Region Stockholm. After surgery, patients in the integrated care system had slightly worse PROMs than patients receiving standard care in many of the outcome measures, however these differences were not statistically significant. The analyses stratified by sex and age did also not show any substantial differences between patients from the two types of care system for most outcomes. Two of the subgroup analyses on the EQ-5D-3L dimensions showed a significant difference between the two groups of patients. Patients aged 70 years or above receiving integrated care reported significantly more problems in the mobility dimension and female patients reported significantly fewer problem in the self-care dimension.

Patients undergoing a THR due to osteoarthritis are in need of early prognosis, care from different health professionals, and early rehabilitation. They may need extra care after surgery, and they often have comorbidities. This group of patients is therefore considered to be a group that could potentially benefit from integrated care as it is provided in Norrtälje Municipality. The findings in this study are therefore somewhat surprising. However, there are some limitations that needs to be considered.

One limitation is that we have no information in this study on the details of the chain of care in the different settings, how THR care was planned and actually implemented. Theoretically, in an integrated care setting, the different care providers involved might be expected to collaborate more closely than in a standard care system. However, this information was not available in our data. Use of pain medication could have impacted on the outcomes. Unfortunately, we have no information on whether the use of pain medication differed between integrated and standard care, which is a limitation with this study.

Socioeconomic position is highly correlated with health. For example, people with lower education often have worse health status than people with higher education [34,35,36]. They often have poorer compliance to medical treatment [37] and might therefore differ in their ability to follow suggested rehabilitation measures. From previous studies, we know that the proportion of people with low socioeconomic position is higher in Norrtälje Municipality than in the rest of Region Stockholm and this might have affected the results [25]. Data on socioeconomic position was not collected in SHAR; however, we were able to compare Norrtälje Municipality with Södertälje Municipality where the socioeconomic composition is more comparable. We found no differences between the two areas; however, we were only able to compare surgeries using the direct lateral approach as this was the only one used in Södertälje.

Knowledge on the patient’s home municipality could also have added valuable information to this study. It is possible that patients from Norrtälje Municipality could be part of the population receiving the surgery at standard care hospitals, as patients are free to choose providers in other municipalities within Region Stockholm. Although the opposite could also be true, it is more unlikely that patients from municipalities outside Norrtälje would prefer to go to Norrtälje Hospital due to its remote location in the region. Nevertheless, the lack of information on the patients’ home municipality could potentially bias the results if the patients choosing hospitals outside Norrtälje differ significantly from those receiving care at Norrtälje Hospital. It is possible that patients with higher socioeconomic position have better prerequisites for seeking out alternative hospitals for THR and thereby benefit more from the free choice of provider that exists within Region Stockholm. These patients might theoretically also have a better health outcome after surgery.

A strength of this study was the large coverage in the SHAR register giving the possibility to collect data for the entire population in the Region Stockholm. Validation analyses showed 97 to 99% completeness of registrations during the study period [30].

Another strength with the SHAR data is that it gives the possibility to control for many different preoperative characteristics that usually affects the outcomes measured. Comorbidity is one such factor, known to influence surgical outcome [38] and PROMs [34, 39]. Although the Charnley classification cannot be regarded as a proper comorbidity index, previous studies have shown that when the patients preoperative PROMs and Charnley category is known, controlling for further preoperative comorbidity adds little to the prediction of postoperative PROMs [38]. A generic instrument like EQ-5D encompasses different dimensions of health and allow comparisons across diseases. However, disease-specific instruments capture outcomes that might be more closely related to the disease and may be more sensitive to change. Further studies could also include disease-specific instruments.

Although the structure for integrating health and social care was put in place already in 2006, it has been a long process to implement all the different parts of the system that is called the Norrtälje Model today. When the implementation started in 2006, the elderly care services had a financial deficit. This affected the entire integration project and the deficit together with structural changes at the hospital hampered the integration of e.g. primary care [40]. It is therefore uncertain when the integration of the health and social care system in Norrtälje had reached a level where it is reasonable to expect an effect on the type of outcomes investigated in this study.

An evaluation from 2012 showed that only parts of the health and social care sector in Norrtälje Municipality worked in an integrated manner while other parts were still lagging behind [40]. As the time frame of this study was 2008─2015, it is possible that not all patients included were getting their THR in a fully developed integrated care system, which could explain some of the results. In an attempt to account for possible trend changes over the time span of this study, we looked at trends in the relative difference between postoperative and preoperative measures of both EQ VAS scores and hip pain VAS scores over time. Although there were slightly more variations over the years for patients from Norrtälje Hospital, probably due to a lower number of THRs, there were no significant differences in the time trend in the two types of hospital.

It is known that volume of surgeries affects the outcome of surgical, medical, and cardiovascular adverse events after a surgery; the more surgeries a surgeon performs, the fewer adverse events [30, 41]. However, in this study it was not possible to get information on the experience of the surgeons at the different hospitals. If doctors with more experience would be more prone to work in larger hospitals than Norrtälje Hospital, this might influence the results of this study.

Integrated care may be especially important for vulnerable groups, e.g., frail older people, patients with multiple health and psychosocial problems or patients that for different reasons have difficulties navigating in a standard care system. In future studies, socioeconomic position, level of health literacy and frailty could be important aspects to consider when investigating the effect of integrated care on THR. Also, a longer follow-up time could be of interest in order to assess if these differences persist after the initial rehabilitation period.

Conclusion

This study aimed to increase knowledge on whether and how PROs among patients undergoing a THR in an integrated care system in Norrtälje Municipality differed from PROs among patients in a standard care system. Measures of generic quality of life as well as experienced level of pain 1 year after the operation were evaluated and no significant differences were found between patients undergoing THR in an integrated care system compared to patients undergoing THR in standard care. Further studies with a longer follow-up time could be of interest, in order to assess if these results persist after the initial rehabilitation period. As the effect of integrated care might be more profound for the oldest old, with both health and social care needs, further studies focusing on this group might be of interest as well as subgroup analyses on patients in different socioeconomic position.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be accessed by applying through the Swedish National Quality Registry for Hip Arthroplasty.

Abbreviations

ASA:

The American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification

BMI:

Body mass index

HRQol:

health-related quality of life

PRO:

Patient-reported outcome

PROM:

Patientreported outcome measure

SHAR:

Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

SOSP:

Supported osteoarthritis self-management programme

THR:

Total hip replacement

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Report on Ageing and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nolte E, Pitchford E. What is the evidence on the economic impacts of integrated care? Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys. Samordnad vård och omsorg : en analys av samordningsutmaningar i ett fragmenterat vård- och omsorgssystem [Integrated care: an analysis of oordination challenges in a fragmented health and social care system]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys; 2016. Report No.: 9789187213502

  4. Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys. VIP i vården? - om utmaningar i vården av personer med kronisk sjukdom [VIP in health care - about challenges in health care for people with chronic conditions]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys; 2014.

  5. Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications--a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. Integrated care models: an overview. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrer L, Goodwin N. What are the principles that underpin integrated care? International. J Integr Care. 2014:14(4):None. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1884.

  8. Goodwin N, Dixon A, Anderson G, Wodchis WP. Providing integrated care for older people with complex needs Lessons from seven international case studies: The King’s Fund; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ouwens M, Wollersheim H, Hermens R, Hulscher M, Grol R. Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Q Health Care. 2005;17(2):141–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goddard M, Mason AR. Integrated Care: A Pill for All Ills? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;6(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.111.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Liljas AEM, Brattstrom F, Burstrom B, Schon P, Agerholm J. Impact of Integrated Care on Patient-Related Outcomes Among Older People - A Systematic Review. Int J Integr Care. 2019;19(3):6. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4632.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vårdbolaget Tiohundra. 10100 [Internet] Norrtälje: Vårdbolaget Tiohundra; 2019.2019 [Available from: http://www.tiohundra.se/.

  13. Back MA, Calltorp J. The Norrtaelje model: a unique model for integrated health and social care in Sweden. Int J Integr Care. 2015;15:e016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Burstrom B. Sweden--Recent Changes in Welfare State Arrangements. Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(1):87–104. https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.45.1.g.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Agerholm J, Bruce D, Ponce de Leon A, Burstrom B. Equity impact of a choice reform and change in reimbursement system in primary care in Stockholm County Council. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1105-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nemes S, Gordon M, Rogmark C, Rolfson O. Projections of total hip replacement in Sweden from 2013 to 2030. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(3):238–43. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.913224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1508–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60457-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Socialstyrelsen. Nationella riktlinjer för rörelseorganens sjukdomar 2012 : osteoporos, artros, inflammatorisk ryggsjukdom och ankyloserande spondylit, psoriasisartrit och reumatoid artrit : stöd för styrning och ledning. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2012. Available from: https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/boa/r/Socialstyrelsens-riktlinjer-f-r-r-relseorganens-sjukdomar-rJBdxcrze.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rolfson O, Karrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(7):867–75. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.93b7.25737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lieberman JR, Leger RR, Tao JC, Clohisy JC, Meneghini RM. Total hip arthroplasty surveillance: when do we see our patients postoperatively? J Arthroplast. 2011;26(8):1161–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Paunescu F, Didilescu A, Antonescu DM. Factors that may influence the functional outcome after primary total hip arthroplasty. Clujul Med (1957). 2013;86(2):121–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Appleby J, Devlin NJ, Parkin DW. Using patient reported outcomes to improve health care. Chichester, West Sussex ; Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Holmes MM, Lewith G, Newell D, Field J, Bishop FL. The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(2):245–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1449-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Olde Rikkert MGM, van der Wees PJ, Schoon Y, Westert GP. Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measures to Promote Integrated Care. Int J Integr Care. 2018;18(2):8. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3961.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Doheny M, Agerholm J, Orsini N, Schon P, Burstrom B. Impact of integrated care on trends in the rate of emergency department visits among older persons in Stockholm County: an interrupted time series analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e036182. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-3L User Guide. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Burstrom K, Sun S, Gerdtham UG, Henriksson M, Johannesson M, Levin LA, et al. Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):431–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0496-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Daabiss M. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesthesia. 2011;55(2):111–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.79879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010;11(4):203–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0115-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kärrholm J, Mohaddes M, Odin D, Vinblad J, Rogmark C, Rolfson O. Svenska Höftprotesregistret: Årsrapport 2017. Göteborg: Svenska Höftprotesregistret; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lindgren JV, Wretenberg P, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Rolfson O. Patient-reported outcome is influenced by surgical approach in total hip replacement: a study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 42,233 patients. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(5):590–6. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Essential medical statistics. 2nd ed. Massachussets: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Goulet JL, Buta E, Bathulapalli H, Gueorguieva R, Brandt CA. Statistical Models for the Analysis of Zero-Inflated Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale Data. J Pain. 2017;18(3):340–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(7):621–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mielck A, Vogelmann M, Leidl R. Health-related quality of life and socioeconomic status: inequalities among adults with a chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Konig HH, Bernert S, Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H, Martinez M, Vilagut G, et al. Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Med Care. 2009;47(2):255–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318184759e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denekens J. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001;26(5):331–42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2710.2001.00363.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Greene ME, Rolfson O, Gordon M, Garellick G, Nemes S. Standard Comorbidity Measures Do Not Predict Patient-reported Outcomes 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(11):3370–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4195-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Heyworth IT, Hazell ML, Linehan MF, Frank TL. How do common chronic conditions affect health-related quality of life? Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(568):e353–8. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453990.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Schön P, Hagman L, Wånell SE. Kan två bli en : TioHundraprojektets effekter på vård och omsorg för målgruppen de mest sjuka äldre. Stockholm: Stiftelsen Stockholm läns äldrecentrum; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ravi B, Jenkinson R, Austin PC, Croxford R, Wasserstein D, Escott B, et al. Relation between surgeon volume and risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty: propensity score matched cohort study. BMJ. 2014;348:g3284. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jonas Wastesson and members of the research group from “Health outcomes and economic evaluation” at KI for valuable comments in the initial phase of this project.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. This research was carried out as part of the projects “Integrated care for older people with complex health problems. How does it affect health, health care utilization and health equity?” funded by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte) (grant 2017–01431); and “The impact of market oriented reforms and management models: Can integrated care mitigate the adverse effects among older people with greater needs?” also funded by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte) (grant 2017–02155). The funders did not participate in the study in anyway. The funding was used for salary and paying for the ethical application.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE – 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden

    J. Agerholm

  2. Equity and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    J. Agerholm & K. Burström

  3. Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    F. S. Teni, J. Sundbye & K. Burström

  4. Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden

    O. Rolfson

  5. Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden

    O. Rolfson

Authors
  1. J. Agerholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. S. Teni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Sundbye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O. Rolfson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Burström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JA, JS, OR and KB conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination. JS performed preliminary analyses and FST designed the statistical models and performed the final analyses. JA and JS drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Agerholm.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has received ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (# 2019/00758).

Registration of an individual in a quality register does not require written informed consent, however the patients are informed about that their data being registered and can choose to opt-out, or to withdraw earlier implicit consent at any time without providing any explanation (7 chap. 2 §. SFS 2008:355).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agerholm, J., Teni, F.S., Sundbye, J. et al. Patient-reported outcomes among patients undergoing total hip replacement in an integrated care system and in a standard care system in Region Stockholm, Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 1414 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08722-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08722-8

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us