Skip to main content
Download PDF

Willingness to pay for HPV vaccine among female health care workers in a Chinese nationwide survey

BMC Health Services Research volume 22, Article number: 1324 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Payment methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine could substantially influence vaccination behavior. In China, HPV vaccination uptake remains currently low. This study aims to determine willingness to pay (WTP) for HPV vaccines among Chinese female health care workers under different payment scenarios.

Methods

This is a nationwide online survey recruiting female health care workers aged 18–45 years from 31 provinces throughout China. We collected the respondents’ vaccination status of HPV vaccines and their sociodemographics. Two WTPs were defined and estimated in the study. A general WTP for HPV vaccination was determined using the contingent valuation method with double dichotomous choice bidding. A WTP out-of-pocket was estimated for each HPV vaccine under two scenarios, including partial coverage by governmental subsidy or partial incorporation in basic medical insurance. Accordingly, a multivariable linear regression model was employed to determine the association between sociodemographis and general WTP. Then the maximum WTP out-of-pocket was compared among the respondents’ attitude shift towards HPV vaccination, payment scenarios, and levels of vaccine attributes, using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results

A total of 15,969 respondents were included in the study. The median general WTP was 2000 CNY (interquartile range, 1000–3200 CNY), positively associated with younger age, unmarried status, higher monthly income, fewer children, more positive vaccination behavior, working in tertiary hospital, higher local GDP and HDI (each P < 0.05). Moreover, the median WTP out-of-pocket was 1250 CNY (540–2000 CNY). It was significantly higher for vaccines partly covered by governmental subsidy (median, 1250 CNY; interquartile range, 560–2000 CNY), imported vaccines (1260 CNY; 630–1960 CNY), and 9-valent vaccines (1400 CNY; 750–2240 CNY) (each P < 0.001). Additionally, majority of respondents did not change their attitude towards HPV vaccination between two payment scenarios; those remaining with more expensive HPV vaccines (51.1%) had higher WTP out-of-pocket (1400 CNY; 560–2250 CNY) than those with cheaper vaccines (39.0%) (1120 CNY; 490–1960 CNY) (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Chinese female health care workers have high WTP for HPV vaccines. A direct public funding for HPV vaccination is more preferable. Our findings may facilitate the adjustment of HPV vaccination strategy and payment mechanism in China.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection [1], with the probability of HPV infection exceeding 80% for women and 90% for males across their lifetime [2]. HPV can cause anogenital warts, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, oropharyngeal cancer, and a variety of anogenital cancers in men and women [3]. Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women, with an estimated 604,000 new cases and 342,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. In China, there are an estimated 110,900 new cases and 59,000 deaths from cervical cancer according to nationwide cancer statistics by the National Cancer Center in 2020 [4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) called for all countries to take action to help end the suffering caused by cervical cancer in May 2018 [5]. In addition, WHO Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020 identifies HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening and treatment as best buys. These interventions have been further recommended for inclusion in WHO member states’ national health plans [6].

HPV vaccination has been proven effective in the prevention of cervical cancer in both high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries [7]. However, it has been estimated that cervical cancer burden may continually increase in the future 15 years in countries like China and Japan which have low uptake of the vaccine [8]. In China, there are routine physical examination programs or certain research programs for HPV screening, whereas no national screening program. Moreover, HPV vaccination uptake remains currently low due to multiple factors, including limited supplies of HPV vaccines, low awareness of the vaccination, and concern of possible adverse events following immunization [9]. Moreover, vaccine price could substantially influence vaccination behavior, as has been found for the influenza vaccine in the UK, rotavirus vaccine in Asian countries, and HPV vaccine in those countries with highest burden of cervical cancer [10,11,12]. The cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination remains inconsistent among different studies, which might be partly attributable to the high price of HPV vaccines [13]. Thus, there warrants further improvement in the pricing and payment mechanism for increasing the uptake of HPV vaccines. This is particularly important in countries or localities which are deciding whether to provide direct public funding for vaccinations, or instead rely on coverage through insurance programs.

Since 2020, multiple cities have included pilot HPV immunization programs in China’s mainland. Diverse strategies have been implemented, such as governmental subsidies and payment by basic medical insurance for certain or non-certain HPV vaccines [14]. It has been documented that different payment mechanisms may influence the willingness to pay (WTP) and vaccine uptake, such as COVID-19 vaccine in China [15]. There are usually two common methods for estimating WTP using the theory of random utility, including discrete choice experiment and contingent valuation method [16,17,18]. These methods have been utilized in identifying the acceptable price thresholds for dengue vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine [19,20,21,22]. In addition, female health care workers have more professional knowledge and make decisions on HPV vaccination depending more on their own knowledge and awareness, compared with general female population. Thus, this study was performed to assess the WTP for HPV vaccines under two payment scenarios among female health care workers aged 18–45 and then identify the factors that could potentially influence the WTP. The findings would facilitate further improvement of HPV vaccination strategies in Chinese adult females.

Materials and methods

Study design

We performed a cross-sectional study to investigate the female health care workers on HPV vaccination behavior and their WTP for HPV vaccines. Using an online questionnaire with convenience sampling method, a total of 15,969 female health care workers aged 18 to 45 years were recruited from 31 provinces in China’s mainland between November 15 and December 22, 2021. In the questionnaire, sociodemographics and HPV vaccination behavior were collected. Moreover, WTP was determined for HPV vaccines, including four actual vaccines (domestic 2-valent, imported 2-valent, imported 4-valent, and imported 9-valent) and one assumed vaccine (domestic 9-valent), under two payment scenarios (partly covered by governmental subsidy or partly incorporated in basic medical insurance).

In addition, we included the Human Development Index (HDI), which is a long-standing summary measure developed by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) [23], to assess the impact of development in different regions on the WTP for HPV vaccines. The HDI is defined as the average achievement of the following three dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life (based on life expectancy at birth); being knowledgeable (based on mean and expected years of schooling); and having a decent standard of living (based on gross national income per capita). The HDI was assessed according to four levels (low, < 0.55; medium, 0.55–0.7; high, 0.7–0.8; very high, ≥ 0.8).

HPV vaccination behavior

We investigated the respondents’ vaccination status of HPV vaccines and prepared four responses, including “had been vaccinated”, “had not been vaccinated but had made an appointment”, “had not been vaccinated or made an appointment but intend to receive vaccination”, and “not intend to receive vaccination”.

Subsequently, the first two responses were collapsed together, because they had a positive vaccination behavior. We classified these responses into three groups, “had been vaccinated or had made an appointment” (positive), “had not been vaccinated or made an appointment” (neutral), and “not intend to vaccinate” (negative). In a multivariable linear regression model, we scored three groups as follows: 3 points for “had been vaccinated or had made an appointment”, 2 points for “had not been vaccinated or made an appointment”, and 1 point for “not intend to vaccinate”.

WTP measurement

Using the contingent valuation method, a combination of closed and open-ended questions was used to precisely determine the respondents’ general WTP, which was defined as a WTP for general HPV vaccination rather than certain vaccines. In the double dichotomous choice bidding format, we prepared questions on two stages. In the initial stage, the questions contained a range of bid amounts (800 CNY, 1600 CNY, 2400 CNY, 3200 CNY, and 4000 CNY), to which respondents stated their WTP as “yes” or “no” to hypothetical vaccine price. These initial bid amounts were randomly distributed among respondents during the questionnaire survey. In the follow-up stage, the questions were listed with bid amount of a 400 CNY plus or minus to the initial bid amounts depending on the response to the initial bid amounts. If the response to the initial bid amount was “yes”, follow-up bid amount increased by a 400 CNY; if the response to the initial bid amount was “no”, follow-up bid amount decreased by a 400 CNY. For example, in the initial stage, a question was asked to respondents, such as “Are you willing to pay for the HPV vaccine of 4000 CNY, regardless of your HPV vaccination status?”. If respondents answered “yes” to the initial bid amount, follow-up bid amount was redirected to be 4400 CNY in the follow-up stage; if response answered “no” to the initial bid amount, follow-up bid amount was redirected to be 3600 CNY.

Consequently, responses to the double-bounded contingent valuation questions were classified as four dichotomous outcomes: (1) respondents were not willing to pay for HPV vaccines at both initial bid amount and a lower follow-up bid amount (“no”, “no”); (2) respondents were not willing to pay for HPV vaccines at the initial bid amount but willing to pay at a lower follow-up bid amount (“no”, “yes”); (3) respondents were willing to pay for HPV vaccines at the initial bid amount but not at a higher follow-up bid amount (“yes”, “no”); and (4) respondents were willing to pay for HPV vaccines at both the initial bid amount and a higher follow-up bid amount (“yes”, “yes”). These four dichotomous outcomes were used as a categorical variable in the analysis. Furthermore, for all respondents, an open-ended question was prepared to ask for the maximum amount of general WTP, which was considered as a continuous variable in the analysis.

In addition, we prepared two questions to investigate the minimum percentage of cost of an HPV vaccine under two payment scenarios, for which respondents are willing to pay the remaining cost of vaccine (“if governmental subsidy or basic medical insurance could cover partial cost of HPV vaccine, which minimum percentage of the coverage do you expect when you are willing to pay the remaining cost”). We utilized a 9-item Likert scale, consecutively from 10% to 90% with an incremental percentage of 10%. Respondents’ maximum WTP out-of-pocket was calculated for each HPV vaccine, including four actual and one assumed vaccines, based on their actual and estimated prices and expected minimum percentage covered by governmental subsidy or basic medical insurance.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented. Four dichotomous responses of the general WTP (“no”, “no”; “no”, “yes”; “yes”, “no”; “yes”, “yes”) were compared across the sociodemographics using chi-square tests. Then a multivariable linear regression model was employed to determine the association between explanatory variables and general WTP [24, 25]. The variance inflation factor (VIF) [26], White test [27], and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test [28] were used to assess the multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and residual normality of the data, respectively. A VIF value of lower than 10 was used to define no multicollinearity between variables. A P value greater than 0.05 in the White test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test indicated no heteroscedasticity and normal distribution of residuals, respectively. Explanatory variables that were not significant at P < 0.05 in the initial model were excluded. The final model was achieved with stepwise regression method using EViews 9.0 (IHS Global INC, Irvine, CA).

Respondents’ attitudes toward HPV vaccines between two payment scenarios were compared across sociodemographics using chi-square tests. Then the maximum WTP out-of-pocket was compared among the attitude shift, payment scenarios, and levels of vaccine attributes. As the maximum WTP out-of-pocket was non-normally distributed continuous variable, we utilized non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. All the analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Significance was assessed at P < 0.05.

Results

Respondents’ sociodemographics

A total of 15,969 female health care workers aged 18–45 years from 31 provinces in China’s mainland completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 30.6 ± 6.2 years, with 4822 (30.2%) aged 18–26 years, 7714 (48.3%) aged 27–35 years, and 3433 (21.5%) aged 36–45 years. Majority of the respondents were married (61.1%), Han Chinese (93.3%), had a bachelor degree (68.3%), monthly income less than 8000 CNY (82.3%), primary professional title (57.7%), worked in tertiary hospitals (74.2%), lived in the city with GDP of ≥ 1.6 trillion CNY (42.4%) and HDI of 0.7–0.8 (63.0%).

General WTP for HPV vaccination

In the contingent valuation questions, the percentage of respondents whose responses to initial and follow-up bid amount were “yes, yes” gradually decreased with increasing initial bid amount, while those whose responses were “no, no” gradually increased (Table 1). When the initial amount was 800 CNY, 1600 CNY, 2400 CNY and 3200 CNY, the percentage of respondents whose responses were “yes, yes” was the highest (66.2%, 57.1%, 51.1%, and 40.8%, respectively); in contrast, when the initial amount was 4000 CNY, the percentage of those whose responses were “no, no” was the highest (47.6%) (Table 1). Furthermore, in each group with diverse initial bid amounts, respondents aged 18–26, with monthly income > 8000 CNY, no child, and positive vaccination behavior were more likely to choose “yes, yes” (each P < 0.05), whereas those aged 36–45, married, living in a city with a GDP ≤ 0.6 trillion CNY, with middle professional title or above, and who did not intend to vaccinate were more likely to choose “no, no” (each P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table 1).

Table 1 Number of respondents stratified by willingness to pay for HPV vaccines
Full size table

Moreover, the median general WTP was determined to be 2000 CNY (interquartile range, IQR, 1000–3200 CNY) for HPV vaccination. A multivariable linear regression model indicated that respondents who were younger, unmarried, had a higher monthly income, fewer children, positive vaccination behavior, worked in tertiary hospitals, and lived in the cities with higher GDP and HDI, would intend to pay higher WTP (Table 2), which was similar to the findings when the general WTP was classified as four dichotomous responses.

Table 2 Factors associated with willingness to pay for HPV vaccines among Chinese female health workers
Full size table

WTP out-of-pocket under two payment scenarios

We classified the respondents’ attitude shift towards HPV vaccines between two payment scenarios (partly covered by governmental subsidy and by basic medical insurance). In the respondents, 51.1% and 39.0% intended to remain with more expensive HPV vaccines and remain with cheaper vaccines, respectively, regardless of payment scenario. Few respondents changed the attitudes, including choosing more expensive vaccines (7.2%) or cheaper vaccines (2.7%) if governmental subsidy is available instead of basic medical insurance. Respondents differed significantly by their attitude shift towards HPV vaccines across sociodemographics (Supplementary Table 2).

The median WTP out-of-pocket was calculated to be 1250 CNY (IQR, 540–2000) and significantly differed among the attitude shift (P < 0.001). It was lowest (median, 1120 CNY; IQR, 490–1960 CNY) in those remaining with cheaper vaccine regardless of payment scenario, while highest (median, 1400 CNY; IQR, 560–2250 CNY) in those remaining with more expensive vaccine regardless of payment scenario (Table 3).

Table 3 Willingness to pay out-of-pocket for HPV vaccines by attitude shift between two payment scenarios
Full size table

WTP out-of-pocket associated with vaccine attributes

We further determined the mean WTP out-of-pocket according to vaccine attributes, including vaccine manufacturer (domestic and imported), valency of vaccine (2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent), and payment scenario (governmental subsidy and basic medical insurance). Respondents preferred to pay higher WTP out-of-pocket if governmental subsidy is available for each HPV vaccine (each P < 0.05) (Table 4). Remarkably, median WTP was approximately 50% of the current actual and estimated prices of each HPV vaccine, regardless of payment scenario. The WTP out-of-pocket was significantly higher for imported vaccines (median, 1260 CNY; IQR, 630–1960 CNY), 9-valent vaccines (median, 1400 CNY; IQR, 750–2240 CNY), and HPV vaccines partly covered by governmental subsidy (median, 1250 CNY; IQR, 560–2000 CNY) (each P < 0.001) (Fig. 1).

Table 4 Willingness to pay out-of-pocket for HPV vaccines under two payment scenarios
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Maximum willingness to pay (WTP) out-of-pocket for an HPV vaccine, stratified by vaccine attributes, including vaccine manufacturer (domestic and imported), valency of vaccine (2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent), and payment scenario (partly covered by governmental subsidy and by basic medical insurance)

Full size image

Discussion

Our study determined the WTP for HPV vaccines among female health care workers in a nationwide survey in China’s mainland. The median general WTP and WTP out-of-pocket was 2000 CNY (approximately 303 USD) and 1250 CNY (approximately 189 USD), respectively. As a female professional population, their WTP was moderately higher than the 49 USD which was documented in women in Vietnam in 2018 [29]. However, WTP out-of-pocket was determined to be half of the current actual and estimated prices for each HPV vaccine, suggesting it remains crucial to reduce vaccine prices or improve payment mechanisms for increasing vaccine uptake.

We found several demographic characteristics were strongly related to higher WTP for the HPV vaccines. HPV vaccination should preferably be performed in younger females to have the most impact, so respondents who were older, married, and had children in this study intended to pay a lower general WTP. Similar findings were also found in previous studies in Vietnam and Hong Kong [29, 30]. Notably, our study included local GDP and HDI as variables in the analysis and identified a positive association with WTP, suggesting that both individual and regional socioeconomic status may increase WTP for HPV vaccines. In a study in the United States in 2020, socioeconomic factors had a strong influence on the HPV vaccination behavior [31]. These studies reveal the need to improve payment mechanisms, particularly in areas of the country which are more socioeconomically disadvantaged.

We found the payment mechanism significantly impacted WTP. Specifically, if HPV vaccines are partly covered by governmental subsidy, WTP out-of-pocket was significantly higher across all five HPV vaccines, compared to if vaccines are partly incorporated in basic medical insurance. It might be interpreted that respondents believe the payment for HPV vaccines by basic medical insurance would cost their own money in the medical insurance that would have paid for more medicine, while payment by governmental subsidy is kind of direct additional support. This finding may provide a clue to design more appropriate payment mechanism for HPV vaccination. In addition, WTP out-of-pocket was highest among respondents remaining with more expensive HPV vaccines, whereas lowest among those remaining with cheaper vaccines, regardless of payment scenario. It indicated the WTP varied along with choice of vaccines, though vaccine price had limited effect on the choice decision, which was also observed in parents of middle school students towards HPV vaccination in China [32]. Currently, multiple cities in China’s mainland have established diverse payment mechanisms for expanding HPV vaccination, including by basic medical insurance and by governmental subsidy [33]. Therefore, it is urgently necessary to prospectively observe the change in the HPV vaccination intent and subsequent uptake in these cities.

In addition, our study explored the difference in the WTP associated with vaccine manufacturer and valency. We found that the WTP for 9-valent vaccine was higher than those for 4-valent and 2-valent (1400 CNY vs. 1250 CNY and 780 CNY). Similarly, a study in 2020 found that Chinese parents of primary school students were also willing to pay more for 9-valent HPV vaccines, rather than 4-valent or 2-valent [9]. However, the WTP for imported HPV vaccines was higher than that for domestic vaccines (1260 CNY vs. 1120 CNY) in our study, which was similar to previous findings that imported HPV vaccines were highly preferable in China [34]. Furthermore, our study included an assumed 9-valent domestic vaccine in the analysis, in addition to four actual vaccines. It may suggest there is a need of a multi-valent domestic HPV vaccine with a lower price for expanding HPV vaccination in China. Therefore, our findings may provide new insights into the adjustment of HPV vaccination strategy and preparation of a more proper payment mechanism.

Limitations of this study need to be discussed. First, we recruited female health care workers in 31 provinces throughout China’s mainland, which may improve the representativeness and generalizability of our study. However, there could be biases due to the socioeconomic disparity across the nation. Second, in applying contingent valuation techniques, respondents could have been influenced by the range of values chosen for the payment scale question design rather than their true maximum WTP values. It is also possible that some respondents may have stated no WTP value or very low WTP value, especially if they feel that HPV vaccination should be paid by the government.

Our study has several strengths. First, with our large sample size and robust findings, our study provides empirical evidence on the WTP for HPV vaccines among Chinese female health care workers. Second, we defined and calculated two WTPs in the study. A general WTP determined the cost for HPV vaccines that respondents could afford, and a WTP out-of-pocket determined the amount that respondents willing to pay for each vaccine under either a governmental subsidy or coverage in basic medical insurance. These WTPs may comprehensively reflect the respondents’ intent to pay for HPV vaccines and their payment preference.

Conclusion

This study found that Chinese female health care workers had a high general WTP for HPV vaccines, which was associated with sociodemographics and local GDP and HDI. When comparing scenarios of payment that is covered by governmental subsidy vs. incorporation in basic medical insurance, 90.1% of respondents did not change their attitudes towards HPV vaccination. Moreover, they preferred to pay higher WTP out-of-pocket for vaccines partly covered by governmental subsidy, imported vaccines, and 9-valent vaccines. Our study suggests a direct public funding for HPV vaccination may be more preferable among Chinese female health care workers.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author Dr. Yihan Lu on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CNY :

Chinese Yuan

COVID-19 :

Coronavirus Disease 2019

GDP :

Gross Domestic Product

HDI :

Human Development Index

HPV :

Human papillomavirus

IQR :

Interquartile range

USD :

United States dollar

WHO :

World Health Organization

WTP :

Willingness to pay

References

  1. Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E, Dunne EF, Mahajan R, Ocfemia MC, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(3):187–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318286bb53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chesson HW, Dunne EF, Hariri S, Markowitz LE. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41(11):660–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunne EF, Park IU. HPV and HPV-associated diseases. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2013;27(4):765–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cervical cancer. an NCD we can overcome. Speech by WHO Director-General, 18 May 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/cervical-cancer-an-ncd-we-can-overcome. [accessed 10 April 2022].

  6. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable. Diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/94384. [Accessed 10 April 2022].

  7. World Health Organization (WHO), Cervical cancer elimination strategy. 2019. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/cervical-cancer-an-ncd-we-can-overcome [Accessed 10 April 2022].

  8. Lin S, Gao K, Gu S, You L, Qian S, Tang M, et al. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality, with predictions for the next 15 years. Cancer. 2021;127(21):4030–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin Y, Lin Z, He F, Hu Z, Zimet GD, Alias H, et al. Factors influencing intention to obtain the HPV vaccine and acceptability of 2-, 4- and 9-valent HPV vaccines: A study of undergraduate female health sciences students in Fujian, China. Vaccine. 2019;37(44):6714–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohli MA, Maschio M, Mould-Quevedo JF, Drummond M, Weinstein MC. The cost-effectiveness of an adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the United Kingdom. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(11):4603–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1971017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson EA, de Quadros CA, Santosham M, Parashar UD, Steele D. Overcoming perceptions of financial barriers to rotavirus vaccine introduction in Asia. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9(11):2418–26. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.26107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallagher KE, LaMontagne DS, Watson-Jones D. Status of HPV vaccine introduction and barriers to country uptake. Vaccine. 2018;36(32 Pt A):4761–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosettie KL, Joffe JN, Sparks GW, Aravkin A, Chen S, Compton K, et al. Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in 195 countries: a meta-regression analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0260808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260808.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiamen Municipal Health Commission, Notice of the Healthy Xiamen Action Promotion Committee on Printing and Distributing the Implementation. Plan (Trial) of the “Two Cancers” Prevention and Control Project for girls in Xiamen City from 2021 to 2025. https://hfpc.xm.gov.cn/zfxxgk/ml/09/07/202203/t20220330_2646665.htm.

  15. Wang J, Lyu Y, Zhang H, Jing R, Lai X, Feng H, et al. Willingness to pay and financing preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China. Vaccine. 2021;39(14):1968–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Catma S, Varol S. Willingness to pay for a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: a contingent valuation approach. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(4):318. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cerda A, Rojas J, García L. Willingness to pay for an improvement in the environmental quality in the Great Santiago. Chile Lecturas de Economia. 2007;67(67):143–60. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n67a2025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bateman IJ, Cole MA, Georgiou S, Hadley DJ. Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: a case study considering the benefits of urban river water quality improvements. J Environ Manage. 2006;79(3):221–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yeo HY, Shafie AA. The acceptance and willingness to pay (WTP) for hypothetical dengue vaccine in Penang, Malaysia: a contingent valuation study. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018;16:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0163-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Heinzen RR, Bridges JF. Comparison of four contingent valuation methods to estimate the economic value of a pneumococcal vaccine in Bangladesh. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(4):481–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646230808063X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou L, Gu B, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng P, Huo Y, et al. On imported and domestic human papillomavirus vaccines: cognition, attitude, and willingness to pay in Chinese medical students. Front Public Health. 2022;10:863748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.863748.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerda AA, García LY, Albornoz DV. Parents willingness to pay for a human papillomavirus vaccine to protect their adolescent daughters: Maule Region, Chile. Salud Publica Mex. 2014;56(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v56i1.7322 Spanish.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu QD, Zhang Q, Chen W, Bai XL, Liang TB. Human development index is associated with mortality-to-incidence ratios of gastrointestinal cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(32):5261–70. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Harapan H, Anwar S, Bustamam A, Radiansyah A, Angraini P, Fasli R, et al. Willingness to pay for a dengue vaccine and its associated determinants in Indonesia: a community-based, cross-sectional survey in Aceh. Acta Trop. 2017;166:249–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.11.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harapan H, Mudatsir M, Yufika A, Nawawi Y, Wahyuniati N, Anwar S, et al. Community acceptance and willingness-to-pay for a hypothetical Zika vaccine: a cross-sectional study in Indonesia. Vaccine. 2019;37(11):1398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim JH. Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(6):558–69. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayes AF, Cai L. Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: an introduction and software implementation. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(4):709–22. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt AF, Finan C. Linear regression and the normality assumption. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;98:146–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tran BX, Than PTQ, Doan TTN, Nguyen HLT, Thi Mai H, Nguyen THT, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice on and willingness to pay for human papillomavirus vaccine: a cross-sectional study in Hanoi, Vietnam. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:945–54. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S165357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong CKH, Man KKC, Ip P, Kwan M, McGhee SM. Mothers’ preferences and willingness to pay for human papillomavirus vaccination for their daughters: a discrete choice experiment in Hong Kong. Value Health. 2018;21(5):622–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pingali C, Yankey D, Elam-Evans LD, Markowitz LE, Williams CL, Fredua B, et al. National, Regional, State, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years - United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(35):1183–90. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7035a1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu S, Chang J, Hayat K, Li P, Ji W, Fang Y. Parental preferences for HPV vaccination in junior middle school girls in China: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2020;38(52):8310–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xia C, Xu X, Zhao X, Hu S, Qiao Y, Zhang Y, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of eliminating cervical cancer through a tailored optimal pathway: a modeling study. BMC Med. 2021;19(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01930-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin Y, Su Z, Chen F, Zhao Q, Zimet GD, Alias H, et al. Chinese mothers’ intention to vaccinate daughters against human papillomavirus (HPV), and their vaccine preferences: a study in Fujian Province. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(1):304–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1756152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. ALW’s salary was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K01AI137123. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University School of Public Health, 131 Dong An Road, 200032, Shanghai, China

    Xinyue Lu, Weiyu Zhou & Yihan Lu

  2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Mengdi Ji & Abram L. Wagner

  3. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, The Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200233, Shanghai, China

    Weifeng Huang & Xiaoping Shao

  4. 131 Dong An Road, 200032, Shanghai, China

    Yihan Lu

Authors
  1. Xinyue Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengdi Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abram L. Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weifeng Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoping Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weiyu Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yihan Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YL and WH conceived of this study. YL, WH, and XS designed the questionnaire. XL and WZ prepared the online questionnaire and investigation. YL, XL and MJ analyzed data and drafted initial manuscript. AW, XS, and WH critically revised the manuscript and helped interpret data. All authors reviewed the final manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yihan Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, including the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fudan University School of Public Health (IRB 00002408 and FWA 00002399) under IRB #2021-09-0919. When the female health care workers clicked the online questionnaire, they first read the informed consent; only those who clicked “agree” to the consent could fulfill the questionnaire. Thus, they had provided the informed consent to the study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Additionally, we did not collect any personal identifier in the questionnaire.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary Table 1. Response to diverse initial bid amounts across sociodemographics among Chinese female health care workers. Supplementary Table 2. Attitude shift towards HPVvaccines between two payment scenarios across sociodemographics.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, X., Ji, M., Wagner, A.L. et al. Willingness to pay for HPV vaccine among female health care workers in a Chinese nationwide survey. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 1324 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08716-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08716-6

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us