Skip to main content

Physicians’ and nurses’ perspective on chronic disease care practices in Primary Health Care in Brazil: a qualitative study

Abstract

Background

Primary health care-oriented systems provide better healthcare, especially for chronic diseases. This study analyzed the perspectives of physicians and nurses performing care for patients with chronic diseases in Primary Health Care in a Brazilian city.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil, using semi-structured interviews with five physicians and 18 nurses. The interview included questions from an analytical matrix based on three dimensions of healthcare practices: organizational, technical care, and biopsychosocial, following a deductive approach. The interviews were fully transcribed and analyzed using a thematic categorical approach.

Results

The results indicated that the provision of chronic care occurs in a comprehensive way. Potentialities were identified in the diversification of access, offer of care actions and technologies, integration of teamwork, and bringing together social networks to foster autonomy and self-care. Weaknesses were mostly related to the high number of people in the teams, follow-up of several cases, high turnover of support teams, low integration of Primary Health Care with other levels, difficulties in intersectoral articulation and family participation in care.

Conclusion

The multidimensional assessment of health care practices aimed at individuals with chronic noncommunicable diseases was useful to portray the strengths and weaknesses of the services. It also ratifies the need to consider the importance of and investment in primary health care by offering the necessary technical, political, logistical and financial support to the units, to ensure the sustainability of the actions by nurses, doctors and entire team.

Peer Review reports

Background

High morbidity and mortality due to chronic diseases is a global challenge, especially in developing countries [1] where socioeconomic inequalities have a striking impact on risk factors and decreasing access to health services [2]. In 2021, chronic diseases accounted for 73,6% of all deaths worldwide, with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in the top ten list of most important causes [1].

In Brazil, the burden of chronic diseases remains high despite the implementation of public policies aimed at controlling risk factors, preventing, and promoting health; implemented fiscal austerity measures reduce the role of the state in providing public services focusing on chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCD) [3]. The epidemiological and demographic transitions culminated in changes in the patterns of illness and increased life expectancy, implying an increased load of NCD, that will need to be coordinated by health professionals to provide higher-quality chronic disease management [4].

Chronic diseases pose a considerable challenge for local health systems. Primary health care (PHC) demands the development of care practices aimed at the early identification of people with risk factors and disease, risk stratification, promotion/prevention/assistance interventions, regular follow-up of health conditions, treatment adherence encouragement [5,6,7], in addition to health care coordination and patient screening in the health care network (HCN) [8]. The PHC oriented health systems provide chronic disease care in terms of resolution, equity, and cost–benefit, as they improve access, and avoid redundant exams, consultations, procedures and hospitalizations [2, 9].

In Brazil, inspired by the Alma Ata conference for the organization of primary care, healthcare practices have been highlighted with the advent of the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde-SUS) in the 80 s and the Family Health Strategy (FHS) in the 90 s, increasing the role of PHC in restructuring, strengthening, and rationalizing health systems [9]. Furthermore, free access, territorial focus, orientation to individual/family/community health needs, providing a range of accessible and resolutive services to regularly and continuously meet the population’s needs, and efficient healthcare coordination between PHC and other levels of care are some PHC governing principles in the country [10].

Although PHC services may be better positioned to address the prevention and management of NCD, other deficiencies in primary healthcare practices have been identified in many studies [10,11,12,13]. In Brazil, despite efforts to address disease burden, this issue is perpetuated by insufficient funding, human and material supply chain issues [13], and fragmented health systems [7, 14,15,16]. In this way, the approach to chronic diseases is multifaceted as it involves several dimensions (organizational, technical care, psychosocial), which are often difficult to consider together in health research [13]. Qualitative methodologies have been widely used to obtain a better contextual understanding of health services and how they impact on chronic conditions [17], as well as to address perspectives related to the practices of health professionals in PHC services, giving an indication gaps in care delivery. This study analyzed the perspectives of physicians and nurses performing care for patients with chronic diseases in Primary Health Care in a Brazilian city.

Methods

Study design

This is a qualitative study that maps a multidimensional scope of chronic disease care practices in the context of the FHS in Brazil.

Study setting

The study was conducted in Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brazil, an important economic and educational nucleus. This city is the medium-sized in relation to Brazil and head office of the Health Region of Southwest Bahia, which includes 19 other cities, and serves as a focal point for secondary and tertiary health service delivery. It has a medium socioeconomic development, but still marked by many disparities in terms of income and schooling. The estimated population is 306,866, a human development index of 0.678, gross domestic product per capita of BRL 20,761.05, and 238 health establishments, of which 48 are health units; of the 48 health units, 35 health unit are in the FHS model [18]. The organization of the Unified Health System in Brazil can be seen in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hierarchical organization of the Unified Health System in Brazil and the relationships between levels of care. The figure illustrates the hierarchical organization of the Unified Health System (SUS) and the relationships between levels of care. On the right side are the SUS principles that cover all levels of health care, bidirectional arrows show this interdependence. At the bottom, it is shown that the population’s demands must reach the primary level, contained in the shaded rectangle and are directed to health units with the Family Health Strategy (FHS) or to the Basic Health Unit (BHU). The main difference between the units is that the first has a defined territory and population, and operates under the logic of teamwork, while the second does not. Support actions by the Family Health Support Center (FHSC) contribute to increasing the scope of FHS actions and improving health conditions. It is indicated that PHC can solve about 80% of the population’s demands by coordinating the care of people between the levels of care, as shown in the triangle on the right

These health units have 29 FHS in urban areas and 19 in rural areas, comprising approximately 48% of the population, and representing the main Brazilian model of primary health care. These health units emphasize health care in community health facilities and at home to a defined local population, having about 2,000–3,500 people registered. The health teams include physicians, nurses, dentists, nursing technicians, and community health workers (CHW). In addition, they have the assistance of multidisciplinary family health support centers (FHSC), composed of specialists such as physiotherapists, nutritionists, psychologists, and physical educators. Each FHSC is responsible for supporting five to nine FHT teams in an integrated and collaborative way with activities of a technical-pedagogical or clinical-assistance nature and, therefore, has a specific coordinator not linked to the health units.

Participant recruitment

A total of 10 FHS in urban areas were intentionally chosen owing to their easy access for presenting specific work processes when compared to rural units, and because this study was nested in a larger study entitled “Vitória da Conquista Health Rise Project” whose central objective was to evaluate the effects of health interventions on high blood pressure (HBP) and diabetes mellitus (DM) control in patients treated at the SUS. Thus, when using the term chronic diseases in this study, we are referring to HBP and DM.

Purposive sampling was used to recruit physicians and nurses. These professionals were chosen owing to the comprehensive and diversified scope of their practice in chronic diseases in PHC, which is consistent with the objective of this investigation. As a criterion in the study, professionals with at least one year of experience in a unit in an urban area were included. Professionals on leave at the time of the interviews were excluded.

Data collection

The data were collected in four months: October to December 2018 and February 2019. Professionals eligible to participate in the research were contacted by telephone, using a list obtained from the health department. The interview was scheduled at a time and place chosen by the participant. Before the interview, the objectives of the study were explained, and the participants signed an informed consent form. The interviews were audio recorded and subsequently transcribed verbatim.

Most interviews were conducted at the health units, during lower patient flow (beginning or end of the working day), in a private and quiet space. A total of 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians (PHY) and nurses (NUR) by a researcher trained in qualitative research methods. This study was approved by the ethics committee. A pilot study was previously carried out, it sought to test, evaluate, review and improve research instruments and procedures. Four professionals were included to participate. With the application of logistical procedures, the estimated duration of the interviews and the best time to approach the professionals (in this case, beginning of work) were identified. Regarding the data collection instrument, there were no substantial changes, other than making the language clearer in order to facilitate understanding. The analysis followed the same perspective described in the article and facilitated the training of the researcher in the establishment of categories and organization of data, confirming the feasibility of the research.

The number of interviews was defined using the sample-saturation criterion when, in the researcher’s assessment, the data obtained contained sufficient elements to interrupt the collection [19]. The most important criterion for interrupting the collection was based on the researchers’ continuous judgment regarding the availability of data that sufficiently showed variety and depth to understand and represent the thematic categories and respond to the outlined objectives. Repetition of words and/or terms in the coding and categorization process was also considered. The interviews lasted from 21–58 min.

Data analysis

A matrix was developed and constituted a dynamic and interactive process of research in national and international literature, integrating the author’s experience. There were three steps in the analysis framework. First, methodological sources were chosen that address the characteristics of comprehensive PHC, as well as the guidelines and strategies for the care of people with chronic diseases [14, 20,21,22,23,24,25]. Second, the main dimensions related to care practices aimed at people with chronic diseases in PHC were identified. Organizational, technical care, and biopsychosocial aspects were considered. Third, an interactive process of systematization and refinement of the dimensions of the study and its corresponding components was carried out, based on the differences, similarities, and intersections.

Regarding the matrix, the organization dimension relates to how the work process is structured by the health care teams involved [14, 15, 20]. The technical care dimension includes the skills professionals require to respond to the users’ problems/needs and their ability to connect to them [21, 22]. The biopsychosocial dimension includes psychosocial elements and community action [20, 23, 24] to develop health awareness among popular organizations. The matrix can be found in Table 1.

Table 1 Analysis matrix of healthcare practices for chronic diseases in the Family Health Strategy

Thematic content analysis followed a deductive approach and included the following stages: superficial and exhaustive reading of transcripts to search for repeated patterns and intra- and inter-group contradictions carried out independently and jointly among the researchers (these contradictions were resolved by consensus to have the first classifications); material exploitation from coding, classification, and categorization procedures; and results interpretation based on the analytical matrix [25].

Results

The participants were predominantly women (n = 21) aged between 31 and 45 years (n = 16) and brown (n = 16). Most (n = 10) had worked for up to five years in FHS, and had a specialization in collective health (n = 15). These characteristics generally followed the same pattern among the professional categories represented, and can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2 Distribution of sampling characteristics of Physicians and Nurses, Vitória da Conquista, 2019

The results were organized in theoretical categories corresponding to the three dimensions and the correlated components contained in the analytical matrix. The most illustrative reports in each category are shown in Tables 3, 4, and 5, and the weaknesses and potentialities related to the practices are summarized in Table 6.

Table 3 Organization of chronic disease care practices
Table 4 Technical care aspects of chronic disease care practices
Table 5 Psychosocial approach to chronic disease care practices
Table 6 Potentialities and weaknesses of chronic disease care practice

Health care practice organization

For the interviewees, the organization of care practices towards people with NCD occurred in a diversified way, considering mechanisms that are institutionalized in the municipality, but also based on specific arrangements made by the investigated units.

Access was predominantly based on spontaneous demand at the unit’s reception (acolhimento) or granted by the screening service. From the reception, professionals listen to problems, assess symptoms and understand the case, even if the problem presented by the user is not resolved immediately. With triage, it is possible to select who will be seen at the PHC on the same day (as in urgent cases) or referred to specialists based on quotas.

For referral to specialists, all health units follow the same pattern: they receive quotas from a Consultation Scheduling Center-CMC, they select patients for vacancies and the scheduling is decentralized. However, despite the autonomy of health units to schedule appointments with specialists, there are too few specialists to service the local population requirements, especially those related to cardiological, endocrinological and ophthalmological evaluations (Table 6).

Other access strategies for consultation and examination access are organized through health education groups, at which time some teams collectively select eligible individuals to carry out short-term consultations and exams, in addition to renewing prescriptions (Table 3, NUR 1).

The high prevalence of chronic disease cases in the territories was also indicated as a contributing factor hindering access, given the difficulty of the team in following up (Table 6).

The organizational arrangement between FHT and the organization of interdisciplinary work with the FHSC team is expressed in horizontal and partnership relationships in the planning of actions and health care. However, the greatest responsibility for planning falls on the FHT due to the high turnover between the supported units. (Table 3, NUR 4). Nevertheless, FHT interaction was well organized (Table 3, NUR 2), despite reports that indicate a greater valuation of including individual care performed by the physician, and the high number of procedures and medications requested by the users (Table 3, NUR 16) taking time away from their participation in organizational responsibilities.

Regarding the articulation of the FHS with the care network, the referral and counter-referral communication mechanism was reported as a one-way process in which the referral occurs only from the FHS to other levels, in a non-standardized way (Table 3, NUR 6). Despite the electronic medical record (EMR) being fully inserted in the FHT routine with shared access to the information recorded, it has not been able to reduce networking issues as it is not yet integrated with other health care levels (Table 3, NUR 16), constituting a barrier to the continuity of care.

The planning of activities developed by the service is based on the demands and information collected from the FHT team, especially from the CHW (Table 3, NUR 4). Monitoring was also reported to occur in a more punctual and individual form, mainly by the physician (Table 3, NUR 1), which proved to be important for the optimization of requests for exams and procedures, and the prioritization of care.

Technical care aspects of health care practices

The interviewees reported a broad range of services and activities provided for chronic disease patients, including health educational group and health-promoting actions for users, prevention of complications in previously diagnosed cases, screening and diagnosis of new patients, healthcare through consultation requests and scheduling, as well as examinations at the same level and between different levels (Table 4, NUR 15; NUR 3). Educational activities included guidelines for lifestyle change, weight control, smoking cessation, and chronic pain control, most of which were conducted by physicians and nurses.

The use of innovative technologies aimed at screening, diagnosis and blood pressure, and blood glucose control monitoring in people with chronic diseases was also reported in PHC, including a device that measures fingertip glycated hemoglobin and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM; Table 4, NUR 3, NUR 15).

Healthcare protocols often used to subsidize the therapeutic conduct in several treatment modalities, especially in individual care, were pointed out by medical professionals (Table 4, PHY 10). It was identified that nursing professionals knew the national protocols, which are more commonly used in home visits for chronic patients, since this practice is most performed by these professionals.

Information exchange and case discussion from a multidisciplinary perspective was referred to as a process occurring in meetings and in individual contact with each member of the FHT. Nursing technicians and CHWs were mentioned as those who identify and communicate the users’ needs to the team, as they are in close contact with users inside and outside the units (Table 4, NUR 11, PHY 3). The integration of the FHT with FHSC for the execution of activities of a technical-pedagogical or clinical-assistance nature, presents difficulties for the reasons mentioned above (Table 6).

As for the establishment of a bond with the community, this is possible through the architecture of the FHS, which presupposes it as inherent in the practice of any professional, but also because it advocates that all people who arrive at the service can be welcomed with active and qualified listening by reference professionals located in a specific sector of these units. Nevertheless, physicians reported difficulties due to the high demand for individual care and the consequent reduction in consultation time (Table 4, PHY 5). The nurses reported successful experiences regarding the use of this resources such as home visits, when they had more time to talk to, and to evaluate the living conditions and health needs of NCD patients (Table 4, NUR 5).

Health care longitudinality was expressed as the possibility of periodic follow-up or management of only the most serious NCD cases (Tables 4 and 5, PHY 2). Follow-up strategies through visits, consultations and participation in educational groups occurred according to the perception of necessity/severity due to the need for periodic prescription renewal, since free medication distribution depends on it, as well as according to the severity of the clinical condition evaluated by the team (Table 4, PHY 2, NUR 13).

Physicians and nurses reported that the consistency and completeness of filling data into the electronic medical record (EMR) was hampered by poor Internet connection and constant system updates, which often make the system unavailable. Some professionals also report that the system interface is not friendly or practical for inserting data or for visualization (Table 4, PHY 4, NUR 11). As a positive aspect, all the professionals used the EMR and it had the potential to provide indicators that can contribute to improvements in the provision of care (Table 6).

Biopsychosocial approach to healthcare practices

The recognition of the psychosocial profile of NCD users by physicians and nurses emerged as the main potentiality to map living and health conditions, and, above all, social and contextual factors located outside the health systems. Low socioeconomic status, an aging population, single-parent households, and family disarray are part of the vulnerability profile of the patients (Table 5, NUR 3; NUR 13). Additionally, the professionals reported their commitment to seeking differentiated and adapted alternatives among the team members themselves and with other sectors, their family and the community, to intervene in disparities that increase the chances of progression morbidity to mortality in user’s with NCD (Table 6). This mobilization was permeated by obstacles related to intersectoral articulation which is still fragmented, little explored and does not solve short-term problems.

Health education actions to explain the importance of lifestyle changes, fostering co-responsibility and self-management in people with chronic diseases during the health-disease-care process were identified to stimulate the users’ self-care and autonomy (Table 5, NUR 2, PHY 10). Educational groups, home visits, and even individual consultations included modalities for the expression of this practice (Table 5).

Physicians and nurses recognize social support and support networks in their communities. It was found that doctors and nurses establish partnerships widely with other actors (community and religious leaders) and with social devices (schools, churches, social assistance referral centers, and residents’ and diabetic patients’ associations) to enhance the development of activities that encourage lifestyle changes, support for community actions, and the strengthening of social and family co-existence (Table 6). However, family support was reported to be challenging due to the lack of support and family participation in the process of taking care of a sick family member (Table 5, NUR 20).

Discussion

A combined analysis of different dimensions (organizational, technical care and psychosocial) of care practices performed by PHC doctors and nurses in Brazil, is relevant since the combination of constituent elements of models aimed at providing care for chronic conditions can achieve better results in practice [7, 13] to meet the needs of people with NCD. For all analyzed dimensions, strengths and weaknesses were found, which can impact the scope of care practices and; therefore, the management of chronic diseases in a comprehensive and resolute way in PHC.

Regarding access, its guaranteed as a right of every Brazilian citizen and a duty of the state is an essential component of the SUS and contributes to universal health coverage [7, 12]. The diversification of strategies is operationalized to legitimize access to services offered in the FHS as sustained care for NCD is essential to avoid interruptions in treatment, and consequently, poorly managed health conditions, potential complications, and comorbidities [3, 13].

In the FHS investigated, access prevailed based on spontaneous demand, in a complementary way, the flow of some demands through group care access. Group assistance denotes the existence of structural arrangements for the organization and manage the health system and local services due the fragmentation of actions, gaps in care, supply and demand disparities, and lack of professionals [24].

As for supply and demand, discourses about insufficient specialized consultations and examinations seems to be aggravated by the high number of people with chronic diseases requiring follow-up by the teams. Duplication of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and unnecessary referrals also represent obstacles to the quality of health systems [8]. In contrast, other international reports highlighted practices in line with recognition of more critical user profiles, monitoring of queues and waiting time for appointments, and the use of decision support systems for health professionals [13, 26, 27].

While guaranteeing access to PHC is essential for coordination of the therapeutic itineraries of users in the services, this is not entirely enough to handle the management of NCDs alone, since articulation with other levels of care may be necessary. The articulation between levels was characterized as precarious confirming PHC difficulties in interacting and communicating with secondary and tertiary levels, which shows the fragility of health care coordination. This is worrisome when considering that people with chronic diseases need continued care and use several devices at different healthcare levels, in turn requiring synchronous coordination of the HCN to guarantee timely and quality assistance [28], but are at greater risk of receiving fragmented care because they are treated by different professionals in diverse contexts [29].

The growing complexity of chronic health care calls for team integration and collaboration. When collaborative primary care practices are based on horizontal work organization and shared decision-making, they can help establish effective and resolutive multidisciplinary teams, with better professional interaction and use of material resources, time optimization, lower rate of patient retention in treatment, and increased work quality and satisfaction [16].

Information exchange and case discussion was widespread practice in the FHT, which contributes to expanding autonomy and self-care, and ratifies the importance of teamwork as a pillar of FHS. Differences observed in the performance of the FHSC in relation to the organization and execution of work in the FHS constituted an important barrier. Despite of the FHSC have being created to increase the resolution and comprehensiveness of care provided in the FHS, your performance can improve. The prioritization of collective activities, restrictions on individual consultations and home visits, and the high turnover between teams were problems that stood out in another study [30,31,32].

The provision of a wide range of health promotion, prevention, and health care actions, financed by the State, and activated by the population based on individual and collective needs, was widely mentioned. However, although not unanimous, a certain technical work division has emerged as a strong local element, designating the individual care of people with chronic diseases to the physician and collective activities to other professionals, especially nurses.

Although this aspect may be an institutionalized reality in other contexts owing to difficulties in accessing physicians, it is interesting to note that the effectiveness and efficiency of health services [16] in Brazil, in which FHS is traditionally a multidisciplinary work, can translate into fractional practices based on the specialization and fragmentation of knowledge and work and restricting comprehensiveness [33].

Opportunities were identified in services that use multiple care technologies towards providing comprehensive care for NCD. Innovative technologies used in local PHC, like the fingertip glycated hemoglobin tester and home blood pressure monitoring, were identified as facilitators for improving access to glycemic and pressure control, both in screening and therapeutic follow-up actions [34, 35]. The reception and bonding are also recognized as a technology of relationships and advocated in Brazil, as a care practice based on the lasting and authentic relationship, mutual understanding, and sense of affiliation [36], stimulating lifestyle changes, and increasing responsibilities and adherence to treatment [22, 31], however more difficult to operationalize due to the great demand for individual care.

Although system computerization can make health information feasible in a safe, consistent, and relevant manner even between different care levels (which was not observed in this study), EMR implementation is challenging, especially in the context of recent implantation. It needs to be better consolidated and explored considering the need for improvements in the interface and connectivity, as well as for the issuance of reports and indicators that facilitate the planning and monitoring of practices.

Actions stimulating autonomy and self-care are strategic pillars in any health program or system aimed at NCD patients due to the longitudinal character of signs, symptoms, risk factors, and the possibility of related complications. The educational groups were a strategy to increase autonomy and self-care, as reported in another study [37], but other modalities were also highlighted, such as home and individual visits. Moreover, contact by telephone or text messages, as well as actions to stimulate autonomous medication management are also innovative practices highlighted in international studies [13, 27], while collective consultations, physical activity practices, and those involving arts were reported in national studies [23, 38, 39].

There is a worrying trend regarding the impact of socioeconomic inequalities in Latin America on health indicators [40]. In Brazil, inequalities are persistent and systematic, and point a context of health vulnerabilities that affect people with NCDs and can lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes [3]. This situation requires integrated responses from FHT to create synergies between different sectors, actors, and social support devices.

In this study, the integrated and successful responses of the teams dealt with the recognition of the socio-epidemiological profile of the registered area for the recognition of vulnerability profiles that interfere in the control of NCDs and in the mobilization of the social support network located in the community.

However, these answers were unable to account for an important part of this network, which is the family, due to the difficulty of including them as an active participant in the care of users with chronic conditions and which requires integrate interventions by the team. Intersectoral actions were also not very evident, which reflects the need for greater equity and integration of the health sector with other sectors to guarantee people a level of health that allows them to lead a socially and economically productive life [40].

Strengths and limitations

A strength point of the study was the combinate use of qualitative design and a multidimensional approach to care practices in PHC, which allowed the identification of important insights in the management of NCDs: better results from the practices of physicians and nurses related to elements that depended on their governability, such as those related to organization of access, teamwork, stimulation of autonomy and self-management, and interaction with services and actors in the provision of care. Dependence on structural aspects, especially related to the high demand for people per team, the insufficient quota for specialists, the fragmentation of HCN and problems in the EMR, there was greater compromise in the response, suggesting investments of different orders in this regard.

A limitation of the study is that the data were from the perspective of doctors and nurses (only two professional categories), which may give some specificity to the data. However, as they were responsible for the widest range of actions relative NCD, this favored representation and contributed to their choice in line with the research proposal. The inclusion of only the most prevalent NCD (HBP and DM) also limited the recognition of care practices for other chronic diseases, which may have other specificities.

Therefore, future studies may explore the same object considering other subjects (CHW, users, managers), scenarios (other municipalities and states), designs (quantitative, mixed methods), and the effects of these practices on treatments and blood pressure and glycemic control outcomes.

Conclusion

The study revealed that the health practices of PHC physicians and nurses presented strengths and weaknesses in the management of chronic conditions, even in a city that is considered a reference in the provision of primary care. This situation confirms the need to develop best practices in PHC as a way of ensuring qualified assistance to people with NCD.

The multidimensional evaluation of practices aimed at people with NCD proved to be effective in demonstrating that all dimensions considered need careful analysis by physicians and nurses, including those that presented more satisfactory results in order to be enhanced. The Brazilian experience can serve both to guide internal changes in the teams’ work process, and to support analyses aimed at formulating health policies to guarantee technical, political, logistical, and financial support in other similar primary care contexts.

Availability of data and materials

Data that are generated or analyzed during this study are not publicly available to preserve the anonymity of participants, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CHW:

Community Health Workers

DM:

Diabetes Mellitus

EMR:

Electronic Medical Record

FHS:

Family Health Strategy

FHSC:

Family Health Support Centers

FHT:

Family Health Team

HBP:

High Blood Pressure

HBPM:

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring

HCN:

Health Care Network

NCD:

Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases

NUR:

Nurses

PHC:

Primary Health Care

PHY:

Physicians

Unified Health System:

(Sistema Único de Saúde-SUS)

References

  1. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2021: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. 2021. (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/342703/9789240027053-eng.pdf Accessed 28 Mar 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rasella D, Hone T, de Souza LE, Tasca R, Basu S, Millett C. Mortality associated with alternative primary healthcare policies: a nationwide microsimulation modelling study in Brazil. BMC Med. 2019;17:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1316-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Malta DC, Duncan BB, Barros MBA, Katikireddi SV, de Souza FM, da Silva AG, et al. Medidas de austeridade fiscal comprometem metas de controle de doenças não transmissíveis no Brasil [Fiscal austerity measures compromise targets for the control of noncommunicable diseases in Brazil]. Cien Saude Colet. 2018;23(10):3115–22. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182310.25222018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. GBD 2016 Brazil Collaborators. Burden of disease in Brazil, 1990–2016: A systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10149):760–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31221-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carrillo MJ, Montserrat LG, Vidal N, Bermúdez K, De Vos P. Comprehensive primary health care and non-communicable diseases management: A case study of El Salvador. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1140-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Silocchi C, Junges JR, Martino A. Estudo comparativo das inovações sobre condições crônicas na atenção primária em Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil e Ferrara, Itália [Comparative study of innovations on chronic conditions in primary care in Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil and in Ferrara, Italy]. Saúde Soc. 2020:29(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902020190633.

  7. Venâncio SI, Rosa TEC, Bersusa AAS. Atenção integral à hipertensão arterial e diabetes mellitus: implementação da Linha de Cuidado em uma Região de Saúde do estado de São Paulo, Brasil [Comprehensive care for hypertension and diabetes mellitus: implementation of the Care Line in a Health Region in the state of São Paulo, Brazil]. Physis. 2016;26(1):113–35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312016000100008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dos Santos Mendes L, De Almeida PF. Do primary and specialized care physicians know and use coordination mechanisms? Rev Saúde Publica. 2020;54:121. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tasca R, Massuda A, Carvalho WM, Buchweitz C, Harzheim E. Recomendações para o fortalecimento da atenção primária à saúde no Brasil [Recommendations for strengthening primary health care in Brazil]. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2020;44:e4. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Santos D de S, Mishima SM; Merhy EE. Processo de trabalho na Estratégia de Saúde da Família: as potencialidades da subjetividade do cuidado para a reconfiguração do modelo de atenção [Work process in the Family Health Program: the potential of the subjectivity of care for the reconfiguration of the care model]. Ciênc. saúde coletiva. 2018;23(3):861–870. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018233.03102016.

  11. Li X, Krumholz HM, Yip W, Cheng KK, Maeseneer JD, Meng Q, et al. Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and Recommendations. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1802–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30122-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Facchini LA, Tomasi E, Dilélio AS. Qualidade da Atenção Primária à Saúde no Brasil: avanços, desafios e perspectivas [Quality of Primary Health Care in Brazil: advances, challenges, and perspectives]. Saúde Debate. 2018;42(1):208–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042018s114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds R, Dennis S, Hasan I, et al. A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0692-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Silva RLDT, Barreto MS, Arruda GO, Marcon SS. Avaliação da implantação do programa de assistência às pessoas com hipertensão arterial [Evaluation of the implementation of an assistance program for people with arterial hypertension]. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69(1):71–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2016690111i.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Salci MA, Meirelles BHS, Silva DMGV. Atenção primária às pessoas com diabetes mellitus na perspectiva do modelo de atenção às condições crônicas [Primary care for people with diabetes mellitus from the perspective of the chronic condition care model]. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2017;25:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1474.2882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cassiani SHB, Fernandes MNF, Reveiz L, Filho JRF, da Silva FAM. Combinação de tarefas do enfermeiro e de outros profissionais na atenção primária em saúde: uma revisão sistemática [Skill mix of nurses and primary health care professionals: a systematic review]. Rev Panam Salud publish. 2020;44:e82. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vidal N, León-García M, Jiménez M, Bermúdez K, Vos P. Community and health staff perceptions on non-communicable disease management in El Salvador’s health system: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:474. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05249-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. IBGE- Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Panorama de dados sobre cidades, Rio de Janeiro [Panorama of data on cities, Rio de Janeiro]. 2020. (https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ba/vitoria-da-conquista/panorama Accessed on: 30 Mar 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;13(2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. dos Santos CM, Barbieri AR, Gonçalves CCM, Tsuha DH. Avaliação da rede de atenção ao portador de hipertensão arterial: estudo de uma região de saúde [Evaluation of the care network for patients with arterial hypertension: a study on a health system region]. Cad Saúde Pública. 2017;33(5):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00052816.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cecílio LCO. Apontamentos teórico-conceituais sobre processos avaliativos considerando as múltiplas dimensões da gestão do cuidado em saúde [Theoretical-conceptual notes on evaluation processes considering the multiple dimensions of health care management]. Interface. 2011;15(37):589–99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832011000200021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barbosa MIS, Bosi MLM. Vínculo: um conceito problemático no campo da Saúde Coletiva [Bonding: a problematic concept in the field of Public Health]. Physis. 2017;27(4):1003–22. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-73312017000400008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Souza JD, Baptista MHB, Gomides D dos S, Pace AE. Adesão ao cuidado em diabetes mellitus nos três níveis de atenção à saúde [Adherence to diabetes mellitus care at the health care three levels]. Esc Anna Nery 2017;21(4):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2017-0045.

  24. Barbiani R, Junges JR, Nora CRD, Asquidamini F. A produção científica sobre acesso no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil: avanços, limites e desafios [Scientific production on access within the scope of the Brazilian Unified Health System: advances, limits, and challenges]. Saúde Soc. 2014;23(3):855–68. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902014000300010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde [The knowledge challenge: qualitative research in health]. 13th ed. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Walters BH, Adams SA, Nieboer AP, Bal R. Disease management projects and the Chronic Care Model in action: baseline qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rijken M, Bekkema N, Boeckxstaens P, Schellevis FG, de Maeseneer JM, Groenewegenet PP. Chronic Disease Management Programmes: an adequate response to patients’ needs? Health Expect. 2014;17(5):608–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00786.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fausto MCR, Almeida PF, Bousquat A. Organização da Atenção Primária à Saúde no Brasil e os desafios para a integração em Redes de Atenção [Organization of Primary Health Care in Brazil and the disadvantages for the integration of Primary Care Networks]. In: Mendonça MHM, Matta GC, Gondim R, Giovanella L (Org.). Atenção Primária à Saúde no Brasil: conceitos, práticas e pesquisa [Primary Health Care in Brazil: concepts, practices and research]. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz. 2018:51–72.

  29. Costa JFR, Portela MC. Percepções de gestores, profissionais e usuários acerca do registro eletrônico de saúde e de aspectos facilitadores e barreiras para a sua implementação [Views of health system administrators, professionals, and users concerning the electronic health record and facilitators and obstacles to its implementation]. Cad Saúde Pública. 2018;34(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00187916.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sousa AN. Monitoramento e avaliação na atenção básica no Brasil: a experiência recente e desafios para a sua consolidação [Monitoring and evaluation in primary care in Brazil: recent experiences and challenges for its consolidation]. Saúde debate. 2018;42(spe1):289–301. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042018s119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Almeida PF, Santos AM, Oliveira SS, Heringer A, Martins Júnior DF. Posição da Estratégia de Saúde da Família na coordenação do cuidado no município sede de região de saúde – o caso de Vitória da Conquista [Position of the Family Health Strategy in the coordination of care in the municipality where the health region is located - the case of Vitória da Conquista]. In: Almeida PF, Santos AM, Souza, MKB (Org). Atenção Primária a saúde na coordenação do cuidado em Regiões de Saúde [Primary health care in the coordination of Health Regions]. Salvador Edufba; 2015:205–37.

  32. Moreira DC, Soares DA, de Castro CP, Bispo Junior JP. Atuação do Núcleo de Apoio à Saúde da Família no fortalecimento da atenção primária: experiências dos agentes comunitários [Family Health Support Center’s work to strengthening of primary care: experiences of community workers]. Physis. 2019;29(3):e290304. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-73312019290304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferreira Neto JL, Oliveira GL, Viana N de O, Duarte LGMF. Integralidade, condições de oferta de serviços e processo de trabalho de Equipes de Saúde da Família em Belo Horizonte [Comprehensiveness, service provision conditions, and work process of Family Health Teams in Belo Horizonte]. Saúde Debate. 2016;40(111):179–192. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201611114.

  34. Visanuyothin S, Plianbangchang S, Somrongthong R. An integrated program with home blood-pressure monitoring and village health volunteers for treating poorly controlled hypertension at the primary care level in an urban community of Thailand. Integr Blood Press Control. 2018;11:25–35. https://doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S160548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosa LS, Mistro S, Oliveira MG, Kochergin CN, Cortes ML, Medeiros DSD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care A1C tests in a primary care setting. Front Pharmacol. 2021;11:588309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.588309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Waibel S, Vargas I, Coderch J, Vázquez M-L. Relational continuity with primary and secondary care doctors: A qualitative study of perceptions of users of the Catalan national health system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3042-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Arantes RKM, Salvagioni DAJ, Araujo JP, Roecker S. Educação que produz saúde: atuação da enfermagem em grupo de hipertensos [Education that produces health: nursing performance with a group of hypertensive patients]. Rev Enf UFSM. 2015;5(2):213–23. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769213472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fausto MCR, Rizzoto MLF, Giovanella L, Seidl H, Bousquat A, Almeida PF de. O futuro da Atenção Primária à Saúde no Brasil [The future of Primary Health Care in Brazil]. Saúde debate. 2018;42(spe1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042018S101.

  39. Becker RM, Heidemann ITSB, Meirelles BHS, Costa MFBNA da, Antonini FO, Durand MK. Práticas de cuidado dos enfermeiros a pessoas com Doenças Crônicas Não Transmissíveis [Nursing care practices for people with Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases]. Rev Bras Enferm 2018;71(6):2800–2807. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0799.

  40. Abramo l, Cecchini S, Ullmann H. Enfrentar las desigualdades en salud en América Latina: el rol de la protección social. [Addressing health inequalities in Latin America: the role of social protection]. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva;25(5):1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020255.32802019

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Municipal Secretary of Health for authorization of the research, and the physicians and nurses who participated in the interviews. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This research is part of the Health Rise Project, which is a global program funded by the Medtronic Foundation under Grant (number 255790) from CAF America.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CNO and DAS contributed towards the study design and data analysis, and were major contributors in drafting the manuscript and its critical review. CNO performed the data collection. JPBJ, CNK, WWCCA, JAL, MLC, SM, DSM, KOS, VMB and VCHSC, MGGO contributed to data analysis, to drafting the manuscript and to its critical review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Arruda Soares.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was granted by the Research Ethics Committee of the Multidisciplinary Health Institute (Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde da Universidade Federal da Bahia—IMS-UFBA, Campus Anísio Teixeira), Vitória da Conquista, Bahia on November 28, 2016, under opinion 1.839.000. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations’ by including a statement of Ethics approval and consent to participate. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All the ethical requirements of the regulatory bodies were met.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nunes Oliveira, C., Galvão Oliveira, M., Wildes Amorim, W. et al. Physicians’ and nurses’ perspective on chronic disease care practices in Primary Health Care in Brazil: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 673 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08078-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08078-z

Keywords

  • Primary healthcare
  • Family health strategy
  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Chronic conditions