Skip to main content

Identifying priorities, directions and a vision for Indigenous mental health using a collaborative and consensus-based facilitation approach

Abstract

Background

Mental health disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in Canada are related to underlying economic, social, and political inequities that are legacies of colonization and the oppression of Indigenous cultures. It also widely acknowledged that mental health services currently available may not be culturally appropriate in supporting the health needs of Indigenous Canadians. A two-day Indigenous mental health forum examined mental health needs and gaps among Indigenous communities across the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB) on Treaty 8 territory, in northern Alberta, Canada. This paper outlines the insights generated by stakeholder engagement at the forum to identify and prioritize directions for Indigenous mental health and build a vision and strategy for improving mental health services and programs for the region’s diverse Indigenous population.

Methods

We applied a modified nominal group technique (NGT) consensus method embedded within Indigenous knowledge to determine key priorities and directions for Indigenous-focused mental health and synthesize information from discussions that occurred at the forum. Following the NGT, a participatory community visioning exercise was conducted with participants to develop a vision, guiding principles, and components of an action plan for an Indigenous mental health strategy for the RMWB.

Results

Four key themes for setting priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health emerged from roundtable group discussions: 1) understand the realities of mental health experiences for Indigenous peoples, 2) design a holistic and culturally rooted mental health system, 3) foster cross-sectoral engagement and collaboration on mental health service delivery, and 4) focus on children and youth. The community visioning exercise helped stakeholders to visualize a direction or path forward for addressing existing gaps in the mental health system and opportunities for strengthening Indigenous mental health in the region.

Conclusions

Forum participants described mental health and well-being around holistic concepts of social and emotional well-being. Addressing Indigenous mental health and wellness involves multi-sectoral action in various settings including community and school through programs, policies, and other interventions that promote mental health for all Indigenous peoples, as well as for those at greater risk such as children and youth.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Mental health problems, indicated by outcomes such as suicide and emotional distress, are generally higher among Indigenous peoples in Canada. These disparities in mental health relate to underlying economic, social, and political inequities that are legacies of colonization and the Canadian government’s attempt at cultural genocide [1]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Indigenous young people, families, and communities within Canada have faced new and pre-existing challenges to their mental health. Indigenous people possess a wealth of diverse healing traditions for promoting positive mental health and emotional well-being that have endured despite cultural oppression of colonization. However, connection to these traditions has been affected during the COVID-19 pandemic due to public health protocols, lack of ability to travel to communities due to lockdown measures, and the shutdown of cultural gatherings, adding further stress on families and entire communities [2]. Heck et al. (2021) described how “physical distancing makes it difficult to interact with people who are at risk of experiencing mental health challenges and to organize ways to collectively grieve and heal” [3]. Indigenous peoples have expressed the desire for access to traditional ceremonies and medicines to discover solutions and help cope with pandemic challenges [4].

To address the mental health disparities that exist within Indigenous populations, effective components of mental health programs and services for Indigenous peoples need to be identified [5]. Given the historical and intergenerational trauma brought on by settler colonialism, mental health programs and services designed and led by Indigenous people and communities hold greater promise at improving mental health and well-being compared to western-based approaches [6, 7]. Furthermore, the need to address the growing mental health disparities in Indigenous peoples compared with non-Indigenous peoples in Canada was emphasized in the findings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) [1]. The TRC’s Calls to Action on health envision how health equity might be achieved through transforming mental health services for Indigenous peoples in Canada [8].

Mental health promotion “involves actions to create living conditions and environments that support mental wellness across the lifespan and allow people to adopt and maintain healthy lifestyles” [9]. This requires cross-sectoral action across home, school, health services and community environments, through culturally safe, strengths-based, family- and community-oriented mental health promotion programs, services, and policies that promote healthy emotional, spiritual, and social development in childhood and adolescence, as well as for those at risk of poor mental health [10]. Despite calls of integrated approaches to address mental health problems and illnesses among Indigenous peoples, we know little about how services work together cross-sectorally to ensure communities receive a continuum of preventative and curative services, according to their needs and priorities, and across different levels of the health and social system [10].

In this paper we report on the findings from an adapted nominal group technique (NGT) consensus [11, 12] and community visioning exercise [13] with a diverse group of cross-sectoral stakeholders, including community members, in the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB) located in northern Alberta, Canada. We held a two-day Indigenous mental health forum to identify and prioritize directions for Indigenous mental health and build a vision and strategy for improving coordinated and integrated mental health services and programs for Indigenous populations in the RMWB. Both the NGT and community visioning methods have been adapted to support group decision-making and priority-setting with Indigenous participants in the areas of health and community development [14, 15]. The forum’s aims were to: 1) discuss the challenges and opportunities in addressing mental health among Indigenous youth, adults, and families; 2) network key stakeholders across the region’s sectors to explore where sectors could overlap and collaborate on improving mental health services for Indigenous populations; and 3) create innovative recommendations to support mental health wellness for Indigenous populations across the life course. We followed a similar approach as the one conducted by Chatwood et al. (2015) by applying a mixed methods approach with western-based research methodologies (i.e., NGT and community visioning) and the incorporation of Indigenous knowledge through storytelling and dialogue [15]. This paper contributes valuable insights to applying collaborative and consensus-based facilitation approaches to strengthen cross-sectoral engagement for Indigenous mental health.

Literature review: Indigenous peoples’ historical and contemporary experiences with access to mental healthcare in Canada

The United Nations recognizes Indigenous peoples as those who self-identify and are accepted by their community as their member, with this community having historical continuity to precolonial and/or presettler societies, with distinct cultural practices and social, economic, and political systems [16]. The mental health status of Indigenous peoples in Canada must be understood within the context of current and historical colonial experiences, from the loss of land and autonomy to the creation of the reserves systems, the historical removal of Indigenous children into residential schools, the current removal of Indigenous children by the child welfare system, and systemic and epistemic racism in healthcare settings [17, 18].

Inequitable access to healthcare in Canada is influenced by the complexity of multiple governing bodies overseeing healthcare delivery, with lack of jurisdictional coordination leading to gaps in care and disparities in funding and data collection within Indigenous populations [19, 20]. Remote communities face a lack of service providers, lack of health infrastructure and services, and high costs [20]. While lack of a sufficient number of mental health professionals is a concern across Canada [21], accessibility and availability of mental healthcare is particularly lacking for Indigenous populations, especially those in rural, remote, and northern settings. Scholars have pointed to the absence of a national Indigenous mental health strategy and subsequent inadequate funding as barriers to both recruiting mental health professionals in rural and remote Indigenous communities and to providing culturally competent mental health services [22]. Additionally, different Indigenous groups in Canada, such as Métis [19, 23] and urban or off-reserve First Nation communities, can have unique experiences that are often excluded in research and data, and which may require different culturally based responses. Indigenous people also face many structural barriers due to the legacy of colonialism in a healthcare system where western knowledge is valued over Indigenous knowledge, trauma-informed care is not consistently practiced, and negative bias from care providers persists due to lack of cultural competency [19, 24,25,26]. Given the context of historical trauma and ongoing discrimination faced by Indigenous people, culturally appropriate mental health services are imperative [20, 27]. Moreover, self-determination, defined as the individual and collective right to have control over health, education, and economic systems, is a key determinant of health for Indigenous individuals and communities [28]. In this sense, self-determination shapes healthcare experiences for Indigenous peoples.

Many Indigenous communities’ perspectives on health are holistic and centred on a connection to culture [29, 30]. Research has supported the importance of mental health clinicians practicing multicultural competence when working with Indigenous peoples, which includes acknowledging and understanding the social and cultural realities of Indigenous peoples and historical impacts of colonization [31]. The strengthening of cultural and community connectedness has been recommended for improving mental health services provided to Indigenous peoples [31]. Consultation with Elders by Drost [32] provided perspectives on how Alberta Health Services (AHS)—a provincial health authority in Canada — can expand their traditional Indigenous healing practices, which included enhancing cultural competency training for staff, and creating and maintaining partnerships with Indigenous communities.

The use of collaboration and teamwork has also been proposed to improve mental health services for Indigenous peoples. While the integration of Indigenous Elders within mental health services was suggested in the TRC, few health systems have attempted to integrate this, though some research initiatives have noted preliminary success [33, 34]. Restoule et al. (2016) emphasized the need to build partnerships between governments and Indigenous communities in order to continue building mental wellness, and supported the creation of multidisciplinary Mental Wellness Teams that included Elders, community workers, social workers, psychiatrists, and other health professionals [30]. However, more research is needed to understand opportunities and barriers for Indigenous health practitioners [24], and to fill the gap in knowledge regarding integration of Indigenous mental health workers and Indigenous Elders to provide mental health care. In order to truly have culturally appropriate mental health programs and policies [23, 35], Indigenous communities need to be involved in research and consulted throughout policy-making, and receive adequate funding for mental health services. Moreover, needed transformations identified in the TRC Calls to Action for mental health include: 1) eliminating health care resource disparities; 2) ensuring culturally safe services free of racism; 3) building provider capacity to effectively support healing by addressing impacts from multigenerational adverse life experiences; and 4) engaging Indigenous people within systems so that inclusion of diverse Indigenous cultures and wellness practices may promote optimal outcomes [8].

Setting

The RMWB is located in a northern region within the Canadian province of Alberta and on Treaty 8 Traditional Territory, which encompasses a landmass of approximately 840,000 square kilometres and is home to 39 First Nations communities across the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, British Columbia, and the Northwestern Territories. The RMWB is home to five First Nation communities (Mikisew Cree First Nation, Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Fort McKay First Nation, Fort McMurray First Nation, Chipewyan Prairie Dene First Nation), and lies within the Métis Nation of Alberta (MNA) Regions 1 and 5, which includes five Métis Locals located in Fort McMurray, Anzac, Fort Chipewyan, Fort McKay, and Conklin.

Indigenous peoples residing in the RMWB experienced one of the largest wildfire evacuations in Canadian history in 2016 (known as the Horse River wildfire) which resulted in community destruction and displacement, loss of homes, jobs, finances, lives as well as injuries and separation from loved ones. Five years post-wildfire, many individuals continue to be impacted by the social, emotional, and psychological difficulties posed by the wildfire. The COVID-19 pandemic in the region has posed a disproportionate threat to Indigenous communities, due to disparities in known risk factors for poorer COVID-19-related outcomes such as chronic health conditions, inadequate healthcare service/infrastructure, and limited resources (e.g., running water, housing) [36]. These disparities add to heightened vulnerabilities for mental health distress [37].

Methods and approach

Modified NGT consensus

The forum adopted an NGT, a structured method used for generating ideas and identifying solutions within groups, with the intention of generating priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health in the region. The method involves interactive group discussions to reach consensus and as such has the benefit of generating qualitative data to garner rich accounts of perspectives on a given topic [15, 38]. This method has been successfully used for gathering important input into evidence-informed policy and practice in the mental health field [39]. We used the NGT method instead of other consensus methods (i.e., a Delphi expert consensus which relies on feedback through the use of iterative questionnaires) for several reasons. Firstly, involving community service providers and mental health professionals in a face-to-face structured meeting enabled first-hand information to be obtained from those working with communities, families, and youth to support mental health. Secondly, the approach encourages participation from diverse cross-sectoral stakeholders. Thirdly, it is time efficient [40] being a single-occasion process and reducing the time burden on stakeholders, while also acquiring a substantial amount of information in a relatively short time. Fourthly, it reduces the influence of response bias resulting from intergroup dynamics and the researchers’ presence [41]. Lastly, NGT allows for in-session completion and immediate dissemination of results to the group. The NGT method also served as a stakeholder engagement strategy to support the co-design of priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health and build relationships [42]. Our modified NGT method involved: (1) the presentation of research evidence on Indigenous mental health outcomes and holistic frameworks for guiding Indigenous mental health interventions and program delivery; (2) four roundtable group discussions where participants generated and shared ideas relating to specific questions (see below); (3) individual voting on priorities for Indigenous mental health using a Dotmocracy method [43]; and (4) group discussion about the voting of priorities.

Qualitative research methods considered to be well aligned with Indigenous health research include consensus methods [15, 44]. The nominal group process also employed an Indigenous framework of Two-Eyed Seeing [45, 46] for equitably embracing multiple perspectives. Two-Eyed Seeing is defined as “learning to see from one eye with the strengths of Indigenous knowledges and ways of knowing, and from the other eye with the strengths of mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing, and to use both these eyes together, for the benefit of all” [46]. While the nominal consensus method is a western paradigm, it has been suggested that it can be responsive to Indigenous knowledge and allows space to share a variety of perspectives to reach consensus on the topic in question [15, 47]. Moreover, the anonymity, autonomy, and relational nature of collaborative and consensus-based techniques like the NGT [48] is compatible with Indigenous research principles (relationality, reciprocity, and respect) [15, 44, 49, 50].

We followed the recommendations by Humphrey-Murto et al. (2016) to ensure methodological rigour when using consensus group methods [51]. The NGT has demonstrated validity in enabling consensus on complex issues while considering participants’ views equally [52]. Scholars have concluded that the validity and effectiveness of the NGT is reflected in the level of expertise of the participants [53]. van Teijlingen et al. (2006) reviewed the merits and applications of using NGT to explore and collate expert opinion and concluded that it has validity, provided the facilitator does not attempt to overcome diversity of opinion to create artificial consensus [54, 55]. We also adhered to strategies for ensuring validity in qualitative research by acknowledging the researcher’s perspective, providing thick descriptions of participant responses, and methodological triangulation (e.g., western methods (qualitative) and Indigenous knowledge). Thus, in bringing together a diverse group of individuals from different sectors and professional settings, our forum provided a unique and valuable opportunity for mutual understanding and clarification of issues related to Indigenous mental health in the region.

Participant recruitment

Invitation letters to key stakeholders to participate in the two-day forum were sent by email. Representation at the forum spanned across multiple sectors to include Indigenous leadership, community service providers, mental health professionals, schoolteachers, representatives from the Fort McMurray School District, Indigenous Elders, youth residing in the urban and rural communities, representatives from provincial and local organizations with mandates for Indigenous Health and Wellness, and non-Indigenous health care, academic, and research organizations. In total, fifty-three (N = 53) stakeholders (Table 1) attended the forum, which included all members of the Community Advisory Committee that guided preparation of the forum (as described below). While using NGT to prioritize issues may be difficult with a higher number of participants and groups, it has been shown to be successful in several studies [56, 57].

Table 1 Participating organizations

Roundtable group discussions

Participants were invited to generate and prioritize key directions for Indigenous mental health for the region in roundtable groups. Roundtable group discussions were guided by the following questions:

  • 1. What matters most to you in promoting mental wellness for Indigenous youth, families, or communities?

  • 2. What mental health resources are critical to advocate for in your community or within your organization?

  • 3. How do current mental health services or programs address the root social causes (e.g., poverty, racism, housing, geography, etc.) of poor mental health? How might services or programs be strengthened for Indigenous clients?

  • 4. How can the different sectors (e.g., health, education, justice) collaborate to support integrated and coordinated mental health and wellness among Indigenous peoples?

On day one of the forum, the organizers (SM, BF) described the objectives of the two-day forum. Participants were divided into four roundtable groups, lasting an average of 60 min and ranging from thirteen to fourteen participants, to explore each question with a discussion facilitator who resided in the region. Participants had the opportunity to rotate and contribute to discussions for all four questions. The first author (SM) developed a facilitation guide for roundtable group facilitators. NGT is an approach to group dialogue and decision-making that places weight on all participants having an equal opportunity to express a view. It is an effective way to enable people who might otherwise be excluded from decision-making to contribute [58]. As the first step, participants were invited to silently reflect and generate responses on provided cue cards following the facilitators’ posing of the question. For the second step, all participants were invited to share, discuss, and explore their proposed directions. Facilitators employed both open discussion and talking circle approaches to ensure all participants had opportunity for input. With permission from participants, conversations were audio-recorded and transcribed and detailed notes were taken by facilitators. At the end of day one, facilitators reported back to the larger group on key insights that were shared at their groups. Following each roundtable discussion, facilitators collected all cue cards from participants, sorted them according to emerging themes, and displayed the cue cards by theme on the wall. At the end of day one, facilitators reported back to the larger group key insights that were shared at their groups.

On day two, participants reviewed, reflected, and voted on the priorities and directions they felt were the highest priority for each of the cue cards displayed by theme on the wall. A modified Dotmocracy method was facilitated by the lead author (SM) as a means of promoting transparency of idea sharing and ranking, and of being inclusive of diverse stakeholder voices. Participants were provided red stickers for each display area to cast their votes. Red stickers were placed next to ideas that they felt were priorities. Dotmocracy is a consensus-building method that uses a democratic voting procedure to provide a structured approach to decision-making [43]. The method promotes transparency by allowing participants to observe the development of priorities around a topic or issue [59] and is inclusive of diverse stakeholder voices.

Community visioning

Following the Dotmocracy exercise, participants gathered in a large group to co-create a community vision for developing an Indigenous mental health strategy for the RMWB (See Additional File 1 for a graphic recording on community vision). The community vision was developed using a participatory community visioning exercise [60, 61] with three parts: a) developing the vision, b) defining the guiding principles, and c) identifying strengths and the components of an action plan to develop an Indigenous mental health strategy. Participatory community visioning is a method employed within action research [62] and can assist in generating “integrative conceptions of place and supporting arguments” and facilitate “a degree of mutual understanding and even ownership among the stakeholders” [61, 63]. The visioning exercise helped stakeholders to visualize a direction or path forward for addressing existing gaps in the mental health system and opportunities for strengthening Indigenous mental health in the region.

Community advisory committee

We followed a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach [64] to support engagement with communities, health professionals, and leaders across the sectors in the RMWB. The objectives and plan for the forum were developed in partnership with a Community Advisory Committee. The committee was comprised of six advisory members, including two Indigenous health service providers, one non-Indigenous health service provider, as well Indigenous Elders or Knowledge Holders from First Nation and Métis ancestry residing in the RMWB (one Dene-speaking Elder, one Cree-speaking Elder, and one Métis Knowledge Holder). The research team engaged the Community Advisory Committee in identifying the objectives and purpose of the forum, the roundtable group discussion questions, and the facilitation and dialogue approach to ensure that Indigenous knowledge was valued and to balance power relationships among community, service providers, and researchers in roundtable discussions [65, 66]. The committee also provided guidance on which key stakeholders to invite across the sectors, as well as ensuring community representation.

Data analysis

The final ranking of priorities from the Dotmocracy method was analyzed in relation to the notes taken by group facilitators to produce a consolidated list of key priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health for the region. The analysis of the roundtable discussions went beyond the presentation of the ranked list of priorities and directions to thematically analyze the roundtable group discussions. The four roundtable group discussions were transcribed verbatim by an external professional company and imported into NVivo 12 (QSR International) for analysis. Our thematic analysis was an iterative process that consisted of three stages involving inductive analysis. The initial analysis was initiated by the roundtable group facilitators who organized the cue cards into broad high-level themes. Next, the lead author (SM) reviewed the recordings and transcripts from the roundtable group discussions and the preliminary themes to develop a framework for priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health for the region (see Tables 2 3, 45). Inductive analysis involved close coding to identify themes emerging from the data for each roundtable group question, and then cross-referencing of themes across all four data transcripts. At the third stage, the research team (SM, KF) and community partner (BF) met to refine key themes, sub-themes, and the nature and extent of their interconnectedness to inform priorities and direction for Indigenous mental health for the region. Quotes from participants were extracted from the transcripts to help explain both individual and group thinking. The final stage of the process was a presentation of the analysis and the framework to the Community Advisory Committee for feedback and confirmation of the key themes.

Table 2 Understand the realities of Indigenous mental health experience (Theme 1)
Table 3 Design a holistic and culturally rooted mental health system (Theme 2)
Table 4 Foster cross-sectoral engagement and collaboration (Theme 3)
Table 5 Focus on children and youth (Theme 4)

Ethics

Before the forum commenced, participants provided written informed consent to take part in the audio-recorded roundtable discussions and community visioning process. Ethical approval was granted by University of Alberta’s Research Ethics Board (Pro00070845).

Results

Priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health

Four themes emerged for setting priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health: a) understand the realities of mental health experience for Indigenous peoples, b) design a holistic and culturally rooted mental health system, c) foster cross-sectoral engagement and collaboration, and d) focus on the mental health of children and youth. The themes are presented below with a short description. Example quotes are presented in Tables 2, 3, 45.

Theme 1: Understand the realities of Indigenous mental health experience

Several key concepts from the roundtable discussions led to a better understanding about the realities of mental health experiences among Indigenous peoples. These concepts included gaps in mental health services, the need for provider education, a focus on destigmatizing mental health, and the inclusion of Indigenous voices in the design and delivery of mental health services. To address the gaps in mental health services, participants highlighted the importance of attention to access of mental health services or supports for Indigenous peoples. Gaps to be addressed included the need for increased frequency, consistency, and availability of mental health services in rural communities; improved transportation to access services; offering of services in Indigenous languages; and reducing system barriers by providing additional funding for mental health professionals to increase time spent in communities and with clients in rural and remote settings. For education, it was established that it is critical for mental health providers to understand the local context and experience of Indigenous peoples, to have knowledge and awareness about the history of Indigenous peoples in Canada and the lasting impacts of colonialism and intergenerational trauma, and to understand the social determinants specific to Indigenous peoples that play an important role in their mental health. Participants emphasized that this requires more than just cultural sensitivity training or certification. It involves changing how care is provided at the institutional level to provide supportive and safe environments for Indigenous clients. Tied to the gap in funding for providers, the need for sufficient time with Indigenous clients was discussed as a component of building trusting provider–client relationships and allowing providers to gain a deep understanding of the root social causes of health inequities.

To address destigmatizing mental health, participants suggested changing the way it is discussed, with positive framing and emphasizing health rather than illness. The idea of removing stigma and empowering individuals to understand mental health and wellness was also introduced. The inclusion of Indigenous voices in the design and delivery of services was highlighted by participants and in particular, engagement and involvement of Indigenous Elders in the design and delivery of services. Also emphasized by participants was the importance for providers and government to understand what healing and wellness means to Indigenous peoples, and for communities to drive the focus of Indigenous-led mental health programing and service delivery.

Theme 2: Design a holistic and culturally rooted mental health system

The key concepts under this theme focused on the inclusion of Indigenous peoples in decision-making on mental health service delivery, as well as harnessing resources within local communities using a strengths-based approach. In addition, providing culturally appropriate and trauma-informed care was highlighted as critical for mental health service provision in the region. Allocating funding to train and hire Indigenous mental health workers from the communities was suggested as this could build local capacity and provide cultural support and traditional healing practices to clients while encouraging programs and services to focus on strengths that are already within communities. Furthermore, including traditional knowledge in the delivery of mental health services was deemed necessary for supporting culturally appropriate care. Participants also spoke about promoting culturally strengthening factors, such as connection to family and kinship and “bringing back what has been lost” as a result of dominant western approaches to treatment such as traditional healing practices, Indigenous language, and Indigenous knowledge. Multiple areas for Elders or Knowledge Keepers to be engaged in as ‘cultural mentors’ were identified including in the training of mental health professionals, in schools to teach youth about mental wellness through cultural and traditional practices, and in paid positions working alongside western health providers for home visits. Moving away from the medical model of sickness and instead including Indigenous knowledge frameworks, such as the Medicine Wheel, was recommended for a holistic approach to healing that is focused on the ‘whole person’. One participant shared that if we are not open to new ways of doing things, then the mental health system and people working within the system “will remain stuck in this perpetual state of doing the same thing over and over that doesn’t work.” Participants also explained that the way the mental health system works now, with mental health professionals using individualized approaches and solutions, is not aligned with an Indigenous holistic view of health and wellness. The holistic approach would take into consideration the individual, family, and community needs to promote healing and recovery. Additionally, the need for cultural sensitivity across the spectrum of mental health care, from prevention to promotion, was also identified. When discussing trauma-informed care, the embedding of Indigenous culture and values into treatment and healing was described. Other recommendations included the provision of addiction and counselling supports across an individual’s lifespan, and the acknowledgment and implementation of the TRC recommendations regarding health across health service organizations.

Theme 3: Foster cross-sectoral engagement and collaboration

The key concepts within this theme that emerged from participant discussions included providing wraparound care, addressing the social determinants of health, collaboration between agencies and sectors, and educating across sectors. From roundtable discussions participants emphasized that the basic needs of individuals must be supported to achieve positive mental health. In order to provide comprehensive holistic support that includes meeting Indigenous peoples’ basic needs (e.g., housing, food security, shelter, safety, community, social support, health services), organizations need to regularly work collaboratively. Establishing a sustainable long-term interagency committee or board that coordinates the different sectors was suggested by participants as a way to foster collective understanding and collaboration on mental health service delivery. It was also mentioned that the sectors need to be decolonized through education regarding past historical trauma and by implementing systemic changes that prioritize anti-racism and culturally safe environments to provide mental health care. Also, participants stated that strengthening mental health services and programs for Indigenous clients, service organizations, funders, decision makers, and healthcare professionals must carefully consider the 94 Calls to Action from the TRC.

Participants also described that the justice sector has a role to play, with the suggestion for promoting restorative justice that is more in line with traditional Indigenous views of healing and rehabilitative justice. Some participants spoke about acknowledging and bringing forward Indigenous legal traditions. Indigenous legal approaches to crime and addressing harm reduction principles that can be important to promoting community healing, reconciliation, and the reintegration of the offender.

Theme 4: Focus on children and youth

The key concepts described by participants for child and youth mental health included making early investments in children’s health and social development, engaging parents and families, promoting youth mentorship, and providing culturally appropriate counselling services for Indigenous youth. The need for supports across the lifespan was emphasized, as supporting healthy early childhood development begins during pregnancy and infancy. Family engagement and mentorship, the inclusion of parents and families in the school and children’s learning as well as the involvement of Elders and peers as mentors were identified as key elements of healthy families and the holistic model of health and well-being [67]. Indigenous peoples believe caring for children is the shared responsibility of their communities. Therefore, participants described the importance that programs or services honor traditional beliefs of well-being and parenting practices. Some participants went on to share that a traditional way of life taught children the importance of connectedness to family and their nation, whereas contemporary society and the education system teaches about isolation and individual gain. This lost sense of connection and belonging has then resulted in a loss of purpose, pride, and identity. When considering existing gaps in the mental health system, participants noted that there is a lack of specialized care and supports for children and youth. Thus, dedicated and specialized mental health services for Indigenous children and youth was considered critical, and should have all sectors (health, education, community and justice) working together.

Community visioning results

From the participatory exercise on day two of the forum, a vision for strengthening Indigenous mental health was formed (see Additional files 1 and 2 for graphic recordings of the community vision). The community vision created by participants included: core guiding principles; taking a strengths-based perspective; respecting Indigenous knowledge; and breaking down the stigma of mental health. There was consensus that the design and delivery of mental health services should take a strengths-based approach to promote mental wellness among Indigenous residents and communities in the region. Focusing on the positive was also discussed in the context of existing data on mental health outcomes in Indigenous populations that is deficit-focused. Additionally, participants voiced that Indigenous-led health partnerships and services need to be grounded in traditional Indigenous knowledge — upheld by community Elders— rather than being grounded in western medicine, structures, and knowledge.

Discussion

The two-day Indigenous mental health forum led to the identification of priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health in the northern region of Alberta, Canada. Researchers, community leaders, service providers, and decision-makers across the sectors gathered to build a shared vision for strengthening mental health services and programs for the region’s diverse Indigenous population. Participants envisioned a holistic and integrated mental health model that is Indigenous-led, culturally based, and blends western modalities with Indigenous knowledge and healing practices [24, 68]. Given the importance of traditional healing practices and culturally appropriate care for Indigenous people, it is critical that these sources of healing are integrated into their care. Furthermore, an integrated care model utilizes the strengths and collaborative skills of many health professionals and specialists, as well as collaboration with community, families, and caregivers [69]. Enrlich and colleagues (2015) engaged multiple stakeholders across sectors within the health system in Australia to identify a range of collaborative actions and processes to improve the physical health of people with severe mental illness [70]. The findings from this study also reinforced the need for holistic care and the integration of health services.

Despite evidence supporting integrated models for mental health service delivery for Indigenous peoples, challenges with implementing integrated models of care involving cross-cultural therapeutic cooperation have been identified. For instance, Carrie et al. (2015), conducted a policy review of Nicaraguan health plans at the national and regional level that support the integration of traditional medicine and biomedicine. The authors found that although measures to create therapeutic cooperation are woven into Nicaraguan health plans at the national and regional level, in practice, the delivery of integrated health services has been implemented with varying results.

Participants of the forum also mentioned that existing mental health services and funding should be realigned to build a more culturally based system of mental health services. With regards to having more Indigenous people educated in the mental health profession, Indigenous communities are already employing Indigenous methods and approaches and engaging Elders, Knowledge Keepers, and healers to support system transformation within the area of health [34]. The training and hiring of Indigenous people within the mental health profession to support holistic mental health service delivery was identified as a key priority by participants for supporting their vision towards Indigenous-led, culturally safe, and equitable mental healthcare in the region.

Participants advocated for holistic approaches to mental health delivery for Indigenous people, rather than individualized approaches to mental health that exclude family and kinship networks supporting the individual’s healing journey. Rather, holistic approaches to mental health need to look at the individual’s mental health state and experience within the context of their family and community structure. Therefore, family and kinship networks should be involved in the person’s healing journey. Participants further explained that the utilization of the Medicine Wheel can serve as a framework for improving the mental health and well-being of Indigenous people in the region. The Medicine Wheel is used to explain an Indigenous worldview of life that everything in life is connected. All four elements of the Medicine Wheel interact together to form a strong, healthy person. It can also be used to guide transformation of mental health services.

Championing self-determination is highlighted as an important factor in the development of Indigenous mental health services globally. In Australia, closing the mental health gap among the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is a national priority. Policy responses have advocated for self-determination to the provision of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mental health services, and support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership in the Australian mental health system [71]. In Canada, the TRC Call to Action #22 states, “We call upon those who can effect change within the Canadian health care system to recognize the value of Aboriginal healing practices and use them in the treatment of Aboriginal patients in collaboration with Aboriginal healers and Elders where requested by Aboriginal patients” [8]. This call to action highlights the need for self-determination in use of traditional knowledge and healing practices which have persevered despite systemic oppression and colonial policies. There are several examples in Canada of Indigenous-led and Indigenous-driven mental health initiatives that promote Indigenous knowledge, culture and language. It was clearly identified during the roundtable group discussions that mental health services and supports must be driven by the needs and priorities identified by communities. Services must also target clearly identified measures of wellness. A systematic literature review found that mental health services developed by Indigenous communities in Canada were the most effective at providing appropriate care [19]. Co-creating Indigenous models of care with Indigenous communities has also been recommended to support self-determination, increased community participation in health, and increased community capacity [68]. Maar, Erskine [22] found that a collaborative, community-based Indigenous mental health care model led to improvements in culturally-safe care for Indigenous communities in northern Ontario, Canada [22]. Furthermore, Kyoon-Achan, Philips-Beck [72] created a framework for mental wellness that was co-developed with Indigenous communities to include culturally informed approaches, allowing participants to articulate their experiences and to advocate for and support culturally informed mental health services. Therefore, there is growing evidence towards Indigenous-led healthcare partnerships for improving health outcomes and access to care for Indigenous peoples [25].

The COVID‐19 pandemic has also highlighted vulnerabilities in local workforces that are highly dependent on staff from out of community. As highlighted during the forum, long‐term initiatives to build local capacity are needed, given the significant issues which have arisen in relation to available workforce (including the need to isolate fly‐in‐fly‐out staff and local Indigenous staff who are unable to work). There is a need to ensure Indigenous health workers are supported to provide the best care for communities, especially in areas with pre-existing staff shortages. The training of Indigenous health workers will help reduce the reliance on out‐of‐community mental health practitioners providing services to remote and rural communities and more importantly, address surge workforce planning in Indigenous and rural communities in anticipation of future public health crises and the associated mental health and social impacts.

Participants at the forum highlighted that the different sectors need to be open and willing to explore different ways or models of delivering mental health services that is inclusive of different knowledge systems on health (i.e., both western and Indigenous knowledge), healing practices, and the preferences of Indigenous clients. Mental health promotion requires multi-sectoral action across health, education, community, and the justice sectors, and through the delivery of culturally safe, strengths-based, family- and community-oriented mental health and wellness programs, services and policies that aim to promote healthy emotional, spiritual, and social development in childhood and adolescence, as well as in those at risk of poor mental health [73, 74]. More importantly, mental health experiences and strengths vary among Indigenous communities and individuals in Canada and across the globe, and this variation reflects the distinctiveness of Indigenous peoples’ histories, languages, cultures, environments, and worldviews. Similar to our study, researchers in Australia worked with Indigenous peoples to create a framework of well-being priorities, which included relationships, empowerment, and culture are key priorities [75]. This framework was tested in four Indigenous remote communities. Further, the authors highlighted the importance of aligning priorities with the values of Indigenous communities and strengthening collaboration among services outside the health sector.

Decolonizing mental health is more than just practicing cultural competence — the ability to understand and interact with people of different cultures. Instead, it is recognizing that for many Indigenous peoples the trauma from oppression and colonization plays a major role in their mental health state. Stigma and discrimination remain a barrier to accessing mental health services for many Indigenous peoples in Canada and in other parts of the globe [26, 76]. The values and traditions of Indigenous persons may be poorly understood and their concepts of wellness and ways of knowing sometimes undervalued.

The cumulative stress caused by natural disasters and the current global COVID-19 pandemic is detrimental to the mental health and well-being of children, youth, and families [77]. During the current pandemic, families are experiencing stress, anxiety, concern and even fear. Unique challenges have been documented for Indigenous communities across Canada, particularly elders who are most at risk, and northern and remote communities that have limited access to services and other types of supports [78,79,80]. The pandemic has been reported to compound existing mental health concerns and may bring up past or lingering trauma for Indigenous peoples who have endured historical trauma from colonialist policies [37, 81, 82]. Moreover, disasters and emergencies have been found to result in some positive experiences, including strengthened relationships and social networks [77]. It is important that we highlight the strength and resilience of Indigenous peoples during challenging and traumatic events like a natural disaster or public health crisis. Research that examined how Indigenous residents coped after the 2016 Horse River wildfire revealed the importance of kinship, social and community support, and connection to culture as positive coping mechanisms and factors influencing mental health and well-being [83].

The themes that emerged from the forum offer important insights for future research, practice, and policy. Firstly, the forum was inclusive of diverse perspectives from people of Métis and First Nations ancestry, and across urban and rural community settings. Different Indigenous groups, such as Métis [19, 23] and urban or off-reserve First Nations can have unique experiences that are often excluded in research and data. Secondly, the provincial Alberta Government’s 2020–2023 fiscal plan commits $100 M for a new mental health and addiction strategy, which is intended to address the ongoing challenges of mental health and addictions in Alberta [84]. However, there is no mention of how (or if) funding for mental health services or supports will be allocated to Indigenous communities. This presents a window of opportunity to advocate for improved, equitable and culturally resonant mental health services and programs for Indigenous populations in the northern province.

Strengths and limitations

The modified nominal group consensus method used for this research ensured equal participation among participants. The structure of the nominal consensus process maximized the uptake of expertise from participants and minimized the potential of one personal or professional perspective dominating the process. However, our study has some limitations. We had limited participation of youth (n = 3) at the forum. Despite recruiting through social media and connecting with representatives of youth programs offered at Indigenous organizations, we were unable to recruit a desirable number of youth to this study. Nonetheless, the study is strengthened by the diverse range of cross-sectoral service providers and community Elders. As is the case with many recruitment approaches, there was the potential that not all Indigenous language groups in the region (Cree, Dene, Michif) were adequately represented. For instance, there were more Cree-speaking Indigenous participants at the forum, in comparison to Dene-speaking or Michif-speaking Indigenous participants. A further limitation is that we restricted voting on the priorities and directions to one round and may therefore have limited the level of consensus achieved.

Conclusion

This study illustrates that collaborative and consensus-based facilitation approaches are effective methods for prioritizing community-based knowledge and expertise on setting priorities and directions for an Indigenous mental health strategy in the RMWB. The forum was also a first step towards fostering multi-sectoral and community relationship-building and collaboration on Indigenous mental health. This study makes an important contribution to improving Indigenous mental health through cross-sectoral engagement. Forum participants emphasized that Indigenous-focused services foster relationships and collaboration between care providers, communities, families, and caregivers [69]. Moreover, Indigenous-focused services ensure Indigenous knowledge, local context, access, and integration of services is supported. The Indigenous mental health forum allowed for a better understanding of the experiences of Indigenous people in the RMWB with accessing mental health services, as well as the Indigenous mental health needs and directions for improving Indigenous mental health service delivery in the RMWB. These outcomes of the modified NGT process, modified Dotmocracy method, and community visioning exercise provided important contextual information and fostered collective action for shaping future responses on Indigenous mental health in region.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. All qualitative data analysis is presented in Tables 2, 3, 45, and transcriptions of roundtable group discussions are stored in a secured drive on a password protected computer.

Abbreviations

RMWB:

Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo

MNA:

Métis Nation of Alberta

TRC:

Truth and Reconciliation Commission

AHS:

Alberta Health Services

CBPR:

Community-Based Participatory Research

References

  1. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Winnipeg, MB; 2015

  2. Mashford-Pringle A, Skura C, Stutz S, Yohathasan T. What we heard: Indigenous peoples and COVID-19. Supplementary Report for the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada’s Report on the State of Public Health in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Waakebiness-Bryce Institute for Indigenous Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; 2021

  3. Heck C, Eaker M, Cobos S, Campbell S, Carnevale FA. Pandemic Impacts for Indigenous Children and Youth Within Canada: An Ethical Analysis. Young. 2021;29(4):381–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/11033088211032791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mushquash C. Voices from the Field (10): Supporting First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples’ Mental Health and Well-being during COVID-19 [Internet]: National Collaborating Centre for Indigenous Health; 2020 April Podcast. Available from: https://www.nccih.ca/495/Podcast__Voices_from_the_Field_10_-Supporting_First_Nations,_Inuit_and_Métis_Peoples’_Mental_Health_and_Well-being_during_COVID-19.nccih?id=295

  5. McIntyre C, Harris MG, Baxter AJ, Leske S, Diminic S, Gone JP, et al. Assessing service use for mental health by Indigenous populations in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America: A rapid review of population surveys. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0233-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Marsh TN, Coholic D, Cote-Meek S, Najavits LM. Blending Aboriginal and Western healing methods to treat intergenerational trauma with substance use disorder in Aboriginal peoples who live in Northeastern Ontario, Canada. Harm Reduct J. 2015;12(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-015-0046-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Boksa P, Joober R, Kirmayer LJ. Mental wellness in Canada’s Aboriginal communities: Striving toward reconciliation. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015;40(6):363–5. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.150309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to action. Winnipeg, MB: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada; 2015

  9. World Health Organization. Global monitoring of action on the social determinants of health: A proposed framework and basket of core indicators - Consultation paper. 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/social_determinants/consultation-paper-SDH-Action-Monitoring.pdf?ua=1

  10. Lopez-Carmen V, McCalman J, Benveniste T, Askew D, Spurling G, Langham E, et al. Working together to improve the mental health of indigenous children: A systematic review. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019;104: 104408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311(7001):376–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL. The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. Am J Public Health. 1972;62(3):337–42. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.62.3.337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien F, Meadows M. Developing a visioning methodology: Visioning Choices for the future of operational research. J Oper Res Soc. 2007;58(5):557–75. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson NL, Miller NC, Cameron AF. The Indigenization of Photovoice Methodology: Visioning Indigenous Head Start in Michigan. Int Rev Qual Res. 2016;9(3):296–322. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2016.9.3.296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chatwood S, Paulette F, Baker R, Eriksen A, Hansen KL, Eriksen H, et al. Approaching Etuaptmumk–introducing a consensus-based mixed method for health services research. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015;74:27438. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v74.27438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous Peoples at the United Nations 2022. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/about-us.html.

  17. Adelson N. The embodiment of inequity: Health disparities in Aboriginal Canada. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(Suppl 2):S45-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. King M, Smith A, Gracey M. Indigenous health part 2: The underlying causes of the health gap. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60827-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson SE, Wilson K. The mental health of Indigenous peoples in Canada: A critical review of research. Soc Sci Med. 2017;176:93–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kielland N, Simeone T. Current issues in mental health in Canada: The mental health of First Nations and Inuit communities (In Brief). Ottawa, ON: Legal and Social Affairs Division: Parliamentary Information and Research Service; 2014. Publication No. 2014–02-E. Available from: https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/bdp-lop/eb/2014-02-eng.pdf.

  21. Lints-Martindale AC, Carlson AA, Goodwin SL, Thompson SN. Putting recommendations into practice: Improving psychological services in rural and northern Canada. Can Psychol. 2018;59(4):323–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maar MA, Erskine B, McGregor L, Larose TL, Sutherland ME, Graham D, et al. Innovations on a shoestring: a study of a collaborative community-based Aboriginal mental health service model in rural Canada. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2009;3(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-3-27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Auger MD. “We need to not be footnotes anymore”: understanding Métis people’s experiences with mental health and wellness in British Columbia. Canada Public Health. 2019;176:92–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rogers BJ, Swift K, van der Woerd K, Auger M, Halseth R, Atkinson D, et al. At the interface: Indigenous health practitioners and evidence-based practice. Prince George, BC: National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health; 2019

  25. Allen L, Hatala A, Ijaz S, Courchene ED, Bushie EB. Indigenous-led health care partnerships in Canada. CMAJ. 2020;192(9):E208–16. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.190728.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen NH, Subhan FB, Williams K, Chan CB. Barriers and Mitigating Strategies to Healthcare Access in Indigenous Communities of Canada: A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(2):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Strudwick G, Sockalingam S, Kassam I, Sequeira L, Bonato S, Youssef A, et al. Digital Interventions to Support Population Mental Health in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rapid Review. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8(3): e26550. https://doi.org/10.2196/26550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Auger M, Howell T, Gomes T. Moving toward holistic wellness, empowerment and self-determination for Indigenous peoples in Canada: Can traditional Indigenous health care practices increase ownership over health and health care decisions? Can J Public Health. 2016;107(4–5): e393. https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.107.5366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Stewart SL. Promoting Indigenous mental health: Cultural perspectives on healing from Native counsellors in Canada. Int J Health Promot Educ. 2008;46(2):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2008.10708129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Restoule BM, Hopkins C, Robinson J, Wiebe PK. First Nations Mental Wellness: Mobilizing Change through Partnership and Collaboration. Can J Community Ment Health. 2016;34(4):89–109. https://doi.org/10.7870/cjcmh-2015-014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gould B, MacQuarrie C, O’Connell ME, Bourassa C. Mental wellness needs of two Indigenous communities: Bases for culturally competent clinical services. Can Psychol. 2021;62(3):213–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Drost JL. Developing the Alliances to Expand Traditional Indigenous Healing Practices Within Alberta Health Services. J Altern Complement Med. 2019;25(S1):S69-77. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tu D, Hadjipavlou G, Dehoney J, Price ER, Dusdal C, Browne AJ, et al. Partnering with Indigenous Elders in primary care improves mental health outcomes of inner-city Indigenous patients: Prospective cohort study. Can Fam Physician. 2019;65(4):274–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hadjipavlou G, Varcoe C, Tu D, Dehoney J, Price R, Browne AJ. “All my relations”: experiences and perceptions of Indigenous patients connecting with Indigenous Elders in an inner city primary care partnership for mental health and well-being. CMAJ. 2018;190(20):E608–15. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.171390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Isaak CA, Mota N, Medved M, Katz LY, Elias B, Mignone J, et al. Conceptualizations of help-seeking for mental health concerns in First Nations communities in Canada: A comparison of fit with the Andersen Behavioral Model. Transcult Psychiatry. 2020;57(2):346–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461520906978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Maher S. Overcrowding Makes It Hard For Native Americans To Socially Distance. Morning Edition. USA: NPR 2020. p. 3:22

  37. Jenkins EK, McAuliffe C, Hirani S, Richardson C, Thomson KC, McGuinness L, et al. A portrait of the early and differential mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Findings from the first wave of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Prev Med. 2021;145: 106333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hall T, Honisett S, Paton K, Loftus H, Constable L, Hiscock H. Prioritising interventions for preventing mental health problems for children experiencing adversity: a modified nominal group technique Australian consensus study. BMC Psychology. 2021;9(1):165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00652-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The Nominal Group Technique: A useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research. NZ J Physiother. 2004;32(2):70–5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cantrill JA, Sibbald B, Buetow S. The Delphi and nominal group techniques in health services research. Int J Pharm Pract. 2011;4(2):67–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.1996.tb00844.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hidalgo ES. Dotmocracy and Planning Poker for Uncertainty Management in Collaborative Research: Two Examples of Co-creation Techniques Derived from Digital Culture. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality; Salamanca, Spain: Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. p. 833–9

  44. Healey GK, Noah J, Mearns C. The Eight Ujarait (Rocks) Model: Supporting Inuit Adolescent Mental Health With an Intervention Model Based on Inuit Ways of Knowing. Int J Ind Health. 2016;11(1):92–110. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijih111201614394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Marshall M, Marshall A, Bartlett C. Two-eyed seeing in medicine. In: Greenwood M, de Leeuw S, Lindsay MN, Reading C, editors. Determinants of Indigenous peoples’ health in Canada: Beyond the social. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars; 2015. p. 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bartlett C, Marshall M, Marshall A. Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. J Environ Stud Sci. 2012;2(4):331–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Crowshoe LL, Sehgal A, Montesanti S, Barnabe C, Kennedy A, Murry A, et al. The Indigenous primary health care and policy research network: Guiding innovation within primary health care with Indigenous peoples in Alberta. Health Policy. 2021;125(6):725–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Lin I, Green C, Bessarab D. “Yarn with me”: applying clinical yarning to improve clinician-patient communication in Aboriginal health care. Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22(5):377–82. https://doi.org/10.1071/py16051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wilson S. What is an Indigenous Research Methodology. Can J Nativ Educ. 2001;25(2):172–9.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, Wood TJ. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research. Med Teach. 2017;39(1):14–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Søndergaard E, Ertmann RK, Reventlow S, Lykke K. Using a modified nominal group technique to develop general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0811-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Harvey N, Holmes CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(2):188–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02017.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. van Teijlingen E, Pitchforth E, Bishop C, Russell E. Delphi method and nominal group technique in family planning and reproductive health research. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006;32(4):249–52. https://doi.org/10.1783/147118906778586598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cook S, Birrell M. Defining an Occupational Therapy Intervention for People with Psychosis. Br J Occup Ther. 2007;70(3):96–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260707000302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Vella K, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, Bion J, Black N. Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care. BMJ. 2000;320(7240):976–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7240.976.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Aspinal F, Hughes R, Dunckley M, Addington-Hall J. What is important to measure in the last months and weeks of life?: A modified nominal group study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(4):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Evans N, Hannigan B, Pryjmachuk S, Gillen E, Edwards D, Longo M, et al. Using the nominal group technique to involve young people in an evidence synthesis which explored ‘risk’ in inpatient mental healthcare. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-017-0069-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Diceman J. Dotmocracy Handbook: A Simple Tool to Help Large Groups Find Agreement. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 2010. p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ames S. The new Oregon model: Envision - plan - achieve. J Futures Stud. 2010;15(2):163–6.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cuthill M. Community Visioning: Facilitating Informed Citizen Participation in Local Area Planning on the Gold Coast. Urban Policy Res. 2004;22(4):427–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0811114042000296335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Minkler M. Using Participatory Action Research to build Healthy Communities. Public Health Rep. 2000;115(2–3):191–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/115.2.191.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Healey P. Collaborative Planning in a Stakeholder Society. Town Plan Rev. 1998;69(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Fletcher C. Community-based participatory research relationships with Aboriginal communities In Canada: An overview of context and process. Pimatisiwin. 2003;1(1):27–62.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kendall E, Sunderland N, Barnett L, Nalder G, Matthews C. Beyond the rhetoric of participatory research in Indigenous communities: advances in Australia over the last decade. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(12):1719–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311418124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D. Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(10):854–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kuo DZ, Houtrow AJ, Arango P, Kuhlthau KA, Simmons JM, Neff JM. Family-centered care: current applications and future directions in pediatric health care. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(2):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0751-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Pepler E, Martell RC. Indigenous model of care to health and social care workforce planning. Healthc Manage Forum. 2019;32(1):32–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470418809105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13: e010. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.886.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Ehrlich C, Kendall E, Frey N, Denton M, Kisely S. Consensus building to improve the physical health of people with severe mental illness: a qualitative outcome mapping study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0744-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Calma T, Dudgeon P, Bray A. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing and Mental Health. Austr Psychol. 2017;52(4):255–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Kyoon-Achan G, Philips-Beck W, Lavoie J, Eni R, Sinclair S, Avey Kinew K, et al. Looking back, moving forward: a culture-based framework to promote mental wellbeing in Manitoba First Nations communities. Int J Cult Ment Health. 2018;11(4):679–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2018.1556714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. World Health Organization. Mental health action plan 2013–2020. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse; 2013. Available from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506021

  74. Petek A, Novak M, Barry MM. Interdisciplinary research framework for multisectoral mental health policy development. Int J Ment Health Promot. 2017;19(3):119–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2017.1326398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Schultz R, Quinn S, Wilson B, Abbott T, Cairney S. Structural modelling of wellbeing for Indigenous Australians: importance of mental health. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):488. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4302-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Kurtz DLM, Nyberg JC, Van Den Tillaart S, Mills B. Okanagan Urban Aboriginal Health Research C. Silencing of voice: An act of violence. Urban Aboriginal women speak out about their experiences with health care. J Aborig Health. 2008;4(1):53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  77. de Miranda DM, da Silva Athanasio B, Oliveira ACS, Simoes-e-Silva AC. How is COVID-19 pandemic impacting mental health of children and adolescents? Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020;51:101845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Lane R, Cerda J. The impact of COVID-19 on Indigenous peoples. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs DfISD; 2020. UN/DESA Policy Brief #70. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/PB_70.pdf.

  79. Wright T. Leaders detail concerns about COVID-19 impacts on Indigenous populations. National Post [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/canada-news-pmn/leaders-detail-concerns-about-covid-19-impacts-on-indigenous-populations?r.

  80. Laskaris A. Mental health concerns in Inuit communities magnified in the time of COVID says ITK's Natan Obed. Toronto Star [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2021/01/23/mental-health-concerns-in-inuit-communities-magnified-in-the-time-of-covid-says-itks-natan-obed.html.

  81. Sapara A, Shalaby R, Osiogo F, Hrabok M, Gusnowski A, Vuong W, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: Demographic and clinical correlates of passive death wish and thoughts of self-harm among Canadians. J Ment Health. 2021:1–9

  82. Bellrichard C. 93% spike in First Nations overdose deaths recorded in B.C. during COVID-19. CBC News [Internet]. 2020 July 06, 2020. Available from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/bc-first-nations-overdose-deaths-1.5639098.

  83. Montesanti S, Fitzpatrick K, Azimi T, McGee T, Fayant B, Albert L. Exploring Indigenous Ways of Coping After a Wildfire Disaster in Northern Alberta. Canada Qual Health Res. 2021;31(8):1472–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211009194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Government of Alberta, President of Treasury Board and Minister of Finance. Budget 2020: Fiscal plan: A plan for jobs and the economy 2020–2023. Edmonton, AB; 2020. Available from: https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/05bd4008-c8e3-4c84-949e-cc18170bc7f7/resource/79caa22e-e417-44bd-8cac-64d7bb045509/download/budget-2020-fiscal-plan-2020-23.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the stakeholders who participated in the Indigenous Mental Health Forum on June 24th and 25th, 2019. The authors also thank Candace Sturgess for the organization of the forum, and the facilitators who supported roundtable discussions. We are thankful for the knowledge and wisdom shared by Elders and Knowledge Keepers, youth, health professionals, and community members. We are also grateful to the Community Advisory Committee for providing feedback on the final analysis. The authors would also like to thank Winta Ghidei and Barbara Verstraeten for providing support with formatting and references and editing of the manuscript.

Funding

The Indigenous Mental Health Forum was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)’s Indigenous Healthy Life Trajectory Initiative (I-HeLTI). The views expressed in this report are the views of the participants and the authors and should not be taken to represent the views of the CIHR. The CIHR did not play any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, nor in writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SM and BF worked with the Community Advisory Committee to conceptualize the forum. The forum was hosted by SM and BF. SM completed data analysis by reviewing the recordings and transcripts from roundtable discussions and the preliminary themes and developed a framework for priorities and directions for Indigenous mental health for the region. CP performed a review of existing literature. SM and BF shared primarily findings from the two-day forum with the Community advisory Committee for feedback. SM led a virtual presentation summarizing the findings from the forum to all participants who attended. SM, KF, and CP were all major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

SM is a white settler woman residing on Treaty 6 Territory in western Canada. She is a health policy and systems researcher and holds the following positions: Associate Professor, School of Public Health, University of Alberta; Scientist, Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta; Member, Women and Children’s Health Research Institute, University of Alberta. KF is a Mi’kmaq French Irish woman residing on Treaty 6 Territory in western Canada and is a senior research associate at the School of Public Health, University of Alberta. KF holds a Master’s of Science from the University of British Columbia. BF is a Métis man from the Fishing Lake Métis Settlement in Alberta, Canada, and holds the position of Disaster Recovery Strategist for McMurray Métis (MNA Local 1935). CP is a white settler woman residing on Treaty 6 Territory in western Canada and at the time of completing this work she was a Research Assistant in the School of Public Health, University of Alberta. CP holds a Master’s in Public Health from the School of Public Health, University of Alberta.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Montesanti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by the University of Alberta Research Ethics Board (Pro00070845). All participants were informed of the objectives of the forum and fully consented to roundtable group discussions being recorded. Both written and verbal consent was obtained to record and transcribe the roundtable group discussion.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montesanti, S., Fitzpatrick, K., Fayant, B. et al. Identifying priorities, directions and a vision for Indigenous mental health using a collaborative and consensus-based facilitation approach. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07682-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07682-3

Keywords

  • Indigenous mental health
  • Holistic mental health service delivery
  • Cultural safety
  • Integrated models of care
  • Cross-sectoral collaboration
  • Community visioning
  • Priority setting
  • Nominal group technique consensus method
  • Children and youth