Skip to main content

The challenge of safe anesthesia in developing countries: defining the problems in a medical center in Cambodia

Abstract

Background

The International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia (ISSPA) were developed on behalf of the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists and the World Health Organization. It has been recommend as an assessment tool that allows anesthetic providers in developing countries to assess their compliance and needs. This study was performed to describe the anesthesia service in one main public hospital during an 8-month medical mission in Cambodia and evaluate its anesthetic safety issues according to the ISSPA.

Methods

We conduct a retrospective study involving 1953 patients at the Preah Ket Mealea hospital. Patient demographics, anesthetic techniques, and complications were reviewed according to the registers of the anesthetic services and questionnaires. The inadequacies in personnel, facilities, equipment, medications, and conduct of anesthesia drugs were recorded using a checklist based on the ISSPA.

Results

A total of 1792 patients received general and regional anesthesia in the operating room, while 161 patients receiving sedation for gastroscopy. The patients’ mean age was 45.0 ± 16.6 years (range, 17–87 years). The three most common surgical procedures were abdominal (52.0%; confidence interval [CI], 49.3–54.7), orthopedic (27.6%; CI, 25.2–29.9), and urological surgery (14.7%; CI, 12.8–16.6). General anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and brachial plexus block were performed in 54.3% (CI, 51.7–56.8), 28.2% (CI, 25.9–30.5), and 9.4% (CI, 7.9–10.9) of patients, respectively. One death occurred. Twenty-six items related to professional aspects, monitoring, and conduct of anesthesia did not meet the ISSPA-recommended standards. A lack of commonly used drugs and monitoring equipment was noted, posing major threats to the safety of anesthesia practice, especially in emergency situations.

Conclusions

This study adds to the scarce literature on anesthesia practice in low- and middle-income countries such as Cambodia. Future medical assistance should help to strengthen these countries’ inadequacies, allowing for the adoption of international standards for the safe practice of anesthesia.

Peer Review reports

Background

Many developing countries, especially countries with longstanding conflicts such as Cambodia, have a critical shortage of healthcare workers and medical resources [1]. As an important part of medical services, anesthesia services are particularly susceptible to the level of socioeconomic development [2]. In low-income countries, anesthesia services are often provided by unqualified personnel, who are considered a low priority and lack the voice to request access to resources [3].

The quality of anesthesia services is highly correlated with perioperative mortality and morbidity [4]. Identification of the basic problems and resulting demands in anesthesia service is important to better ensure the safety and efficacy of surgical treatments in the developing world. Such data are essential to guide the efforts of governmental and nongovernmental organizations to improve health care delivery in these countries [5]. Unfortunately, with the exception of anecdotal reports and regional evaluations published 20 years ago, few recent studies have focused on the status of anesthesia service in Cambodia [6, 7].

To provide guidance and assistance in maintaining and improving the quality and safety of anesthesia care worldwide, the International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia (ISSPA) was developed on behalf of the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists and the World Health Organization [8]. The ISSPA was first published in 1992 and most recently amended in 2018. The ISSPA covers essential areas for anesthesia safety, including professional aspects, facilities and equipment, medications, monitoring, and the conduct of anesthesia [8]. The ISSPA has been recommend as an assessment tool that allows anesthetic departments, institutions, or countries to assess their compliance and needs [8, 9]. In the present study, we described the anesthetic management in one of the largest teaching institutions in Phnom Phen, Cambodia for the first time and evaluated its anesthetic safety issues according to the ISSPA.

Methods

Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee of Preah Ket Mealea Hospital. Because this was an observational quality improvement study, the need for individual written consent was waived by the hospital ethics committee. The article adheres to the applicable Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) guidelines (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement).

The Preah Ket Mealea Hospital is the main public teaching referral center in Phnom Phen, Cambodia. Procedures such as major brain and spine surgeries are routinely performed here [10, 11]. We retrospectively reviewed the anesthetic records of all patients who had undergone operations in the hospital from 1 February to 30 September 2018 either directly or indirectly under the help of a local anesthetist. The patients were requested to provide written consent for surgery and anesthesia. Patients who underwent local anesthesia performed by surgeons were excluded from the analysis. Data were obtained from the registers of the anesthetic services. A standardized form was designed to collect relevant information: age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, diagnosis, type of operation, and anesthetic technique. In addition, one questionnaire on the incidence of complications (defined in additional file 1) [12] and another questionnaire on the availability of medications and equipment (based on the ISSPA) were designed to compensate for data that were lacking from the recording charts [13]. At the end of the questionnaires, anesthetists of the department were asked to provide free-text comments on how to improve the safety of anesthesia services.

Two investigators checked the anesthesia personnel, monitoring, and delivery technique in the department according to the ISSPA [8]. The ISSPA includes three levels of standards: highly recommended, recommended, and suggested standards. We checked all levels of standards in this study to fully demonstrate the current situation of anesthesia service. Two investigators (K.M. Tao and S. Sokha) independently filled out the checklists through their observation and work experience, and disagreements were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer (H.B. Yuan). Items that did not meet the standard were recorded for further analyses.

The SPSS 12.0.1 software program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistical methods were applied to present the results of single sections and questions. An overall Kappa coefficient was calculated as a measure of inter-rater reliability between two investigators’ ratings on the ISSPA checklist. P values of < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Economic, health care, and anesthesia workforce status in Cambodia

The financial resources allocated to health care are meager in Cambodia (see in additional file 1) [14,15,16]. Per capita spending on healthcare is 18 times greater in the United Kingdom than in Cambodia. Although the medical education model in Cambodia is identical to the Western model, the number of physician anesthesia providers per 100,000 population is only one-sixth that in the United Kingdom. Additionally, the proportion of anesthesiologists with qualified training experience is even lower.

Epidemiology of anesthesia service

The records of 1953 patients were included in the study, with 1792 (91.8%) receiving general and regional anesthesia in the operating room and 161 (8.2%) receiving sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in the outpatient operating room. The male: female sex ratio was 1.53:1.00, and the mean age was 45.0 ± 16.6 years (range, 17–87 years).

All the patients undergoing surgery were preoperatively assessed by a physician anesthetist. Ninety percent of patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of 1 or 2. The baseline investigations included an electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood tests for a complete blood count, blood group, coagulation function, electrolyte levels, and liver and kidney function.

The types of surgery performed are presented in Table 1. The three most common procedures were appendectomy, fracture reduction and internal fixation, and cholecystectomy. Emergency surgery accounted for approximately 37.3% of the procedures, and most were performed in patients with trauma or general peritonitis.

Table 1 Patients’ baseline characteristics and surgical procedures

Anesthetic techniques

After the patient entered the operating room, the anesthesiologist was responsible for the peripheral venous puncture. Pulse oximetry and noninvasive blood pressure measurement were performed for intraoperative monitoring in all patients. ECG monitoring was rarely used during surgery. Capnography, measurement of body temperature, and monitoring of neuromuscular function were not used in any patients because of a lack of equipment.

General anesthesia was performed in 54.3% of the patients. The combination of diazepam and propofol was used for anesthesia induction, isoflurane was used for maintenance, succinylcholine and vecuronium were used for muscle relaxation, and fentanyl was used for analgesia. Compressed air and oxygen were supplied by cylinders. For all patients undergoing general anesthesia, tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation were applied with an Aestiva/57900 anesthesia machine (Datex-Ohmeda Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The regional anesthesia techniques performed were mainly spinal and brachial plexus blocks. Epidural anesthesia was rarely performed because of the lack of needles and supplies. At the end of surgery, all patients who underwent regional anesthesia were immediately transferred to the surgical wards, and patients who underwent general anesthesia were observed in a recovery ward. Table 2 lists the five most frequent complications as described by the anesthetists surveyed.

Table 2 Details of anesthesia practice

Anesthesia-related death

One death was recorded during the study period. A 50-year-old man undergoing surgery for lumbar disc herniation developed sudden cardiac arrest during anesthesia induction. The patient had no preexisting comorbidities. Preoperative monitoring and blood analysis excluded heart disease, hypovolemia (normal heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform), acute anemia, and electrolyte disturbance as possible causes of cardiac arrest. No ECG or end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring were being performed when the cardiac arrest occurred. Decreased oxygen saturation and hypotension were first detected after propofol bolus injection. No signs of cutaneous rash or edema were present. Immediately after the cardiac arrest, ECG monitoring, chest compressions, tracheal intubation, and mechanical ventilation were performed. Ventilation difficulty was detected with a rise in the peak airway pressure after intubation. Adrenalin and sodium bicarbonate were then administered via a peripheral vein during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved after 30 min of resuscitation, and the patient was transferred while still intubated and ventilated to the intensive care unit with the support of vasoactive drugs. However, after 3 days of coma (Glasgow coma scale score of 3 on day 3), the family discontinued treatment and the patient died of circulatory failure after 7 days.

Compliance with ISPPA

According to the ISSPA-recommend checklists, items that did not meet the standards are listed in Tables 4 to 8. The overall inter-rater Kappa coefficient was 0.75, indicating substantial agreement between the two raters.

Professional aspects

With respect to professional aspects, the main problem was the lack of available time, facilities, and financial support for professional training of all anesthesia providers. Additionally, no incident-reporting system with case analysis for anesthesia quality control had been established. Because of the nationwide shortage of anesthesiologists, physicians often need to provide anesthesia services in out-of-hospital clinics; thus, the physicians often practice with undue fatigue (Table 3).

Table 3 Compliance with ISSPA on professional aspects

Equipment, medications, and monitoring

With respect to equipment and medications, the questionnaire results reflected the lack of supplies and equipment for ECG monitoring, defibrillation, end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement, body temperature measurement, and neuromuscular monitoring (Table 4). This severely limits the monitoring items that can be carried out during and after surgery (Table 5). This was coupled with a lack of commonly used anti-arrhythmia and cardiovascular active drugs (Table 6), making it difficult to handle emergencies such as difficult airways, arrhythmia, and allergic reactions.

Table 4 Availability of equipment according to ISSPA
Table 5 Compliance with ISSPA on intraoperative and postoperative monitoring
Table 6 Availability of medications according to ISSPA

Conduct of anesthesia

With respect to the conduct of anesthesia, no safety checklist such as the World Health Organization safe surgery checklist was utilized during the whole process of care. When responsibility for care is transferred from one anesthesia provider to another, the process of handing over patient information is arbitrary. Still, postoperative administration of opioids and other analgesics depends mainly on the doctor’s habits rather than on assessment and certain analgesic modalities (Table 7).

Table 7 Compliance with ISSPA on conduct of anesthesia

Anesthesia provider’s suggestions for safe anesthesia

Anesthesia providers were asked to make free-text comments about ways in which anesthesia safety could be improved in their hospital (Table 8). The main categories were improvements in equipment, availability of anesthetic drugs, access to reliable monitoring, and more training opportunities. These comments indicate that the anesthesia services had long been limited by the economic conditions of the region and that providers had difficulties in maintaining the safety of anesthesia with limited medical expense.

Table 8 Anesthetists’ suggestions and comments for making anesthesia safera

Data are presented as the number of staff members who made suggestions; the total number of staff surveyed was 15.

Discussion

As the rate-limiting step for provision of safe anesthesia, the quality of anesthesia service is not only related to the outcomes of surgical care but is also an important indicator of the level of medical development [17,18,19,20,21,22]. In this study, we described the anesthesia service in a main public hospital in Phnom Penh for the first time and identified the problems of anesthesia safety according to the ISSPA. Through questionnaires and interviews with staff in the anesthesiology department, we proposed suggestions for further improvement of the safety of anesthesia that are worthy of reference by future medical assistance teams.

In this survey, we found that the proportion of patients who underwent general anesthesia was 54.3%, which is higher than that in other developing countries [23]. One reason for this high proportion is that the tools and materials for epidural anesthesia were unavailable, and a large number of abdominal operations were performed under general anesthesia. This finding also indicates that with continuous medical assistance and technical support, the drugs and instruments required for general anesthesia are basically guaranteed, and general anesthesia is becoming a routine anesthesia service. However, we also found that the concept of balanced anesthesia had not been implemented, and no regional block with sedative or analgesic measures was performed. This may have been due to the difficulty in obtaining drugs such as dexmedetomidine or midazolam. However, it also indicates that the anesthesia service provider was limited in his or her ability to implement the concept of comfortable anesthesia on the basis of ensuring the safety of anesthesia.

As the population of the world rapidly ages, the amount of surgery being performed in older patients is also increasing [24]. In this study, patients aged > 60 years accounted for 20.9% of the entire sample population, which is high for a country in which the estimated life expectancy is around 70 years [25]. Still, age-related diseases such as ischemic heart disease, stroke, and lower respiratory tract infections are the main causes of death in Cambodia [26]. Under the limited conditions of this country, the aging population poses a great challenge to anesthesia safety. First, there were difficulties in preoperative evaluation. In this survey, we often encountered missing and inadequate medical records and difficulty in acquiring patients’ medical history. Even when the disease had been clearly diagnosed, the treatment was often unstandardized. Second, to balance the medical expenses, doctors often had to omit some examinations such as 24-h dynamic ECG, pulmonary function tests, or coronary angiography tests; thus, some occult diseases could not be diagnosed before surgery. Third, inadequate intraoperative monitoring and poor control of the intraoperative anesthesia depth, which relied solely on oxygen saturation and noninvasive blood pressure monitoring, prevented the detection of problems during the operation in a timely and effective manner and thus increased the risk of perioperative complications in patients of advanced age.

The factors that affect the safety of anesthesia are ultimately associated with Cambodia’s economic development. Because of limited resources, early medical assistants generally performed general anesthesia under the monitoring of oxygen saturation [7]. This method may have resulted in the formation of habits among local anesthesiologists through years of inheritance. Because most of the surgeries in our survey were minor surgeries, a simple pulse oximeter can monitor the blood oxygen saturation of patients during surgery. However, in an emergency such as an allergic reaction, pulse oximetry may miss the best time for rescue, resulting in serious consequences such as death. Our study emphasizes the importance of ensuring the availability of basic monitoring and rescue equipment to improve the level of anesthesia safety. Acquisition of an ECG monitor, end-tidal carbon dioxide monitor, blood gas analyzer, and defibrillator in the operating room can greatly increase the safety of anesthesia. Based on the rational allocation of basic equipment and drugs, a regional anesthesia safety management team should then be established to conduct anesthesia quality control. Reporting of severe adverse events, regular anesthesia safety quality inspections, and personnel training are important measures to effectively improve anesthesia safety [26].

Many medical teams have recently been sent to Cambodia for medical assistance services, which to some extent have alleviated the shortage of medical services in Cambodia [27]. Especially for some surgical services performed on excellent-quality professional medical ships, the overall incidence of anesthesia-related complications and postoperative complications approached the level in developed countries [28]. However, these medical assistance actions have not fundamentally promoted the quality of medical services in developing countries. Donation of medical equipment and medications is another common form of assistance that can quickly improve the treatment capacity of medical institutions. However, there are still problems with maintenance of the equipment [29]. The present investigation revealed that the anesthesia machine in the operating room had air leakage problems that could not be repaired, which poses a great danger to the implementation of general anesthesia. We also found that the basic equipment and medications that affect the safety of anesthesia are still largely missing, necessitating continued medical assistance. Finally, in conducting this survey, we fully understood the local anesthesiologists’ desire for knowledge. Young anesthesiologists, who have received a Cambodia medical education based on western education system, with the same training time and courses as western medical education, are especially skilled at using the Internet and are very interested in new techniques such as ultrasound-guided nerve block. However, they tend to pay more attention to advanced anesthesia technologies than the progress in anesthesia guidelines, and it is worthy of the attention of future medical assistance teams.

This study has several limitations. First, the hospital we surveyed is a large public hospital; we did not collect data from private hospitals. According to the records from the Cambodian Society of Anesthesia Critical Care and Emergency Medicine [30], anesthesiologists at Preah Ket Mealea Hospital tend to have better education and training experience than anesthesiologists in other hospitals, and the patient population they serve is larger than that of other hospitals. Second, we should also recognize that Cambodia still faces a critical shortage of medical resources and has a huge gap between urban and rural medical services [31]; therefore, the results of this study can only reflect the level of anesthesia services in the cities. Third, the sample size was too small to make firm conclusions on the safety of anesthesia practice for rare events such as death [4]. Because of missing data records, the incidence of anesthesia-related complications was obtained through questionnaires rather than from records. Still, as the operating rooms in Preah Ket Mealea Hospital did not perform obstetric and pediatric surgery, our results did not include data on obstetric and pediatric patients. A comprehensive and well-designed further prospective observational study should be done to estimate the incidence of anesthesia-related and postoperative complications [32].

Conclusion

In this study, we have herein described the status of the anesthesia service carried out in one of the largest public hospitals in Phnom Phen. According to the ISSPA-recommended standards, the most significant risk factors regarding anesthesia safety are the insufficient training of anesthesiologists, the lack of monitoring equipment, and the lack of emergency medications. We recommend that all medical institutions in low-income countries improve their anesthesia services in accordance with the ISSPA so that all patients in each country can have access to safe anesthesia.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

CI:

Confidence interval

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

ISSPA:

The International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia

WHO:

World Health Organization

PPP:

Purchasing power parity

References

  1. 1.

    Liverani M, Nguon C, Sok R, Kim D, Nou P, Nguon S, et al. Improving access to health care amongst vulnerable populations: a qualitative study of village malaria workers in Kampot, Cambodia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nyberger K, Jumbam DT, Dahm J, Maongezi S, Makuwani A, Kapologwe NA, et al. The situation of safe surgery and anaesthesia in Tanzania: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2019;43(1):24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hodges SC, Mijumbi C, Okello M, McCormick BA, Walker IA, Wilson IH. Anaesthesia services in developing countries: defining the problems. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(1):4–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pignaton W, Braz JR, Kusano PS, Módolo MP, de Carvalho LR, Braz MG, et al. Perioperative and anesthesia-related mortality: an 8-year observational survey from a tertiary teaching hospital. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(2):e2208.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Burssa D, Teshome A, Iverson K, Ahearn O, Ashengo T, Barash D, et al. Safe surgery for all: early lessons from implementing a national government-driven surgical plan in Ethiopia. World J Surg. 2017;41(12):3038–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Uemura T, Preeyanont P, Udnoon S. Humanitarian cleft lip/palate surgeries in buddhist Thailand and neighboring countries. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(4):1112–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bion JF. An anaesthetist in a camp for Cambodian refugees. Anaesthesia. 1983;38(8):798–801.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gelb AW, Morriss WW, Johnson W, Merry AF, Abayadeera A, Belîi N, et al. International standards for a safe practice of anesthesia workgroup. World Health Organization-world Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) international standards for a safe practice of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(6):2047–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lundeg G. The Mongolian Society of Anesthesiologists supports the international standards for a safe practice of anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(7):842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tao KM, Sokha S, Yuan HB. Sphygmomanometer for invasive blood pressure monitoring in a medical mission. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(2):312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Xu T, Chor T. Transtubular evacuation of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage with limited equipment. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    White MC, Barki BJ, Lerma SA, Couch SK, Alcorn D, Gillerman RG. A prospective observational study of anesthesia-related adverse events and postoperative complications occurring during a surgical mission in Madagascar. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(2):506–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    World Federation Of Societies of Anaesthesiologists: Anaesthesia Facility Assessment Tool. (2019) https://www.wfsahq.org/afat. Accessed 25 June 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Meara JG, Greenberg SL. The lancet commission on global surgery global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare and economic development. Surgery. 2015;157(5):834–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    World Federation Of Societies of Anaesthesiologists. Anaesthesia Workforce Map. Cambodia; 2019. https://www.wfsahq.org/component/wfsa_worldmap/countrynew/. Accessed 25 June 2019.

  16. 16.

    World Health Organization: Country statistics. (2019) https://www.who.int/countries/khm/en/. Accessed 25 June 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U. Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic. 2015;57:324–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hendel S, Coonan T, Thomas S, McQueen K. The rate-limiting step: the provision of safe anesthesia in low-income countries. World J Surg. 2015;39(4):833–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Vo D, Cherian MN, Bianchi S, Noël L, Lundeg G, Taqdeer A, et al. Anesthesia capacity in 22 low and middle income countries. J Anesth Clin Res. 2012;03(4):1000207.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tran TM, Saint-Fort M, Jose MD, Henrys JH, Pierre Pierre JB, Cherian MN, et al. Estimation of surgery capacity in Haiti: nationwide survey of hospitals. World J Surg. 2015;39(9):2182–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cherian M, Choo S, Wilson I, Noel L, Sheikh M, Dayrit M, et al. Building and retaining the neglected anaesthesia health workforce: is it crucial for health systems strengthening through primary health care? Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(8):637–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Epiu I, Tindimwebwa JV, Mijumbi C, Chokwe TM, Lugazia E, Ndarugirire F, et al. Challenges of anesthesia in low- and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional survey of access to safe obstetric anesthesia in east africa. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(1):290–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ellison EC, Pawlik TM, Way DP, Satiani B, Williams TE. The impact of the aging population and incidence of cancer on future projections of general surgical workforce needs. Surgery. 2018;163163(3):553–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevetion: Global Health-Cambodia. (2019) https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/countries/cambodia/default.htm. Accessed 25 June 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Williams GD, Muffly MK, Mendoza JM, Wixson N, Leong K, Claure RE. Reporting of perioperative adverse events by pediatric anesthesiologists at a tertiary children’s hospital: targeted interventions to increase the rate of reporting. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(5):1515–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jun JK, Koo JS, Kang AY, Chien DB, Shim A, Knutson D, et al. Utilizing three years of epidemiological data from medical missions in Cambodia to shape the mobile medical clinic formulary. Christ J Glob Health. 2017;4(1):13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lagrew J, Lujan E, Nelson SC, Hauff NM, Kaesberg JL, Lambert ME, et al. Pacific partnership 2010: anesthesia support aboard the USNS mercy humanitarian civic assistance. Mil Med. 2012;177(8):939–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Shah S, Bellows BA, Adedipe AA, Totten JE, Backlund BH, Sajed D. Perceived barriers in the use of ultrasound in developing countries. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015;7(1):28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cambodian Society of Anesthesiology, Critical care and Emergency Medicine (SCARMU). https://www.facebook.com/Scarmu-Cambodia-7 04018643142687/ (2019). Accessed 25 June 2019.

  31. 31.

    Canavati SE, Lawpoolsri S, Quintero CE, Nguon C, Ly P, Pukrittayakamee S, et al. Village malaria worker performance key to the elimination of artemisinin-resistant malaria: a Western Cambodia health system assessment. Malar J. 2016;15(1):282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Webster CS. Estimating and reporting error rates, and detecting improvements. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:60–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support and coordination assistance from the department of anesthesiology, Preah Ket Mealea Hospital. We thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KMT helped conceive the original idea and study design; helped with data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; and helped review the literature, write the draft of the manuscript, and approve the final manuscript. SS helped with data acquisition, and helped review the literature, critically appraised and approved the final manuscript. HBY helped conceive the original idea and study design; helped with data analysis and interpretation; and critically write, appraised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-bin Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee of Preah Ket Mealea Hospital. Because this was an observational quality improvement study, the need for individual written consent was waived by the hospital ethics committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1.

Adverse event definitions and Supplemental Table 2. Comparison of economic, health care, and anesthesia workforce in the United Kingdom and Combodia.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, Km., Sokha, S. & Yuan, Hb. The challenge of safe anesthesia in developing countries: defining the problems in a medical center in Cambodia. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5068-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • International standards for a safe practice of anesthesia
  • Anesthesia safety
  • Cambodia