Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Job satisfaction of certified primary care physicians in rural Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study

BMC Health Services Research201919:75

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3893-8

©  The Author(s). 2019

  • Received: 17 April 2018
  • Accepted: 9 January 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to measure the level of job satisfaction of certified physicians in rural primary health care facilities (PHCFs) in Shandong Province in order to ascertain the key factors affecting their satisfaction and to provide effective information for policy decisions.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted among certified physicians in PHCFs in rural Shandong from June to August 2016. An anonymous questionnaire was completed by 495 participants (valid response rate: 91.6%). Data were analyzed using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple linear regression.

Results

The participants consisted of 310 (62.6%) males and 185 (37.4%) females. The overall mean score for job satisfaction among respondents was 3.41 (standard deviation (SD) 0.68), which indicated that certified physicians were partially satisfied with their jobs. Results also indicated that factors for the highest level of satisfaction among certified physicians were the internal environment and job description. Moreover, physicians were more satisfied with competency behaviours and organizational management than with working conditions and job rewards. In contrast, physicians were dissatisfied with the external environment to an extent. Overall job satisfaction decreased with more years of service. Older physicians were less satisfied with their jobs than younger ones. Physicians with a higher level of education or senior professional title were less satisfied with their jobs than those with a lower level of education or junior professional tilte. Organizational management and the external environment were the most important factors influencing job satisfaction.

Conclusion

Certified physicians working in PHCFs in rural Shandong had a slightly higher level of overall job satisfaciton than usual. After recent healthcare reforms, the job satisfaction of primary health care physicians in Shandong has changed little in comparison to that of physicians in other provinces in China. More attention should be paid to the impacts of these variables (age, educational background, technical title, monthly salary, form of employment, and years of service) on job satisfaction. Numerous recommendations may be considered to enhance organizational management and the external environment. The Government should enhace the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies to ensure that physicians continue to enjoy working in PHCFs. In short, the Government should pay more attention to protecting the legitimate rights and interests of primary care physicians when devising medical reforms.

Keywords

  • Job satisfaction
  • Primary health care facility
  • Certified physician
  • Cross-sectional study
  • Shandong P rovince

Background

In early 2009, the Government of China (GOC) launched a new health care system reforms. The goal of this program is to establish a basic medical and health system covering both urban and rural residents, to provide safe, effective, convenient, and inexpensive medical health services for all [1]. For the last decade, China has been working to achieve universal health coverage as defined by the World Health Organization [2–4]. China’s medical and health care system has a dual structure in urban and rural areas, and there are large gaps in medical care in both areas. By the end of 2017, there were 576 million people living in rural areas while there were 4.28 medical and technical personnel per 1000 population in those areas, compared to 10.87 in urban areas. The key aspects of and difficulties with Chinese health care reforms lie in rural areas and PHCFs.

The service capacity of PHCFs needs to be enhanced and the system of primary medical and health care needs to be improved. In recent years, the GOC has emphasized that medical reform should begin at the local level and it has implemented a series of policies, such as enhancing the establishment of local basic medical and health service networks and urban community health service centres, implementing a national essential medicine system, promoting the reform of county hospitals, accelerating the training of general practitioners, advancing hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, and so on. Furthermore, the GOC provided 12 kinds of basic public health services to all residents free of charge. The national subsidy per person for basic public health services increased from 15 Chinese Yuan (CNY) in 2009 to 55 CNY in 2017. The financial subsidy per person for resident medical insurance increased from 120 CNY in 2010 to 450 CNY in 2017. In addition, the proportion of personal health expenditures to total health expenditures has dropped to less than 30% in 2017.

Despite numerous efforts, however, primary health care has not been significantly improved as expected. PHCFs have not served as a gate-keeper in terms of disease prevention and control [1, 5]. Many rural residents preferred to see a doctor in an urban hospital or tertiary hospital directly rather than in a local PHCF. Therefore, the number of outpatients and inpatients in PHCFs have not increased significantly. The “drug-dependent” medical system has not fundamentally changed, and the unbalanced distribution of medical resources is still a major concern [6]. Although expansion of health insurance coverage has led to increase in insurance reimbursements, it has not reduced the financial burden of illness borne by households, nor has it improved the quality of care [1, 7, 8]. According to statistics, personal health expenditures increased from 657.1 billion CNY in 2009 to 1513.3 billion CNY in 2017. The two popular Chinese phrases “kan bing nan” and “kan bing gui” could reflect the current reality.

Talent is the key component to developing PHCFs, and certified physicians are the most valuable resources. To solve medical difficulties for local residents, they need to receive appropriate medical care from physicians. To gain insight into possible problems, the job satisfaction of certified primary care physicians needs to be studied. Job satisfaction is not only closely related to physicians’ feelings towards a job and to the quality and efficiency of their services but is also an important indicator in evaluating retention, motivation, and work performance. Job dissatisfaction could lead to other negative consequences, such as poor communication between doctors and patients, poor quality of care, and even medical disputes [9]. In turn, it may affect the successful implementation of new health system reforms [10–12]. A previous study found a correlation between doctors’ job satisfaction and patients’ satisfaction with the quality of health care [13]. Good job satisfaction will enable patients to spend less and achieve better results [14]. Physicians with higher job satisfaction were likely to provide more satisfactory care and more effective treatment than those with lower job satisfaction [14, 15]. The existing challenge is how to create conditions to improve job satisfaction so that physicians are willing to stay in local PHCFs.

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the job satisfaction of physicians in rural Shandong Province following recent health system reforms and to identify the factors affecting their job satisfaction. This study also considered what the Government should do to help PHCFs retain talented personnel.

Review of literature on job satisfaction of physicians

Job satisfaction is a measure of people’s contentedness with their job and an assessment of their work experience [16]. It can be measured using cognitive, affective, and behavioural components. Many researchers have provided definitions of job satisfaction. One of the most widely used is job satisfaciton defined as “a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from one’s work or work experiences” [17], while Motowidlo (1996) suggested that it is a perception of the “favourableness of the working environment” [18]. Attempting to combine both approaches, Brief (1998) defined job satisfaction as “an internal state that was expressed by affectively or cognitively evaluating an experienced job with some degree of favour or disfavour” [19]. Other researchers simply defined it as an individual’s satisfaction with one’s job, indicating whether or not he or she likes the job [16]. Numerous studies have revealed the importance of employee satisfaction. A study by Schneider and Bowen indicated that customer satisfaction was largely influenced by the attitudes and behaviours of service employees, while employee satisfaction was positively related to service quality [20]. Consequently, motivating and retaining qualified employees are crucial to the further success of service organizations [21]. To enhance customers’ perceptions of the quality of service, several studies have suggested that managers must increase employees’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction and reduce their role conflict and ambiguity [22, 23].

Several studies have examined the job satisfaction of physicians. A survey conducted by the American Physical Therapy Association in 1989 indicated that physicians were satisfied with their work [24]. The highest job satisfaction was the result of “autonomy,” whereas the lowest was the result of “reward”. This finding was consistent with the results of one study of doctors in Utah and another of doctors in Texas [25, 26]. Moreover, these two studies also revealed that the key factors contributing to physicians’ willingness to leave were heavy clinical workload, high patient expectations, and the clerical aspects of work. A study in New Zealand indicated that general practitioners had a rather high level of job satisfaction [27]. However, health care reforms, long working hours, too much bureaucracy and too many restrictions made them feel stressed and dissatisfied. Similar results were reported in a study of Pakistani public health professionals [28]. Working conditions, job description, and time pressures were the major reasons for dissatisfaction. Other factors influencing the level of job satisfaction were a low salary, lack of training opportunities, inadequate supervision, and insufficient financial incentives [28, 29].

According to an Australian study, lower job satisfaction was associated with poor health, training outside of Australia, fewer professional development opportunities, and longer working hours [10]. Meanwhile, lower job satisfaciton was also associated with a desire to reduce one’s working hours and an intention to leave medical profession. In contrast, a study in Lithuania found that doctors working in PHCFs had a relatively low level of overall job satisfaction [30]. The key factors influencing their dissatisfaction were compensation, social status, and workload.

The job satisfaction of physicians has garnered increasing attention among Chinese researchers. Numerous studies have discussed the factors infulencing job satisfaction and turnover intention. In Xinjiang and Anhui Provinces, Liu et al. (2010) conducted a quantitative study among township health centre (THC) employees in poor rural China. That study indicated that employees in THCs had a moderate level of job satisfaction. They were more satisfied with job significance, job competency, and teamwork than job rewards and working conditions [14]. In Hubei Province, more than a third (36.8%) of village doctors considered leaving their current positions voluntarily [31]. According to that study, income satisfaction, organizational policy implementation, wages and workload, career development opportunities, and working conditions were significant factors that contributed to the intention to quit among village doctors. This fingding was consistent with the results of a study of general practitioners in Hebei Province [32]. In Guangdong Province, the intention to quit among physicians was directly and negatively related to job satisfaction, and it was positively related to work stress and work–family conflict [33]. Thus, reducing working hours, increasing salaries, providing more opportunities for career development and training, and encouragement of senior managers may contribute to a reduction in their intention to quit. In Chongqing, a study found that 42.3% of primary care doctors intended to quit [34]. Findings suggested that the Government should increase its financial input to PHCFs, especially those in less-developed areas, and reform incentives to improve the job satisfaction among primary care physicians. A study in Liaoning indicated that Chinese community health workers enjoyed a moderate level of job satisfaction [35]. That study corroborated the evidence that stress and burnout are important predictors of intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction. Studies have examined the job satisfaction among rural village doctors, THC employees, community health workers, and physicians in urban state-owned medical facilities in other provinces of China [14, 36]. Their conclusions indicated that the respondents also enjoyed a moderate level of job satisfaction and that they were increasingly quitting or intending to quit because of job dissatisfaction.

Few investigations have been conducted to ascertain the job satisfaction of certified physicians in PHCFs in Shandong province following China’s recent health system reforms. Accordingly, the current study has been conducted in order to help policymakers to improve strategies designed to enhance physicians’ job satisfaction.

Methods

Study design

This study was designed to analyse current working conditions and to measure the job satisfaction of certified physicians working in PHCFs in rural Shandong in order to ascertain the factors influencing job satisfaction.

Sampling

Shandong Province, one of China’s typical densely populated and economically developed regions, governs 17 prefectural-level cities. It has a good medical personnel foundation. By the end of 2016, there were 643,000 health care technicians in Shandong Province, of whom 245,000 were certified physicians, including 126,000 physicians working in rural areas. There is uneven economic development and an imbalance in medical resources among the eastern, middle, and western parts of Shandong Province. Therefore, a thorough survey of the job satisfaction of certified physicians in Shandong would provide general and representative data. Stratified random sampling was used in this study. It is a fact that the economy of Shandong is more developed in the east and less towards the west. First, two prefectural-level cities were randomly selected from the economically developed areas in the east, the developing areas in the middle, and the less-developed areas in the west, for a total of 6 prefectural-level cities. Second, two counties in each city were randomly selected, for a total of 12 counties. Finally, 12 CHs and 30 THs were randomly selected in those counties. In total, 540 copies of a questionnaire were distributed to certified physicians at the selected PHCFs. Trained research assistants distributed and collected the questionnaire. The survey was conducted from June to August 2016. Valid responses were received from 495 physicians (valid response rate: 91.6%). The questionnaire was anonymous and all participants provided informed consent prior to the study.

Instrument

A review of the literature indicated that many instruments have been used to investigate the job satisfaction of different groups of people, such as village doctors, THC employees, and community health workers [31, 36–41]. However, those tools were not conductive to the aim of the current study. The features of questonnaires were adapted and revised, and a new one (see Additional file 1 for the questionnaire) was developed [42–44]. This questionnaire, consisting of 48 items in two parts, was used to evaluate the job satisfaction of certified primary care physicians. The first part includes socio-demographic information, such as gender, age, marital status, educational background, technical title, monthly salary, form of employment, years of service, hospital category and hospital grade. The second part consists of 38 items to assess job satisfaction, covering organizational management, the internal environment, the external environment, working conditions, competency behaviours, job rewards, and job description. These aspects are measured on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where “1” represents extremely dissatisfied, “2” represents dissatisfied, “3” represents neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, “4” represents satisfied, and “5” represents extremely satisfied. Reliability statistics indicated a weak correlation among these items, and a regression analysis revealed no multicollinearity. The reliability coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.945.

Data analysis

The software packages EpiData 3.1 and IBM SPSS Statistics Version 21 were used for data entry and statistical analysis. EFA was used to identify common factors that cover all of the aspects of job satisfaction according to principal component analysis (PCA) and varimax rotation. The basic socio-demographic characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistical analysis. Different groups of physicians were compared via one-way ANOVA and a post-hoc test of least-significant differences (LSD). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship between general job satisfaction and each individual dimension. The aggregated factors influencing job satisfaction were analyzed using multivariate linear regression. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

In total, 495 certified physicians in rural Shandong Province participated in this study, including 310 (62.6%) males and 185 (37.4%) females. Among the respondents, 291 physicians (58.8%) worked in township hospitals (THs), and 204 (41.2%) worked in county hospitals (CHs). The average age of the participants was 37.78 years. Most respondents (61.8%) were university graduates, 31.7% were junior college or technical school graduates, and a small proportion (6.5%) were recipients of a master’s degree. Of the respondents, 86.7% were permanent full-time employees. In addition, 87.3% of participants had a junior technical title while only 12.7% of physicians had a senior technical title. Most (88.6%) of the physicians surveyed had a monthly salary between 2000 and 5000 CNY. However, 4% earned less than 2000 CNY a month and 8% earned more than 5000 CNY. Further details on the participants are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of doctors (n = 495)

Characteristics

Category

No. (%)

Gender

Male

310 (62.6)

Female

185 (37.4)

Age

Younger than 25

16 (3.2)

26–35

159 (32.1)

36–45

260 (52.5)

Over 46

60 (12.2)

Marital status

Not married

40 (8.1)

Married

455 (91.9)

Educational background

Technical school graduate

25 (5.0)

Junior college graduate

132 (26.7)

University graduate

306 (61.8)

Recipient of a master’s degree

32 (6.5)

Technical title

Medical Assistant

47 (9.5)

Resident Physician

132 (26.7)

Attending Physician

253 (51.1)

Associate Chief Physician

57 (11.5)

Chief Physician

6 (1.2)

Monthly salary (CNY)

Less than 2000

36 (7.4)

2001–3000

163 (32.9)

3001–4000

207 (41.8)

4001–5000

69 (13.9)

Over 5001

20 (4.0)

Form of employment

Temporary/casual

66 (13.3)

Permanent full-time

429 (86.7)

Years of service

Fewer than 5

103 (20.8)

6–10

88 (17.8)

11–15

77 (15.6)

16–20

138 (27.9)

21–25

59 (11.9)

More than 26

30 (6.0)

Hospital category

TH

291 (58.8)

CH

204 (41.2)

Hospital grade

Grade I hospital

282 (57.0)

Grade II hospital

213 (43.0)

Factor analysis

An EFA was conducted using a correlation matrix with varimax rotation. There were 7 factors with eigenvalues greater than 1.0. Eigenvalues measure how much the factors explian the observed components. The initial eigenvalues indicated that the factors explained from 2.841 to 38.379% of the variance. As a result, these 7 factors were selected, with a cumulative initial eigenvalue of 65.804% and a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.944 (Table 2).
Table 2

Total variance explained by each factor

Factor

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Rotation sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

14.584

38.379

38.379

14.584

38.379

38.379

7.226

19.017

19.017

2

3.295

8.671

47.049

3.295

8.671

47.049

4.285

11.276

30.293

3

1.871

4.925

51.974

1.871

4.925

51.974

4.111

10.819

41.112

4

1.552

4.083

56.058

1.552

4.083

56.058

2.573

6.772

47.884

5

1.394

3.667

59.725

1.394

3.667

59.725

2.438

6.416

54.301

6

1.230

3.238

62.962

1.230

3.238

62.962

2.294

6.036

60.337

7

1.080

2.841

65.804

1.080

2.841

65.804

2.077

5.467

65.804

Common factors for job satisfaction

Table 3 shows the categories of survey questions and their associated factor loadings. Six questions were not closely associated (greater than 0.5) with any factors (Q32: Competence improved, Q46: Recognition by the patient, Q16: Pay equivalent to ability, Q15: Interest in the job, Q34: Attention of leadership, and Q33: Business training). The remaining 32 items had large factor loadings ranging from 0.508 to 0.845. These 32 items can be categorized into 7 common factors using PCA with Kaiser Normalization Varimax rotation. Cronbach’s alpha indicated that the items included in six common factors had good internal consistency, except for the job description factor. The first factor related to organizational management included 11 items. The second factor related to the internal environment included 4 items. The third factor related to the external environment included 5 items. The fourth factor related to working conditions included 4 items. The fifth factor related to competency behaviours included 3 items. The sixth factor relating to job rewards included 2 items. The seventh factor related to job description included 3 items.
Table 3

Questions included in each principal component and their factor loadings

Common factors

Cronbach’s alpha

Question No.

Variables

Loadings

Factor 1

0.951

Q44

Performance assessment

0.769

Organizational management (11 items)

 

Q40

Effective rules and regulations

0.761

Q45

Incentive system

0.749

Q42

Safety management system

0.748

Q43

Task management system

0.748

Q39

Income distribution system

0.746

Q41

Human resources management

0.739

Q38

Enterprise welfare

0.663

Q37

Personal income

0.625

Q31

Administration

0.611

Q30

Logistical support

0.555

Factor 2

0.863

Q26

Relationship with colleagues

0.845

Internal environment (4 items)

 

Q27

Relationship with supervisors

0.828

Q28

Cooperation within the department

0.750

Q29

Cooperation with other departments

0.726

Factor 3

0.920

Q49

Role of government

0.797

External environment (5 items)

 

Q51

Resolution of medical disputes

0.779

Q52

Health care system reform

0.766

Q48

Media reports

0.730

Q50

Supervision of care

0.704

Factor 4

0.781

Q24

Medical equipment

0.765

Working conditions (4 items)

 

Q23

Talented team

0.746

Q25

Receipt of information

0.652

Q22

Office conditions

0.508

Factor 5

0.696

Q19

Administration of medication

0.762

Competency behaviours (3 items)

 

Q21

Decision-making

0.710

Q20

Group discussion

0.624

Factor 6

0.813

   

Job rewards (2 items)

 

Q35

Job promotion

0.708

Q36

Promotion in title

0.696

Factor 7

0.574

Q17

Challenging work

0.739

Job description (3 items)

 

Q18

Heavy workload

0.682

Q47

Social recognition and respect

0.627

Working conditions and job satisfaction

Statistical results for job satisfaction are shown in Table 4. In general, the mean score of job satisfaction was 3.41 (SD 0.68), which confirmed that certified physicians employed in PHCFs in rural Shandong Province were partially satisfied with their jobs. Respondents were most satisfied with the internal environment (median 4.50, QR 1.00) and their job description (median 4.33, QR 1.00). They were partially satisfied with competency behaviours (median 3.67, QR 1.33) and organizational management (mean 3.24, SD 0.95). However, respondents had a neutral attitude towards working conditions (median 3.00, QR 1.25) and job rewards (median 3.00, QR 2.00). In contrast, physicians were slightly dissatisfied with the external environment (median 2.80, QR 1.40).
Table 4

Descriptive statistics for job satisfaction in 7 dimensions

Dimension

Mean/Median

SD/Quartile range (QR)

Internal environment

4.50

1.00

Job description

4.33

1.00

Competency behaviours

3.67

1.33

Organizational managementa

3.24

0.95

Working conditions

3.00

1.25

Job rewards

3.00

2.00

External environment

2.80

1.40

Overall job satisfactiona

3.41

0.68

aA Kolmogorov-Smirnov test indicated that the specific scale or item followed a normal distribution

Demographic characteristics associated with job satisfaction among physicians

As shown in Table 5, the descriptive variables of age, educational background, technical title, monthly salary, form of employment, and years of service were found to be significantly associated with job satisfaction (P < 0.05), whereas the other four variables, including gender, marital status, hospital category, and hospital grade, were not significant. Additionally, Table 5 indicates that older physicians were significantly less satisfied with their jobs compared to younger ones (P < 0.01). Physicians over 46 years old had the lowest level of job satisfaction. Physicians with a higher level of education or senior technical title were significantly less satisfied with their jobs than those with a lower level of education or junior technical title (P < 0.01). Physicians with the title of chief physician or a master’s degree had the lowest satisfaction. Thus, retaining talented personnel is one of the greatest challenges for PHCFs and can easily lead to a serious “brain drain.” Moreover, three-quarters of physicians’ monthly salaries were between 2000 and 4000 CNY (P < 0.01). Only 4% of physicians earned more than 5000 CNY a month. Physicians who were temporary/casual employees were more satisfied with their jobs than those who were permanent full-time employees (P < 0.05). Moreover, physicians with numerous years of service were significantly less satisfied with their jobs (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in job satisfaction for physicians at CHs and THs, and the same was true for the hospital grade.
Table 5

Demographic characteristics associated with job satisfaction among physicians

Variables

Groups

N

Score

F

P

Gender

Male

310

3.40

0.034

0.853

Female

185

3.42

  

Age

Younger than 25

16

3.69

5.237

0.001

26–35

159

3.52

  

36–45

260

3.38

  

Over 46

60

3.16

  

Marital status

Not married

40

3.49

0.569

0.451

Married

455

3.40

  

Educational background

Technical school graduate

25

3.49

3.276

0.021

Junior college graduate

132

3.56

  

University graduate

306

3.35

  

Recipient of a master’s degree

32

3.29

  

Technical title

Medical Assistant

47

3.68

3.674

0.006

Resident Physician

132

3.49

  

Attending Physician

253

3.34

  

Associate Chief Physician

57

3.33

  

Chief Physician

6

3.07

  

Monthly salary (CNY)

Less than 2000

36

3.81

3.647

0.006

2001-3000

163

3.37

  

3001-4000

207

3.39

  

4001-5000

69

3.34

  

Over 5001

20

3.46

  

Form of employment

Permanent full-time

429

3.38

5.094

0.024

Temporary/casual

66

3.58

  

Years of service

Fewer than 5

103

3.49

2.706

0.020

6–10

88

3.58

  

11–15

77

3.38

  

16–20

138

3.36

  

21–25

59

3.27

  

More than 26

30

3.21

  

Hospital category

CH

204

3.37

1.298

0.255

TH

291

3.44

  

Hospital grade

Grade I hospital

282

3.44

1.664

0.198

Grade II hospital

213

3.36

  

Multivariate linear regression analysis of multi-item scales

The results of multivariate linear regression analysis of overall job satisfaction are shown in Table 6. The 7 multi-item scales were entered as regressors in a multivariate linear regression model estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS). During analysis, the 7 factors were found to be significantly associated with job satisfaction (P < 0.05). From the highest to the lowest regression coefficient, those factors were organizational management, the external environment, the internal environment, working conditions, job rewards, competency behaviours, and job description. Organizational management and the external environment were closely realted to job satisfaction. Organizational management was the most important factor for job satisfaction. This means that better hospital management can imporve physicians’ job satisfaction. The second important factor was the external environment. This finding is enlightening since job satisfaction among physicians could be improved through intensifying reforms in the medical system, strengthening supervision of care, improving the physician-patient relationship, promoting media reporting, resolving medical disputes, and other efforts to create a favourable external environment.
Table 6

Multivariate linear regression analysis of multi-item scales

Factors for job satisfaction

Unstandardized coefficients

Standardized coefficients

T

P

95.0% confidence interval for beta

Beta

Std. error

Beta

Lower bound

Upper bound

(Constant)

3.409

0.004

 

968.840

0.000

3.402

3.416

Factor 1 for organizational management

0.433

0.004

0.635

122.923

0.000

0.426

0.440

Factor 3 for the external environment

0.292

0.004

0.429

83.015

0.000

0.285

0.299

Factor 2 for the internal environment

0.242

0.004

0.355

68.762

0.000

0.235

0.249

Factor 4 for working conditions

0.229

0.004

0.335

64.885

0.000

0.222

0.235

Factor 6 for job rewards

0.200

0.004

0.293

56.676

0.000

0.193

0.207

Factor 5 for competency behaviours

0.172

0.004

0.252

48.767

0.000

0.165

0.179

Factor 7 for job description

0.074

0.004

0.109

21.069

0.000

0.067

0.081

Discussion

The current results confirm that primary care physicians in Shandong Province are only slightly satisfied with their work. This is slightly higher than the job satisfaction of primary care employees as reported in the domestic and foreign literature [14, 23, 30]. The current results indicated that primary care physicians are slightly more satisfied with their jobs than moderately so, which is consistent with the resluts of a similar study in China [14]. Additionally, physicians with a higher level of education, senior technical title or numerous years of service were less satisfied than other physicians. In contrast, the primary health care physicians working in Lithuania for 30–39 years were most satisfied with their jobs [30].

Moreover, physicians who are senior specialists or younger tend to quit due to lower levels of job satisfaction, as was noted in a previous study [32]. PHCFs face the ongoing challenge of a shortage of personnel. A previous study indicated that good relations with co-workers and support from superiors led to a sense of satisfaction, and that social support was the most consistent and potent predictor of job satisfaction [35]. The current analysis identified 7 factors that were associated with the job satisfaction among physicians in PHCFs. Among them, the internal environment and job description factors scored the highest. This indicates that primary care physicians have a harmonious relationship with their colleagues and organizations, and that they are engaged in challenging and valuable work. In contrast to the two factors mentioned, the external environment was the factor with the lowest average score. This indicated that respondents were slightly dissatisfied with the current health care system reforms. As these reforms intesfy physicians flet a great deal of pressure from the external environment, in terms of medical disputes, media reports, and supervision of care, as well as reform of the medical system itself.

Primary care physicians were partially satisfied with competency behaviours and organizational management, but neutral on working conditions and job rewards. These findings suggest that physicians in PHCFs did not find their job rewarding in terms of career development or a promotion in technical title.

Last but not least, multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that organizational management and the external environment were the most important factors associated with job satisfaction. That said, the average score for both factors was almost in the middle of the scale. The external environmental had only a minimun score of 2.80. In other words, it is urgent and necessary to enhance organizational management and improve the external environment to increase job satisfaction among primary health care physicians. It is certainly high time that the Government considered giving PHCFs greater operational and staffing autonomy to stimulate vitality and create an effective development environment [24, 27].

Shandong proposed a model in which “CHs are leaders, THs are hubs, and VCs are the foundation” to enhance regional health consortia (RHCs). A previous study found that the GOC invested large amounts of money in PHCFs [5]. Although the Shandong provincial government has gradually increased its investment in PHCFs, it has not completely changed circumstances since both PHCFs and physicians are still heavily dependent on income from medical services. Therefore, medical reform in Shandong has not effectively increased physicians’ satisfaction.

Although the GOC has issued a series of policies, some have not yet been adequately implemented at the local level. The Government should comprehensively and extensively examine the effectiveness of its policies because the fate of primary health care physicians is bound up with these policies. In turn, good policies and physicians’ active participation will contribute to the success of health care reforms. The Government should protect the legitimate rights and interests of physicians when devising medical reforms in terms of supervision of care, media reporting, and the handling of disputes.

In addtion, the internal environment and working conditions are secondary contributors to job satisfaction. Motivating and retaining qualified employees is crucial to furthering the success of service organizations [21]. This indicates the importance of building talented teams and improving medical equipment. Only job description contributed the least to overall satisfaction.

In 2017, the Department of Human Resources and Health Commission of Shandong Province issued a notice on the granting of senior technical titles to health technicians at the local level in order to gradually establish a system of classification and evaluation. This notice stipulates that physicians with a local senior professional title could only be hired by PHCFs while those with a standardized provincial senior title could be employed in health care facilities in Shandong Province. The purpose of that change was to encourage exceptional personnel to continue working in PHCFs. This will greatly increase the remuneration of medical staff at PHCFs, enhance their job satisfaction, and also attract other talented personnel.

Limitations of this study

This study had several limitations. First, during this cross-sectional study investigation, the respondents may be reluctant to give correct answers to some sensitive questions, which may result in report bias. At the same time, there may be bias in the random selection control of objects. Second, this study only examined the job satisfaction of physicians and there are no historical data for comparison. With the intensifying of China’s medical reform, it is of great value to enrich and verify the current results through in depth interviews with administrators and physicians in PHCFs, and further investigation can be carried out to establish time series data for comparison in the future. Further conclusions may be drawn if the study encompassed all medical staff, including administrators and technicians. Third, this scale has rather unsatisfactory internal consistency reliability. Lastly, the instrument developed in this study was not adequately validated and the structural validity of the questionnaire was not assessed. Its reliability and validity need to be assessed further in the future.

Conclusion

The current study has investigated the current job satisfaction of primary health care physicians in Shandong Province and it has identified factors influencing that satisfaction. Since recent healthcare reforms, the job satisfaction of primary health care physicians has changed little compared to that of physicians in other provinces in China [31, 33, 45]. The current findings reflect the needs to recognize the influence of variables (age, educational background, technical title, monthly salary, form of employment, and years of service) on job satisfaction. Sufficient attention should be paid to the lower level of satisfaction of physicians with a higher level of education, senior technical title or numerous years of service based on their current realistic situation. Factors such as organizational management and the external environment have the greatest impact on the job satisfaction of health care workers. Numerous recommendations may be considered to enhance organizational management and improve the external environment. The Government should enhance the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies to ensure that beneficial policies can be implemented and have their intended effect. Giving PHCFs moderate autonomy may be an avenue for further efforts.

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

CH: 

County hospital

CNY: 

Chinese yuan

EFA: 

Exploratory factor analysis

GOC: 

Government of China

OLS: 

Ordinary least squares

PCA: 

Principal component analysis

PHCF: 

Primary health care facility

QR: 

Quartile range

RHC: 

Regional health consortia

SD: 

Standard deviation

TH: 

Township hospital

THC: 

Township health centre

VC: 

Village clinic

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71673169) and the Innovation Project of the Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences for their financial support. The authors also wish to thank the certified physicians who participated in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant ID:71673169) and the Innovation Project of the Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpertation, and writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JG conceived of the study, reviewed the literature, designed the questionnaire, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. TZ helped with the study design, data collection, and data analysis. YS reviewed the literature and helped with data collection. LX helped to interpret study findings and write and revise the manuscript. All authors revised, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Shandong Institute of Medicine and Health Information (IMHI-EC-16-001). The survey data were collected voluntarily and anonymously, without sensitive information about the participants. Prior to the questionnaire, all participants were given informed consent and detailed information explaining the purpose of the study.

Consent for publication

As a part of the consent process, all participants have agreed that collected information can be used for research and publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Shandong University, 44 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250012, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Shandong Institute of Medicine and Health Information, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 18877 Jingshi Road, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250062, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Yip W, Hsiao W. Harnessing the privatisation of China's fragmented health-care delivery. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):805–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization. Health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Meng Q, Xu L. Monitoring and evaluating progress towards universal health coverage in China. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001694.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Fang K, Shia B, Ma S. Health insurance coverage and impact: a survey in three cities in China. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39157.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang X, Xiong Y, Ye J, Deng Z, Zhang X. Analysis of government investment in primary healthcare institutions to promote equity during the three-year health reform program in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wen X, Fang Z. Annual report on reform of medical and health system in China(2014–2015). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Yip WC, Hsiao WC, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A. Early appraisal of China's huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):833–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Meng Q, Xu L, Zhang Y, Qian J, Cai M, Xin Y, Gao J, Xu K, Boerma JT, Barber SL. Trends in access to health services and financial protection in China between 2003 and 2011: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):805–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Landon BE, Reschovsky JD, Pham HH, Blumenthal D. Leaving medicine: the consequences of physician dissatisfaction. Med Care. 2006;44(3):234–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Joyce C, Wang WC. Job satisfaction among Australian doctors: the use of latent class analysis. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015;20(4):224–30.Google Scholar
  11. Dieleman M, Toonen J, Toure H, Martineau T. The match between motivation and performance management of health sector workers in Mali. Hum Resour Health. 2006;4:2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Munyewende PO, Rispel LC, Chirwa T. Positive practice environments influence job satisfaction of primary health care clinic nursing managers in two south African provinces. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12:27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Szecsenyi J, Goetz K, Campbell S, Broge B, Reuschenbach B, Wensing M. Is the job satisfaction of primary care team members associated with patient satisfaction? Bmj Quality & Safety. 2011;20(6):508–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu JA, Qi W, Zu XL. Job satisfaction and its modeling among township health center employees: a quantitative study in poor rural China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz A. Better outcome means more job satisfaction: pilot project in Winnipeg and Halifax to enhance physician-patient communication. Can Fam Physician. 1999;45:218–20.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Spector PE. Job satisfaction: application, assessment, causes, and consequences; 1997.Google Scholar
  17. Locke EA. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In: Dunnette MP, editor. Chicago: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally. 1976. p. 1297-349.Google Scholar
  18. Murphy KR. Individual differences and behavior in organizations. 1996.Google Scholar
  19. Brief AP: Attitudes in and around organizations. 1998.Google Scholar
  20. Schneider B, Bowen DE. The service organization: human resources management is crucial. Organ Dyn. 1993;21(4):39–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sohail MS, Jang J: Understanding the relationships among internal marketing practices, job satisfaction, service quality and customer satisfaction: an empirical investigation of Saudi Arabia’s service employees. 2017:1–19.Google Scholar
  22. Hartline MD, Ferrell OC. The Management of Customer-Contact Service Employees: an empirical investigation. J Mark. 1996;60(4):52–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Fogarty L, Kim YM, Juon HS, Tappis H, Noh JW, Zainullah P, Rozario A. Job satisfaction and retention of health-care providers in Afghanistan and Malawi. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12:11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Akroyd D, Wilson S, Painter J, Figuers C. Intrinsic and extrinsic predictors of work satisfaction in ambulatory care and hospital settings. J Allied Health. 1994;23(3):155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Speakman HG, Pleasant JM, Sutton GB. The job satisfaction of physical therapists. Physiother Res Int. 2010;1(4):247–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Okerlund VW, Jackson PB, Parsons RJ. Factors affecting recruitment of physical therapy personnel in Utah. Phys Ther. 1994;74(2):177–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Dowell AC, Hamilton S, Mcleod DK. Job satisfaction, psychological morbidity and job stress among New Zealand general practitioners. N Z Med J. 2000;113(1113):269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar R, Ahmed J, Shaikh BT, Hafeez R, Hafeez A. Job satisfaction among public health professionals working in public sector: a cross sectional study from Pakistan. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(1):2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Aziz I, Kumar R, Rathore A, Lal M. Working environment and job satisfaction among health professional working at a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad Jamc. 2015;27(1):201–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Buciuniene I, Blazeviciene A, Bliudziute E. Health care reform and job satisfaction of primary health care physicians in Lithuania. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6(1):1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fang P, Liu X, Huang L, Zhang X, Fang Z. Factors that influence the turnover intention of Chinese village doctors based on the investigation results of Xiangyang City in Hubei Province. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13(1):84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gan Y, Gong Y, Chen Y, Cao S, Li L, Zhou Y, Herath C, Li W, Song X, Li J. Turnover intention and related factors among general practitioners in Hubei, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu Y, Hu XM, Huang XL, Zhuang XD, Guo P, Feng LF, Hu W, Chen L, Zou H, Hao YT. The relationship between job satisfaction, work stress, work–family conflict, and turnover intention among physicians in Guangdong, China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e014894.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tong W, Yan Z, Xue W, Guo T. Factors influencing turnover intention among primary care doctors: a cross-sectional study in Chongqing, China. Hum Resour Health. 2018;16(1):10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ge C, Fu J, Ying C, Wang L. Factors associated with job satisfaction among Chinese community health workers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):884–4.Google Scholar
  36. Zhang Y, Feng X. The relationship between job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intention among physicians from urban state-owned medical institutions in Hubei, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:235.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Shi L, Song K, Rane S, Sun X, Li H, Meng Q. Factors associated with job satisfaction by Chinese primary care providers. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014;15(1):46-57.Google Scholar
  38. Ge C, Fu J, Ying C, Wang L. Factors associated with job satisfaction among Chinese community health workers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–13.Google Scholar
  39. Gillies DA, Foreman M, Pettengill MM. Satisfaction of nurse managers in long-term care. J Gerontol Nurs. 1996;22(4):33–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Maqbali MA. Factors that influence nurses' job satisfaction: a literature review. Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2015;22(2):30–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Pinto IC, Panobianco CS, Zacharias FC, Bulgarelli AF, Carneiro TS, Gomide MF, Arcencio RA. Analysis of job satisfaction of the nursing staff of a primary health care unit. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2014;35(4):20–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Tan PP, Hawkins WE. The factor structure of the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire and participants of vocational rehabilitation. Psychol Rep. 2000;87(1):34–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Parsons SK, Simmons WP, Penn K, Furlough M. Determinants of satisfaction and turnover among nursing assistants. The results of a statewide survey. J Gerontol Nurs. 2003;29(3):51–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Ali Jadoo SA, Aljunid SM, Dastan I, Tawfeeq RS, Mustafa MA, Ganasegeran K, AlDubai SA. Job satisfaction and turnover intention among Iraqi doctors - a descriptive cross-sectional multicentre study. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13(1):21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang H, Tang C, Zhao S, Meng Q, Liu X. Job satisfaction among health-care staff in township health centers in rural China: results from a latent class analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us