Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Insulin prices, availability and affordability: a cross-sectional survey of pharmacies in Hubei Province, China

BMC Health Services ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:597

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2553-0

Received: 10 February 2017

Accepted: 16 August 2017

Published: 24 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Poor access to affordable insulin results in serious and needless complications and premature deaths for those with diabetes who need this essential medicine. To help address this issue, we assessed insulin availability, prices, affordability and price components in Hubei Province as China has the heaviest burden of diabetes globally.

Methods

In 2016, insulin availability and price data was collected in the capital and five other cities. A total of 30 public sector outlets (hospitals and primary care institutions) and 30 private pharmacies were sampled, using an adaptation of the World Health Organization/Health Action International methodology, Data was collected for all human and analogue insulins in stock, then analyzed by type (prandial, basal or pre-mixed) and duration of action. Prices were expressed as Median Price Ratios (MPRs) to Australian PBS prices. Price components were tracked for five insulin products in two cities.. Affordability was assessed as the number of days’ wages of the lowest paid unskilled government worker needed to purchase 10 ml 100 IU/ml (approximately 30 days’ supply).

Results

Mean availability was highest in public hospitals for prandial (70%), basal (80%) and pre-mixed insulin (90%). In primary care institutions and private pharmacies mean availability ranged from 10% to 33%. Median prices of all insulin types were higher that Australian PBS prices in all three sectors for human and analogue insulins (ranging from1.36–2.59 times). Patients have to pay 4 to 16 days’ wages to purchase a month’s treatment depending on the insulin type and sector. The largest component of the patient price was the manufacturers’ selling price (60%). Taxes in the form of import duties and VAT are applied in some sectors.

Conclusions

The availability of insulin in primary care institutions and private retail pharmacies was very low in Hubei. Only public hospitals had good insulin availability. Insulin prices were high in all sectors making this life-saving medicine unaffordable, especially for those on low incomes. Governments should consider using its bargaining power to reduce prices, abolish taxes on essential medicines such as insulin, and develop strategies for more equitable access to insulin.

Keywords

Access Availability Affordability Price component Insulin Diabetes China WHO/HAI

Background

Over the past few decades, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have surpassed communicable diseases and become a major health challenge in the world [1]. Diabetes, one of the most prevalent NCDs, has since been prioritized in the NCDs strategy of the World Health Organization (WHO) because of its significant contribution to morbidity and mortality [2]. It was estimated that diabetes led to 1.5 million deaths in 2012 and was associated with more than 60% of all deaths [3, 4]. This has led the United Nations (UN) to publish global plans of actions to tackle diabetes and other NCDs [2, 5].

Effective control of blood glucose is crucial for mitigating the risks of morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes. The discovery of insulin in 1921 [6] ended the harsh approach of calorie management and a miserable death from starvation of diabetic patient [7]. Nowadays, the life expectancy of children in the USA with Type 1 Diabetes is only 4–6 years less than the general population [8].

However, poor access to affordable insulin has resulted in needless complications and premature deaths in many parts of the world [9]. The life expectancy of children born with Type 1 Diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa is as low as one year [10]. It is challenging to find Type 1 Diabetes patients living beyond 30 years with his disease in China [11]. Although insulin has been included in the WHO Model Essential Medicines List (EML) since 1977 [12], high prices are making it unaffordable in many countries, even in some high-income countries. For example, discontinuation of insulin use because of the high price was the main cause of diabetic ketoacidosis in an inner city setting in the USA. The UK’s National Health Service has also experienced a growing financial burden in supplying insulin [13].

China bears the heaviest burden of diabetes in the world [3, 14]. About 12% of adults (nearly 113.9 million) [15] have diabetes. Of these, 30% will eventually require insulin treatment [16]. The prevalence of children with Type 1 Diabetes is also increasing in China. A recent study in Shanghai estimated that the number of children with Type 1 Diabetes will increase six-fold by 2025 [17].

This study measured the price, availability and affordability of insulin in Hubei province in China, and insulin price components (mark-ups etc.) in the pharmaceutical supply chain.

Methods

Study setting

Hubei is located in central China, with a population of over 60 million. Compared with other provinces, Hubei has the highest incidence (4.6/100,000 per year from 1988 to 1996) of children with Type 1 Diabetes [18] and a relatively lower prevalence (8.26% vs an average of 12%) of adults with diabetes. The mortality of diabetes in Hubei has been increasing at an average annual rate of 2.1% since 1990 [19].

In China, patients can obtain insulin from hospitals, primary care institutions, and private pharmacies with a prescription from a doctor. Public hospitals and primary care institutions dominate the market because the majority of doctors are employed by these institutions and patients are encouraged to have prescriptions dispensed in these outlets. However, there is no gate keeping arrangement. Patients can seek medical attention from hospital outpatient clinics without referral from primary care providers. More than 95% of Chinese people are covered by social health insurance [20].

Despite near universal coverage of social health insurance in China, a high percentage of out-of-pocket payment is still required. On average, out-of-pocket payment comprises 72.35% of total health expenditure in China [21]. Furthermore, the insurance contributions from governments and employers (if any) usually fund inpatient care. Because insulin is mainly prescribed in outpatient clinics, the major financial burden falls on patients. To reduce this financial burden, the Chinese government introduced a maximum procurement price policy [22] for public institutions. In addition, a zero-mark-up policy [23] has applied to primary care facilities since 2012; this is expected to soon expand to public hospitals. There are no medicine price or mark-up regulations in the private sector [24].

Design and sampling

From August to September 2016 we firstly conducted a survey of insulin availability and prices in public and private sector outlets using an adaptation of the WHO/Health Action International (HAI) methodology [25]. Secondly, as part of the Addressing the Challenges and Constraints of Insulin Sources and Supply (ACCISS) Study, we measured price components (mark-ups, taxes etc.) for five selected insulin products as a case study.

For the insulin availability and prices survey, the capital and 5 other cities were selected based on their size, geographic location and economic status: Wuhan (the capital city with a population of 9.79 million people); three medium-sized prefecture-level cities (with a population ranging from 1.05 to 5.50 million); two smaller-sized county-level cities (with populations of about 0.95 million).

Although WHO/HAI recommended that there should be 5 hospitals and 5 primary cares in each survey area, respectively, it could not be met in most cities in Hubei Province. Thus, we revised our sampling to consistent with the distribution of healthcare facilities in each survey area, namely, two hospitals and three primary care institutions in each large or medium-sized city; one hospital and four primary care institutions in each small-sized city.

In each city, the largest public hospital was identified as a “local anchor”. Then, four other public sector pharmacies (hospitals or primary cares) within 15-min of driving distance from the local anchor were selected. Finally, one private retail pharmacy closest to each of the selected public pharmacies was selected. This resulted in a sample size of 60 pharmacies: 10 public hospitals, 20 primary cares and 30 private pharmacies (Table 1).
Table 1

Number of outlets sampled and characteristics of participating cities

City name

Number of facilities in each city (N)

City characteristics

Hospitals

Primary care

Private pharmacies

City size

Economic status

Geographic location

Wuhan

2

3

5

Large (Capital)

High-income

East

Ezhou

2

3

5

Medium (Prefecture)

High-income

Southeast

Xiangyang

2

3

5

Medium (Prefecture)

Middle-income

North

Enshi

2

3

5

Medium (Prefecture)

Low-income

Southwest

Qianjiang

1

4

5

Small (County)

High-income

Central

Huangpi

1

4

5

Small (County)

Middle-income

Northeast

Total

10

20

30

   

Data collection

Following training, which included piloting data collection, two PhD candidates (CXL and ZNZ) visited the selected pharmacies in pairs and collected data. Pharmacies were contacted in advance, collecting information (name, address) and agreeing an appropriate time to conduct the survey. Each interviewee was given an insulated cup ($3.78) as a gift. Following data collection, the data were checked by the supervisor (XPZ) for completeness.

Data was recorded on all human and analogue insulin products in each outlet, including the brand name, type, strength [international unit (IU)/ml], presentation [vial, cartridge or prefilled pen], volume [ml], pack size, pack price and manufacturer. The insulins found were categorized into sub-types according to the onset, peak time, and duration of effects. The insulin products were grouped into prandial (short-acting and rapid-acting), basal (intermediate-acting and long-acting), and pre-mixed (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Animal insulin products were not included in this study because our pilot survey showed that they were rarely available in Hubei province.

As a case study, we conducted face-to-face or phone interviews to identify price components (mark-ups and other charges) for the five mostly commonly used insulin products. Buying and selling prices were recorded in the supply chain, starting from the pharmacy outlets and tracking back to the manufacturers/importers. A literature review was used to identify the most commonly used insulin. This resulted in tracking price components of two human insulins and three analogues. All were imported products (Table 2). The data was collected in the capital (Wuhan) and one county-level city (Huangpi). In each city, the largest public hospital and one private pharmacy participated in the price components case study.
Table 2

Insulin products selected for the pricing component survey

Brand name

Insulin type

Manufacturers

Presentation

Imported/locally produced

Novolin Mix 30

Human

Novo Nordisk

Cartridge

Imported

Novolin Mix50

Human

Novo Nordisk

Cartridge

Imported

Lantus

Analogue

Sanofi

Pen

Imported

Humalog

Analogue

Eli Lilly

Cartridge

Imported

Humalog 25

Analogue

Eli Lilly

Cartridge

Imported

Data analysis

Availability was defined as the percentage of pharmacies where insulin products were available at the time of the survey. We compared availability of different subtypes of insulin products in different outlets using Fisher exact tests. The following ranges were used for describing availability [26]:

• < 30% very low.

• 30–49% low.

• 50–80% fairly high.

• > 80% high.

Prices were expressed as a Median Price Ratio (MPR) i.e. a ratio of the local price to a standard set of international reference prices (IRPs). Thus, MPRs describe how much greater or less the price of an insulin product is compared to the IRP. The WHO/HAI methodology recommends Management Sciences for Health’s International Drug Price Indicator Guide as the source of the international reference price (IRP). However, the Guide does not include prices for analogue insulins so was of limited value. Therefore, prices from the Australia Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) [27] were used as IRPs. PBS prices represented reimbursement prices paid by the Australian government. We standardized all prices (PBS and the prices collected in Hubei) to US$ for 1000 IU insulin then calculated the MPRs.
$$ \mathrm{MPR}=\frac{\mathrm{Selling}\ \mathrm{price}\ \mathrm{of}\ 1000\mathrm{IU}\ \mathrm{in}\mathrm{sulin}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{Hubei}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{US}\ \$}{\mathrm{Selling}\ \mathrm{price}\ \mathrm{of}\ 1000\mathrm{IU}\ \mathrm{in}\mathrm{sulin}\ \mathrm{Australian}\ \mathrm{PBS}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{US}\kern0.50em \$} $$

Generally, an MPR of 1 or less represents efficient procurement in the public hospitals and primary cares, while an MPR below 3 is interpreted as acceptable prices for the private sector [28, 29].

Affordability was expressed as the number of days the lowest paid unskilled government worker needs to work to purchase 1000 IU (approximately 30 days’ supply) of insulin based on average treatment costs [30]. In 2016, the average daily wage of unskilled government workers was US$6.40 in Hubei. We considered paying over one day’s wage for one month’s therapy is unaffordable [31].

We tested normality and homogeneity of variances of prices and affordability, and performed either parametric (independent t test or One-way ANOVA) or non-parametric (Kruskal–Wallis test or Mann-Whitney U test) analyses to compare the differences of those indicators across the pharmacies per sector.

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 12.0 and a p value < 0.05 was considered as statistical significance.

For insulin price components, the add-on charges identified in each sector where grouped as follows: manufacturer’s selling price (MSP), import duty, importer’s mark-up, wholesaler’s mark-up, outlet’s mark-up and value-added tax (VAT).

Results

Across the 60 pharmacies sampled, 186 price points were recorded. Of these, 90 were for human insulin and 96 were for analogues. All were presented in cartridges or prefilled pens containing 300 IU/3 ml. No insulin in vials were found. Most of the insulin products (81.18%) were imported (Table 3).
Table 3

Insulin products found in the pharmacies

Characteristics

Number of products

Type of insulin

Human insulin

 Short-acting

14 (7.53%)

 Intermediate-acting

10 (5.38%)

 Mixed

66 (35.48%)

Analogue insulin

 Rapid-acting

23 (12.37%)

 Long-acting

28 (15.05%)

 Mixed

45 (24.19%)

Supplier

Imported

 Novo Nordisk A/S

93 (50.00%)

 Eli Lilly Italia S.p.A./ Lilly France

41 (22.04%)

 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

12 (6.45%)

 BIOTON S.A.

5 (2.69%)

Locally produced

 Gan Lee Pharmaceutical co., Ltd.

7 (3.76%)

 Dongbao Pharmaceutical co., Ltd.

14 (7.53%)

 Lianbang Ppharmaceutical co., Ltd.

14 (7.53%)

Presentation

 Cartridge, containing 300 IU/3 ml

155 (83.33%)

 Prefilled Pen, containing 300 IU/3 ml

31 (16.67%)

Availability

Significant differences in availability were found for all insulin types across the outlets (p < 0.05), except for intermediate-acting human insulin products. The highest availability of insulin was found in public hospitals compared with primary care institutions and private pharmacies (Table 4).
Table 4

Mean availability (%) of insulin in outlets

Type of insulin

Public hospital

Primary care facility

Private retailer

P value*

Prandial insulin

Overall

70%

20%

13%

0.008

Human short-acting

50%

10%

10%

0.018

Analogue rapid-acting

70%

15%

10%

0.001

Basal insulin

Overall

80%

10%

20%

< 0.001

Human intermediate-acting

20%

0%

17%

1.000

Analogue long-acting

70%

10%

13%

0.001

Pre-mixed insulin

Overall

90%

20%

33%

0.001

Human

90%

15%

27%

< 0.001

Analogue

80%

15%

20%

0.001

*p value of Fisher’s exacts

Overall, 90% of public hospitals had pre-mixed insulin products (90% human and 80% analogue). Although the availability of short-acting (50%) and intermediate-acting (20%) human insulin was low, 70% of public hospitals had rapid-acting and long-acting analogue insulin (Table 4).

Insulin availability in primary care institutions was very low (10% to 20%). No intermediate-acting human insulin was available in primary care institutions. Overall, the availability of insulin in private pharmacies ranged from 13% for prandial (10% short-acting and 10% rapid-acting) to 33% for pre-mixed (27% human and 20% analogue). Consistent with public hospitals, primary care institutions and private pharmacies were more likely to have pre-mixed insulin products than others (Table 4).

Patient prices and affordability

Prices of insulin products were higher than Australian PBS prices, with median MPRs greater than 1 for all insulin types. Between 4 to 16 days’ wages of the lowest paid unskilled government worker is needed to purchase a month’s treatment depending on the insulin type purchases and the sector (Table 5).
Table 5

Median Price Ratio (MPR) and average affordability of insulins in different kind of outlets (Mean ± Standard)

Type of insulin

Indicators

Public hospital

Primary care institution

Private retailer

Overall

p value*

Prandial insulin

Human short-acting

MPR

1.41  ±  0.12

1.37 ± 0.13

1.52 ± 0.13

1.44 ± 0.13

0.173

Affordability

4.35 ± 0.37

4.24 ± 0.41

4.68 ± 0.40

4.45 ± 0.40

Analogs rapid-acting

MPR

1.69 ± 0.14

1.67 ± 0.13

1.76 ± 0.32

1.70 ± 0.19

0.957

Affordability

6.29 ± 0.53

6.19 ± 0.50

6.53 ± 1.20

6.33 ± 0.69

Basal insulin

Human intermediate-acting

MPR

1.49 ± 0.11

Not Available

1.57 ± 0.24

1.55 ± 0.21

0.636

Affordability

4.61 ± 0.35

Not Available

4.84 ± 0.75

4.77 ± 0.43

Analogs long-acting

MPR

2.59 ± 0.33

2.23 ± 0.24

2.53 ± 0.27

2.53 ± 0.32

0.155

Affordability

16.11 ± 1.89

14.16 ± 1.53

15.72 ± 1.61

15.8 ± 01.84

Pre-mixed insulin

Human

MPR

1.49 ± 0.40

1.28 ± 0.20

1.36 ± 0.29

1.43 ± 0.36

0.018

Affordability

4.61 ± 1.23

3.95 ± 0.61

4.19 ± 0.90

4.43 ± 1.11

analogs

MPR

1.59 ± 0.20

1.59 ± 0.23

1.68 ± 0.21

1.62 ± 0..21

0.401

Affordability

5.92 ± 0.75

5.91 ± 0.87

6.26 ± 0.79

6.02 ± 0.76

*t tests or ANOVA for data with normal distribution; Kruskal Wallis tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for data with non-normal distribution

p < 0.001 compared with analogs products

Overall, analogue insulins were higher priced and less affordable than human insulins (p < 0.001). Long-acting analogue insulins were highest priced, with median MPRs ranging from 2.23 to 2.59 compared with about 1.5 for the other insulin products. Overall, across the sectors, 14–16 days wages are needed to purchase long-acting analogues, compared to 4–7 days for other insulins.

Insulin products dispensed from primary care institutions were lower priced and more affordable than those dispensed from public hospitals and private pharmacies. However, such differences were only statistically significant for pre-mixed human insulin (p = 0.018).

Insulin price components

For each of the five insulin brands (2 human, 3 analogues) in the analysis, price components were categorized into four stages namely, MSP, importer’s mark-up, wholesaler’s mark-up and outlet’s mark-up (Actual prices and contribution from stakeholders were showed in Additional file 2: Table S2). After summarized, the main contribution of price (over 60%) was the MSP for all five brands. In accordance with Chinese tax policy, import duty was levied on importers and VAT was levied on importers, wholesalers and private retailers. Public hospitals were tax exempt. The VAT was extracted from importers, wholesalers and private retailers then summarize based on tax policy, patients are required to pay VAT on the retail price.

Figure 1 shows the contribution of price components to the final patient price, for one human insulin and one analogue in the two sectors. In the top four bars, the mark-ups include VAT. In the second set of bars, VAT was extracted from the mark-ups and added to the VAT paid by patients. In total VAT contributed 12.05% to 13.55% to final prices and import duty contributed about 3%. Cumulatively, taxes constituted over 15% to final insulin prices. Excluding VAT, importers’ mark-ups contributed about 7% in both sectors for human and analogue insulin. The contribution of the wholesaler’s mark-up doubled when insulin was sold to public hospitals (6% vs 3%). The contribution of private retail and hospital mark-ups for analogues were 6–7%, while the contribution for human insulin was about 10% in both sectors.
Fig. 1

Contribution of price components to the final patient price of insulin. The first histogram indicated the original stakeholders’ contribution (with taxes) to the final prices. To show the impact of tax, import duty and value added tax was extracted and the second histogram showed the mark-ups of different stakeholders (without tax) and cumulative contribution of taxes

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind in China to analyze the availability, price, affordability and price components of insulin in the public and private sectors. We found that the availability of pre-mixed insulin products was good in public hospitals. But the availability of insulin in primary care institutions and private pharmacies was sub-optimal. A study in 15 developing countries revealed that insulin was available in 56% (17–100%) of public facilities and 39% (0–95%) private facilities [32].

The pricing level of insulin products is high, leading to poor affordability. This is particularly the case for long-acting analogue insulin, which costs half of a month wage of the lowest paid government worker for a month’s treatment. About 60% of the price was due to the MSP, with taxes and mark-ups also important contributors.

Availability of insulin

A wide range of insulin products need to be made available in pharmacies. This is because insulin treatment is highly individualized due to variations of lifestyle, calories intake, and responsiveness of patients. The American Diabetes Association recommends combined use of different insulin products for children with Type 1 Diabetes and in adults whose blood glucose level is difficult to control [33]. Our study shows that only public hospitals are likely to be able to meet this recommendation for insulin treatment.

Although patients can seek medical attention from any facility without referral, buying insulin from a public hospital is more inconvenient and time consuming than visits to primary care institutions and private pharmacies. Unfortunately, the availability of insulin products in primary health centres was low although they are slightly more affordable. Therefore patients have to visit public hospitals frequently to obtain insulin supplies. This would disadvantage those who live far away from hospitals, the elderly, children and patients who have amputations with diabetic feet. The inconvenience and additional travel costs could lead to disrupted treatment and poor management of blood glucose, resulting in serious complications.

Affordability of insulin

Overall, the pricing level of insulin products is high, leading to poor affordability of insulin. A month’s treatment costs at least four days’ wages, even in the public sector. In reality, the affordability of insulin may be even worse because diabetes is associated with poverty and many diabetic patients earn a lower wage than the lowest paid unskilled government workers [34].

The high pricing level is also likely to impose high financial burden on patients [30]. Although China has achieved almost universal coverage of health insurance, insurance benefits are limited. High percentages of out-of-pocket payments are required for medicines [20]. A national survey showed that less than 14% of direct costs of medicines dispensed through outpatient outlets are covered by those insurance programs [35].

Pricing components

Identifying price components provides insight into why insulin prices may be high and potential of cost reduction. The MSP accounts for over 60% of the final patient price. It should be reduced given the large number of diabetic patients in China [15]. But only the government has the bargaining power due to the lack of highly functioning non-governmental bodies. Unfortunately, the Chinese government has recently abandoned an initiative that established medicine prices based on scientific evidence and negotiations with the pharmaceutical industry. The medicine price setting systems in China are currently decentralized and fragmented, jeopardizing the bargaining power of the government. Each provincial government set its own pricing policy for public hospitals and primary care institutions [22]. It is also important to note that the Chinese market has few insulin manufacturers, which may impose additional barriers on the cost reduction efforts of governments [30, 36].

Abolishing taxes can reduce the price of medicines. VAT contributes 12% to 14% of the total patient price of insulin. Experience in some developing countries [30] shows that insulin price can be reduced by about 15% if government tax is eliminated. Considering the fact that these tax levies are imposed on the sick and are inequitable, and most diabetic patients are children (Type 1 Diabetes) and elderly (Type 2 diabetes), there is a strong rationale to exempt insulin from VAT.

The current government policy has a strong focus on reducing mark-ups of public health providers when dispensing medicines. This is understandable because most medicines are dispensed through public providers. In the past, the mark-up policy (15%) had encouraged doctors to prescribe high priced medicines to maximise profits for their organizations [37]. Since 2012, China has initiated a zero-mark-up policy for pharmaceutical products in public health care institutions [23]. This study found that the mark-up for dispensing insulin comprised 6% to 11% of final patient price of insulin.

Insulin supplied in vials is needed as they tend to be cheaper [38], while pens/cartridges offer more options for patients who can afford them. The disappearance of vials may tie patients to insulin injection devices, some of which are patented, and the associated cartridges [36]. However, insulin in vials appears to no longer be available in the Hubei market, although it is still registered with the National Food and Drug Administration [39]. The WHO advises that human insulin in vials should be available in outlets to meet the basic demands of patients [2]. However, the transition from vial to cartridge/pen has been observed all over the world [30]. The reasons behind the transition are still not fully understood. It may be a combination of many factors, including less wastage, better adherence and higher quality of life [40], only if patients could afford them.

Policy implications

China is attempting to establish a primary care dominated tiered health care system. Such a system is supposed to be able to provide more cost-efficient and cost-effective services to consumers [41]. Patients, especially those with chronic conditions, are encouraged to obtain more services from primary care centres than from hospitals. However, appropriate care for people needing insulin cannot be provided in primary care facilities unless they are equipped with needed insulin products at affordable prices. Singular government subsidies through insurance programs are not enough to alleviate the financial burden of accessing insulin. Prices of insulin products are too high in China; the government needs to use its bargaining power to reduce the price of insulin and make it more affordable, especially for the poor.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study was conducted in Hubei province and hence may not be representative of all of China. Secondly, a few private pharmacies did not keep insulin in stock but could order for their customer on request. Therefore, the availability of insulin in private pharmacies is likely to be underestimated. Thirdly, the IRPs were from PBS of Australia, rather than International Drug Price Indicator Guide which was recommended by WHO/HAI, in current study. The MPR results can be skewed by a particularly high or low price from PBS. Finally, MSP and importers’ mark-ups were estimated, rather than self-reported. The importers mark-up includes profit as well as transport costs. The importers’ mark-up was based on wholesaler mark-ups because delivery costs of importers are similar to those of wholesalers. The MSP was back calculated based on importers’ mark-ups.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence on access to insulin problems in Hubei. The availability of insulin in primary care institutions and private retail pharmacies was very low. Only public hospitals had good insulin availability. However, in hospitals, primary care institutions and private retail pharmacies, insulin prices were high making this life-saving medicine unaffordable, especially for those on low incomes. The government should consider using its bargaining power to reduce prices, abolish taxes on essential medicines such as insulin, and develop strategies for more equitable access to insulin.

Abbreviations

EML: 

Essential Medicine List

HAI: 

Health Action International

IRP: 

International Reference Price

MPR: 

Median Price Ratio

MSP: 

Manufacturer’s Selling Price

NCD: 

Non-communication disease

PBS: 

Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme

UN: 

United Nations

VAT: 

Value added tax

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the participating pharmacies and other interviewees who very kindly provided data. The authors also wish to thank Douglas Ball who lead, and Charles Allotey who hosted, a training workshop on collecting insulin price components which was part of the ACCISS Study. The ACCISS Study is a collaboration between HAI (Margaret Ewen), University of Geneva (David Beran) and Boston University School of Public Health (Richard Laing).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Contact information: xpzhang602@hust.edu.cn or xpzhang602@163.com.

Funding

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

CXL contributed to data collection, checking, analysis and interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. XPZ contributed to the conception, design, and conduct of the study, and led the drafting of the manuscript. CJL contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and helped draft the manuscript. ME contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of the data and reviewed the manuscript. ZNZ contributed to data collection, checking, analysis and interpretation. GQL contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and help draft the manuscript. CXL takes responsibility for the contents of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Local ethics committee (the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology) reviewed this study and stated that no formal ethics approval was required in this particular case. Oral consent was obtained from all participated interviewees.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
(2)
China Health Program, La Trobe University
(3)
Health Action International
(4)
School of Management, Zunyi Medical University

References

  1. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.Google Scholar
  2. WHO. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Ramachandran A, Ma RC, Snehalatha C. Diabetes in Asia. Lancet. 2010;375(9712):408–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Seshasai SR, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):829–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. UN. Prevention and control of non-communicable diseases: report of the secretary-general. New York: United Nations; 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Madeb R, Koniaris LG, Schwartz SI. The discovery of insulin: the Rochester, New York, connection. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(12):907–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bliss M. The discovery of insulin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Miller RG, et al. Improvements in the life expectancy of type 1 diabetes: the Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications study cohort. Diabetes. 2012;61(11):2987–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. WHO. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  10. Beran D, Yudkin JS. Diabetes care in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet. 2006;368(9548):1689–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Holmes D. Linong Ji: fighting to turn the tide against diabetes in China. Lancet. 2014;383(9933):1961.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoyer CB, Christensen EF, Eika B. Standards of resuscitation during inter-hospital transportation: the effects of structured team briefing or guideline review - a randomised, controlled simulation study of two micro-interventions. Scand J Trauma, Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Currie CJ, Peters JR, Evans M. Dispensing patterns and financial costs of glucose-lowering therapies in the UK from 2000 to 2008. Diabet Med. 2010;27(7):744–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wild S, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Xu Y, et al. Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults. JAMA. 2013;310(9):948–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerstein HC, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2545–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhao Z, et al. Rapidly rising incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in Chinese population: epidemiology in shanghai during 1997-2011. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51(6):947–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang Z, et al. Childhood diabetes in China: enormous variation by place and ethnic group. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(4):525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. GBD, The Global Health Data Exchange. Diabetes Mellitus in Hubei [Aggregated online database]. 2016, Global Burden of Disease Study, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington: The Global Health Data Exchange (ghdx.healthdata.org). http://global-disease-burden.healthgrove.com/l/66349/Diabetes-Mellitus-in-Hubei. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.
  20. SCIOPRC. Progress in China's Human Rights in 2014. 2015, the state council information Office of the People's Republic of China: Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  21. WB. Out-of-pocket health expenditure (% of private expenditure on health). 2014, The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.OOPC.ZS?locations=CN. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.
  22. MoH. Further standardize centralized tender and procurement of drugs in medical institutions. 2004, Ministry of Health: Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  23. NDRC. Standardize the price management of medical services and related issues. 2012, National Development and Reform Commission: Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  24. NDRC. Promote the reform of medicine prices. 2015.6, National Development and Reform Commission: Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  25. WHO/HAI. Measuring medicine prices, availability, affordability and price components. Switzerland: World Health Organization and Health Action International; 2008.Google Scholar
  26. World Health Organization. Price, availability and affordability: an international comparison of chronic disease medicines. 2006. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/116493/1/dsa560.pdf.
  27. DoH. Standard Packs and Prices for Ready Prepared Pharmaceutical Benefits. 2016, Department of Health, Australia Government. http://www.pbs.gov.au/browse/medicine-listing.
  28. Babar ZU, et al. Evaluating drug prices, availability, affordability, and price components: implications for access to drugs in Malaysia. PLoS Med. 2007;4(3):e82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Gelders S, et al. Price, availability and affordability: an international comparison of chronic disease medicines. 2006.Google Scholar
  30. Beran D, Ewen M, Laing R. Constraints and challenges in access to insulin: a global perspective. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(3):275–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiang M, Yang S, Yan K, et al. Measuring access to medicines: a survey of prices, availability and affordability in Shaanxi province of China. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70836.Google Scholar
  32. HAI. Database of medicine prices, availability, affordability and price components [Online database]. 2012, Health Action International. http://haiweb.org/what-we-do/price-availability-affordability/price-availability-data/. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.
  33. Cefalu WT. American diabetes association, standards of medicial care in diabetes-2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(supplement 1):6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. GOPG. Notice on adjusting the minimum wage standards of Hubei Province. Wuhan: General Office of the Provincial Government, the People ‘s Government of Hubei Province; 2015.Google Scholar
  35. Wang Y. Medical Service and Health Insurance of the Middle and Low - income Groups in China. 2010: China Financial and Economic Press. p. 562.Google Scholar
  36. Luo J, Kesselheim AS. Evolution of insulin patents and market exclusivities in the USA. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(11):835–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Chen C, Dong W, Shen JJ, et al. Is the prescribing behavior of Chinese physicians driven by financial incentives? Soc Sci & Med. 2014;120:40–48.Google Scholar
  38. Ewen M, et al. Insulin prices profile. 2016, Health Action International. p. 6. http://haiweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ACCISS-Prices-report_FINAL-1.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.
  39. CFDA. Online database of registered medicines. Beijing: China Food and Drug Administration; 2016.Google Scholar
  40. Al-Sharayri MGA, Aljbori TM, Abu-Rumman TM. A. E. K. Insulin vials vs. insulin cartridges: Further cost considerations. Saudi Pharm J. 2013;21(2):225–7.Google Scholar
  41. GOSC. Guiding opinions on promoting the construction of hierarchical medical system. Beijing: General Office of the State Council; 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017