This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The care of patients with subthreshold depression in primary care: Is it all that bad? A qualitative study on the views of general practitioners and patients
© Backenstrass et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 09 January 2007
Accepted: 21 November 2007
Published: 21 November 2007
Studies show that subthreshold depression is highly prevalent in primary care, has impact on the quality of life and causes immense health care costs. Although this points to the clinical relevance of subthreshold depression, contradictory results exist regarding the often self-remitting course of this state. However, first steps towards quality improvement in the care of subthreshold depressive patients are being undertaken. This makes it important to gather information from both a GPs' and a patients' point of view concerning the clinical relevance as well as the status quo of diagnosis and treatment in order to appraise the need for quality improvement research.
We conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews for the questioning of 20 GPs and 20 patients with subthreshold depression on aspects of clinical relevance and on the status quo of diagnosis and treatment. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed on a content analytical theoretical background using Atlas.ti software.
Most of the GPs found subthreshold depression to be clinically significant. Although some problems in diagnosis and treatment were mentioned, the GPs had sensible diagnostic and treatment strategies at hand which resulted from the long and trustful relationship with the patients and which corresponded to the patients' expectations. The patients rather expected their GP to listen to them than to take specific actions towards symptom relief and, in the main, were satisfied with the GPs' care.
The study shows that subthreshold depression is a clinically relevant issue for GPs but raises the possibility that quality improvement might not be as necessary as past studies showed. Further quantitative research using larger random samples is needed to determine the effectiveness of the strategies used by the GPs, patients' satisfaction with these strategies and the course of these patients' symptoms in primary care.
With a prevalence rate of up to 16% subthreshold depression is frequent in primary care [1, 2]. Although these patients suffer from depressive symptoms without meeting the criteria of a full-blown Major Depression as defined by DSM-IV (i.e. at least 5 out of 9 depression symptoms which are present during the same 2-week period) , these symptoms lead to impairment  and higher health care costs . Moreover, it has been shown that patients with depressive symptoms not reaching the threshold for Major Depression have a consistently higher risk of developing Major Depression [6, 7].
Although the impairment of patients with subthreshold depression and their heightened risk of developing Major Depression point to the clinical relevance of this concept, the need for treatment is still unclear, especially since up to 48% of cases remit without treatment  and only up to 8% of patients with subthreshold depression develop Major Depression within 2 years . Moreover, to date, no evidence based treatment exists [10, 11]. What also seems critical is the problematic discrimination of subthreshold depression and "normal" emotional distress. Lowering the threshold of psychiatric disorders could lead to a "psychiatrization" of healthy persons who have "normal" and self-remitting emotional distress and thus bring about unnecessary treatment and costs for the health care system . However, because of the nature of subthreshold states and consequential diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties, subthreshold depression represents a special and frequent challenge to GPs. These uncertainties may in part have caused criticism of GPs' inefficiency in detection and treatment of depression [e.g. ]. Moreover, depressive patients have been found to often present only somatic symptoms when consulting the GP [e.g. ], a fact that further complicates diagnosis and treatment. Results of first projects (e.g. the Partners in Care Study ) on improving primary health care for subthreshold depressive patients, point to a benefit for these patients but are inconsistent [16–20]. Therefore, the need for quality improvement research in this field must include information on the status quo of diagnosis and treatment of subthreshold depression in primary care. Also, the necessity for such research should be judged from a GPs' and patients' point of view, bearing in mind that changes in care require the involved groups' dissatisfaction with care as one major criterion.
With this in mind, the aim of the qualitative study was to assess the perspectives of GPs and subthreshold depressive patients on aspects of diagnosis and treatment supposed to be problematic from a current literature point of view and to gather information on the necessity for changes in care.
Given the exploratory, hypothesis-generating nature of our research field, we favored a qualitative interview design. Qualitative research has the advantage of revealing issues and problems not accessible with quantitative methods using closed-ended questions . Therefore, we developed a semi-structured interview guide on a set of open questions.
For selecting the GPs, we used a numbered list with 200 cooperating teaching practices of the Department of General Practice and Health Services Research at the University of Heidelberg and created 30 random numbers between 1 and 200. According to these random numbers, the corresponding practices from the list were phoned and asked for participation. Twenty of the 30 GPs (14 men and 6 women) agreed to take part in the study. The GPs were set up in a large area in southern Germany, comprising rural as well as urban practices. Mean age of the GPs was 50.8 years (SD = 6.6) and they were in practice for 17.5 years (SD = 7.4) on average.
Current diagnosis according to SCID-I and SCID-II (N = 20 patients)
Number of patients (N)
No current disorder
Depressive Personality Disorder
In order to examine the views of the two groups, semi-structured interview guides were compiled by an interdisciplinary team including GPs, psychiatrists, and psychologists from the University Hospital in Heidelberg. The interviews included mostly open-ended questions about different aspects of diagnosis (e.g. procedure, documentation, information about diagnosis, problems) and treatment (e.g. strategies, problems). For example, we asked the GPs: "How do you treat patients with subthreshold depression?" and patients were asked: "When you first consulted the GP, did you talk to him/her about mental distress? Which complaints did you mention?"
Semi-structured interview guides with open-ended questions can be helpful especially for qualitative research since the aim of this kind of research is classification and understanding of social phenomena rather than enumeration. This research approach has especially proved fertile for the assessment of GPs' and patients' problems and needs regarding care [24, 25] and more specifically, for the assessment of proceedings and problems in the treatment of depressive patients [e.g. ]. In order to compare the views of GPs and patients, we matched the interviews for both groups on important issues but also asked specific questions concerning only the investigated group.
Additionally, to diagnose patients, they were questioned using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, German version (SCID) , including the mood disorder section, the section for anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders. Also, the questions for the diagnosis of depressive personality disorder of the SCID-II (Structured Clinical Interview for the assessment of personality disorders) were posed and patients filled out the Beck Depression Inventory , one of the most frequently used instruments for the assessment of depression.
The interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed literally in order to carry out a content analysis with Atlas.ti-Software . Content analysis is a systematic examination of text in order to determine, identify and group certain concepts and themes within the text . The software helps in documenting the process of categorization and coding. Before starting the analysis, an initial categorizing system was established based on the interview questions in which categories were clearly defined and linked with representative examples from the original text . Moreover, in the process of the analysis, numerous free categories were developed from the text and incorporated into the categorizing system. This means that the code or category system is the result of constant comparison, which can be seen as an iterative method of content analysis where each category is searched for in the entire data set and all instances are compared until no new categories can be identified . After coding the interviews with Atlas.ti using the defined categories, the program allows to content-analyze what the two groups think of different issues. It is also possible to carry out a quantitative analysis on how many categories and subcategories were discussed by how many subjects. In order to verify the categories and codings, two coders independently analyzed the first five transcriptions of both groups and then discussed discrepancies. Categories and codings which led to discrepancies were modified until agreement was reached.
The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg (019/2004).
Selected diagnostic aspects
Proceedings (19) a:
Presenting behaviour (20):
Making somatic examination (11)
Presentation of somatic symptoms (11):
Questions on possible psychological causes for symptoms (8)
- Heart complaints/stabbing chest pain (4)
Using depression criteria (6)
- Thyroid dysfunction (3)
Making an indirect anamnesis by asking family members or including information about the patients' biography (5)
- Pain (head, limbs) (2)
Watchful waiting (5)
- Diabetes (1)
Referring patients to specialists (2)
- Hypertension (1)
Observation of nonverbal behavior (e.g. body language) (2)
- Overweight (1)
Using a depression questionnaire (1)
- Fatigue (1)
- Sleeping problems (1)
- Vertigo (1)
Diagnostic problems (17)
Presentation of psychological complaints (9):
- Time consuming psychological diagnosis (1)
- Overstrain by family or work problems (4)
- Financial losses because of time consuming psychological diagnosis (1)
- Depression/depressiveness (3)
- Differential diagnosis of Depression, Parkinsons' and Alzheimers' disease in older patients (1)
- Sleeping problems (3)
- Fear of overlooking Depression (1)
- Agitation (2)
- Decision if somatic symptoms are actually caused by Depression (1)
- Feeling low (2)
- Being sure if the patient really suffers from Depression, detection of Depression (1)
- Anxieties (2)
- Nervousness (1)
- Loss of zest for life (1)
- Loss of drive and energy (1)
- Fatigue (1)
Satisfied with diagnostic proceedings (11)
Not satisfied with diagnostic proceedings (5) for following reasons:
- Missing information about diagnosis and its causes (3)
- Feeling of not being taken seriously (1)
- No application of concrete measures, such as questionnaire (1)
Selected treatment aspects
Applied treatments (18) a:
Therapeutic talk and psychopharmacological medication (14)
Be listened to, conversation about the problems, be taken seriously, sympathy (10)
Mainly supporting therapeutic talk (7)
Suggestion of concrete treatments (5)
Mainly psychopharmacological medication (3)
- Medication (3)
- Referral to psychologist (1)
- Symptom relief (1)
Advice how to deal with symptoms (2)
Topics of conversation (13):
Treatment Preferences (20):
Possible individual causes for depression (6)
Relaxation techniques (1)
No Psychotherapy (4)
Psychopharmacological treatment (4)
No pharmacological treatment (6)
Reduction of excessive demands (1)
Resource orientation (1)
Self-worth enhancement (1)
Concrete behavioural advises (1)
Treatment problems (18):
Satisfied with treatment (14)
- Patients' refusal of pharmacological therapy or non-compliance (5)
Not satisfied with treatment (6) for following reasons:
- GPs' insecurity with pharmacological treatment (3)
- Not enough time (2)
- Motivating the patient to use offers for counselling or psychotherapy (3)
- Insufficient communication between GP and practice nurse (1)
- Insufficient efficiency of treatment (3)
- Not taking somatic complaints seriously and not offering special treatments such as physical therapy (1)
- Patients' acceptance of the diagnosis (2)
- Not taking presented complaint (fatigue) seriously and not offering concrete treatment besides exercising (1)
- Problems with appointments for referral (2)
- Not addressing depression in more detail, e.g. by applying a questionnaire (1)
- Heightened utilization of primary care (2)
- Personal strain due to insufficient efficiency of treatment and perceived lack of competence (2)
- Lack of time (1)
- Financial losses because of time consuming psychological diagnosis (1)
Clinical significance of subthreshold depression in primary care
"I think that the clinical significance is high because patients do suffer from the symptoms. They have a relatively high psychological strain, which they may not be aware of, that it is caused by depression or depressive mood." A15
"It's significant because it leads to secondary diseases. I mean, everyone is depressive every now and again, often it's a natural mood swing, but when this isn't recognized as depressive, symptoms often tend to worsen and lead to psychosomatic complaints" A14
"Let's put it this way, I don't think that mild forms of depression are extremely serious...I can't always tell if it is depression, often it's stress, overwork, problems in the workplace and so on." A6
"I don't find this to be a very big problem because I think that quite a lot of patients have mild depressive episodes. I don't think that this is a very relevant clinical symptomatology – feeling a little bit low from time to time. I don't think that this is therapeutically relevant. I don't have the impression that this merits treatment." A9
"I also do that to reassure or calm the patient down. The patient is often afraid of having some serious illness and has to be reassured from the outset. They need to hear that "technically" everything is ok and that the instruments show that. And then I just ask. I think that it is not very difficult for the GP because he knows the patients' living conditions." A2
"...You have to try to find something out about the conditions the patient is living in, whether there are problems at work or private problems. You have to develop a sense for that...I ask the patient if there might be something different in the background, problems with the relationship, at work or with the family." A15
"Whenever possible I try to take a lot of time for the anamnesis and normally I know the patients living conditions. These patients are primary care patients and I often see the whole family. I may know their friends and I often have background knowledge about things the patient doesn't want to talk about at first. That makes it easier to find out about a psychogenetic factor." A4
"Well, first of all I make a somatic examination, because that's why the patient consults me, he primarily presumes to have a somatic disorder and this needs to be clarified. And depending on how well I know the patient – if I am seeing him for the first time, I wait for about 2 or 3 consultations until we have gotten to know each other – you talk about his career or family and then if I determine there is no evidence of a somatic disorder I will say that I think that there is a connection between the problems the patient talks about and the somatic symptoms. I will say something along the lines that it is really stressful with the kids or being out of work and so on...often the patients are not aware of this and when I directly address this I find that most of them say "well you're actually right". A10
"...There are a few patients who have subthreshold depression on and off. These are momentary disorders which remit relatively quickly and I don't treat them pharmacologically. We talk about it and I tell them to come again in 1, 2, 3 weeks time in order to see how they are and in most cases its fine. If it is a major depressive episode, I will recognize it then. That's why I invite them in again and ask them how they feel." A12
"...I attach great importance to seeing the patient come in and having the opportunity to assess the patient's body language can prove valuable. I think that a large part of the diagnosis is done before the patient sits down. Of course this depends on how long you have known the patient for...With depressive patients, the body language is often muted or reduced." A3
"Well, yes, being certain is a problem. First, I have to arrive at the point where I actually suspect a depression. I don't know in how many patients I detect an existing depression. I often suspect depression but I have to admit that I don't always address this. If a patient comes to me and talks about exhaustion then I wouldn't always immediately say it is depression. I often class it as a kind of burn-out and go on to ask the patient about resources. So, on the one hand, the problem is how many patients with depression I actually detect and on the other, it is 'if I detect it, how can I communicate that to the patient'." A16
"It is definitely a problem that many patients present somatic complaints and other misleading symptoms and it is indeed difficult to find out if there is a covert depressive syndrome in the background." A1
"I don't really have problems with diagnosing these patients. But it can be very difficult to guide them to a place where they can accept that they do actually have a problem with depression when they are experiencing migraine or irritable bladder symptoms or something like that." A2
"Further problems? No. Because, once I speak with the patient, I can go on using the depression criteria." A1
"I usually don't talk about mental problems, I'm just not that kind of person. I would rather say to him that I'm aching all over and that I can't sleep." P8
"Lately, I've been talking to him about mental problems. I told him that I have problems sleeping, that I lost zest for life, that my anxieties worsen and that I sometimes don't want to get up." P17
"I told him that I can't sleep at night, that I suffer from depression and from being lonely." P16
"Well, I said to him that I'm always quite nervous, that I couldn't sleep, and that I was upset and depressed – always quite depressed." P6
"Well, if I go to the doctor he of course asks what the problem is, but the thing is that you don't really talk about depression. When I have the flu, I can say that my head aches or my throat hurts or something like that, but with something emotional I can't really say what hurts. There is something deep inside that hurts and I can't really talk about that." P3
Other reasons given were bad experiences with other physicians who didn't take mental problems seriously, the opinion that the GP is not responsible for mental health problems, lack of confidence in the GP, ignorance regarding the fact that symptoms could have a mental cause, the opinion that problems should be solved without help and the belief that somatic problems actually are more important.
"Well, I think that for me everything went as well as it could. I don't have any reason to say that anything should have or could have been better. She arranged the therapy for me, she detected my depression without me having to directly address it..." P4
"I wished he would have taken me more seriously and not have told me to exercise more frequently. I work all day long and still feel beat-up." P10
"Well, actually it was not that important to me that she didn't specify my complaints with a diagnosis. Sometimes I think its better you don't label it that clearly." P2
"She said its stress and exhaustion. If she had told me it's something depressive, I would have thought "I'm not nuts", because that's what you first think." P4
"Well, I would have appreciated being told what the doctor diagnosed, what it is. He always said "psychosomatic disorder" or something like that. But I would have really been interested in what is it and why." P6
"He sometimes said that this is depression but I wasn't sure. And I didn't need or find it necessary to be told that – in fact, most of the time I would rather not hear it." P11
"I mainly treat them with supporting talk. I use medication when the patients suffer from sleeping problems or if the symptoms they experience are causing real discomfort of distress. But I always combine that with talking about the problems." A10
"The most important is the therapeutic talk. I use pharmacological treatment partly to bring about relief but also to show, by way of the symbolic application of medication, that it is a disorder that should be taken seriously and that can be treated..." A19
"Well, talking to the patient a few times, giving him information and sometimes, in cases of subthreshold depression, also treating him herbally with St. Johns' wort. I don't go any further without having a diagnosis from a specialist. If the specialist says, it's a full-blown depression and gives me a treatment recommendation, I follow that." A12
"Well, I have an authorization for basic psychosomatic care, so I use therapeutic talk or refer to a psychotherapist, but I also give medication, maybe St. John's wort or a mild antidepressant and before that I examine whether the estrogen situation might be the cause." A2
Other than with diagnosis, a narrow majority of the GPs said that they do have problems in treating these patients, mainly due to patient factors such as compliance with pharmacological treatment, motivation for psychotherapy or acceptance of the diagnosis. Few GPs mentioned treatment problems caused by physician factors such as insecurities concerning treatment with antidepressants or the management of these patients in general:
"Well, regarding medication, there are so many possibilities that, to be honest, I regularly experience the problem of knowing just where to start." A4
Despite these problems, some of the GPs have developed a clear strategy for dealing with these patients:
"...when patients fulfill criteria for depression it doesn't always mean that they are in need of treatment, in the sense of antidepressant treatment. Often, I'd say in 50% of cases, talking to the patient is enough, making him aware that he is experiencing a depressive mood, and then the patient finds a solution for the situation by himself." A1
"I didn't have any special expectations. I just wanted to talk to someone I completely trust and who listens to me." P13
"Sometimes I think, because one has the notion that a GPs knows how to deal with everything, that sometimes you hope that he just listens and sees the other side of the person, not only the somatic side." P8
"Well, I think you always expect that the doctor will be able to help you almost immediately, that she can give you a 'magic pill' that makes everything disappear. You think you go to the doctor and that settles the matter – I know this isn't the case but she takes a lot of time and always tells me that I can come again and again even if it's just for talking." P17
"Well, I actually wanted to have psychotherapy." P14
"Well, yes, he talked to me about giving me tablets or something. But I have to say that I disapprove a little bit of taking pills...I'm more interested in psychotherapy." P11
"I was very satisfied. She was very understanding. She really is very warm-hearted and very nice and maybe it's because we've known each other for many years, I'm one of her first patients and she got to know me during a completely different time when I was in a completely different state. We got along very well and I could always rely on her not least because I had the impression that she didn't try to keep the patient to herself but was happy to refer to specialists as well, that is one of her strengths..." P4
"Well, sometimes I wish she had more time. Sometimes I wanted to tell her something but was unable because she was so pressed for time." P17
"The only thing that occurs to me is that when I've been talking to her and she has told me "I will give you this and that to take with you" the practice nurses often don't know what she has said and this breakdown in communication can cause problems... I would sometimes appreciate it if I didn't have to remind them again." P2
The aim of the study was to explore the status quo of the diagnosis and treatment of subthreshold depression from both a patients and GPs points of view. We used a qualitative, hypotheses-generating approach since important issues regarding subthreshold depression are still unsettled. Our study provides several important findings on different aspects:
Although some findings point to the clinical significance of subthreshold depression, others, for example the high rates of spontaneous remissions, do not. The majority of the GPs we questioned found mild depression to be highly relevant for their daily clinical work. This appraisal is based on the prevalence of subthreshold depression, the complication of somatic symptoms and the patients' suffering. When it comes to diagnosing subthreshold depression, most of the GPs did not feel as insecure as one might expect, given past findings. Their diagnostic strategy is quite clearly outlined starting with the exclusion of somatic diseases and thereafter drawing on information gleaned from the patient's biography and family history as well as on the assessment of diagnostic criteria. The validity of this diagnostic strategy is confirmed by the fact that the patients recruited by the GPs indeed had experienced some form of current or past depression. Correspondingly, newer studies on the recognition of depression in primary care [e.g. [30, 31]] find that instead of a lack of recognition GPs often diagnose depression in cases where diagnostic criteria for Major Depression are not fully met. However, this can not be regarded as a misidentification since these false positive cases differ from true negative cases on important clinical characteristics such as higher distress and impairment and a history of mental health problems and treatment . This also points to the fact that the psychiatric case model might not be valid for primary care patients and that GPs base their diagnostic decision on meaningful cues resulting from the special relationship. Although many GPs mentioned diagnostic problems, these were mainly due to the patients' somatic presenting behavior, a problem also identified in respect of patients with Major Depression . However, although still a minority, the number of patients who reported to have presented mental problems was higher than would have been expected from other studies . One explanation might be the special relationship of trust with the GP as described by many of the patients. Simon et al. also found that the probability of somatic presentation is higher in primary care centers where patients do not have ongoing relationships with the GPs and which are not characterized by the privacy of the visit . Understanding the patients' reasons for not presenting mental problems e.g. embarrassment, perceived inability to communicate effectively etc. can ease diagnosis by allowing GPs to directly address the patients' fears and beliefs. The discrimination of subthreshold depression from "normal" states of psychological distress does not seem to be as problematic for the GPs as expected. Many GPs said that they do have a lot of information about the patients' medical, biographical and familial history which makes it easier to decide whether the patient suffers from subthreshold depression and points to the enormous significance of the GP-patient relationship for the care of patients with emotional problems. Accordingly, some findings suggest that the clinician-patient relationship is an important component in recognizing depression [33–35]. For the patients, it seems to be rather less relevant and some patients even find it unpleasant or unnecessary if the GP mentions the depression diagnosis. Moreover, since most GPs treat these patients with counseling or therapeutic talk anyway, whether or not the patients has been labeled with a depression diagnosis does not have differential treatment implications in the clinical practice of the GPs. Regarding treatment, most of the GPs practice a stepwise approach, starting with counseling and prescribing medication in persisting or otherwise complicated cases. Pharmacological treatment consists of St. Johns' wort in most cases. Also, some GPs practice a watchful waiting strategy. Thus, although to date there is no clear evidence for the treatment of subthreshold depression, the GPs are quite in line with existing treatment recommendations by Ackerman & Williams and Oxman & Sengupta [10, 11]. These authors recommend a watchful waiting strategy including support, therapeutic empathy and supporting the patient in activating himself. Regarding medication with herbal or synthetic antidepressants which is also used by the questioned GPs, Oxman & Sengupta argue that it is better to prescribe unnecessary medication than to run the risk of failing to prescribe appropriate medication. However, they do not mention herbal medications such as St. John's wort as a useful treatment strategy. The GPs in our study reported that they regularly prescribe herbal medications and did express uncertainty as to whether these patients should receive conventional antidepressants. This insecurity may in part be attributable to the lack of evidence-based treatment strategies for patients with subthreshold depression. A watchful waiting strategy could help the GPs in deciding when to prescribe an antidepressant, i.e. when symptoms persist or worsen over time. Since quality of care can, to a large extent, be evaluated by examining the patients' perspective, it is important to directly ask patients for their expectations, wishes and dissatisfactions. This, however, has rarely been done in studies on quality improvements. The majority of the questioned patients expected the GP to listen to their problems and to have an understanding attitude. Again, it was obvious that the perceived relationship of trust between the GP and the patient is of paramount importance to the patients. Fewer patients expected the GP to actually undertake specific actions towards symptom relief. This raises the hypotheses that patients with subthreshold depression do not conceptualize their syndrome as a state that merits any form of treatment above and beyond a trusting and confidential conversation with their GP. Moreover, as was shown for the majority of German primary care patients , most of the studied patients were satisfied with the GPs' care and their treatment preferences were in accordance with the GPs' tendency to treat patients with therapeutic talk.
The study has some methodological limitations which need to be mentioned. 30 GPs were asked to participate in the study of which 20 agreed to be interviewed. It can be hypothesized that the 20 questioned GPs are those with a special interest or experience in depression. This may have influenced the results, possibly with regard to GPs' problems and awareness of the diagnosis. Another problem is that patients were recruited by the GPs which may also has led to a selection bias, insofar as GPs may have primarily asked patients with whom they have a good relationship to participate or it may be that those patients who agreed to take part, were, in any event, satisfied with the GP. Patients not diagnosed by the GP as subtreshold depressive and thus not included in our study as well as patients diagnosed by the GP but not asked for participation, might have had a different, more critical view on the care by the GP. In order to rule out such a selection bias, it would have been advisable to select patients by screening them for depression. On the other hand, the selection bias does not, from our point of view, diminish our finding that the patients were satisfied when diagnosed and treated using the strategies reported by the GPs. Another limitation certainly is the applicability of the results to an international context. This is particularly the case with regard to treating these patients with St. John's wort. Here, international comparative studies are needed to find differences in treatment strategies (including herbal medications) and, more importantly, their impact on the course and outcome of depression.
Despite these limitations, the study stresses the clinical relevance of subthreshold depression in primary care from the GPs' perspective. And despite many studies showing GPs' problems with diagnosing and treating depressive patients, GPs in our study do have sensible strategies for the management of these patients, and patients as well as GPs do not describe care as very problematic. The trusting and often long-lasting GP-patient relationship eases diagnosis and can be regarded as a kind of treatment in itself especially since patients mainly expect the GP to listen to them. However, Further studies using random samples of GPs and subtreshold depressive patients, and thus avoiding selection biases, are needed to further validate the diagnostic and treatment strategies of the GPs' we questioned and to confirm their approach to the care of patients with subthreshold depression as sufficient and satisfactory. Also, such studies should include patients with major depression in order to find out how specific the findings are for patients with subthreshold depression.
As the study shows, subthreshold depression proved to be a clinically relevant issue from the GPs' point of view. However, the results also raise the possibility that quality improvement might not be as necessary as past studies showed since the GPs had sensible strategies for the management of these patients at hand. Nevertheless, quantitative research using larger random samples is needed to determine the effectiveness of the strategies used by the GPs, patients' satisfaction with these strategies and the course of these patients' symptoms in primary care.
Conflicts of interest
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding: This study was part of the PRAXKOM project that aims at improving the quality of life of patients suffering from subthreshold depression. The project is financed by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant-number 01GK0301.
We thank all participating patients and doctors who took part in this study. We also thank Ms. Dipl.-Psych. Britta Jaentsch for giving helpful feedback.
- Rucci P, Gherardi S, Tansella M, Piccinelli M, Berardi D, Bisoffi G, Corsino MA, Pini S: Subthreshold psychiatric disorders in primary care: prevalence and associated characteristics. J Affect Disord. 2003, 76: 171-181. 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00087-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrett JE, Barrett JA, Oxman TE, Gerber PD: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in a primary care practice. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988, 45: 1100-1106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 1994, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 4Google Scholar
- Backenstrass M, Frank A, Joest K, Hingmann S, Mundt C, Kronmuller KT: A comparative study of nonspecific depressive symptoms and minor depression regarding functional impairment and associated characteristics in primary care. Compr Psychiatry. 2006, 47: 35-41. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson J, Weissman MM, Klerman GL: Service utilization and social morbidity associated with depressive symptoms in the community. JAMA. 1992, 267: 1478-1483. 10.1001/jama.267.11.1478.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cuijpers P, Smit F: Subthreshold depression as a risk indicator for major depressive disorder: A systematic review of prospective studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004, 109: 325-331. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00301.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cuijpers P, Smit F, Willemse G: Predicting the onset of major depression in subjects with subthreshold depression in primary care: a prospective study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005, 111: 133-138. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00416.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Paulus MP: The role and clinical significance of subsyndromal depressive symptoms (SSD) in unipolar major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 1997, 45: 5-17. 10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00055-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cuijpers P, Smit F: Subthreshold depression as a risk indicator for major depressive disorder: a systematic review of prospective studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004, 109: 325-331. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00301.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ackermann RT, Williams JW: Rational treatment choices for non-major depressions in primary care. An evidence-based review. J Gen Intern Med. 2002, 17: 293-301. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10350.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Oxman TE, Sengupta A: Treatment of minor depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002, 10: 256-264. 10.1176/appi.ajgp.10.3.256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helmchen H, Linden M: Subthreshold disorders in psychiatry: clinical reality, methodological artifact, and the double-threshold problem. Compr Psychiatry. 2000, 41: 1-7. 10.1016/S0010-440X(00)80001-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simon GE, Von Korff M: Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 1995, 4: 99-105. 10.1001/archfami.4.2.99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simon GE, Von Korff M, Piccinelli M, Fullerton C, Ormel J: An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression. N Engl J Med. 1999, 28: 1329-35. 10.1056/NEJM199910283411801.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wells KB: The design of Partners in Care: evaluating the cost-effectiveness of improving care for depression in primary care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999, 34: 20-29. 10.1007/s001270050107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miranda J, Muñoz R: Intervention for minor depression in primary care patients. Psychosom Med. 1994, 56: 136-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrett JE, Williams JW, Oxman TE, Frank E, Katon W, Sullivan M, Hegel MT, Cornell JE, Sengupta AS: Treatment of dysthymia and minor depression in primary care: a randomized trial in patients aged 18 to 59. J Fam Pract. 2001, 50: 405-412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williams JW, Barrett J, Oxman T, Frank E, Katon W, Sullivan M, Cornell JE, Sengupta AS: Treatment of dysthymia and minor depression in primary care: a randomized controlled trial in older adults. JAMA. 2000, 284: 1519-1526. 10.1001/jama.284.12.1519.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wells K, Sherbourne C, Schoenbaum M, Duan N, Meredith L, Unützer J, Miranda J, Carney MF, Rubenstein LV: Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000, 283: 212-220. 10.1001/jama.283.2.212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wells K, Sherbourne C, Duan N, Unützer J, Miranda J, Schoenbaum M, Ettner S, Meredith LS, Rubenstein L: Quality improvement for depression in primary care: Do patients with subthreshold depression benefit in the long run?. Am J Psychiatry. 2005, 162: 1149-1157. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Willems SJ, Swinnen W, De Maeseneer JM: The GP's perception of poverty: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2005, 22: 177-183. 10.1093/fampra/cmh724.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wittchen H-U, Wunderlich U, Gruschwitz S, Zaudig M: Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV, Achse I (SKID) [Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Axis I]. 1997, Göttingen: HogrefeGoogle Scholar
- Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961, 4: 561-571.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosemann T, Wensing M, Joest K, Backenstrass M, Mahler C, Szecsenyi J: Problems and needs for improving primary care of osteoarthritis patients: the views of patients, general practitioners and practice nurses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006, 7: 48-10.1186/1471-2474-7-48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rosemann T, Joest K, Körner T, Schaefert R, Heiderhoff M, Szecsenyi J: How can the practice nurse be more involved in the care of the chronically ill? The perspectives of GPs, patients and practice nurses. BMC Fam Pract. 2006, 7: 14-10.1186/1471-2296-7-14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Andersson SJ, Lindberg G, Troein M: What shapes GPs' work with depressed patients? A qualitative interview study. Fam Pract. 2002, 19: 623-631. 10.1093/fampra/19.6.623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scientific Software Development: ATLAS.ti – the Knowledge Workbench. 19-5-2004, [http://www.atlasti.de/]
- Pope C, Mays N: Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995, 311: 42-45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Malterud K: Shared understanding of the qualitative research process. Guidelines for the medical researcher. Fam Pract. 1993, 10: 201-206. 10.1093/fampra/10.2.201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berardi D, Menchetti M, Cevenini N, Scaini S, Versari M, De Ronchi D: Increased recognition of depression in primary care. Psychother Psychosom. 2005, 74: 225-230. 10.1159/000085146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klinkman M, Coyne J, Gallo S, Schwenk T: False positives, false negatives, and the validity of the diagnosis of Major Depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 1998, 7: 451-461. 10.1001/archfami.7.5.451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kroenke K, Taylor-Vaisey A, Dietrich AJ, Oxman TE: Interventions to improve provider diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders in primary care: A critical review of the literature. Psychosomatics. 2000, 41: 39-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Primary care staff and clinical-family relationships are critical elements in efforts to improve quality of care. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Research Activities. 2002, 257: 4-5.Google Scholar
- Carney P, Eliassen S, Wolford G, Badger L, Dietrich A: How physician communication influences recognition of depression in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1999, 48: 958-964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meredith LS, Orlando M, Humphrey N, Camp P, Sherbourne CD: Are better ratings of the patient-clinician relationship associated with higher quality care for depression?. Med Care. 2001, 39: 349-3. 10.1097/00005650-200104000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klingenberg A, Bahrs D, Szecsenyi J: Wie beurteilen Patienten Hausarzte und ihre Praxen? Deutsche Ergebnisse der europaischen Studie zur Bewertung hausarztlicher Versorgung durch Patienten (EUROPEP). [How do patients evaluate general practice? German results from the European Project on Patient Evaluation of General Practice Care (EUROPEP)]. ZaeFQ. 1999, 93: 437-45.Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/190/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.