Skip to main content
Download PDF

Hospice utilization during the SARS outbreak in Taiwan

BMC Health Services Research volume 6, Article number: 94 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic threw the world into turmoil during the first half of 2003. Many subsequent papers have addressed its impact on health service utilization, but few have considered palliative (hospice) care. The aim of the present study was to describe changes in hospice inpatient utilization during and after the SARS epidemic in 2003 in Taiwan.

Methods

The data sources were the complete datasets of inpatient admissions during 2002 and 2003 from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Before-and-after comparisons of daily and monthly utilizations were made. Hospice analyses were limited to those wards that offered inpatient services throughout these two years. The comparisons were extended to total hospital bed utilization and to patients who were still admitted to hospice wards during the peak period of the SARS epidemic.

Results

Only 15 hospice wards operated throughout the whole of 2002 and 2003. In 2003, hospice utilization began to decrease in the middle of April, reached a minimum on 25 May, and gradually recovered to the level of the previous November. Hospices showed a more marked reduction in utilization than all hospital beds (e.g. -52.5% vs. -19.9% in May 2003) and a slower recovery with a three-month lag. In total, 566 patients were admitted to hospice wards in May/June 2003, in contrast to 818 in May/June 2002. Gender, age and diagnosis distributions did not differ.

Conclusion

Hospice inpatient utilization in Taiwan was indeed more sensitive to the emerging epidemic than general inpatient utilization. A well-balanced network with seamless continuity of care should be ensured.

Peer Review reports

Background

The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic threw the world into turmoil during the first half of 2003 [1, 2]. Since then, thousands of papers had been devoted to this novel virus, many have addressed its impact on health service utilization [3–8], but few have focused on hospice palliative care [9]. When the fears declined and utilization data became available, we were able retrospectively to review the broad hospice situation during the SARS epidemic in Taiwan, one of the most heavily affected countries.

The first inpatient hospice ward in Taiwan was established in 1990 [10]. By the end of 2004, there were 26 hospice wards with 424 beds and 42 units for hospice home care [11]. All hospice care programs in Taiwan until then had been hospital-based. A universal health insurance program started in Taiwan in 1995 and now covers nearly all inhabitants (21,984,415 beneficiaries at the end of 2003, equivalent to a coverage rate of 97.3%) [12]. During the early years of National Health Insurance (NHI), admission to hospice wards was reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis, as in acute wards. The payment for services of nurses and other ancillary staff was included in the room fee. This method of reimbursement put the intensive-care hospice at a great disadvantage. After years of negotiation, the Bureau of National Health Insurance began to implement a special program for hospice wards in July 2000. The payment changed to a per-diem lump sum and was generally improved. Any hospice ward was free to join the new program, which also had stricter requirements on personnel and facilities.

The first case of SARS in Taiwan was identified on 14 March 2003 [13]. Until 21 April, only 28 probable SARS cases were reported. After 22 April, the incidence abruptly increased and was associated primarily with health-care settings. Moreover, in many cities and regions of Taiwan, the infection spread from one hospital to several others. Five hospitals had to discontinue routine or emergency services totally. Stricter quarantine was implemented after 28 April. Real panic ensued in Taiwanese society. The last probable case was reported on 14 June, and Taiwan was removed from the list of SARS-affected countries by the World Health Organization on 5 July 2003 [14]. In retrospect, the SARS epidemic in Taiwan had involved 668 probable cases with severe deterioration of pulmonary function and 181 deaths [15].

The aim of the current study was to describe the changes in hospice inpatient utilization during and after the SARS epidemic within the NHI program in Taiwan. Such quantitative analyses might provide evidence for discussion in health policy-making and help with effective planning in the future.

Methods

Data sources

In 1999, the Bureau of National Health Insurance began to release all claims data to the public in electronic form under the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) project [16]. Since then, dozens of extracted datasets have been available to researchers. The identification numbers of persons and healthcare facilities in the datasets have been encrypted to protect privacy. The encryption is consistent across all datasets so that longitudinal comparisons are feasible. However, no linkage with external databases and medical records was possible. Researchers who wish to access NHIRD datasets must sign a user agreement form indicating that they will obey relevant regulations and acknowledge the NHIRD in their publications.

In the current study, we used the complete inpatient admission datasets from 2000 to 2003 (DD{2000..2003} {01..12}.DAT). Each record in the admission file contains the data for one admission, including the re-coded identification numbers of the patient and hospital, type of benefits, dates of admission and discharge, five discharge diagnoses, and items of expenditure. We also used the registry for contracted medical facilities (HOSB2003.DAT) to identify the accreditation levels and locations of the hospitals with hospice wards, and the registry for contracted beds (BED2003.DAT) to compute the number of beds in each hospice ward.

Study design

To begin with, we extracted the admission records for hospice wards according to the type of benefit. Twenty-five hospitals had participated in the NHI hospice program: from 12 hospitals in July 2000 to 21 in December 2003, during which time 4 hospitals dropped out. After computing the utilization of hospice beds for each day, we found that there were indeed cyclic fluctuations around the year. Because data were only available for a few years and the numbers of hospice wards and beds had increased over time, it did not seem appropriate to deploy a conventional time series analysis, e.g. the autoregressive integrated moving average method [3, 4, 17]. Instead, we performed a before-and-after comparison of monthly utilizations between 2002 and 2003 and plotted daily utilization. The analysis was limited to those hospitals that offered hospice inpatient services throughout the whole of 2002 and 2003. Because insurance claims were normally submitted after the patients' discharge, the claims for the final month of the available datasets contained no data for patients who were still hospitalised at the end of that month. Thus, the data for December 2003 were not analysed.

We extended the before-and-after comparison to the totality of hospital beds within the National Health Insurance to contrast with the utilization of hospice wards. To indicate the situation in individual hospice wards, we computed the changes of utilization in each hospice ward separately during and after the SARS epidemic. These data were further stratified by the accreditation levels and locations of the hospice wards. We also analysed the patients who were admitted to hospice wards during the peak period of the SARS epidemic (i.e. May/June 2003) and compared them with the patients admitted during the same months of the previous year. This latter analysis included age, sex, and primary diagnosis at discharge and was also stratified by ward accreditation level and location.

Data processing and statistical analysis

The Perl programming language (version 5.8.7) was used for the extraction and computation of data [18]. The unit of hospice/hospital ward utilization was the patient-day, i.e. each claimed day of hospitalisation. Conventionally, the discharge day is not counted as a hospitalisation day in insurance claims. For example, if a patient was hospitalised from 1 January to 7 January, the per-diem fees for physician and room services were payable only from 1 January to 6 January. We used two-sample t-tests to compare the age distributions of those admitted in May/June 2003 with those admitted in May/June 2002, and Pearson's chi-square test to compare the sex and diagnosis distributions. We also used one-way analysis of variance to compare the age distributions of those admitted in May/June 2003 to hospice wards of different accreditation levels and locations. A P-value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (Release 13.0 for Windows, 2004, SPSS Inc., Chicago).

Results

Only 15 hospitals in Taiwan offered hospice inpatient services throughout the whole of 2002 and 2003. The numbers of patients in these wards on each day of 2002 and 2003 are shown in Figure 1. In 2002, the maximal capacity was 214 patients per day (on 11 July) and the regular utilization was between 150 and 200 patients per day. Two noticeable troughs in February 2002 and January 2003 corresponded with the Chinese New Year holidays, which are based on the lunar calendar. In 2003, hospice utilization began to decrease in the middle of April, reached a minimum on 25 May (69 patients), and gradually recovered to the level of the previous November. The trend in utilization over 15 hospice wards during 2003 was parallel to that in all hospitals, except that the hospice wards showed a more marked reduction in utilization during the peak period of the SARS epidemic (-52.5% vs. -19.9% in May 2003) and a slower recovery with a three-month lag (Figure 2).

Figure 1
figure1

Number of patients per day in 15 hospice wards during 2002 (non-SARS year) and 2003 (SARS year).

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Differences between aggregate patient-days of hospice beds and all kinds of hospital beds in 15 hospitals during each month of 2003 compared with the corresponding months of 2002. Difference = ((patient-days in a month of 2003) – (patient-days in a month of 2002))/(patient-days in a month of 2002).

Full size image

The influence of the SARS epidemic on hospice utilization varied widely among the 15 wards studied (Table 1). Even during the peak period of the epidemic, three wards showed growth in utilization and one was unchanged, while two seemed temporarily to cease operating. The recovery also varied from ward to ward: two months after the epidemic, four wards still showed a reduction in utilization of more than 20%.

Table 1 Differences between bimonthly patient-days in individual hospice wards during 2003 and those at the same periods in 2002
Full size table

In total, 566 patients were admitted to hospice wards in May/June 2003, in contrast to 818 admissions in May/June 2002. The gender, age and diagnosis distributions did not differ between patient groups in these two years (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics of hospice patients admitted during the peak period of the severe acute respiratory syndrome and one year earlier
Full size table

Of the 15 wards, eight were located in academic medical centres, six in metropolitan hospitals, and one in a local community hospital. As to geographic location, six were located in northern Taiwan, two in the middle of the country, six in the south and one in the east (Table 3).

Table 3 Distribution of hospice wards by accreditation level and geographic location (aggregate numbers of hospice beds in parentheses)
Full size table

During the peak period of the SARS epidemic, hospice wards in academic medical centres were affected more severely than those in metropolitan hospitals (-60.4% vs. -38.4% in May 2003), whereas the one in a local community hospital was only slightly affected (-3.2% in May 2003) (Figure 3). Hospice wards in northern and middle Taiwan were affected more severely than those in southern Taiwan (-66.0% and -71.8% vs. -36.8% in May 2003), whereas the one in eastern Taiwan showed increased utilization (+15.4% in May 2003) (Figure 4).

Figure 3
figure3

Differences between aggregate patient-days in hospice wards during each month of 2003 and those of the corresponding months of 2002, stratified by accreditation level. Difference = ((patient-days in a month of 2003) – (patient-days in a month of 2002))/(patient-days in a month of 2002).

Full size image
Figure 4
figure4

Differences between aggregate patient-days in hospice wards during each month of 2003 and those of the corresponding months of 2002, stratified by geographic location. Difference = ((patient-days in a month of 2003) – (patient-days in a month of 2002))/(patient-days in a month of 2002).

Full size image

Among the 566 patients admitted to hospice wards during the peak of the epidemic, the gender and age distributions did not differ among patient groups in academic medical centres, metropolitan hospitals or the local community hospital (Table 4). The gender distribution did not differ among patient groups in different locations, but the age distribution did (Table 5).

Table 4 Characteristics of hospice patients admitted during the peak period (May/June 2003) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome, stratified by accreditation level
Full size table
Table 5 Characteristics of hospice patients admitted during the peak period (May/June 2003) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome, stratified by location
Full size table

Discussion

Most studies of the impact of SARS on health service utilization have been confined to a single facility. Our study, based on nationwide data, gave a complete and exact picture of hospice utilization. The hospice, also known as palliative care, has usually been considered as conservative and non-acute. One could well imagine that the use of hospice services would be compromised because of fears during uncertain times. Our findings support this view. Hospice inpatient utilization in Taiwan was indeed more sensitive to the emerging epidemic than general inpatient utilization. Not only was the reduction sharper, but also recovery to the previous level took longer.

Although it cannot be classed as acute care, hospice care is unlike elective surgery, which can put patients on a long waiting list. Hospice care is provided to terminally ill patients whose life expectancy is limited. During the SARS epidemic in Taiwan, many terminally ill patients might have been suspended or deterred from professional hospice care because well-organized patient transfers did not exist. Health consequences might not be a big issue among hospice patients. Instead, quality of care and humanity are the major concerns.

During the peak period of the SARS epidemic, i.e. May/June 2003, the number of admissions to the 15 hospice wards in our study decreased to 69% of those in the previous year, and the utilization in patient-day units to 54%. This meant that some patients might have been discharged earlier. It remains unknown whether the decrease of utilization was due to patients' voluntary decisions or to manoeuvring by the hospitals. According to our personal experiences, both patients' decisions and hospital policies could have played a role. On the patient's side, the family might have a major part in the decision about hospice care, because weak terminally ill patients are usually dependent on their families. The fear of SARS might have come from the family rather than the patient. Only interviews with the patients and their caregivers could give a satisfactory answer.

The aggregate utilization of the 15 hospice wards during the peak period of the SARS epidemic in Taiwan was lower than that during the Chinese New Year holidays (Figure 1). Like Christmas to Christians, the Chinese New Year holidays are important to most Chinese as occasions of family reunion. Usually hospital activities are kept to a minimum on these days. The daily curve of hospice utilization vividly illustrated the impact of the SARS epidemic.

As for the patients admitted to hospice wards during the SARS epidemic, the insurance claims used in our study could only offer three reliable variables (gender, sex and discharge diagnoses), which showed no differences. Because about 60% of cancer patients in Taiwan die at home [19], we could not calculate the survival time of every hospice patient as a proxy of disease severity from our closed datasets.

Although Taiwan had been declared a SARS-affected country, not every hospice ward was equally influenced by this epidemic. The impact was related to the locations and accreditation levels of the hospitals with hospice wards: the bigger the hospital, the stronger the SARS impact. Other features, e.g. the admission policy and mission of each hospital during the SARS epidemic, might have played a role. Hospices in middle Taiwan were most severely affected; only the hospice in eastern Taiwan was negligibly affected. The main island of Taiwan has 22 cities and counties. The probable cases of SARS appeared mainly in Taipei city (in northern Taiwan), Taipei county (northern), Taoyuan county (northern), Kaohsiung city (southern) and Kaohsiung county (southern) [13]. On 26 March 2003, a resident of Hong Kong's Amoy Gardens flew to Taiwan and travelled to Taichung (in middle Taiwan). That man's brother in Taiwan became Taiwan's first SARS fatality [15]. This might partly explain the impact of SARS in middle Taiwan (Figure 4).

Because the NHIRD prohibited any break of confidentiality, we did not continue the analysis hierarchically from geographic location to accreditation level. Instead, we displayed the aggregate data in location and level separately. However, hierarchical modelling could be used to examine the factors associated with reduced utilization and would help construct a real-time and on-line analytical processing system for nationwide surveillance during an outbreak of an infectious disease.

A striking feature of the SARS epidemic in Taiwan was that 56.3% of SARS patients were hospital-related [15]. In retrospect, it was reasonable and preferable to reduce hospitalisations. A similar phenomenon was observed simultaneously in childbirth in Taiwan [7]. Many deliveries were shifted from secondary and tertiary care hospitals to primary clinics. The question remains whether continuity and quality of care could be ensured. It is unlikely that patients shifted from the 15 hospices in the current study to the other six (unanalysed) hospices, which either quitted or joined the hospice program after the SARS epidemic. However, the possibility of patient flow to other non-hospice wards cannot be excluded. Our claims-based study could not determine whether the needs of patients with terminal illnesses were met during the epidemic, and threw no light on the psychological impact on patients and healthcare workers [20].

Conclusion

The SARS epidemic will not be the last to affect humankind. The lessons for the hospice society in Taiwan and for the world might be to distribute services into well-balanced networks, e.g. hospice care at home (through visits by physicians and nurses), shared hospice care in hospitals (i.e. providing hospice care in non-hospice wards), and hospice care at independent hospices in the community. A seamless continuity of care between facilities should be ensured at all times.

Abbreviations

NHI:

National Health Insurance

NHIRD:

National Health Insurance Research Database

SARS:

severe acute respiratory syndrome

References

  1. 1.

    Christian MD, Poutanen SM, Loutfy MR, Muller MP, Low DE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 38: 1420-1427. 10.1086/420743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Leung GM, Hedley AJ, Ho LM, Chau P, Wong IO, Thach TQ, Ghani AC, Donnelly CA, Fraser C, Riley S, Ferguson NM, Anderson RM, Tsang T, Leung PY, Wong V, Chan JC, Tsui E, Lo SV, Lam TH: The epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the 2003 Hong Kong epidemic: an analysis of all 1755 patients. Ann Intern Med. 2004, 141: 662-673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Boutis K, Stephens D, Lam K, Ungar WJ, Schuh S: The impact of SARS on a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. CMAJ. 2004, 171: 1353-1358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chang HJ, Huang N, Lee CH, Hsu YJ, Hsieh CJ, Chou YJ: The impact of the SARS epidemic on the utilization of medical services: SARS and the fear of SARS. Am J Public Health. 2004, 94: 562-564.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen WK, Cheng YC, Chung YT, Lin CC: The impact of the SARS outbreak on an urban emergency department in Taiwan. Med Care. 2005, 43: 168-172. 10.1097/00005650-200502000-00010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chui AKK, Rao ARN, Chan HLY, Hui AY: Impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on liver transplantation service. Transplant Proc. 2004, 36: 2302-2303. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.08.018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lee CH, Huang N, Chang HJ, Hsu YJ, Wang MC, Chou YJ: The immediate effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic on childbirth in Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2005, 5: 30-10.1186/1471-2458-5-30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lim PA, Ng YS, Tay BK: Impact of a viral respiratory epidemic on the practice of medicine and rehabilitation: severe acute respiratory syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004, 85: 1365-1370. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Leong IY, Lee AO, Ng TW, Lee LB, Koh NY, Yap E, Guay S, Ng LM: The challenge of providing holistic care in a viral epidemic: opportunities for palliative care. Palliat Med. 2004, 18: 12-18. 10.1191/0269216304pm859oa.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lai YL, Su WH: Palliative medicine and the hospice movement in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer. 1997, 5: 348-350. 10.1007/s005200050090.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Distribution of hospice wards and home care in Taiwan (in Chinese). [http://www.kungtai.org.tw/]

  12. 12.

    Bureau of National Health Insurance: National Health Insurance Annual Statistical Report 2003. Taipei. 2004

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Severe acute respiratory syndrome – Taiwan, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003, 52: 461-466.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Use of quarantine to prevent transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome – Taiwan, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003, 52: 680-683.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen KT, Twu SJ, Chang HL, Wu YC, Chen CT, Lin TH, Olsen SJ, Dowell SF, Su IJ, Taiwan SARS Response Team: SARS in Taiwan: an overview and lessons learned. Int J Infect Dis. 2005, 9: 77-85. 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.04.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    National Health Insurance Research Database. 2005, [http://www.nhri.org.tw/nhird/]

  17. 17.

    Earnest A, Chen MI, Ng D, Sin LY: Using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to predict and monitor the number of beds occupied during a SARS outbreak in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005, 5: 36-10.1186/1472-6963-5-36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    ActiveState – ActivePerl free Perl open source binary language distribution – Dynamic Tools for Dynamic Languages. [http://www.activestate.com/Products/ActivePerl/]

  19. 19.

    Chen LK, Hwang SJ, Chen TW, Tsai ST, Chen TJ: In-hospital death of cancer patients in a medical centre in Taiwan: comparison between hospice and acute wards. Palliat Med. 2004, 18: 577-578. 10.1191/0269216304pm912xx.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Person B, Sy F, Holton K, Govert B, Liang A, the NCID/SARS Community Outreach Team: Fear and stigma: the epidemic within the SARS outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004, 10: 358-363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/94/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is based in part on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health and managed by National Health Research Institutes in Taiwan. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health or National Health Research Institutes.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Shih-Pai Road, Section 2, No 201, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan

    Tzeng-Ji Chen, Ming-Hwai Lin & Shinn-Jang Hwang

  2. National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

    Tzeng-Ji Chen, Ming-Hwai Lin & Shinn-Jang Hwang

  3. Department of Public Finance, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Li-Fang Chou

Authors
  1. Tzeng-Ji Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming-Hwai Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li-Fang Chou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shinn-Jang Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tzeng-Ji Chen.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

TJC conceived and carried out the study, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. MHL and LFC participated in the design of the study and helped to perform the statistical analysis as well as to interpret findings. SJH participated in the design and coordination of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, T., Lin, M., Chou, L. et al. Hospice utilization during the SARS outbreak in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res 6, 94 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-94

Download citation

Keywords

  • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
  • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
  • Hospice Care
  • National Health Insurance Research Database
  • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Patient

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us