Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Parent-reported health care expenditures associated with autism spectrum disorders in Heilongjiang province, China

  • Jia Wang1,
  • Xue Zhou1,
  • Wei Xia1,
  • Cai-Hong Sun1,
  • Li-Jie Wu1Email author,
  • Jian-Li Wang2 and
  • Akemi Tomoda3
BMC Health Services Research201212:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-7

Received: 20 April 2011

Accepted: 10 January 2012

Published: 10 January 2012

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the health expenses incurred by families with children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and those expenses' relation to total household income and expenditures.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, health care expenditure data were collected through face-to-face interviews. Expenses included annual costs for clinic visits, medication, behavioral therapy, transportation, and accommodations. Health care costs as a percentage of total household income and expenditures were also determined. The participants included 290 families with ASD children who were treated at the Children Development and Behavior Research Center, Harbin Medical University, China.

Results

Families with ASD children from urban and rural areas had higher per-capita household expenditures by 60.8% and 74.7%, respectively, compared with provincial statistics for 2007. Behavioral therapy accounted for the largest proportion of health expenses (54.3%) for ASD children. In 19.9% of urban and 38.2% of rural families, health care costs exceeded the total annual household income. Most families (89.3% of urban families; 88.1% of rural families) in that province reported higher health care expenditures than the provincial household average.

Conclusion

For families with ASD children, the economic burden of health care is substantially higher than the provincial average.

Keywords

health care expenditure autism spectrum disorders family disease burden

1. Background

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a group of developmental disabilities characterized by pervasive deficits in socialization and communication, as well as unusual behaviors or interests [1]. Children with autism can present a broad range of clinical features including qualitative developmental and neurological abnormalities, as well as sensory/motor symptoms, epilepsy, cognitive dysfunction, severe impairments in adaptive behavior, and aberrant regulation of emotion [1, 2]. ASD include autism, Asperger syndrome and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). The impairments range from mild to severe.

China has the world's largest population. Since four children with autism were first identified in Nanjing in 1982, interest in autism has increased. The number of newly diagnosed cases of ASD seeking medical services has increased substantially. Nevertheless, a lack of nationwide epidemiologic data on ASD persists in China. In some regional studies conducted in China, the prevalence of autism was 1.10 per 1000 children in the city of Tianjin (2004), 1.25 per 1000 children in Jiangsu province (2001), 1.34 per 1000 children in Beijing (2007) and 2.27 per 1000 in Harbin city (2010) [36]. It has since been estimated that there are about 7.8 million individuals with ASD in China, with more affected boys than girls [7].

Some medications including melatonin and risperidone have been used to treat ASD [8, 9]. However, behavioral therapy is the most widely used therapeutic method for improving social and language skills in children with ASD [10]. Behavioral intervention plays an important role in ASD rehabilitation. With improved awareness and knowledge of ASD, Chinese parents of ASD children have recognized that it is important for their children to receive early intervention and behavioral therapy. Consequently, the number of parents seeking early intervention is increasing rapidly.

Public rehabilitation services in China are limited. Institutions involved in ASD behavioral therapy and training include medical and educational institutes and The China Disabled Person's Federation (CDPF). Private services are a supplementary component of the system. Most of the private services have been established and managed by the parents of ASD children.

The economic burden and the impacts on health and social integration associated with ASD are considerable. According to a UK study [11], the costs of supporting children with ASD were estimated as £2.7 billion per year. For adults, these costs amount to £25 billion per year. The lifetime cost was estimated as £1.23 million for individuals with ASD and intellectual disability and £0.80 million for individuals with ASD but without intellectual disability [11]. Similarly, in 2003, a US study estimated that the annual expenditure per autistic child for early medical service was $35,000 [12]. The US government has invested $3.2 million for children with autism to support expenses incurred for children aged 3-7 years old [12]. However, financial support from the government for children with ASD children is in a very early stage in China. The CDPF has planned to establish early rehabilitation and training settings for autistic children in 31 cities in China, but few developed cities provide financial support to the families involved. One obstacle is the lack of basic descriptive data about current costs of treatment of ASD in China and how these costs relate to total household income and expenditures.

To rectify this situation, we conducted the current study in Heilongjiang province, which is located in northeastern China. Its total area is 473,000 km2, with a population of 38.24 million, of which 46.1% reside in urban areas and 53.9% in rural areas. In terms of gross domestic product, Heilongjiang was ranked 15th among 31 provinces in 2007. Generally, families in urban areas have higher income than families in rural areas in China. Therefore, it is possible that the per-capita health care expenditure and its share of household income differ between rural and urban areas. The provincial government is currently unable to provide sufficient financial support for rehabilitation therapy for all ASD children. In fact, the provincial government has limited economic assistance to families with low income. Nevertheless, most families with ASD children face significant economic stress. Accordingly, understanding the economic costs and burdens associated using services in this population will provide a strong basis for policy development.

In this study, we estimated and compared health care expenditures for physician visits and rehabilitation therapy incurred by families with ASD children in Heilongjiang province, overall and according to rural or urban areas. Data indicating health care costs as a percentage of household income and overall annual expense were collected and analyzed.

2. Methods

2.1. Study population

Parents whose children were diagnosed with and treated for ASD at the Children Development and Behavior Research Center (CDBRC), Harbin Medical University, were enrolled for this study. The CDBRC is a specialized and authorized institution that provides counseling, evaluation, training, rehabilitation, and health education for children with developmental disabilities and behavioral disorders. From May 2007 to August 2009, 290 children with ASD had received services provided by the CDBRC. Their parents were included in this study. ASD was diagnosed by pediatricians and psychiatrists according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - IV diagnostic criteria [13]. This study was approved by the ethics review committee of Harbin Medical University.

2.2. Measures

All parents of ASD children who sought services provided by the CDBRC between May 2007 and August 2009 were invited to participate and completed a questionnaire (n = 290), which recorded the following information: per-capita household income in the past year (total household income divided by number of family members), per-capita household expenses, medical experience, behavioral therapy, and health care expenditures related to ASD treatment. Health care expenditures included costs of clinic counseling, diagnosis, behavioral intervention, medication, transportation, and accommodation. We also recorded demographic data for the children and the families, including sex, age, race, family structure, urban/rural areas, employment status, educational levels and developmental quotient (DQ).

The health care burden for the families with ASD children, we compared the household income and health care expenses of these families with provincial statistics for 2007. Data collected and published by the Statistics Bureau of the Central Government and are publicly available (http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2008/indexch.htm).

2.3. Statistical analysis

Per-capita household income and expenditures and health service expenses were analyzed for the overall population and according to urban and rural areas. Specific health care expenses related to consultation, medication, behavioral therapy, transportation, and accommodation during the past 12 months were estimated and compared between families residing in rural and urban areas. Health care costs as a percentage of household income and overall annual expense were collected and analyzed. The percentages were also compared between rural and urban areas and with provincial statistics for 2007.

3. Results

The demographic characteristics of the children who received services at the CDBRC are presented in Table 1. During the study period, 290 children aged between 1.82 and 15.12 years received treatment at the CDBRC. The mean age was 5.44 (SD = 2.43) years old. There were more boys than girls. More families from urban areas participated than families from rural areas. The average DQ of the participants was 52.30 (SD = 16.25), ranging from 18 to 93. The mean age of participants' mothers was 32.10 (SD = 4.41) years old, ranging from 23 to 48 years old; in fathers, the mean age was 33.71 (SD = 4.92) years old, ranging from 23 to 51 years old. The annual average household income was 31880.00 RMB.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of children with ASD and their families

  

n

%

Gender

Male

248

85.5

 

Female

42

14.5

Age

1-3

93

32.1

 

4-6

133

45.9

 

7-9

50

17.2

 

≥ 10

14

4.8

Race/ethnicity

Han Chinese

279

96.2

 

Minority Chinese

11

3.8

Number of children

Single child

255

87.9

 

Non-single child

35

12.1

Family structure

Nuclear family

208

71.7

 

Non-nuclear family

82

28.3

Address

Harbin

99

34.1

 

Other cities

191

65.9

Urban/Rural areas

Urban

209

72.1

 

Rural

81

27.9

Mother's education level

Elementary school

27

9.3

 

Junior high school

97

33.4

 

High school or technical school

68

23.4

 

Vocational college or bachelor's degree

94

32.4

 

Masters degree

4

1.4

Father's education level

Elementary school

17

5.9

 

Junior high school

106

36.6

 

High school or technical school

75

25.8

 

Vocational college or bachelor's degree

85

29.3

 

Masters degree

7

2.4

*Nuclear families consisted of a father, mother, and their children; non-nuclear families included families residing with grandparents.

Table 2 shows the annual per-capita household income and expenses for families with ASD children involved in the study. The per-capita household income of families involved in this study was 12,226.83 RMB and 4628 RMB, respectively, for families in urban and rural areas, whereas the values for the whole province were 10,245.28 RMB and 4132.29 RMB, respectively. Therefore, compared with the 2007 provincial statistics, 40.2% of the families from urban areas and 44.4% of the families from rural areas reported a higher annual per-capita household income.
Table 2

Per-capita household income and expenditure for participating families and comparison with provincial statistics for 2007

 

Urban areas

(RMB)

Rural areas

(RMB)

Per-capita income

  

Per-capita household income

12,226.83

4628.39

Provincial statistics for 2007

10,245.28

4132.29

Per-capita expense

  

Per-capita household expense

10,919.23

7317.41

Provincial statistics for 2007

7519.28

3117.44

Among the families involved in this study, the per-capita household expense was 10,919.23 RMB for those in urban areas and 7317.41 RMB for those in rural areas. Meanwhile, the 2007 provincial statistics showed that the per-capita expenditures of residents in urban and rural areas were 7519.28 RMB and 3117.44 RMB, respectively. Therefore, 60.8% of the families from urban areas and 74.7% of those from rural areas involved in our report described higher per-capita household expenditures than in the overall provincial statistics.

Overall, 60.2% of the participating families reported having spent more than 10,000 RMB on health services related to ASD in the last 12 months. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, the mean annual health service expenditure for children with ASD was 17,292.67 RMB. Of this, 11,072.37 RMB resulted from behavioral therapy, which accounted for 54.3% of all health care-related costs for ASD children. Other costs included outpatient care (1532.44 RMB), prescription medications (1240.65 RMB), and transportation and accommodation (2770.62 RMB). It is particularly interesting that no significant difference was found between urban and rural families in terms of either total household expenditure or health care-related expenditure (Table 3).
Figure 1

Percentages of health care expenditure for various ASD related services.

Table 3

Annual family expenditure on ASD related health services, overall and by residing areas

 

n

Total

Outpatient care

Medicine

Behavioral therapies

Transportation and accommodation

Urban areas

178

17,497.28

1637.53

1420.22

11,089.91

2701.08

Rural areas

68

16,757.06

1257.35

770.59

11,026.47

2952.65

Total

246

17,292.67

1532.44

1240.65

11,072.37

2770.62

Values are means. *Data were missing for 44 families; P > 0.05

As shown in Table 4, the mean percentage of health costs relative to annual family income was 70.5% for families from urban areas, and 128.5% for families from rural areas. We also found that the annual health care costs associated with ASD exceeded the annual family income in 19.9% of urban families and 38.2% of rural families, with 6.8% of urban families and 23.5% of rural families having costs that were two times higher than their annual family income. Among the participating families, the mean percentage of the families' health care expenditure for ASD relative to annual family expenditure was 44.1% in urban areas and 51.1% in rural areas. Comparison with provincial statistics reveals that 89.3% of the families reported a larger share of health care-related costs in overall household expenditures in urban areas and 88.1% in rural areas.
Table 4

Percentages of Health care expenditure in household income and total household expenditure*

 

Mean (%)

Thresholds (%)

N(%)

Per-capita health expenditure as a percentage of per-capita household income

   

Urban

70.5

< 50

94 (53.4)

  

50-100

47 (26.7)

  

100-150

19 (10.8)

  

150-200

4 (2.3)

  

≥ 200

12 (6.8)

Rural

128.5

< 50

21 (30.9)

  

50-100

21 (30.9)

  

100-150

3 (4.4)

  

150-200

7 (10.3)

  

≥ 200

16 (23.5)

Per-capita health care expenditure as a percentage of per-capita household expenses (2007 provincial statistics)

   

Urban

44.1

< 9.7

19 (10.7)

  

≥ 9.7

158 (89.3)

Rural

51.1

< 8.7

8 (11.9)

  

≥ 8.7

59 (88.1)

*Data were missing for 46 families; Compared with provincial statistics for 2007, the per-capita health expenses accounted for 9.7% of all household expenses in urban areas and 8.7% in rural areas.

4. Discussion

Although several studies have examined the prevalence of ASD, very little is known about the costs associated with these disorders or the economic burden on families with ASD children, particularly in China. Results of this study show a considerable economic burden of ASD. All participating families paid for all health care expenses; behavioral therapy accounted for the largest share of these costs. Of paramount concern is that the health care costs related to ASD actually exceeded annual per-capita household income in 19.9 percent of urban families and 38.2 percent of rural families. In fact, majority of families (89.3% of urban and 88.1% of rural areas) reported a higher proportion of ASD-related costs relative to overall household expenditure compared with provincial statistics.

The prevalence of ASD has increased from 4 to 5 per 10000 in 1960s to approximately 1-2% today [1420]. It was estimated that there were about 67,000,000 ASD cases in the world (http://www.autismspeaks.org/). In the developed countries, ASD is publicly funded; most of the health related expenses are covered by the governments. In China, presently health services for children with ASD are not included in the national health insurance program. Therefore, administrative data related to health service use and expenses are unavailable for ASD children at the national level. Gregory et al. reported that the annual cost of autism for children in the US was $6132, including $3992 for outpatient care, $869 for physician visits, and $971 for prescription medications. Notably, the expenses for children with ASD were higher than those for children without ASD [21]. It was also reported that US families with autistic children spent $613 on out-of-pocket expenses each year, corresponding to 9.0% of total expenditure [22]. This is much lower than the shares of income observed in the present study. Some reports have described that children with autism incurred 2.5 times higher outpatient costs, 2.9 times higher inpatient costs, and 7.6 times higher medication costs than randomly selected children without autism [23]. In terms of special health services, families with autistic children spent more than families in general [24, 25].

Results of the present study show that costs related to behavioral therapies constituted the greatest share of overall ASD related health care costs (54.3%) followed by transportation and accommodation (18.4%), outpatient care (15.9%), and medication (8.2%). Similarly, Ganz et al. reported that behavioral therapies comprised the largest component of direct medical costs in their study conducted in the USA [12]. Wang reported that although the per patient expenditures grew slightly over time, the increased prevalence of ASD may have contributed to the staggering rise in total ASD-associated health care expenditures [26]. We consider that the high share of behavioral therapy costs is reasonable because, as described previously, parents now believe that earlier diagnosis and rehabilitation are particularly important for children with ASD [27] and that behavioral therapies are the key to rehabilitation, especially in children aged 3-6 years [28].

Transportation and accommodation (18.41%) comprised a greater proportion of total health care costs than outpatient costs and consulting (15.94%). This is perhaps not surprising because many of the families did not live in Harbin, where the CDBRC is located. For that reason, they incurred high transportation and accommodation costs. The CDPF has planned to pilot the model of ASD rehabilitation centers in 31 major cities in China and to expand it to other cities if it is successful. The goal of the plan was to ensure that the families with ASD children could seek help and receive services in the areas where they live. As part of it, transportation and other related costs could be reduced, especially for those who live in rural areas.

In developed countries, the costs of ASD services are covered by the governments. In China, the families of ASD children pay the costs of ASD rehabilitation out of their own pockets, which account for a significant proportion of their household income. Since 2006, the CDPF has initiated rehabilitation support programs for ASD for low income families. As part of the program, each ASD child may receive about 10,000 RMB each year to cover the rehabilitation costs. Additionally, the Harbin municipal government has provided 8000 RMB /year to each ASD child on top of the national support since 2010.

Montes reported the average loss of annual income associated with having a child with autism spectrum disorder was $6200 or 14% of their household income [29]. Unfortunately, we cannot compare the health care expenses incurred by the families in this study directly with those of studies conducted in developed countries because of different economic conditions and health insurance policies. Nevertheless, we can evaluate economic burdens based on the health care expenditures as a percentage of family income and expenditure. The per-capita household income of our families was equivalent to the mean provincial income. However, the health care costs for ASD children in some families were greater than their annual income, with costs exceeding twice of the household income in some families. Moreover, health expenditure as a share of total family expenses was much higher for families with ASD children than the provincial level and exceeded the mean proportion for Heilongjiang province in > 80% of families, irrespective of whether they lived in urban or rural areas. Consequently, the families were compelled to reduce their other expenses.

Although no difference was found in health care expenditure between urban and rural families, families from rural areas reported lower income than those from urban areas. Moreover, transportation and accommodation costs were higher for families from rural areas than for those from urban areas. Therefore, the percentage of ASD health care expenditures in total household income for rural families was 1.82 times higher than that for urban families. Consequently, rural families face a greater economic burden than urban families. In fact, many participating families reported using personal savings or private loans to cover the expenses.

This study was consistent with previous studies investigating economic burdens on families with ASD children. Studies in the USA showed that families with ASD children were in desperate need of financial support to gain access to treatment for their ASD children [23, 30]. This burden was often exacerbated because many mothers with ASD children or foster parents were unable to work outside the home as a result of the extensive need for care of their children. Future longitudinal studies are needed to investigate the changes in ASD disease burden and how the changes are related to the prognosis of ASD.

4.1. Study limitations

Some limitations of the study warrant comment. First, this is a single center study. Participants were those who attended the CDBRC. ASD children who received services from private practitioners were not included in our study. Therefore, generalization of the results is limited and caution must be taken when comparing them with results obtained for other regions. However, data about health related costs include not only expenses incurred at the CDBRC, but also the costs related to the services received at other organizations. Second, the data relied on self-reporting, which directly implies that recall and reporting biases are possible. Participants may not be able to remember exactly specific cost items. However, the overall expenses reported by the participants may not deviate significantly from the true expenses. Third, no comparison group consisting of children with other chronic conditions was used for this study. Therefore, we cannot determine whether ASD is associated with greater or lesser costs than other health conditions. Such studies should be included in future research efforts.

5. Conclusion

This study is the first of this kind in China to examine the economic burden of ASD on families. Our findings shed some light on the circumstances faced by families with ASD children. With the rapidly increasing demand for health services for ASD children, the economic burden imposed on their families will become an important social issue. Therefore, future studies should also consider examining family stress, quality of life, and lost income for caregivers in this population. Health services for ASD children should be considered in the future development of medical insurance coverage in China. Currently, the families use their personal savings and loans to cover the costs because health care expenditures exceed the household income in many families. The costs associated with treatment affect their socioeconomic status, causing them to fall below the poverty level, leading to a vicious circle. We believe that more studies are needed in China to understand the impact of ASD on the patients and their families better, and thereby to aid the development of health and insurance policies.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients and their parents for their support and participation. We also thank the personnel at the Children Development and Behavior Research Center of Harbin Medical University for their help in data collection. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30771817).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Children's and Adolescent Health, Public Health College of Harbin Medical University
(2)
Departments of Psychiatry and of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary
(3)
Department of Child Development, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University

References

  1. Canitano R, Luchetti A, Zappella M: Epilepsy electroencephalographic abnormalities, and regression in children with autism. J Child Neurol. 2005, 20: 27-31. 10.1177/08830738050200010401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ghaziuddin M, Ghaziuddin N, Greden J: Depression in persons with autism: implications for research and clinical care. J Autism Dev Disord. 2002, 32: 299-306. 10.1023/A:1016330802348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu J, Yang XL, Jia MX: Survey on Pervasive Developmental Disorder in 2-6 Year-old Children in Beijing. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2007, 05: 290-293.Google Scholar
  4. Wang WH, Zhai LW, Zheng L: Epidemiological investigation of autism children of Jiangsu province. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science. 2003, 12: 173-175.Google Scholar
  5. Zhang X, Ji CY, Li JS: The investigation of autism in children aged 2 to six years old in Tianjin. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health. 2004, 15: 206-208.Google Scholar
  6. Cong Y, Wei X, Cai-Hong S, Yan-Juan Zh, Li L, Xue Zh, Li-Jie W: Survey on autistic spectrum disorder in 2 to 6 years old children in Harbin city. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2010, 18: 750-753.Google Scholar
  7. Wu BL, Zou XB, Xu X: Autism: from Genomics to clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Pediatrics. 2008, 04: 241-246.Google Scholar
  8. Ivy M, Andersen , JoAnna K, Susan G, McGrew , Beth A, Malow : Melatonin for Insomnia in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Child Neurology. 2008, 23: 482-485. 10.1177/0883073807309783.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Munarriz R, Bennett L, Goldstein I: Risperidone in children with autism and serious behavioral problems. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 314-321. 10.1056/NEJMoa013171.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarbrink K, Knapp M: The economic impact of autism in Britain. Autism. 2001, 5: 7-22. 10.1177/1362361301005001002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Knapp M, Romeo R, Beecham J: Economic cost of autism in the UK. Autism. 2009, 13: 317-336. 10.1177/1362361309104246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ganz ML: The lifetime distribution of the incremental societal costs of autism. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007, 161: 343-349. 10.1001/archpedi.161.4.343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 1994, American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, FourthGoogle Scholar
  14. Fombonne E: Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. Pediatr Res. 2009, 65: 591-598. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819e7203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kogan , Blumberg SJ, Schieve LA, Boyle CA, Perrin JM, Ghandour RM, Singh GK, Strickland BB, Trevathan E, van Dyck PC: Prevalence of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder among children in the US, 2007. Pediatrics. 2009, 124: 1395-1403. 10.1542/peds.2009-1522.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009, 58: 1-20.Google Scholar
  17. Baird G, Simonoff E, Pickles A, Chandler S, Loucas T, Meldrum D, Charman T: Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Lancet. 2006, 368: 210-215. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69041-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Baron CS, Scott FJ, Allison C, Williams J, Bolton P, Matthews FE, Brayne C: Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study. Br J Psychiatry. 2009, 194: 500-509. 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Brugha TS, McManus S, Bankart J, Scott F, Purdon S, Smith J, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Meltzer H: Epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders in adults in the community in England. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011, 68: 459-465. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim YS, Leventhal BL, Koh YJ, Fombonne E, Laska E, Lim EC, Cheon KA, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Lee H, Song DH, Grinker RR: Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Total Population Sample. Am J Psychiatry. 2011, 168: 904-912. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10101532.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Curran AL, Sharples PM, White C, Knapp M: Time costs of caring for children with severe disabilities compared with caring for children without disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol D. 2001, 43: 529-533. 10.1017/S0012162201000962.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Liptak GS, Stuart T, Auinger P: Health care utilization and expenditures for children with autism: data from U.S. national samples. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006, 36: 871-879. 10.1007/s10803-006-0119-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Croen LA, Najjar DV, Ray GT, Lotspeich L, Bernal P: A comparison of health care utilization and costs of children with and without autism spectrum disorders in a large group-model health plan. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: e1203-1211. 10.1542/peds.2006-0127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kogan MD, Strickland BB, Blumberg SJ, Singh GK, Perrin JM, Dyck PC: A national profile of the health care experiences and family impact of autism spectrum disorder among children in the United States, 2005-2006. Pediatrics. 2008, 122: e1149-1158. 10.1542/peds.2008-1057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Montes G, Halterman JS: Child care problems and employment among families with preschool-aged children with autism in the United States. Pediatrics. 2008, 122: e202-208. 10.1542/peds.2007-3037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang L, Leslie DL: Health care expenditures for children with autism spectrum disorders in Medicaid. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010, 49: 1165-1171.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris SL, Handleman JS: Age and IQ at intake as predictors of placement for young children with autism: a four- to six-year follow-up. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000, 30: 137-142. 10.1023/A:1005459606120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Howard JS, Sparkman CR, Cohen HG, Green G, Stanislaw H: A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism. Res Dev Disabil. 2005, 26: 359-383. 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Montes G, Halterman JS: Association of childhood autism spectrum disorders and loss of family income. Pediatrics. 2008, 121: e821-6. 10.1542/peds.2007-1594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Peele PB, Lave JR, Kelleher KJ: Exclusions and limitations in children's behavioral health care coverage. Psychiatr Serv. 2002, 53: 591-594. 10.1176/appi.ps.53.5.591.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/7/prepub

Copyright

© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.