Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: How protective is cervical cancer screening against cervical cancer mortality in developing countries? The Colombian case

Original Submission
25 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nancy Breen
9 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Magdalena Grce
15 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Magdalena Grce
5 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nancy Breen
11 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nancy Breen
25 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
9 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive
Resubmission - Version 8
9 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
16 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
16 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-270

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page