Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nancy Breen |
9 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magdalena Grce |
15 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magdalena Grce |
5 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nancy Breen |
11 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nancy Breen |
25 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
1 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
9 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Luz Angela Choconta-Piraquive |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
9 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
16 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-270 |
You can find further information about peer review here.