Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Cost-consequence analysis of computer vision-based skin prick tests: implications for cost containment in Switzerland

Original Submission
26 Jan 2024 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Jean Pierre Uwitonze
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Apr 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Apr 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Apr 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Göran Petersson
28 May 2024 Author responded Author comments - Jean Pierre Uwitonze
Resubmission - Version 4
28 May 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Göran Petersson
17 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Jul 2024 Author responded Author comments - Jean Pierre Uwitonze
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Jul 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Aug 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Göran Petersson
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
13 Aug 2024 Editorially accepted
26 Aug 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12913-024-11433-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page