Peer Review reports
From: Does randomised evidence alter clinical practise? The react qualitative study
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 May 2024 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 May 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Bethune |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 May 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 May 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Bruening |
24 May 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
26 May 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
6 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Bethune |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
7 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Bethune |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
7 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Bethune |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Bethune |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
27 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Bethune |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
27 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
8 Jul 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Bethune |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
8 Jul 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
10 Jul 2024 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jul 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12913-024-11305-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.