Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Exploring clinical specialists’ perspectives on the future role of AI: evaluating replacement perceptions, benefits, and drawbacks

Original Submission
22 Sep 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Oct 2023 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Daniyal
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Oct 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Nov 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Nov 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Dec 2023 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Daniyal
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Dec 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Dec 2023 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Daniyal
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Dec 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Dec 2023 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Daniyal
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Dec 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Feb 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Daniyal
Resubmission - Version 7
13 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 7
14 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Daniyal
Resubmission - Version 8
14 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 8
16 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Daniyal
Resubmission - Version 9
16 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
29 Mar 2024 Editorially accepted
9 May 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12913-024-10928-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page