Skip to main content

Table 5 Intervention and time effects from adjusted models for community survey and patient cohort outcomes

From: The role of a community conversation intervention in reducing stigma related to lower limb lymphoedema in Northern Ethiopia

Community survey (N = 1617)

Comparison

Coefficient

95% C.I

p-value

Model ICC

95% C.I

Stigmatizing attitudes a

CC vs. Control

0.407

(0.187, 0.627)

< 0.001

0.26

(0.18, 0.34)

T1 vs T0

-0.700

(-0.848, -0.553)

< 0.001

Treat × Time

-0.322

(-0.599, -0.046)

0.022

Social distance b

CC vs. Control

-0.187

(-0.979, 0.605)

0.644

0.33

(0.27, 0.39)

T1 vs T0

-1.442

(-1.890, -0.993)

< 0.001

Treat × Time

0.944

(0.049, 1.840)

0.039

Knowledge a

CC vs. Control

0.058

(-0.165, 0.281)

0.608

0.28

(0.22, 0.35)

T1 vs T0

0.850

(0.701, 0.998)

< 0.001

Treat × Time

-0.438

(-0.703, -0.172)

0.001

Patient cohort ( N  = 289)

 Social support d

CC vs. Control

-0.290

(-0.782, 0.202)

0.248

0.19

(0.09, 0.35

T1 vs T0

-0.061

(-0.428, 0.306)

0.744

 Experienced stigma c

CC vs. Control

0.110

(0.027, 0.193)

0.009

0.11

(0.03, 0.36)

T1 vs T0

-0.241

(-0.297, -0.186)

< 0.001

 Internalized stigma c

CC vs. Control

1.764

(0.717, 2.812)

0.001

< 0.001

 

T1 vs T0

-3.650

(-4.544, -0.276)

< 0.001

  1. aAdjusted for occupation and educational attainment
  2. bAdjusted for access to health information score, sex and occupation
  3. cAdjusted for age and educational attainment
  4. dAdjusted for educational attainment and relative income