Skip to main content

Table 1 Guiding framework for school-based speech-language services with recommended and promising indicators

From: Core outcomes for speech-language services in Ontario schools: a group concept mapping study and guiding framework

Outcome

Recommended indicators

(rated important and feasible)

Promising indicators

(rated important but less feasible)

Classroom-based services

children’s goals are personalized

children’s goals are constantly updated to reflect progress

SLP supports complement coursework and classroom learning

SLP supports and techniques work in a busy classroom environment

each school has a consistent, assigned SLP

Holistic approach

the school works as a team to support each child’s communication development

the school is an inclusive place that supports students with all needs

each school receives SLP services tailored to the school’s needs

the school has the staff needed to support the needs of all children

Support for teachers

teachers pinpoint specific student needs in collaboration with SLP

teachers can access SLPs directly with questions or concerns

teachers use SLP strategies and recommendations in the classroom

teachers develop strategies to support communication development in the classroom

teachers develop skills and techniques to support specific students

teachers can use techniques independently after concrete demonstration, modelling, or training

teachers feel confident in their abilities to support students

teachers learn about their students’ specific communication needs

teachers are provided with the right equipment to support their students

teachers can access professional development opportunities via the SLPs

Care coordination

children with greater needs spend more time with SLPs and in SLP programming

SLP programming for each student is tailored and individualized

SLP recommendations and suggestions are not overly complicated

SLPs advocate to meet children’s needs

children who need SLP supports are identified very early

resources are carefully matched to children’s needs and skills

communication challenges are identified and not confused with behavioural concerns

children’s supports are carefully matched with their needs

children receive consistent, frequent, individualized classroom-based supports

all children with needs receive services, and not just a subset

children do not need a formal diagnosis to access supports

supports are implemented very early, near when children enter school

Accessible services

SLPs can access specialty training to support children with unique needs

resources are allocated to provide maximum impact

SLP supports and services are appropriately funded

waitlists are minimized

gatekeeping and obstacles to supports are removed or reduced

Family supports

parents hear a consistent and unified message from teachers and SLPs

families know about all SLP recommendations

families feel included in decision-making

families feel supported by the school professionals

appropriate services are fully supported by administration and policy

families learn SLP strategies to use at home

Student success

children are more confident and independent

children enjoy the supports they receive from SLPs

children who receive supports do not feel different or singled out

children communicate more easily and willingly in class

children are able to bring together multiple skills to communicate, read, and write

children engage socially with their classmates

children find SLP supports helpful

children settle in and become more comfortable in the classroom

children use strategies and techniques taught by SLPs

children have better self-esteem

children can eventually participate in society and gain employment

children do not feel pressured or intimidated by SLP activities

children have greater quality of life

children understand others’ communication

others understand the child’s communication

children demonstrate improvement on assessments of specific communication skills

children learn how to include their peers with communication difficulties

  1. The local term SLP (speech-language pathologist or speech-language pathology) was used in the statements