Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Patients’ perspectives on quality and patient safety failures: lessons learned from an inquiry into transvaginal mesh in Australia

Original Submission
17 Nov 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mina Motamedi
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amali U Lokugamage
3 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Mina Motamedi
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 6
22 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Mina Motamedi
Resubmission - Version 7
22 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 7
22 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Mina Motamedi
Resubmission - Version 8
22 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
27 Feb 2024 Editorially accepted
8 Apr 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12913-024-10791-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page