Skip to main content

Table 2 Ranking of main themes of open science affecting research processes in the healthcare system

From: Design and validation of a conceptual model regarding impact of open science on healthcare research processes

Rank

Main themes

Importance

Sum total/ percentage

Collective agreement/ percentage

Very- low (F/P)

Low (F/P)

Medium (F/P)

Much (F/P)

Very- much (F/P)

1

Increasing trust factors in research outputs

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

5 (8/20)

19 (2/79)

24 (100)

24 (100)

Mechanism and guidelines of open research

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

8 (3/33)

16 (7/66)

24 (100)

24 (100)

Promoting compliance with ethical principles in the research process

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

5 (8/20)

19 (2/79)

24 (100)

24 (100)

Open research evaluation process

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

7 (2/29)

17 (8/70)

24 (100)

24 (100)

2

The formation of extensive scientific communication

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (2/4)

6 (25)

17 (8/70)

24 (100)

23 (95/8)

Managing publishing costs

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (2/4)

6 (25)

17 (8/70)

24 (100)

23 (95/8)

Supportive policies

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (2/4)

3 (5/12)

20 (3/83)

24 (100)

23 (95/8)

Strengthening the infrastructure - management tools and sharing research outputs

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (2/4)

6 (25)

17 (8/70)

24 (100)

23 (95/8)

Output distribution and sharing channels

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (3/8)

6 (25)

16 (7/66)

24 (100)

22 (91/7)

Open access to all types of research output

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (3/8)

5 (8/20)

17 (8/70)

24 (100)

22 (91/6)

Culturalization based on education

0 (0)

1 (2/4)

1 (2/4)

5 (8/20)

17 (8/70)

24 (100)

22 (91/6)

3

Level of access to outputs

1 (2/4)

0 (0)

2 (3/8)

8 (3/33)

13 (2/54)

24 (100)

21 (87/5)

Participation of citizens in research stages

0 (0)

1 (2/4)

2 (3/8)

11 (8/45)

10 (7/41)

24 (100)

21 (87/5)

  1. 1Frequency/Percent