Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the regression analyses with employee-perceived coordination (employees n = 1450; agencies n = 71)

From: How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat study

  

Coordination regressed only with coordination process variables

 

Coordination regressed with coordination process & agency characteristic variables

 

Coordination regressed with coordination process agency characteristic & external factors variables

\( \beta \) [95% CI]

 

\( \beta \) [95% CI]

 

\( \beta \) [95% CI]

Coordination Process

      

Explicit coordination mechanism (Programming & Communication)

      

Presence of standards / guidelines

 

0.00 [-0.03; 0.03]

 

0.01 [-0.03; 0.04]

 

0.01 [-0.02; 0.04]

Case responsible/managers

 

-0.03 [-0.09; 0.02]

 

-0.01 [-0.07; 0.05]

 

0.00 [-0.06; 0.05]

Exchange vessels

 

-0.03 [-0.09; 0.02]

 

-0.03 [-0.08; 0.02]

 

-0.03 [-0.09; 0.02]

Electronic data sharing with physicians: yes

 

0.04 [-0.04; 0.12]

 

0.03 [-0.06; 0.11]

 

0.03 [-0.06; 0.10]

Communication and information exchange

 

0.11* [0.07; 0.14]

 

0.10* [0.06; 0.13]

 

0.10* [0.06; 0.13]

Implicit coordination mechanism (Cognition)

      

Knowledge of the health system

 

-0.09* [-0.12; -0.05]

 

-0.07* [-0.10; -0.03]

 

-0.07* [-0.10; -0.03]

Possibility for continuous education

 

-0.03 [-0.07; 0.01]

 

-0.02 [-0.05; 0.02]

 

-0.01 [-0.05; 0.03]

Role clarity

 

0.10* [0.06; 0.14]

 

0.08* [0.03; 0.11]

 

0.07* [0.03; 0.11]

Mutual respect and trust

 

0.08* [0.04; 0.12]

 

0.07* [0.03; 0.11]

 

0.07* [0.03; 0.11]

Accountability, predictability, common perspective

 

0.21* [0.17; 0.26]

 

0.19* [0.15; 0.24]

 

0.19* [0.14; 0.24]

Agency characteristics

      

Obligation to serve all clients (yes)

   

-0.14* [-0.26; -0.02]

 

-0.14 [-0.31; -0.02]

Range of service

      

 Palliative Care (yes)

   

-0.02 [-0.15; 0.05]

 

-0.02 [-0.11; 0.09]

 Oncological care (yes)

   

-0.01 [-0.09; 0.08]

 

0.00 [-0.07; 0.09]

 Psychiatric care (yes)

   

0.03 [-0.10; 0.16]

 

0.04 [-0.09; 0.16]

 24-hour care service (yes)

   

0.04 [-0.07; 0.15]

 

0.04 [-0.09; 0.13]

 Continuous night care (yes)

   

-0.09 [-0.21; 0.03]

 

-0.05 [-0.16; 0.05]

Percentage of RNs

   

0.00 [0.01; 0.00]

 

0.00 [-0.01; 0.00]

Employment percentage

   

0.00 [0.00; 0.00]

 

0.00 [0.00; 0.00]

Experience in agency

   

0.00 [-0.01; 0.00]

 

0.00 [-0.00; 0.00]

Perceived staffing

   

0.05* [0.01; 0.10]

 

0.06* [0.01; 0.10]

Perceived workload

   

-0.01* [-0.03; 0.00]

 

-0.02* [-0.03; -0.01]

Overtime

   

-0.05* [-0.08; -0.03]

 

-0.05* [-0.07; -0.02]

External factors

      

Reimbursement regulations of residual payments (reference: effective full costs)

      

 agency-specific and predefined costs

     

0.10 [-0.01; 0.18]

 standard costs

     

-0.04 [-0.17; 0.07]

 others

     

-0.00 [-0.22; 0.23]

Client co-payment (reference: No co-payment)

      

 maximum of CHF 7.65 a day

     

-0.06 [-0.18; 0.03]

 up to 20% of HI, with max CHF 15.35/d

     

-0.08 [-0.20; 0.03]

 direct with max. of CHF 15.35/d

     

-0.05 [-0.17; 0.09]

Average hours of care per client

     

0.00 [0.00; 0.00]

Second level variable

      

Homecare agencies

Agency level (Variance [SD])

 

0.01 [0.11]

 

0.01 [0.11]

 

0.01 [0.10]

Residuals (Variance [SD])

 

0.24 [0.48]

 

0.22 [0.47]

 

0.23 [0.48]

Effect size

      

AIC

 

2143.98

 

2183.22

 

2222.33

Marginal R2

 

0.328

 

0.363

 

0.367

Conditional R2

 

0.359

 

0.395

 

0.395

  1. Note. AIC = Akaike Information Criterion, CHF = Swiss Francs, CI = Confidence Interval, HI = health insurance, RN = Registered nurse, SD = Standard Deviation,
  2. α levels of significance = *p <.05, \( \beta \) = coefficient estimate