Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the included studies (= 25)

From: Unfinished nursing care in healthcare settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

Author(s)

Year

Country

Aim(s) & Study Design

Sample & Setting

Period of Data Collection &

Tools

Quality Appraisala

Y/N/U/NA

Albsoul et al. [34]

2022

Jordan

To identify the perceptions of nurses for UNC and the reasons for UNC across three health-care sectors: public, private and university

Cross-sectional survey

672 questionnaires were completed by registered nurses working in medical and surgical wards

10 acute-care hospitals

March–July 2021

MISSCARE survey

6/1/0/1

Alfuqaha et al. [35]

2022

Jordan

To compare perception of nurses about UNC for patients before and during the COVID-19; to examine how nurses differed in terms of the type of UNC and the factors that contributed to it before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Comparative cross-sectional study

260 nurses

Medical/ surgical wards and intensive care units of a tertiary hospital

From November 2019 to May 2020

MISSCARE survey – Arabic version

6/0/1/1

Al Muharraq et al. [36]

2022

Saudi Arabia

To explore the dimensions of UNC and its predictors

Cross-sectional study

604 staff nurses

Inpatient wards in the Jazan area (2 tertiary and 8 general hospitals)

June-September 2021

MISSCARE survey

7/0/0/1

Cengia et al. [37]

2021

Italy

To compare the occurrence and the reasons for UNC among COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients as perceived by nurses

Comparative cross-sectional study

479 registered nurses

22 units (15 COVID-19 and 7 non-COVID-19 units) caring for medical, geriatric, medical-surgical, and orthopaedic patients

November 2020–January 2021

The Unfinished Nursing Care Survey

5/2/0/1

Falk et al. [38]

2022

Sweden

To describe and evaluate reported UNC in the critical care context before and during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic

Comparative cross-sectional study

134 nurses

Critical care units at a university hospital

First period: October 2019

Second period: November 2020

Third period: May 2021

MISSCARE survey – Swedish version

6/0/1/1

Gurková et al. [25]

2021

Czech Republic

To examine the differences in reasons for UNC according to the type of hospitals and wards; to determine the relationship between the reasons for UNC and job satisfaction

Cross-sectional correlational study

371 nurses

4 hospitals: 1 university and 3 regional hospitals (internal medicine and surgical areas in a region)

May–September 2020

MISSCARE survey – Czech version

7/0/0/1

Gurková et al. [39]

2022

Czech Republic

To examine the frequencies, type of UNC, and the associations between nurses’ reported nurse work environment and UNC variables during the COVID-19 pandemic at inpatient medical and surgical wards

Observational cross-sectional study

371 nurses

30 inpatient wards of four acute care hospitals

April–September 2020

MISSCARE survey

6/1/0/1

Hackman et al. [40]

2023

Finland

To describe UNC activities in nursing homes

Descriptive cross-sectional study

2700 care workers

69 nursing homes representing four public organizations

January–May 2021

BERNCA-NH

6/0/1/1

Hosseini et al. [41]

2022

Iran

To investigate UNC and its reasons during the COVID-19 pandemic

Cross-sectional study

135 nurses

COVID-19 units at educational hospitals

Summer 2020

MISSCARE survey – Persian version

5/0/2/1

Jarosz et al. [42]

2022

Poland

To assess the level of rationing care, fatigue, job satisfaction and occupational burnout and the relationship between them

Cross-sectional study

130 nurses

Urology departments at a hospital

March–May 2021

PIRNCA

6/0/1/1

Jarosz & Mlynarska [43]

2023

Poland

To assess the impact of place of residence, forms of postgraduate education, work system, number of patients per one nurse on duty, satisfaction with the financial situation, number of diseases the nurse suffers from on the rationing of nursing care in urology wards

Cross-sectional study

130 nurses

Urology departments at a hospital

March–May 2021

PIRNCA

6/0/1/1

Khrais et al. [44]

2022

Jordan

To examine the relationship between UNC and perceived organizational support, accountability and nurses’ characteristics under the impact of COVID-19

Cross-sectional study

536 nurses

Three public hospitals, three private hospitals and the two teaching hospitals

March–May 2021

MISSCARE survey

7/0/0/1

Labrague et al. [45]

2022

Sultanate of Oman

To examine UNC, overall quality of nursing care, and factors that may influence nurses’ intent to omit or complete required nursing tasks during the pandemic

Cross-sectional study

295 clinical frontline nurses

14 hospitals (seven government and seven private hospitals)

November–December 2020

MISSCARE survey

7/0/0/1

Maghsoud et al. [46]

2022

Iran

To investigate the mediating role of implicit rationing of nursing care, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion in the relationship between workload and quality of nursing care

Cross-sectional study

311 nurses

4 different hospitals

October–December 2020

BERNCA

6/0/1/1

Mingude et al. [47]

2022

Ethiopia

To assess the magnitude, reason and associated factors of UNC

Cross-sectional study

315 nurses

Medical, paediatric, surgical and gynaecology wards in 7 hospitals

April 2021

MISSCARE survey

7/0/0/1

Nymark et al. [48]

2021

Sweden

To evaluate UNC and patient safety during the outbreak and first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic at the in-patient wards at the cardiology department

Cross-sectional study with a comparative approach

43 registered nurses and nursing assistants

Cardiology department (two highly specialized medical wards and two intensive coronary care units)

May–June 2020

MISSCARE survey – Swedish version

5/0/2/1

Rahmani et al. [49]

2021

Iran

To evaluate UNC and its relationship with nurses’ patient safety attitudes at hospitals

Observational correlational study

351 nurses

9 Tabriz University of Medical Sciences hospitals

2021

MISSCARE survey – Persian version

7/0/0/1

Schneider-Matyka et al. [50]

2023

Poland

To assess the effect of stress on rationing of nursing care

Observational cross-sectional study

800 nurses, 567 of whom participated

Primary health-care facility; county hospital;

teaching hospital; regional hospital

From September 2020 to December 2021

PIRNCA

6/0/1/1

Tomaszewska et al. [51]

2021

Poland

To assess the rationing of the level of nursing care among nurses employed at a district hospital

Cross-sectional study

295 nurses

District hospital

September–December 2020

BERNCA-R – Polish version

5/0/2/1

Uchmanowicz et al. [52]

2021

Poland

To assess the relationship between the rationing of nursing care and professional burnout in nursing staff

Cross-sectional design

219 cardiac nurses

Non-invasive cardiology wards of four hospitals in Wroclaw

January–May 2020

BERNCA-R – Polish version

6/0/1/1

Vincelette et al. [53]

2022

Canada

To describe the characteristics of omitted nursing care in ICU; to

examine the relationship between work environment features, omitted nursing care and nurse-reported outcomes in the ICU

Cross-sectional correlational study

2107 ICU nurses from Quebec’s Board of Nurses, 564 ICU nurses participated

ICU units

Over September 2021

The ICU-ONC

7/0/0/1

von Vogelsan et al. [54]

2021

Sweden

To determine frequencies, types of and reasons for UNC during the COVID- 19 pandemic at inpatient wards

Comparative cross-sectional study

130 registered nurses and nursing assistants in pandemic (COVID-19 sample)

157 registered nurses and nursing assistants in pre-pandemic (reference sample)

A highly specialized university hospital in medical/surgical departments

May–June 2020

(COVID-19 sample)

October 2019 (reference sample)

MISSCARE survey – Swedish version

6/0/1/1

Xie et al. [55]

2023

China

To examine the effect of role overload, work addiction and leader–member exchange on UNC

Cross-sectional study

420 RNs, 403 of whom participated

One general tertiary hospital from five cities in five regions, randomly selected

March–May 2022

MISSCARE survey

7/0/0/1

Yuwanto et al. [56]

2023

Indonesia

To assess the Indonesian version of the PIRNCA instrument to psychometric properties

Descriptive cross-sectional study

214 RNs working in inpatient units, 167 of whom participated

Two government hospitals

May 2021

PIRNCA

5/1/1/1

Zhang et al. [22]

2021

China

To provide initial evidence on implicit rationing of nursing care in publicly funded nursing homes in Shanghai with a particular focus on the association between care workers’ training needs and implicit care rationing

Cross-sectional study

374 care workers

Publicly funded nursing homes in Shanghai

September–November 2020

BERNCA-NH

7/0/0/1

  1. Legend: BERNCA: Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care; BERNCA-NH: Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care for Nursing Homes; BERNCA-R: Revised Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care-Revised; COVID-19: Coronavirus-19; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; ICU-ONC: the Intensive Care Unit Omitted Nursing Care instrument; PIRNCA: perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care; RN: Registered Nurse; UNC: unfinished nursing care; Y: Yes; N: No; U: Unclear; NA: Not Applicable
  2. a the first number indicates the number of ‘Yes’ answers; the second the numberof ‘No’ answers; the third the number of ‘Unclear’ answers; the fourth the number of ‘Not available’ answers