Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: How to select and understand guidelines for patient-reported outcomes: a scoping review of existing guidance

Original Submission
13 Feb 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Sep 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Oct 2023 Author responded Author comments - Takako Kaneyasu
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Oct 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Oct 2023 Author responded Author comments - Takako Kaneyasu
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Oct 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
31 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Takako Kaneyasu
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Dec 2023 Author responded Author comments - Takako Kaneyasu
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Dec 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Takako Kaneyasu
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Takako Kaneyasu
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 7
7 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Takako Kaneyasu
Resubmission - Version 8
7 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 8
17 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Takako Kaneyasu
Resubmission - Version 9
29 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
12 Feb 2024 Editorially accepted
13 Mar 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12913-024-10707-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page