From: Exploring patient safety risk in an emergency ward for substance use through a mixed-method analysis
Main findings | Theme |
---|---|
Challenges for patient safety | Â |
1. Transport to medical facilities | Risk for delayed treatment |
2. Transporting patients to other ward units requires two healthcare workers, which blocks intake of new patients | (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5) |
3. Moving one patient from a subsequent ward unit to another block transitions from the emergency ward | Â |
4. Treatment for patients with delirium tremens or psychosis | Risk for increased violence |
5. Insufficient staffing | (5 + 6 + 7 + 8) |
6. Crowded ward unit, several patients at the same time | Â |
7. Violence and threats from patients | Â |
8. Continuous observation | Â |
9. Patients with complex somatic and psychiatric needs | Risk of underestimating needs |
10. Lack of information to the patients in the emergency ward increases time for enrolment in the next ward unit | (8 + 9 + 10 + 11) |
11. Outgrown the premises | Â |
Strategies to manage pressure | Â |
1. First-line chief of staff works clinically, leads to increased understanding of front-end workers’ needs | Accessible manager (1 + 2 + 3 + 5) |
2. Asking colleagues “what do you need?” instead of monitoring and controlling |  |
3. Accessible doctors | Â |
4. It’s easier to say no for the subsequent ward unit if all their beds are occupied | Prioritising treatment (4 + 6 + 7 + 10) |
5. Low hierarchy—anyone can request assistance for a patient in need |  |
6. Workload is not constant—this helps front-end workers recuperate | Innovative competence |
7. When ward is overcrowded, doctors can be called with the specific aim of discharging someone | (8 + 9 + 10) |
8. All workers have increased their competence in acute somatic healthcare | Â |
9. Somatic assessments are made in the psychiatric ward more frequently | Â |
10. Treatments can be given in the hallway and the corridor | Â |