The impact of the education program based on dimensions of quality of work life among emergency medical services providers

Table 3 Demographic information of the participants in IG and CG

Group Variables	IG (n = 79)		CG (n = 79)			p-value
Group Variables	M ± SD		M ± SD			p-value
Age	16.8 ± 1.48		15.83 ± 1.68			0.27^a
	Frequency	Percentage		Frequency	Percentage
Marital status
Married	40	80		38	76	0.510^b
Single	10	20		12	24	0.510^b
Education
Diploma	2	4		1	2	0.444^c
Associate	12	24		18	36
Bachelor	35	70		30	60
Master	1	2		1	2
Major						0.553^b
Emergency medical technician/ Responder	37	74		33	66
Nursing	4	8		6	12
Anesthesiology	9	18		11	22
Occupational status
Permeant	40	80		38	76	0.651^d
contract	8	16		11	22
Two-year recruitment	2	4		1	2
Monthly income						0.620^d
Inadequate	49	98		50	100
Adequate	1	2		0	0
Prehospital emergency services						0.589^d
Urban emergency bases	47	94		49	98
Road urban emergency bases	0	0		0	0
Both	3	6		1	2

Note: ^a Independent t-tests t-test, ^b Chi-square test, ^c Mann–Whitney U test, ^d Fisher’s exact test
IG, Intervention group; CG, control group

ISSN: 1472-6963