Measures | Sample Items | PCP Reg | Patient Survey | TG service records | Key Informant Interviewsa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention Characteristics | |||||
 Relative advantage | Perception that remote services provides an advantage over existing care options |  | X |  | X |
 Adaptability | Perception that the intervention could be modified to meet practice, provider or patient needs, recommendations for improvement |  | X |  | X |
 Complexity | Perception that services were too complex |  | X | X | X |
 Cost | Perception that remote services genetic counseling or testing would be too costly for patient, practice (cost or resources) |  | X | X | X |
Outer setting | |||||
 Provider needs and resources | Awareness of genetic risk and cancer prevention; importance within practice |  |  |  | X |
 Provider incentives and disincentives | External mandates for genetic testing (e.g. accreditation) |  |  |  | X |
Inner Setting | |||||
 Structural characteristics | EMR, medical staff #, structure |  |  | X | X |
 Climate for implementation | Previous innovation implementation, compatibility with practice, relative priority, quality metrics/rewards |  |  |  | X |
 Readiness for Implementation | Available staff resources, practice experience with genetic services |  |  | X | X |
Characteristics of Individuals | |||||
 Practice background | Type of practice, practice setting | X |  |  |  |
 Provider practice characteristics | Years in practice, gender, comfort with genetic testing, champion for genetic testing |  |  |  | X |
 Patient background | Age, race, ethnicity, education, insurance |  | X |  |  |
 Patient attitude toward genetic testing | Attitudes about genetic testing scale (8 items)3 |  | X |  |  |
 Patient preference for shared medical decision making | Control Preference Scale (5 items)4 |  | X |  |  |
 Patient comfort with technology | HINTS 5, Cycle 1 selected items related to internet and social media use (8 items) and electronic medical record use and perceptions of privacy (14 items)5 |  | X |  |  |
 Patients baseline genetic knowledge, health literacy and affect | See Table 2 and corresponding measures in Section C6. Effectiveness outcomes |  | X |  |  |
Process | |||||
 Planning | Planning process for PCPs, quality of materials to introduce the program, steps for PCPs/practice and supports provided |  | – | Xb | X |
 Opinion leaders | Who in the practice was most influential, how did they influence others or what could have helped them to be more effective |  |  |  | X |
 Champions | Who in the practice helped ensure that all steps were completed? What did they do to make the practice successful? |  |  | X | X |
 Reflecting and evaluation | What procedures are working? Which are not? What can we change to make the process easier? etc |  |  | Xc | Xc |