Skip to main content

Table 4 Descriptive statistics of participants’ reactions regarding the intervention content and design (second round of testing; N = 28)

From: Developing a capacity-building intervention for healthcare workers to improve communication skills and awareness of hard of hearing and D/deaf patients: results from a participatory action research study

General assessment

Questions

1

(%)

2 (%)

3 (%)

4 (%)

5 (%)

In general, how do you evaluate the training?1

0

0

0

21.4

78.6

The training met my expectations2

0

0

0

29.6

70.4

The training met my needs in the field2

0

0

11.1

33.3

55.6

Content

The content of the training is applicable to my workplace2

0

0

10.7

50

39.3

The content is useful for my practice

0

0

14.3

32.1

53.6

Logistics

How would you rate the organization of the training?1

0

0

0

28.6

71.4

What do you think of the duration of the training?3

0

7.4

44.4

29.6

18.5

  1. Rating.1 1 = very bad, 2 = bad, 3 = average, 4 = good, 5 = very good;2 1 = disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = somewhat agree, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree;3 1 = really too short, 2 = too short, 3 = good, 4 = too long, 5 = really too long