Table 3 Descriptive statistics of participants’ reaction regarding the intervention (first round of testing; N = 13)
Questions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Assessment | 1 (%) | 2 (%) | 3 (%) | 4 (%) | 5 (%) |
In general, how do you evaluate the training?1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.8 | 69.2 |
The training met my expectations2 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 | 33.3 | 58.3 |
The training met my needs in the field2 | 0 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 46.2 | 38.5 |
Content | |||||
In general, how would you rate the content of the training?1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53.8 | 46.2 |
How would you rate the following parts1: | |||||
History of the Deaf | 0 | 0 | 58.3 | 33.3 | 8.23 |
Deafness and hard of hearing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.5 | 61.5 |
The Deaf Community and Culture | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | 69.2 | 23.1 |
Communication needs and tools | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | 23.1 | 69.2 |
Good practices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.1 | 76.9 |
Introduction of French Sign Language | 0 | 0 | 17.7 | 41.7 | 41.7 |
Introduction to Lip reading | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.5 | 61.5 |
The toolbox | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.8 | 69.2 |
The content of the training was sufficient2 | 0 | 0 | 23.1 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
The content of the training is applicable to my workplace2 | 0 | 0 | 16.7 | 25 | 58.3 |
The content of the training is useful for my practice2 | 0 | 0 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 69.2 |
Organization and logistics | |||||
How would you rate the organization of the training?1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53.8 | 46.2 |
What do you think of the intervention’s support (slides)?1 | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | 61.5 | 30.8 |
What do you think of the videos?1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.4 | 84.6 |
What do you think of the duration of the training3 | 0 | 7.7 | 69.2 | 15.4 | 7.7 |
Usefulness | |||||
The training will influence my practice2 | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | 46.2 | 46.2 |
The training reinforced/improved my understanding of the experiences of people who are D/deaf and hard of hearing and their specific communication needs2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69.2 | 30.8 |
The training gave me a better understanding of the basic principles to apply in order to improve communication with people who are D/deaf or hard of hearing2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41.7 | 58.3 |
The training allowed me to learn more about the tools available to improve communication with D/ deaf or HoH patients2 | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | 38.5 | 53.8 |
After having followed the training and with the toolbox, I am able to pass on to my colleagues which basic principles to apply and which tools to use to improve communication with D/deaf or HoH patients2 | 0 | 0 | 15.4 | 46.2 | 38.5 |
At the end of the training and with the toolbox, I feel equipped to receive peopled/deaf or HoH patients2 | 0 | 0 | 30.8 | 53.8 | 15.4 |