Skip to main content

Table 2 Theories and their use for social prescribing in studies

From: Theories used to develop or evaluate social prescribing in studies: a scoping review

Group

Theory/theories

Report

Study Typea

Understand, explain

Purposive sampling

Interview guide

Coding

Generate/test variables

Generalise findings

1. Outcomes

Salutogenesis

Wood et al., 2021 [22]

QL

     

Self-Determination Theory (SDT)

Bhatti et al., 2021 [23]

QL

  

  

Hanlon et al., 2021 [24]

QL

 

  

Social Cure

Dingle et al., 2022 [25]

P;QT

   

 

Halder et al., 2021 [26]

P;MM

   

 

Kellezi et al., 2019 [27]

MM

   

 

Wakefield et al., 2022 [28]

QT

   

 

Social Innovation

Dayson, 2017 [29]

MM

   

2. Differences in Outcomes

Bourdieusian approaches to class

Gibson et al., 2022 [30]

QL

     

Synchronicity; time

Gibson et al., 2021 [31]

QL

     

Candidacy

see below Mercer et al

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3. Implementation

Boundary-spanning

Baker & Irving, 2016 [32]

QL

     

Critical Systems Thinking (CST)

Fixsen et al., 2020 [33]

QL

     

Normalisation Process Theory (NPT)

Blickem et al., 2014 [34]

QL

  

  

Chng et al., 2021b [35]

QL

  

  

Whitelaw et al., 2017 [36]

QL

    

Social Capital

White et al., 2017 [37]

QL

     

Several groups

NPT, SDT, Candidacy

Mercer et al., 2017ab [38]

P;MM

 

 

Mercer et al., 2017bb [39]

MM

 

  
  1. aStudy types: P protocol, QL qualitative, QT quantitative, MM mixed methods
  2. bThree reports for the same study: one protocol and two publications with results