Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the rehabilitation programs

From: Rehabilitation in primary care for an ageing population: a secondary analysis from a scoping review of rehabilitation delivery models

Category

Details

N

% within category

% of included studies

Rehabilitation service delivery model

Community

46

40.7

47.9

Home

27

23.9

28.1

Telerehabilitation

19

16.8

19.8

Outpatient

15

13.3

15.6

Eldercare

6

5.3

6.3

Models identified

113

100.0

117.7

Service provider

Health workers

83

84.7

86.5

Peers and volunteers

7

7.1

7.3

Informal caregivers and family

4

4.1

4.2

Not reported

4

4.1

4.2

Providers identified

98

100.0

102.1

Type of rehabilitation intervention provided

 Assessment

59

23.3

61.5

 

Person-centred goals

39

36.8

40.6

Functioning/functional abilitya

25

23.6

26.0

Fall risk

9

8.5

9.4

Environment

8

7.6

8.3

Medications used

7

6.6

7.3

Comprehensive geriatric assessment

5

4.7

5.2

Health status

5

4.7

5.2

Emotional functions

4

3.8

4.2

Less than two studiesb

4

4

4.2

 Care coordination and management

45

17.8

46.9

 

Follow up visits

25

30.5

26.0

Case management

15

18.3

15.6

Monitoring of functioning/functional abilitya

14

17.1

14.6

Health status monitoring

11

13.4

11.5

Rehabilitation process coordination and management

10

12.2

10.4

Home visit

6

7.3

6.3

Discharge planning

1

1.2

1.0

 Restorative and compensatory approaches

78

30.8

81.3

 

Therapeutic exercise

52

41.6

54.2

Motivational interventions

12

9.6

12.5

Multicomponent care or rehabilitation program not specified

10

8.0

10.4

Activities of daily living skills training

10

8.0

10.4

Behavioural interventions

8

6.4

8.3

Cognitive rehabilitation

6

4.8

6.3

Psychological interventions not specified

5

4.0

5.2

Therapeutic recreation

5

4.0

5.2

Management of incontinence

4

3.2

4.2

Occupational therapy not specified

4

3.2

4.2

Less than two studiesc

9

7.2

9.4

 Education, counselling and skills training

60

23.7

62.5

 

Education and skills training for selfcare and self-management not specified

46

45.1

47.9

Education and skills training for caregivers

16

15.7

16.7

Education and counselling on behavioural risk factors

14

13.7

14.6

Education and counselling on self-directed therapeutic exercise

13

12.8

13.5

Education and counselling about healthy diet and nutrition

12

11.8

12.5

Education and counselling for weight management

1

1.0

1.0

 Environmental adaptations

7

2.8

7.3

 Provision and training in the use of assistive technology

4

1.6

4.2

Time and intensity of rehabilitation programd

 Dosage decision

Adapted

16

 

16.67

Prespecified

50

 

52.08

Prespecified and adapted

30

 

31.25

 

median

IQR

min–max

Frequency of sessions per week

1.0

0.55–2

0.07–8

Session duration in minutes

65.0

50–120

10–300

Number of sessions per patient per program

16.0

8–29

1–149

Rehabilitation length in weeks

12.0

8–28

2–192

Health workers

Physical therapists

38

22.0

39.6

Nurses

34

19.7

35.4

Occupational Therapists

16

9.3

16.7

General practitioners (or “family doctors”)

10

5.8

10.4

Social workers

9

5.2

9.4

Dieticians

9

5.2

9.4

Exercise professionals

7

4.1

7.3

Community workers

6

3.5

6.3

Other physicianse

6

3.5

6.3

Geriatricians

5

2.9

5.2

Psychologists

3

1.7

3.1

Rehabilitation physicians

2

1.2

2.1

Speech and language therapists

2

1.2

2.1

Otherf

11

6.4

11.5

Does not applied or not reported

15

8.7

15.6

Health workers identified

173

100.0

180.2

  1. aWe considered “functional ability” and “functioning”, as introduced in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [44] as equivalent concepts
  2. bOther assessments included: Cognitive functions, family and caregivers support network, and nutritional status
  3. cOther restorative approaches included: Pharmacological agents not specified, Problem solving skills training, Physical therapy not specified, social skills training, and Music therapy
  4. dMedians and IQRs are presented because all dosage-related variables were not normally distributed
  5. eOther physicians included cardiologists and physicians not specified
  6. fOther health workers included professional caregivers, home care personnel, dance instructors, welfare officers, pharmacists, mental health workers or therapists not specified, health care managers, music therapists, therapist assistants or students, gerontologists, optometrists