Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Investigating the quality of hemovigilance process using the first two steps of Six Sigma model: a cross-sectional study

Original Submission
15 Apr 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hossein Mehrolhassani
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hossein Mehrolhassani
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Aug 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hossein Mehrolhassani
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Aug 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hossein Mehrolhassani
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Aug 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
1 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hossein Mehrolhassani
Resubmission - Version 7
1 Sep 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hossein Mehrolhassani
Resubmission - Version 8
25 Sep 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
4 Oct 2023 Editorially accepted
27 Oct 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12913-023-10113-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page