Skip to main content

Table 3 The Johanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal for analytical cross-sectional studies

From: eHealth literacy among hospital health care providers: a systematic review

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Yes

Unclear

No

Ahmed et al., 2022

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

5

0

1

Alipour and Payandeh, 2022

Unclear

Yes

NA

NA

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

4

2

0

Chereka et al., 2022

Unclear

Yes

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

5

1

0

Cho et al., 2018

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

6

0

0

Gartell et al., 2020

No

Yes

NA

NA

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Yes

3

2

1

Isazadeh et al., 2019

Yes

Unclear

NA

NA

No

No

Yes

Yes

3

2

1

Kayser et al., 2022

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

No

No

Yes

Yes

4

2

0

Kritsotakis et al., 2021

Unclear

No

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

4

1

1

Şayik and Uçan, 2022

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

N0

No

Yes

Yes

4

0

2

Shiferaw and Mehari, 2019

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

No

No

Yes

Yes

4

0

2

Tesfa et al., 2021

No

Yes

NA

NA

No

No

Unclear

Yes

2

1

3

Tesfa et al., 2022

Unclear

Yes

NA

NA

No

No

Yes

Yes

3

1

2

Yoğurtcu and Haney, 2022

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

No

No

Yes

Yes

4

0

2

Özer et al., 2021

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

No

No

Yes

Yes

4

0

2

  1. NA = Not applicable
  2. Q1: Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?
  3. Q2: Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
  4. Q3: Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
  5. Q4: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
  6. Q5: Were confounding factors identified?
  7. Q6: Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
  8. Q7: Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?
  9. Q8: Was appropriate statistical analysis used?