Skip to main content

Table 3 Distribution of leprosy actions by comparison between the classifications of municipalities, according to the teams that carry out consultations in primary health care. Brazil. 2017–2018

From: Leprosy and tuberculosis control scenario of the national program for the improvement of access and quality of primary care in Brazil

Teams that carry out consultations at the Unit

BRAZIL

27.200

RRa

940

ARb

8,878

RIc

267

IAd

2,949

Urban

14,166

p-value

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

X2

Do you diagnose new cases of leprosy?

25,948 (69.5)

897 (95.4)

8,513 (95.9)

255 (95.5)

2,830 (96)

13,453 (95)

 

p-value

 

0.5193

0.7944

0.7681

0.0004

0.0111

Do you notify the leprosy diagnoses made in the unit?

26,508 (71.0)

906 (96.4)

8,670 (97.7)

261 (97.8)

2,883 (97.8)

13,788 (97.3)

 

p-value

 

0.0183

0.8236

0.5025

0.1749

0.0951

Do you monitor a person referred to reference health services?

26,624 (71.3)

906 (96.4)

8,678 (97.8)

263 (98.5)

2,896 (98.2)

13,881 (98)

 

p-value

 

0.0057

0.3215

0.0619

0.2065

0.0083

The team performs an active search for the following cases:

 Symptomatic (skin lesions)

26,511 (71.0)

911 (96.9)

8,695 (97.95)

260 (97.4)

2,903 (98.4)

13,742 (97)

 

  p-value

 

0.0575

0.6352

0.0629

 < 0.0001

 < 0.0001

 contact persons

26,631 (71.3)

918 (97.7)

8,693 (97.9)

259 (97)

2,900 (98.3)

13,861 (97.8)

 

  p-value

 

0.6011

0.3172

0.1165

0.4627

0.3698

 Treatment abandonment

25,996 (69.6)

889 (94.6)

8,445 (95.1)

254 (95.1)

2,827 (95.9)

13,581 (95.9)

 

  p-value

 

0.437

0.962

0.0662

0.0131

0.0381

  1. Source: prepared by the authors. based on data from Program for the Improvement of Access and Quality of Primary Care (2019) and IBGE (2017)
  2. aRR Rural Remote
  3. bAR Adjacent Rural
  4. cRI Remote Intermediary
  5. dIA Intermediate Adjacent