Skip to main content

Table 4 Linear regression: Association of individual and facility-level factors with overall attitude scores towards CombinADO intervention packages among stakeholders providing HIV care in AYAHIV in Nampula, Northern Mozambique, (N = 59)

From: Positive attitudes toward adoption of a multi-component intervention strategy aimed at improving HIV outcomes among adolescents and young people in Nampula, Mozambique: perspectives of HIV care providers

Characteristic

Mean total score (SD); Range

Unadjusted linear regression

Adjusted multivariate linear regression****

β Coefficient

95%CI

P-value

β Coefficient

95%CI

P-value

Overall mean total attitude score

35.0 (2.59); 30–41

      

Stakeholder level

Intervention group

 ESOC package

34.24 (2.65); 30–41

reference

reference

 

reference

reference

 

 CombinADO package

35.8 (2.31); 31–41

1.56

0.26–2.86

0.02**

1.57

0.34–2.80

0.01***

Age

 

-0.07

-0.17–0.41

0.22

   

 24 and under

34.3 (3.21); 32–38

reference

reference

 

reference

reference

 

 25–34

35.3 (3.03); 31–41

0.97

-2.40–4.34

0.57

1.25

-2.63–5.13

0.52

 35–44

35.3 (1.85); 32–39

0.97

-2.26–4.21

0.55

1.38

-2.45–5.21

0.47

 45 and older

32 (1.83); 30–34

-2.33

-5.88–1.21

0.19

-1.99

-5.83–1.85

0.30

Gender

 Male

34.1 (2.40); 30–41

reference

reference

 

reference

reference

 

 Female

35.4 (2.59); 31–41

1.33

-0.06–2.71

0.06**

1.21

-0.35–2.78

0.13

Current position

 Medical doctor

34.8 (2.71); 30–40

reference

reference

    

 Nurse/midwife

34.9 (2.21); 31–38

0.07

-1.54–1.69

0.93

   

 Health tech

35.2 (3.14); 31–41

0.46

-1.54–2.46

0.65

   

 Other profession

35.7 (1.53); 34–37

0.83

-1.14–2.81

0.40

   

Primary role at the clinic

 Health care worker (HCW)

35.1(2.44); 31–41

reference

reference

    

 Key informant (KI)

35 (2.72); 30–41

-0.08

-1.43–1.27

0.91

   

Years working in the facility (SD), n = 26*

 

-0.10

-0.34–0.145

0.41

   

 Less than a year

35.8 (2.28); 33–38

reference

reference

    

 1 to 5

35.0 (2.77); 32–41

-0.80

-3.38–1.78

0.53

   

 6 or more

34.8 (2.19); 31–37

-1.05

-3.61–1.51

0.41

   

Facility level

Location of facility

 Rural

34.7(2.39); 30–39

reference

reference

    

 Urban

35.1(2.95); 31–41

0.45

-1.15–2.05

0.57

   

 Peri-urban

34.6(1.85); 31–37

-0.10

-1.80–1.61

0.91

   

 Governmental KI

36.3 (2.06); 34–39

1.52

-0.65–3.70

0.17

   

Facility size, n = 55

 

0.79

-0.33–1.91

0.17

   

 Less than 200

34.7 (2.62); 30–41

reference

reference

    

 200 and more

35.3 (2.62); 31–41

0.61

-0.81–2.04

0.39

   

Number of HCWs at the facility

 

0.00

-0.00–0.01

0.13

   

 1 HCW

33.8 (2.19); 31–36

reference

reference

 

reference

reference

 

 2 or more HCWs

35.1 (2.65); 30–41

1.40

-0.27–3.07

0.10**

1.57

0.06–3.08

0.04***

  1. Null model: Explained facility-level variance without any variables (ICC,%) = Variance estimate /(Variance estimate + Explained variation) = (0.29/ 0.29 + 6.68) = 4.38%, p = 0.32
  2. *Data only collected in HCWs
  3. **p < 0.10
  4. ***p < 0.05
  5. ****For multivariable model: R2 = 0.2917, p < 0.001