Table 3 Mean item and total stakeholder attitudes scores towards adoption of intervention packages, overall and by study condition, (N = 59)
Items | Mean score (SD) | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (n = 59) | Intervention sites (n = 30) | Enhance SOC sites (n = 29) | |||
Q1 | The intervention would be more effective than interventions currently being used to improve retention and viral suppression among AYLHIV | 4.3 (0.55) | 4.3(0.60) | 4.24 (0.51) | 0.69 |
Q2 | The intervention package is too complexa | 2.62 (1.08) | 2.7 (1.11) | 2.5 (1.05) | 0.45 |
Q3 | The intervention package would be successful to improve retention and viral suppression among AYLHIV this clinic | 4.37 (0.52) | 4.4 (0.57) | 4.3 (0.47) | 0.37 |
Q4 | The intervention package is compatible and consistent with the needs of AYLHIV | 4.32 (0.51) | 4.3 (0.55) | 4.3 (0.47) | 0.86 |
Q5 | The intervention package requires too many human resources, n = 58a | 2.8 (1.16) | 3.0 (1.08) | 2.6 (1.23) | 0.20 |
Q6 | The intervention package would be easy to understand and use after training | 4.3 (0.48) | 4.5 (0.51) | 4.2 (0.41) | 0.04 |
Q7 | The intervention package would have a visible and substantial impact on the health status of AYLHIV in this clinic | 4.3 (0.45) | 4.3 (0.48) | 4.2 (0.41) | 0.28 |
Q8 | AYLHIV would benefit from the intervention package | 4.3 (0.44) | 4.3 (0.48) | 4.2 (0.38) | 0.16 |
Q9 | The intervention package could be easily adapted to fit the needs of community-based organizations and/or health departments that would implement it, n = 58 | 3.9 (0.77) | 4.0 (0.60) | 3.8 (0.91) | 0.24 |
Mean Total Attitude score (SD); rangeb | 35.0 (2.59); 30–41 | 35.8 (2.31); 31–41 | 34.2 (2.65); 31–41 | 0.02 | |