Skip to main content

Table 3 ISII-2 and independent implementation site teams: coder numbers and ICC ranges for 2016 to 2020

From: Five-year fidelity assessment of an evidence-based parenting program (GenerationPMTO): inter-rater reliability following international implementation

Site

FIMP Coders

2016

ICC Ranges

FIMP Coders

2017

ICC Ranges

FIMP Coders

2018

ICC Ranges

FIMP Coders

2019

ICC Ranges

FIMP Coders

2020

ICC Ranges

Alpha

6

.62—.88

5

.80—.92

5

.67—.80

5

.79—.91

6

.64—.87

Beta

8

.74—86

8

.60—.87

6

.78—.88

6

.65—.84

3

.71—.83

Gamma

5

.62—.91

4

.70—.93

5

.77—.96

5

.66—.88

5

.67—.94

Delta

8

.85—.95

8

.83—.90

6

.82—.91

7

.80—.94

5

.82—.93

Epsilon

7

.62—.95

13

.64—.88

11

.70—.92

15

.61—.93

10

.68—.89

Zeta

-

-

13

.59—.94

13

.72—.94

-

-

12

.77—.95

Eta

-

-

-

-

3

.62—.76

3

.74—.90

4

.74—.94

Theta

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

.69—.85

Total

34

.62—.95

51

.59—.94

49

.62—.96

41

.61—.94

49

.64—.95

  1. The ISII-2 Team is mentioned first and labeled as Alpha. Eta became an independent FIMP team in 2018 and Theta in 2020. Data is missing from Zeta in 2016 and 2019