Criteria | Underlying questions |
---|---|
1. Conceptual framework | |
1.1 Selection and justification of needs indicators | Is the selection of indicators theoretically well-founded and empirically supported for the respective context of the analysis? |
1.2 Relationship between supply and need | Is the conceptual dependency of indicators of need on supply • in general, • regarding unmet need/lack of physicians or • regarding overuse/oversupply examined and, if possible, accounted for in the framework? |
2. Data basis | |
2.1 External validity | Is the population for which providers are to be planned and the population from which data are used identical or representative? |
2.2 Internal validity | Does the observed data accurately measure the indicators of interest? |
2.3 Timeliness and availability | Is the timeliness of data and availability of data sources reported, and considered with respect to the intended planning horizon? |
3. Modelling and translation into physician capacity | |
3.1 Transformation into provider requirements | Is the estimated need for healthcare related to some measure of provider productivity to transfer the estimated service requirement to physician capacities? |
3.2 Model selection and validation | Is the statistical model appropriate and well-founded, and were the validity and the robustness of the findings established? |
3.3 Level of analysis | Was the level of analysis defined and discussed regarding the potential for ecological errors? |
4. Integration of future trends and developments | |
4.1 Projection variables | Are projection variables identified that can be modelled according to future changes in population need for healthcare? |
4.2 Planning horizon | Was the chosen planning horizon justified appropriately with respect to future changes? |