Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Feedback on clinical team performance: how does it work, in what contexts, for whom, and for what changes? A critical realist qualitative multiple case study

Original Submission
3 Oct 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandrijn Van Schaik
21 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Dec 2022 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Rapin
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Dec 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Dec 2022 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Rapin
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandrijn Van Schaik
20 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Rapin
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandrijn Van Schaik
17 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Rapin
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
13 Apr 2023 Editorially accepted
27 Apr 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12913-023-09402-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page