Skip to main content

Table 4 Facilitators ( +) and barriers (-) to the first steps of the CMI implementation – Contexts of the clinics

From: Implementation analysis of a case management intervention for people with complex care needs in primary care: a multiple case study across Canada

Themes

Case

 

A

B

C

D

E

F

Roles and interprofessional collaboration

( +) Formal collaborative approach

( +) NCM autonomy and leadership

( +) Informal connections among providers

( +) Formal collaborative approach

( +) NCM autonomy and leadership

( +) Formal collaborative approach

( +) Informal connections among providers

( +) Formal collaborative approach

( +) Excellent communication within the clinic staff

( +) Informal connections among providers

(-) Difficulty contacting specialist physicians

( +) Formal collaborative approach and team meetings where clinic providers discuss complex patients

(-) Few psychosocial resources within the clinic

Organizational collaboration

( ±) Positive relationships with many different organizations, but lack of collaboration with some

(-) Increasing reduction in services offered from other organizations

( ±) Positive relationships with many different organizations, but lack of collaboration with some

(-) Long delay before the take-over of patient care from other organizations

( ±) Positive relationships with many different organizations, but lack of collaboration with some particularly mental health

(-) Challenges accessing some community resources available to clinic

( ±) Positive relationships with many different organizations, but lack of collaboration with some, particularly mental health

(-) Lack of access to resources

( ±) Positive relationships with many different organizations, but lack of collaboration with some, particularly mental health

( +) Access to various services in close proximity

(-) Inability to share records with external departments

( +) External organizations help to overcome the lack of psychosocial resources

(-) Lack of collaboration with some organizations

(-) No simple stream-lined process for connecting to community supports

Access to patient health information

( ±) Affiliation to regional health centre gives easier access to EMR, but access is still limited

(-) Regulations surrounding confidentiality may interfere with the exchange of information among providers

(-) Lack of access to EMR and limited information sharing

(-) Regulations surrounding confidentiality may interfere with the exchange of information among providers

(-) Lack of access to EMR

( ±) Systems and tools exist for specific medical information sharing, but more tools are needed

(-) Systems are not used by all providers

( +) Ability to share records between departments

( ±) Systems and tools exist for specific medical information sharing, but more tools are needed

(-) Regulations surrounding confidentiality may interfere with the exchange of information between providers

( +) Systems and tools exist for specific medical information sharing

(-) Communication from referrals not consistent

Patient-centered care

( +) Patient centeredness around building a strategy together

(-) Goals of care not always discussed with patients

(-) Need for more training in patient self-management support for NCMs

( +) Patient centeredness around building a strategy together

( +) Having patients self-identify which services or providers they need

( +) Patient centeredness around building a strategy together

( +) Empowering patients to self-manage

( +) Access to translation services

(-) Literacy and language constraints

( +) Establishing trusting relationship with patients and staying in touch regularly

( +) Empowering patients to self-manage